期刊專區/ Periodical Section

一所國中國文教師運用學生聲音回饋促進教師專業發展之研究

A Study on the Use of Student Voice Feedback to Promote Professional Development among Junior High School Chinese Language Teachers

所屬期刊：	第21卷第1期 主編：國立暨南國際大學教育學院學士班教授兼副校長 楊洲松
系統編號：	vol080_01
主題：	師資培育
出版年份：	2025
作者：	曾碩彥
作者(英文)：	Shou-Yen Tseng
論文名稱：	一所國中國文教師運用學生聲音回饋促進教師專業發展之研究
論文名稱(英文)：	A Study on the Use of Student Voice Feedback to Promote Professional Development among Junior High School Chinese Language Teachers
共同作者：
最高學歷：
校院名稱：
系所名稱：
語文別：	中文
論文頁數：	38
中文關鍵字：	學生聲音；教師專業發展；反思性實踐；國文教學
英文關鍵字：	Student Voice, Teacher Professional Development, Reflective Practice, Chinese Teaching
服務單位：	臺北市立大學師資培育及職涯發展中心助理教授
稿件字數：	24431
作者專長：
投稿日期：	2024/10/7
論文下載：
摘要(中文)：	本研究探討臺灣一所國中三位不同資歷國文教師如何運用學生聲音回饋促進專業發展。透過質性研究方法，包括教師深度訪談、學生焦點團體訪談、課堂觀察及教師反思日誌，揭示學生聲音在國文教學中的「平衡」與「轉化」角色，以及教師反思性實踐的深化與專業身分重構過程。研究發現，學生聲音在國文教學中扮演著平衡傳統與創新、促進教學方法轉變的關鍵角色。教師在回應學生聲音過程中，反思性實踐從技術層面的調整，逐步深化為對教育本質和教學理念的批判性思考，促進了教學方法的創新和教師角色的轉變。本研究之國中國文科教師的實踐經驗，歸納建構出「運用學生聲音回饋促進教師專業發展模式」，包含學生聲音回饋蒐集機制、教師反思與實踐循環，以及同儕支持與協作網絡三個核心要素。本研究從運用學生聲音的回饋，為理解和促進教師專業發展提供更多元的視角，對國文教學實踐的改進和師資培育政策之制定提供建議。
摘要(英文)：	This study explores how three junior high school Chinese language teachers in Taiwan, each with varying levels of teaching experience, utilized student voice feedback to facilitate their professional development. Adopting qualitative research approach, the study employed in-depth teacher interviews, student focus group interviews, classroom observations, and teacher reflective journals to examine the roles of student voice as both a “balancing” and “transformative” force in Chinese language instruction. The findings indicate that student voice plays a pivotal role in balancing tradition with innovation and in catalyzing pedagogical transformation. Through engaging with student feedback, teachers evolved from solely making technical adjustments to engaging in deeper, critical reflection on the nature of education and their instructional philosophies. This reflective practice led to pedagogical innovation and a redefinition of the teacher’s professional identity. Drawing from the teachers’ practical experiences, this study proposes a model for “facilitating professional development through student voice feedback”. The model consists of three cores components: mechanisms for collecting student feedback, a cyclical process of teacher reflection and practice, and a peer support and collaboration network. By highlighting the role of student voice, this study offers a multifaceted perspective on understanding and advancing the professional development of teachers. It also provides recommendations for enhancing Chinese language instruction and informs on the formulation of teacher education policies.
