IPIP五大人格量表簡版的發展及其跨年齡層的測量不變性檢定

The Development of a Shortened Version of IPIP Big Five Personality Scale and the Testing of Its Measurement Invariance between Middle-Aged and Older People

李仁豪; 陳怡君
Ren-Hau Li; Yi-Chun Chen

Doi：10.3966/181665042016121204004


所屬期刊： 第12卷第4期 「教育心理、輔導與測評」
主編：國立臺灣師範大學教育心理與輔導學系兼任教授
陳秉華
系統編號： vol047_04
主題： 測驗與評量
出版年份： 2016
作者： 李仁豪; 陳怡君
作者(英文)： Ren-Hau Li; Yi-Chun Chen
論文名稱： IPIP五大人格量表簡版的發展及其跨年齡層的測量不變性檢定
論文名稱(英文)： The Development of a Shortened Version of IPIP Big Five Personality Scale and the Testing of Its Measurement Invariance between Middle-Aged and Older People
共同作者：
最高學歷：
校院名稱：
系所名稱：
語文別： 中文
論文頁數： 34
中文關鍵字： IPIP 五大人格量表; 中老年人; 測量不變性; 簡版
英文關鍵字： IPIP Big Five personality scale; middle-aged and older people; measurement invariance; shortened version
服務單位： 中山醫學大學心理學系; 維新醫院臨床心理科
稿件字數： 18123
作者專長： 應用心理計量學
投稿日期： 2015/9/15
論文下載： pdf檔案icon
摘要(中文)： 為了減少研究成本及增加參與者配合度，並讓諮商輔導或臨床初步晤談得以
便利進行，本研究乃根據Goldberg 所發展之IPIP 五大人格量表五十題版本進行簡
版的發展工作，提供其建構效度、效標關聯效度、聚合效度及內部一致性信度等
證據，並檢定中老年在此簡版上的跨年齡層測量不變性。研究樣本係來自臺灣地
區的中老年人，共進行兩次橫斷面問卷調查，第一次回收之有效樣本共455 人，
間隔一年後，蒐集未重複的有效樣本283 人，兩樣本合計共含426 位未滿60 歲的
中年人及312 位60 歲以上的老年人。簡版是利用結構方程式模型的測量模型進行
分析選題，建構效度是以驗證性因素分析的模型適配度及因素負荷量來確認，而
效標關聯效度是以與正負向情緒量表及與自尊量表的相關來建立，聚合效度主要
是以與原IPIP 五大人格量表五十題版本以及TDA 五大人格問卷的相關來建立。研
究結果獲得的簡版IPIP 五大人格量表簡稱為IPIP-15，每一人格包含3 題，共15 題，
具有不錯的模型適配度，因素負荷量在.61-.83，內部一致性α 信度在.67-.83，效
標關聯效度及聚合效度也大多符合預期，且在中老年人之間具有跨年齡層的測量
不變性。整體而言，IPIP-15 具有可接受的信效度。
摘要(英文)： To reduce research cost and to increase participation, as well as to make it
convenient for initial counseling guidance and clinical interview, this study developed a
shortened version of Big Five personality scale on basis of Goldberg’s IPIP-50. The study
presents among all its construct validity, criterion-related validity, convergent validity,
internal consistent reliability, and also checks its across age-level measurement invariance
for middle-aged and older people. There are two sample data surveyed from middle-aged
and older people in Taiwan. The fi rst survey had a valid sample with 455 participants, and
one year later, a second survey was conducted and 283 non-duplication participants were
obtained. The two samples included 426 below 60 year-old middle-aged people and 312
over 60 year-old people, respectively. The items of the shortened version were analyzed
and chosen by measurement model of structural equation modeling. Its construct validity
was checked by confi rmatory factor analysis with model-fi t indices and factor loadings.
Its criterion-related validity was established by correlations with the affect balance scale
and the self-esteem scale. Its convergent validity was obtained by correlations with IPIP-
50 and with another Big Five personality scale, TDA-40. The results show that a 15-
item shortened version of Big Five personality, named IPIP-15, was developed, and its
each personality included 3 items. The IPIP-15 has good model-fi ts with factor loadings
ranging from .61 to .83. Its internal consistent reliability coeffi cients α ranged from .67
to .83, and its criterion-related validity and convergent validity are also as expected.
