政策移植研究之評析及其在教育領域的展望

Policy Transfer Research: Retrospects and Prospects

陳文彥
Wen-Yan Chen


所屬期刊: 第5卷第3期 「教育政策與制度」
主編:國立暨南國際大學人文學院院長
張鈿富
系統編號: vol018_03
主題: 教育政策與制度
出版年份: 2009
作者: 陳文彥
作者(英文): Wen-Yan Chen
論文名稱: 政策移植研究之評析及其在教育領域的展望
論文名稱(英文): Policy Transfer Research: Retrospects and Prospects
共同作者:
最高學歷:
校院名稱:
系所名稱:
語文別:
論文頁數: 22
中文關鍵字: 政策移植;政策學習;教育借用
英文關鍵字: policy transfer, policy learning, education borrowing
服務單位: 新竹市立光華國中教師
稿件字數: 13506
作者專長: 教育政策;學校行政
投稿日期: 2005/1/5
論文下載: pdf檔案icon
摘要(中文): 隨著全球化趨勢的開展,「政策移植」(policy transfer)在實務上的重要性益形凸顯,在台灣的教育脈絡下尤然。不過就理論與研究的層次來說,政策移植的相關概念五花八門,於探討前有待釐清,且教育領域對於政策移植的研究呈現獨自發展的狀態,與其他學門的對話甚少,形成研究上的罅隙,殊為可惜。基於此,本文透過文獻分析,由後設的角度對於政策移植之研究取向進行評析,期由鉅觀視角呈現政策移植研究的多樣風貌,進而拓展教育領域對於政策移植研究的不同視野。在分析層次的安排上,本文首先針對政策移植的相關概念進行釐析,其次綜整不同領域政策移植研究的相關文獻,歸納出四類不同的政策移植研究,包括歷史個案的分析、前瞻評估的發展、理論架構的建立,以及批判分析的提出等,分別闡明其研究旨趣並加以評述,最後並綜合先前的分析結果,對於國內教育政策移植研究的發展提出展望。
摘要(英文): Policy transfer is a common political phenomenon. With the trend of globalization, its processes become even faster and more frequent. This paper analyzes different types of policy transfer researches to bridge the gap between researches from education and other disciplines and proposes the prospects for researching educational policy transfer. To attain the goals, some related concepts of policy transfer are firstly reviewed. Then, four types of policy transfer researches based on different interests, including the historical study of policy transfer, the prospective evaluation of policy transfer, theory building of policy transfer, and the critiques of policy transfer, are discussed. At last, prospects for future development of policy transfer research in education are brought up.
參考文獻: 王玉麟(1998)。美國中小學校長培育制度在我國實施之可行性研究。臺北市立師範學院國民教育研究所碩士論文,未出版,台北市。
王麗雲(2007,5月)。教育政策借用的省思。載於南華大學教育社會學研究所舉辦之「第六屆意識、權力與教育—教育政策的理論基礎與論述形成」研討會論文集(頁389-404),嘉義縣。
李春興(2007)。美國營利性大學及其在我國可行性之研究。國立中正大學教育研究所碩士論文,未出版,嘉義縣。
林水波(2004)。制度移植策略性評估:以公投法為例。國家政策季刊,3(1),51-80。
洪雯柔(2000)。貝瑞岱比較教育研究方法論之探析。台北市:揚智。
許皓萱(2005)。我國國立大學校院校務基金委外經營可行性之研究。淡江大學教育政策與領導研究所碩士論文,未出版,台北縣。
黃美芳(2002)。美國學校教育績效責任制及其在我國實施可行性之研究。臺北市立師範學院國民教育研究所碩士論文,未出版,台北市。
黃東益(2004)。全球治理下政府知識管理的新面向:府際政策學習。國家政策季刊,3(1),139-153。
葉玉賢(2005)。教育轉移,改革取代。載於楊深坑(編審),比較教育論述之形成(頁157-183)。台北市:高等教育出版社。
楊思偉、王如哲編著(2004)。比較教育。台北:國立空中大學。
楊深坑(1999)。知識形式與比較教育。台北市:揚智。
楊深坑編審(2005)。比較教育論述之形成。台北市:高等教育出版社。
楊深坑(2006)。教育改革研究方法論的回顧與前瞻。教育研究集刊,52(4),141-171。
Agelasto, M. (1996). Educational transfer of sorts: The American credit system with Chinese characteristics. Comparative Education, 32(1), 69-93.
Bennett, C. J. (1991). What is policy convergence and what causes it? British Journal of Political Science, 21(2), 215-234.
Bennett, C., & Howlett, M. (1992). The lessons of learning: Reconciling theories of policy learning and policy change. Policy Science, 25, 275-294.
Cohen, M. D., March, J. G., & Olsen, J. P. (1972). A garbage can model of organizational choice. Administrative Science Quarterly, 17, 1-25.
Dolowitz, D., & Marsh, D. (1996). Who learns what from whom: A review of the policy transfer literature. Political Studies, XLIV, 343-357.
Dolowitz, D., & Marsh, D. (2000).Learning from abroad: The role of policy transfer in contemporary policy-making. Governance, 13(1), 5-24.
Evans, M. (2006). At the interface between theory and practice: Policy transfer and lesson-drawing. Public Administration, 84(2), 479-515.
Evans, M., & Davies, J. (1999). Understanding policy transfer: A multi-level, multi-disciplinary perspective. Public Administration, 77(2), 361-385.
Hall, P. A. (1993). Policy paradigms, social learning, and the state: The case of economic policymaking in Britain. Comparative Politics, 25(3), 275-296.
