The Study of Academic Entitlement: Development of Measurement Scale and the Relationships between Relational Variables among Taiwan University Students- Eight Colleges in North and Central Taiwan as an Example

Fu-Yuan Hong;Su-Lin Chiu;Kuang-Tsan Cheng

所屬期刊: 第8卷第4期 「測驗與評量」
系統編號: vol031_6
主題: 測驗與評量
出版年份: 2012
作者: 洪福源;邱素玲;鄭光燦
作者(英文): Fu-Yuan Hong;Su-Lin Chiu;Kuang-Tsan Cheng
論文名稱: 大學生學業應得權益感研究:量表發展與相關變項關係分析-以臺灣北部與中部地區八所大學為例
論文名稱(英文): The Study of Academic Entitlement: Development of Measurement Scale and the Relationships between Relational Variables among Taiwan University Students- Eight Colleges in North and Central Taiwan as an Example
論文頁數: 34
中文關鍵字: 學業應得權益感;外控信念;人格;自尊;父母教養方式
英文關鍵字: academic entitlement;external locus of control beliefs;personality;self esteem;parenting style
服務單位: 台北海洋技術學院通識教育中心助理教授;台北海洋技術學院通識教育中心講師;真理大學應用數學系講師
稿件字數: 20697
作者專長: 性別教育、生涯規劃、心理學
投稿日期: 2012/8/18
論文下載: pdf檔案icon
摘要(中文): 近年來在美國高等教育,學業應得權益概念的探討已被視為一種重要的課題,然而學業應得權益感之測量工具與概念卻存在一些問題有待釐清,再加上國內學業應得權益感研究付之闕如,本研究將編製測量工具、驗證量表之信效度,進而分析學業應得權益感概念與其他相關變項間的關連性,以提供後續高等教育教學與相關研究之參考。本研究以臺灣916位大學生為樣本進行探究,研究結果顯示:(一)經因素分析歸納出大學生學業應得權益感的三個因素:「剝削的學業應得權益信念」、「非剝削的學業應得權益信念」、「個別化的學業應得權益信念」,且一階驗證性因素(變項間存在相關)和二階驗證性因素模式的配適度均佳,觀察資料的模式適配度呈現良好結果,顯示這三個因素所構成的量表具有良好的信效度;(二)大學生在學業應得權益感的現況方面是屬「中程度」;(三)大學生學業應得權益感與外控信念、社會外向、自卑感、神經質、焦慮性、憂鬱性、雙親教養態度之保護均具有正相關;(四)男學生的剝削的學業應得權益信念、非剝削的學業應得權益信念、個別化的學業應得權益信念、整體學業應得權益信念得分均明顯高於女學生。最後,本研究進行討論並對未來研究提出相關建議。
摘要(英文): In higher education in the United States, academic entitlement has been regarded as an important educational issue in recent years. However, academic entitlement measurement tools and concepts have some shortcomings. So far the research of analyzing the relationships between academic entitlement in domestic university students is lacking. This study will develop university students’ academic entitlement scale, and verify the reliability and validity of this scale for the reference of teaching and related research. There were 916 university students that participated in this study and the findings are as following: (1) three latent variables contain “exploitative academic entitlement”, “non-exploitative academic entitlement”, and “individual academic entitlement”. The first order and the second order confirmatory factor analysis as well as observation data showed the best fit.; (2) university students have a middle degree of academic entitlement; (3) academic entitlement had significantly positive relationships with external locus of control beliefs, social extraversion, inferiority, nervousness, anxiety, depression and parenting style; (4) male students would perceive more exploitative academic entitlement, non-exploitative academic entitlement, individual academic entitlement and total academic entitlement than female students. Based on the findings of this study, discussion and suggestions were made for practical work for the school and for future research.
參考文獻: 吳詩婷(2000)。個人的內控信念和性別特質對於刻板印象威脅的影響(未出版之碩士論文)。國立中正大學,嘉義縣。
教育部統計處 (2012)。各級學校縣市別學生數100學年度SY2011-2012。取自http://www.edu.tw/files/site_content/b0013/student.xls
賴保禎、賴美玲 (2003)。新訂賴氏人格測驗指導手冊。臺北市:千華。
Achacoso, M. V. (2002). “What do you mean my grade is not an A?” An investigation of academic entitlement, causal attributions, and self-regulation in college students (Unpublished Doctoral dissertation). Retrieved from http://repositories.lib.ut-exas.edu/handle/2152/2486
Bagozzi, R. P., & Yi, Y. (1988). On the evaluation of structural equation models. Academy of Marketing Science, 16, 76-94.
Balli, S. J., Demo, D. H., & Wedman, J. F. (1998). Family involvement with children’s homework: An intervention in the middle grades. Family Relations, 47, 142-146.
Baumeister, R. F. (1996). Self-regulation and ego threat: Motivated cognition, self-deception, and destructive goal setting. In P. M. Gollwitzer & J. A. Bargh (Eds.), The psychology of action: Linking cognition and motivation to behavior., (pp. 27-47) New York, NY: Guilford Press.
Bentler, P. M. (1988). Theory and implementation of EQS: A structural equations program. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
Bentler, P. M. (1993). EQS: Structural equation program manual. Los Angeles, CA: BMDP Statistical Software.
Bollen, K. A. (1989). Structural equations with latent variables. New York, NY: John Wiley & Sons.
Browne, M. W., & Cudeck, R. (1993). Alternative ways of assessing model fit. In K. A. Bollen & J. S. Long (Eds.), Testing structural equation models (pp. 136-162). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
Bushman, B., & Baumeister, S. (1998). Threatened egotism, narcissism, self-esteem, and direct and displaced aggression: does self-love or self-hate lead to violence? Journal of Personality & Social Psychology, 75, 219-229.