Besides, IPIP-15 has an across age-level measurement invariance between middle-aged
and older people. In general, IPIP-15 has acceptable reliability and validity.
參考文獻： 王秀美、李長燦（2011，6 月）。五大人格特質量表中文版之信效度研究。論文發
表於美和科技大學舉辦之「社會服務與休閒產業」研討會，屏東縣。
李仁豪、余民寧（2016）。心理幸福感量表簡式中文版信效度及測量不變性：以
大學生為樣本並兼論測量不變性議題。中華輔導與諮商學報，46，127-154。
吳武典、林幸台、王振德、郭靜姿（1999）。基本人格量表指導手冊。臺北市：心
理。
林美珠、周東山、林繼偉（2008）。愛德華個人偏好量表中文版指導手冊。臺北市：
心理。
郭為藩、陳榮華、林坤燦、蔡榮貴、陳學志、陳心怡（2008）。戈登人格剖析量
表指導手冊。臺北市：中國行為科學社。
楊中芳（總校訂譯）（1997）。性格與社會心理測量總覽（上）（原作者：J. P.
Robinson, P. R. Shaver, & L. S. Wrightsman）。臺北市：遠流。（原著出版年：
1991）
鄧景宜、曾旭民、李怡禛、游朝舜（2011）。“International English Big-Five Mini-
Markers” 之繁體中文版量表發展。管理學報，28，579-600。
葉光輝（譯）（2012）。性格心理學：理論與研究（二版）（原作者：A. P.
Lawrence, & D. Cervone）。臺北市：雙葉。（原著出版年：2010）
薛秀宜、陳利銘、洪佩圓（2006）。人格理論新紀元：人格五因素模式之測驗工
具與其研究應用：教育人力與專業發展。研習資訊，23(1)，109-117。
Allport, G. W. & Odbert, H. S. (1936). Trait-names: A psycho-lexical study.
Psychological Monographs, 47(1), i-171. doi: 10.1037/h0093360
Aluja, A., Rolland, J. P., Garcia, L. F., & Rossier, J. (2007). Dimensionality of the
Rosenberg Self-Esteem Scale and its relationships with the three-and the fivefactor
personality models. Journal of Personality Assessment, 88(2), 246-249. doi:
10.1080/00223890701268116
Bagozzi, R., & Yi, Y. (1988). On the evaluation of structural equation models. Journal of
the academy of marketing science, 16(1), 74-94. doi: 10.1007/BF02723327
Baumgartner, H., & Steenkamp, J.-B. E. M. (1998). Multi-group latent variable models
for varying numbers of items and factors with cross-national and longitudinal
applications. Marketing Letters, 9(1), 21-35. doi: 10.1023/A:1007911903032
Brown, T. A. (2006). Confi rmatory factor analysis for applied research. New York, NY:
Guilford.
Bradburn, N. (1969). The structure of psychological well-being. Chicago, IL: Aldine.
Butkovic, A., Brkovic, I., & Bratko, D. (2012). Predicting well-being from personality
in adolescents and older adults. Journal of Happiness Studies, 13(3), 455-467. doi:
10.1007/s10902-011-9273-7
Byrne, B. M., Shavelson, R. J., & Muthen, B. (1989). Testing for the equivalence of
factor covariance and mean structures: The issue of partial measurement invariance.