Halpin, D., & Troyna, B. (1995). The politics of education policy borrowing. ComparativeEducation, 31(3), 303-310.
Hulme, R. (2005). Policy transfer and the internationalization of social policy. Social Policy & Society, 4(4), 417-425.
Hulme, R. (2006). The role of policy transfer in assessing the impact of American ideas on British social policy. Global Social Policy, 6(2), 173-195.
Hurst, P. (1975). Three criteria for the selection stage of the transfer of educational innovation. Comparative Education, 11, 63-71.
Ikenberry, J. G. (1990). The international spread of privatization policies: Inducements, learning and policy band-wagoning. In E. Suleiman and J. Waterbury (Eds.), The political economy of public sector reform. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
Jacobs K, & Barnett, P. (2000). Policy transfer and policy learning: A study of the 1991 New Zealand health services taskforce. Governance, 13(2), 185-213).
James, O., & Lodge, M. (2003). The limitations of ‘policy transfer’ and ‘lesson drawing’ for public policy research. Political Studies Review, 1, 179-193.
Jester, T. E. (2005). Transfer of standards-based education in rural Alaska: An analysis of the politics of educational transfer in the Tikishla school district. Teachers College Record, 107(4), 862-893.
Kingdon, J. W. (1984). Agendas, alternatives, and public policy. Boston, MA: Little Brown.
Moreira, A. F. B., & Macedo E. (1999, April). Reconceptualizing educational transfer: Brazilian curriculum field in the nineties. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Montreal, Quebec, Canada.
Moseberger, K., & Wolman, H. (2003). Policy transfer as a form of prospective policy evaluation: Challenge and recommendations. Public Administration Review, 63(4), 428-440.
Ochs, K., & Phillips, D. (2002). Comparative studies and ‘cross-national attraction’ in education: A typology for analysis of English interest in educational policy and provision in Germany. Educational Studies, 28(4), 325-339.
Ochs, K., & Phillips, D. (2004). Processes of educational borrowing in historical context. In D. Phillips & K. Ochs (Eds). Educational Policy Borrowing: Historical perspectives (pp. 7-23). Oxford: Symposium Books.
Paterson, W., & Sloam, J. (2005). Learning from the west: Policy transfer and political parties. Journal of Communist Studies and Transition Politics, 21(1),33-47.
Phillips, D., & Ochs, K. (2003). Processes of policy borrowing in education: some explanatory and analytical devices. Comparative Education, 39(4), 451-461.
Phillips, D., & Ochs, K. (2004). Researching policy borrowing: Some methodological challenges in comparative education. British Educational Research Journal, 30(6), 773-784.Radaelli, C. M. (2000). Policy transfer in the European Union: Institutional isomorphism as a source of legitimacy. Governance, 13(1), 25-43.
Robertson, D. B. (1991). Political conflict and lesson-drawing. Journal of Public Policy, 2(1), 55-78.
Rose, R. (1993). Lesson drawing in public policy: A guide to learning across time and space. Chatham , NJ: Chatham House.
Stone, D. (1999). Learning lessons and transferring policy across time, space and disciplines. Politics, 19(1), 51-59.
Wolman, H., & Page, E. (2002). Policy transfer among local governments: An information-theory approach. Governance, 15(4), 477-501.
Zymek, B., & Zymek, R. (2004). Traditional-national-international: Explaining the inconsistency of educational borrowers. In D. Phillips & K. Ochs (Eds). Educational Policy Borrowing: Historical perspectives (pp. 25-35). Oxford: Symposium Books.