參考文獻：	丁一顧、王淑麗、江姮姬（2019）。國小校長共創式領導與教師專業學習社群關係 之研究：以教師信任為中介變項。教育科學研究期刊，64（3），237-264。 https://doi.org/10.6209/JORIES.201909_64(3).0009 王更生（2001）。國文教學面面觀。五南。 王明通（2009）。中學國文教學法研究。五南。 丘愛鈴（2021）。探究新制教育實習師資生的學科教學知能：素養導向教學的視角。 臺灣教育評論月刊，10（10），1-9。http://www.ater.org.tw/journal/article/10-10/topic/01.pdf 吳俊憲、蔡淑芬、吳錦惠（2015）。教師專業學習社群「再聚焦、續深化」的精進 作為。臺灣教育評論月刊，4（2），129-145。 宋明娟（2021）。教學反思：師資培育實習課程中的靈魂。臺灣教育評論月刊，10 （10），58-63。http://www.ater.org.tw/journal/article/10-0/topic/10.pdf 孫志麟（2022）。證據說了什麼？國民中小學教師專業發展的樣貌。師資培育與教師專業發展期刊，15（1），1-27。https://doi.org/10.53106/20713649202204150 1001 張瑞菊、高敬堯（2023）。國小師資職前國語文內容深究教學之增能——以專業成長社群之課室研究為例。師資培育與教師專業發展期刊，16（3），1-25。 https://doi.org/10.53106/207136492023121603001 教育部（2014）。十二年國民基本教育課程綱要總綱。https://www.naer.edu.tw/ upload/1/16/doc/288/ 十二年國教課程綱要總綱 .pdf 黃靜芳（2021）。推動「素養導向」閱讀教學的探討。臺灣教育評論月刊，10（8）， 167-172。http://www.ater.org.tw/journal/article/10-8/free/15.pdf 曾碩彥、黃鴻文、謝艾芸（2022）。108 課綱實施後一所普通高中學生的課程觀。 臺灣教育社會學研究，22（2），93-137。https://www.edubook.com.tw/OAtw/ File/PDf/907272.pdf 黃鴻文、鄭英傑、王俐蘋（2016）。為何不傾聽學生的聲音？學生課程觀及其對課 程 研 究 的 啟 示。 臺 灣 教 育 社 會 學 研 究，16（1），127-152。https://www.edubook.com.tw/OAtw/File/PDf/406285.pdf 詹雨欣、宋明娟（2022）。傾聽學生的聲音？中國大陸南方某小學五年級學生的課 程詮釋。教育研究集刊，68（4），127-152。https://doi.org/10.53106/10288708 2022126804002 Ab Kadir, M. A. (2018). Singapore’s educational policy through the prism of student voice: Recasting students as co-agents of educational change and ‘disrupting’ the status quo? Journal of Education Policy, 34(4), 547-576. https://doi.org/10.1080/02680939.2018.1474387 Baroutsis, A., McGregor, G., & Mills, M. (2015). Pedagogic voice: Student voice in teaching and engagement pedagogies. Pedagogy, Culture & Society, 24(1), 123-140. https://doi.org/10.1080/14681366.2015.1087044 Beauchamp, C., & Thomas, L. (2009). Understanding teacher identity: An overview of issues in the literature and implications for teacher education. Cambridge Journal of Education, 39(2), 175-189. https://doi.org/10.1080/03057640902902252 Beltramo, J. L. (2017). Developing adaptive teaching practices through participation in cogenerative dialogues. Teaching and Teacher Education, 63, 326-337. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2017.01.007 Black, R., & Mayes, E. (2020). Feeling voice: The emotional politics of ‘student voice’ for teachers. Cambridge Journal of Education, 46(5), 1064-1080. https://doi.org/10.1002/berj.3613 Blackledge, D., & Hunt, B. (1985). Sociological interpretations of education. Croom Helm. Conner, J. O. (2022). Educators’ experiences with student voice: How teachers understand, solicit, and use student voice in their classrooms. Teachers and Teaching, 28(1), 12-25. https://doi.org/10.1080/13540602.2021.2016689 Cook-Sather, A. (2006). Sound, presence, and power: ‘Student voice’ in educational research and reform. Curriculum Inquiry, 36(4), 359-390. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-873X.2006.00363.x Cook-Sather, A. (2020). Student voice across contexts: Fostering student agency in today’s schools. Theory Into Practice, 59(2), 182-191. https://doi.org/10.1080/00405841.2019.1705091 Darling-Hammond, L., & Richardson, N. (2009). Teacher learning: What matters? Educational Leadership, 66(5), 46-53. https://jorluiseptor.github.io/EQUIP1/suplemental_docs/PLC/Darling-Hammond,％ 20L.％ 20and％ 20Richardson,％ 20N.％20(2009).％ 20Teacher％ 20Learning..pdf Denzin, N. K. (1978). Sociological methods: A sourcebook. McGraw-Hill. Emdin, C. (2017). For white folks who teach in the hood and the rest of y’all too: Reality pedagogy and urban education. Beacon. Fielding, M. (2001). Students as radical agents of change. Journal of Educational Change, 2, 123-141. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1017949213447 Fielding, M. (2004). Transformative approaches to student voice: Theoretical underpinnings, recalcitrant realities. British Educational Research Journal, 30(2), 295-311. https://doi.org/10.1080/0141192042000195236 Flutter, J. (2007). Teacher development and pupil voice. Curriculum Journal, 18(3), 343-354. https://doi.org/10.1080/09585170701589983 Fraile, J., Panadero, E., & Pardo, R. (2017). Co-creating rubrics: The effects on self-regulated learning, self-efficacy and performance of establishing assessment criteria with students. Studies in Educational Evaluation, 53, 69-76. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.stueduc.2017.03.003 Ip, C. W.-H., & Fok, P.-K. (2010). Challenges of involving student voice in curriculum implementation: The case of Hong Kong. The Chinese University of Hong Kong. Kaiser, K. (2009). Protecting respondent confidentiality in qualitative research. Qualitative Health Research, 19(11), 1632-1641. https://doi.org/10.1177/1049732309350879 Kidd, W. (2012). Relational agency and pre-service trainee teachers: Using student voice to frame teacher education pedagogy. Management in Education, 26(3), 120-129. https://doi.org/10.1177/0892020612445684 Lincoln, Y. S., & Guba, E. G. (1985). Naturalistic inquiry. Sage. Mezirow, J. (1991). Transformative dimensions of adult learning. Jossey-Bass. Mitra, D. L., & Serriere, S. C. (2015). Civic education in the elementary grades: Promoting student engagement in an era of accountability. Teachers College. Mitra, D. L., Holquist, S., Conner, J., & Wright, N. (2021). What is student voice anyway? The intersection of student voice practices and shared leadership. Educational Administration Quarterly, 59(4), 703-743. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013161X231178023 Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. (2018). The future of education and skills education 2030. https://www.oecd.org/content/dam/oecd/en/publications/reports/2018/06/the-future-of-education-and-skills_5424dd26/54ac7020-en.pdf Punch, S. (2002). Research with children: The same or different from research with adults? Childhood, 9(3), 321-341. https://doi.org/10.1177/0907568202009003005 Quinn, S., & Owen, S. (2016). Digging deeper: Understanding the power of ‘student voice.’ Australian Journal of Education, 60(1), 60-72. https://doi.org/10.1177/0004944115626402 Rogoff, B. (1995). Observing sociocultural activity on three planes: Participatory appropriation, guided participation, and apprenticeship. In J. V. Wertsch, P. del Rio, & A. Alvarez (Eds.), Sociocultural studies of mind (pp. 139-164). Cambridge University. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139174299.008 Schon, D. A. (1983). The reflective practitioner: How professionals think in action. Basic. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315237473 Seiler, G. (2013). Reconstructing science curricula through student voice and choice. Education and Urban Society, 45(3), 362-384. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013124511408596 Shulman, L. S. (1986). Those who understand: Knowledge growth in teaching. Educational Researcher, 15(2), 4-14. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X015002004 Shulman, L. S. (1987). Knowledge and teaching: Foundations of the new reform. Harvard Educational Review, 57(1), 1-23. https://doi.org/10.17763/haer.57.1.j463w79r56455411 Sieber, J. E., & Tolich, M. B. (2013). Planning ethically responsible research (2nd ed.). Sage. Taines, C. (2012). Intervening in alienation: The outcomes for urban youth of participating in school activism. American Educational Research Journal, 49(1), 53-86. https://doi.org/10.3102/0002831211411079 Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Harvard University. Wenger, E. (1998). Communities of practice: Learning, meaning, and identity. Cambridge University. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511803932