Psychological Bulletin, 105(3), 456-466. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0033-
2909.105.3.456
Conley, J. J. (1985). Longitudinal stability of personality traits: A multitrait-multimethodmultioccasion
analysis. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 49(5), 1266-
1282. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.49.5.1266
Connor-Smith, J. K., & Flachsbart, C. (2007). Relations between personality and coping:
A meta-analysis. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 93(6), 1080-1107.
doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.93.6.1080
Cooper, A. J., Smillie, L. D., & Corr, P. J. (2010). A confirmatory factor analysis of
the Mini-IPIP five-factor model personality scale. Personality and Individual
Differences, 48(5), 688-691. doi: 10.1016/j.paid.2010.01.004
Corwyn, R. F. (2000). The factor structure of global self-esteem among adolescents
and adults. Journal of Research in Personality, 34(4), 357–379. doi: 10.1006/
jrpe.2000.2291
Crede, M., Harms, P., Niehorster, S., & Gaye-Valentine, A. (2012). An evaluation of the
consequences of using short measures of the Big Five personality traits. Journal of
Personality and Social Psychology, 102(4), 874-888. doi: 10.1037/a0027403
Deneve, K. M., & Cooper, H. (1998). The happy personality: A meta-analysis of 137
personality traits and subjective well-being. Psychological Bulletin, 124, 197-229.
doi: 10.1037/0033-2909.124.2.197
Digman, J. M., & Inouye, J. (1986). Further specification of the five robust factors
of personality. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 50, 116-123. doi:
10.1037/0022-3514.50.1.116
Donnellan, M. B., & Lucas, R. E. (2008). Age differences in the Big Five across the life
span: Evidence from two national samples. Psychology and Aging, 23(3), 558-566.
doi: 10.1037/a0012897
Donnellan, M. B., Oswald, F. L., Baird, B. M., & Lucas, R. E. (2006). The mini-
IPIP scales: Tiny-yet-effective measures of the Big Five factors of personality.
Psychological Assessment, 18(2), 192-203. doi: 10.1037/1040-3590.18.2.192.
Ehrhart, M. G., Ehrhart, K. H., Roesch, S. C., Chung-Herrera, B. G., Nadler, K., &
Bradshaw, K. (2009). Testing the latent factor structure and construct validity of the
ten-item personality Inventory. Personality and Individual Differences, 47(8), 900-
905. doi: 10.1016/j.paid.2009.07.012.
Ehrhart, K. H., Roesch, S. C., Ehrhart, M. G., & Kilian, B. (2008). A test of the factor
structure equivalence of the 50-item IPIP fi ve-factor model measure across gender
and ethnic groups. Journal of Personality Assessment, 90(5), 507-516. doi:
10.1080/00223890802248869
Fornell, C., & Larcker, D. F. (1981). Evaluating structural equation models with
unobservable variables and measurement error. Journal of Marketing Research,
18(1), 39-50. doi: 10.2307/3151312
Goldberg, L. R. (1992). The development of markers for the Big-Five factor structure.
Psychological Assessment, 4(1), 26-42. doi: 10.1037/1040-3590.4.1.26
Goldberg, L. R. (1996). Evidence for the Big Five in analyses of familiar English
personality adjectives. European Journal of Personality, 10, 61-77.
Goldberg, L. R., Johnson, J. A., Eber, H. W., Hogan, R., Ashton, M. C., Cloninger, C. R.,
& Gough, H. G. (2006). The international personality item pool and the future of
public-domain personality measures. Journal of Research in Personality, 40(1), 84-
96. doi: 10.1016/j.jrp.2005.08.007
Goldberg, L. R., Sweeney, D., Merenda, P. F., & Hughes Jr, J. E. (1998). Demographic
variables and personality: The effects of gender, age, education, and ethnic/racial
status on self-descriptions of personality attributes. Personality and Individual
Differences, 24(3), 393-403. doi: 10.1016/s0191-8869(97)00110-4
Gutierrez, J. L. G., Jimenez, B. M., Hernandez, E. G., & Puente, C. P. (2005).
Personality and subjective well-being: Big Five correlates and demographic
variables. Personality and Individual Differences, 38(7), 1561-1569. doi: 10.1016/
j.paid.2004.09.015
Gow, A. J., Whiteman, M. C., Pattie, A., & Deary, I. J. (2005). Goldberg’s IPIP
Big-Five factor markers: Internal consistency and concurrent validation in
Scotland. Personality and Individual Differences, 39(2), 317-329. doi: 10.1016/
j.paid.2005.01.011
Guenole, N., & Chernyshenko, O. S. (2005). Suitability of Goldberg’s Big Five IPIP
personality markers in New Zealand: A dimensionality, bias, and criterion validity
evaluation. The New Zealand Journal of Psychology, 34(2), 86-96.