Callahan, K., Rademacher, J. A., & Hildreth, B. L. (1998). The eVect of parent participation in strategies to improve the homework performance of students who are at risk. Remedial and Special Education, 19, 1-22.
Campbell, W. K., Bonacci, A. M., Shelton, J., Exline, J. J., & Bushman, B. J. (2004). Psychological entitlement: Interpersonal consequences and validation of a self-report measure. Journal of Personality Assessment, 83, 29-45.
Chowning, K., & Campbell, N. J. (2009). Development and validation of a measure of academic entitlement: Individual differences in students externalized responsibility and entitled expectations. Journal of Educational Psychology, 101, 982-997.
Ciani, K. D., Summers, J. J., & Easter, M. A. (2008). Gender differences in academic entitlement among college students. Journal of Genetic Psychology, 169, 332-344.
Cooper, H., & Valentine, J. C. (2001). Using research to answer practical questions about homework. Educational Psychologist, 36, 143-154.
Deci, E. L., Koestner, R., & Ryan, R. M. (1999). A meta-analytic review of experiments examining the effects of extrinsic rewards on intrinsic motivation. Psychological Bulletin, 125, 627-668.
Devellis, R. F. (1991). Scale development: Theory and applications. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Dubovsky, S. L. (1986). Coping with entitlement in medical education. New England Journal of Medicine. 315, 1672-1674.
Exline, J. J., Baumeister, R. F., Bushman, B. J., Campbell, W. K., & Finkel, E. J. (2004). Too proud to let go: Narcissistic entitlement as a barrier to forgiveness. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 87, 894-912.
Greenberger, E., Lessard, J., Chen, C., & Farruggia, S. P. (2008). Self-entitled college students: Contributions of personality, parenting, and motivational factors. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 37, 1193-1204.
Hersh, R. H. & Merrow, J. (2005). Declining by degrees: Higher education at risk. New York, NY: Palgrave Macmillan.
Hu, L. T., & Bentler, P. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling, 6, 1-55.
Huang, D. H. (1988). The predicts of social behavior and social relationship in junior and elementary school classes (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). National ChengChi University, Taipei, Taiwan.
Hutsinger, C. S., Jose, P. E., & Larson, S. L. (1998). Do parent practices to encourage academic competence inXuence the social adjustment of young European, American, and Chinese American children?. Developmental Psychology, 34, 747-756.
Kaiser, H. F. (1974). An index of factorial simplicity. Psychometrika, 39, 31-36.
Kopp, J. P., Zinn, T. E., Finney, S. J., & Jurich, D. P. (2011). I can’t believe she gave me a C!: Measuring entitlement in higher education. Measurement and Evaluation in Counseling and Development, 44(2), 105-129.
Kukla, A. (1972). Attributional determinants of achievement-related behavior. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 21, 166-174.
Lessard, J., Greenberger, E., Chen, C., & Farruggia, S. (2011). Are youths’ feelings of entitlement always “bad”?: Evidence for a distinction between exploitive and non-exploitive dimensions of entitlement. Journal of Adolescence, 34, 521-529.
Major, B. (1994). From social inequality to personal entitlement: The role of social comparisons, legitimacy appraisals, and group memberships. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 26, 293-355.
McHoskey, J. (1995). Narcissism and Machiavellianism. Psychological Reports, 77, 755-759.
Parker, G., Tuplin, H., & Brown, L. B. (1979). A parental bonding instrument. British Journal of Medical Psychology, 52, 1-10.
Raskin, R., & Terry, H. (1988). A principal-components analysis of the Narcissistic Personality Inventory and further evidence of its construct validity. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 54, 890-902.
Richards, G. E., Ellis, L., & Neill, J. T. (2002, August). The ROPELOC: Review of personal effectiveness and locus of control: a comprehensive instrument for reviewing life effectiveness. Paper presented at the Self-Concept Enhancement and Learning Facilitation (SELF) Research Centre International Conference, Sydney, Australia.
Rosenberg, M. (1965). Society and the adolescent self-image. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Rotter, J. B. (1966). Generalized expectancies for internal versus external control of reinforcement. Psychological Monographs: General and Applied, 80(1), 1-28.
Tabachnick, B. G., & Fidell, L. S. (2007). Using multivariate statistics (5th ed.). New York, NY: Allyn and Bacon.
Trice, A. D. (1985). An academic locus of control scale for college students. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 61, 1043-1046.
Twenge, J. M. (2006). Generatin me: Why today’s young Americans are more confident, assertive, entitled – And more miserable than ever before. New York, NY: Free Press.
Twenge, J. M. (2009). Generational changes and their impact in the classroom: Teaching generation me. Medical Education, 43, 398-405.
Weiner, B., & Kukla, A. (1970). An attributional analysis of achievement motivation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 15, 1-20.
Weiner, B., & Potepan, P. A. (1970). Personality characteristics and affective reactions toward exams of superior and failing college students. Journal of Educational Psychology, 61, 144-151.
Witte, T. H., Callahan, K. L., & Perez-Lopez, M. (2002). Narcissism and anger: an exploration of underlying correlates. Psychological Reports, 90, 871-875.
Wortman, C. B., & Brehm, J. W. (1975). Responses to uncontrolled outcomes: An integration of reactance theory and the learned helplessness model. In L. Berkowitz (Ed.), Advances in experimental social Psychology (Vol. 8, pp. 278-336). New York, NY: Academic Press.
Wright, R. E. (2008). Targeting, segmenting, and positioning the market for college students to increase customer satisfaction and overall performance. College Student Journal, 42, 891-894.