Hair, J. F., Black, W. C., Babin, B. J., & Anderson, R. E. (2010). Multivariate data
analysis: A global perspective (7th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Prentice
Hall.
Hartup, W. W., & Van Lieshout, C. F. M. (1995). Personality development in social
context. Annual Review of Psychology, 46(1), 655-687. doi:10.1146/annurev.
ps.46.020195.003255
John, O. P., Naumann, L. P., & Soto, C. J. (2008). Paradigm shift to the integrative big
fi ve trait taxonomy: History, measurement, and conceptual issues. In O. P. John, R.
W. Robins, & L. A. Pervin (Eds.), Handbook of personality: Theory and research (3rd
ed., pp. 114-158). New York, NY: Guilford.
John, O. P., & Srivastava, S. (1999). The Big Five trait taxonomy: History, measurement,
and theoretical perspectives. In L. A. Pervin, & O. P. John (Eds.), Handbook of
personality: Theory and research (pp.102-138). New York, NY: Guilford.
Li, R-H. (2014). Reliability and validity of a shorter Chinese version for Ryff’s
psychological well-being scale. Health Education Journal, 73(4), 446-452. doi:
10.1177/0017896913485743
Little, T. D. (2013). Longitudinal structural equation modeling. New York, NY: Guilford.
Lynam, D. R., & Widiger, T. A. (2001). Using the five-factor model to represent the
DSM-IV personality disorders: An expert consensus approach. Journal of Abnormal
Psychology, 110(3), 401-412. doi: 10.1037/0021-843X.110.3.401
Marsella, A. J., Dubanoski, J., Hamada, W. C., & Morse, H. (2000). The measurement
of personality across cultures historical, conceptual, and methodological
issues and considerations. American Behavioral Scientist, 44(1), 41-62. doi:
10.1177/00027640021956080
Mash, E. J., & Wolfe, D. A. (2008). Abnormal child psychology. Belmont, CA:
Wadsworth.
McCrae, R. R., & Costa, P. T. (1985). Updating Norman’s adequate taxonomy:
Intelligence and personality dimensions in natural language and in questionnaires.
Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 49, 710-721.
McCrae, R. R., & Costa, P. T. (1987). Validation of the fi ve-factor model of personality
across instruments and observers. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology,
52(1), 81-90. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.52.1.81
McCrae, R. R., Costa, P. T., & Martin, T. A. (2005). The NEO–PI–3: A more readable
revised NEO Personality Inventory. Journal of Personality Assessment, 84(3), 261-
270. doi: 10.1207/s15327752jpa8403_05
McCrae, R. R., & John, O. P. (1992). An introduction to the five-factor model and its
applications. Journal of Personality, 60(2), 175-215. doi : 10.1111/j.1467-6494.1992.
tb00970.x
Mla?i?, B., & Goldberg, L. R. (2007). An analysis of a cross-cultural personality
inventory: The IPIP Big-Five factor markers in Croatia. Journal of Personality
Assessment, 88(2), 168-177.
Mount, M. K., Barrick, M. R., Scullen, S. M., & Rounds, J. (2005). Higher-order
dimensions of the Big Five personality traits and the big six vocational interest
types. Personnel Psychology, 58(2), 447-478. doi: 10.1111/j.1744-6570.2005.00468.x
Norman, W. T. (1963). Toward an adequate taxonomy of personality attributes:
Replicated factor structure in peer nomination personality ratings. The Journal of
Abnormal and Social Psychology, 66(6), 574-583. doi: 10.1037/h0040291
Lynam, D. R., & Widiger, T. A. (2001). Using the five-factor model to represent the
DSM-IV personality disorders: An expert consensus approach. Journal of Abnormal
Psychology, 110(3), 401-412. doi: 10.1037/0021-843X.110.3.401
Marsella, A. J., Dubanoski, J., Hamada, W. C., & Morse, H. (2000). The measurement
of personality across cultures historical, conceptual, and methodological
issues and considerations. American Behavioral Scientist, 44(1), 41-62. doi:
10.1177/00027640021956080
Mash, E. J., & Wolfe, D. A. (2008). Abnormal child psychology. Belmont, CA:
Wadsworth.
McCrae, R. R., & Costa, P. T. (1985). Updating Norman’s adequate taxonomy:
Intelligence and personality dimensions in natural language and in questionnaires.
Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 49, 710-721.
McCrae, R. R., & Costa, P. T. (1987). Validation of the fi ve-factor model of personality
across instruments and observers. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology,
52(1), 81-90. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.52.1.81
McCrae, R. R., Costa, P. T., & Martin, T. A. (2005). The NEO–PI–3: A more readable
revised NEO Personality Inventory. Journal of Personality Assessment, 84(3), 261-
270. doi: 10.1207/s15327752jpa8403_05
McCrae, R. R., & John, O. P. (1992). An introduction to the five-factor model and its
applications. Journal of Personality, 60(2), 175-215. doi : 10.1111/j.1467-6494.1992.
tb00970.x
Mla?i?, B., & Goldberg, L. R. (2007). An analysis of a cross-cultural personality
inventory: The IPIP Big-Five factor markers in Croatia. Journal of Personality
Assessment, 88(2), 168-177.
Mount, M. K., Barrick, M. R., Scullen, S. M., & Rounds, J. (2005). Higher-order
dimensions of the Big Five personality traits and the big six vocational interest
types. Personnel Psychology, 58(2), 447-478. doi: 10.1111/j.1744-6570.2005.00468.x
Norman, W. T. (1963). Toward an adequate taxonomy of personality attributes:
Replicated factor structure in peer nomination personality ratings. The Journal of
Abnormal and Social Psychology, 66(6), 574-583. doi: 10.1037/h0040291
Socha, A., Cooper, C. A., & McCord, D. M. (2010). Confirmatory factor analysis of
the M5-50: An implementation of the international personality item pool item set.
Psychological Assessment, 22(1), 43-49. doi: 10.1037/a0017371
Specht, J., Egloff, B., & Schmukle, S. C. (2011). Stability and change of personality
across the life course: The impact of age and major life events on mean-level and
rank-order stability of the Big Five. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology,
101(4), 862-882. doi: 10.1037/a0024950
Steinmetz, H., Schmidt, P., Tina-Booh, A., Wieczorek, S., & Schwartz, S. H. (2009).
Testing measurement invariance using multigroup CFA: Differences between
educational groups in human values measurement. Quality & Quantity, 43(4), 599-
616. doi: 10.1007/s11135-007-9143-x
Thompson, E. R. (2008). Development and validation of an international English big-fi ve
mini-markers. Personality and Individual Differences, 45, 542-548. doi: 10.1016/
j.paid.2008.06.013
Tupes, E. C., & Christal, R. E. (1961). Recurrent personality factors based on trait
ratings. Technical Report ASD-TR-61-97. Lackland Air Force Base, TX: U.S. Air
Force.
Vandenberg, R. J., & Lance, C. E. (2000). A review and synthesis of the measurement
invariance literature: Suggestions, practices, and recommendations for
organizational research. Organizational Research Methods, 3(1), 4-70. doi:
10.1177/109442810031002
Walton, K. E., Huyen, B. T. T., Thorpe, K., Doherty, E. R., Juarez, B., D’Accordo, C., &
Reina, M. T. (2012). Cross-sectional personality differences from age 16 to 90 in a
Vietnamese sample. Journal of Research in Personality, 47(1), 36-40. doi: 10.1016/
j.jrp.2012.10.011
Zheng, L., Goldberg, L. R., Zheng, Y., Zhao, Y., Tang, Y., & Liu, L. (2008). Reliability
and concurrent validation of the IPIP Big-Five factor markers in China:
Consistencies in factor structure between Internet-obtained heterosexual and
homosexual samples. Personality and Individual Differences, 45(7), 649-654. doi:
10.1016/j.paid.2008.07.009