學前特教教師專業評鑑規準建構之探究

Teacher Evaluation Criteria for Early Childhood Special Educators

鐘梅菁;江麗莉;陳清溪;陳麗如
Mei-Ching Chung;Lily Chiang;Chin-Hsi Chen;Li-Ju Chen


所屬期刊: 第5卷第3期 「教育政策與制度」
主編:國立暨南國際大學人文學院院長
張鈿富
系統編號: vol018_06
主題: 教育政策與制度
出版年份: 2009
作者: 鐘梅菁;江麗莉;陳清溪;陳麗如
作者(英文): Mei-Ching Chung;Lily Chiang;Chin-Hsi Chen;Li-Ju Chen
論文名稱: 學前特教教師專業評鑑規準建構之探究
論文名稱(英文): Teacher Evaluation Criteria for Early Childhood Special Educators
共同作者:
最高學歷:
校院名稱:
系所名稱:
語文別:
論文頁數: 30
中文關鍵字: 教師評鑑;教師評鑑規準;學前特殊教育教師
英文關鍵字: teacher evaluation;criteria for teacher evaluation;early childhood special educators
服務單位: 國立新竹教育大學幼兒教育學系副教授;國立新竹教育大學幼兒教育學系教授;國家教育研究院籌備處主任秘書;長庚大學早期療育研究所副教授
稿件字數: 20072
作者專長: 學前特殊教育; 教師專業成長; 教育行政
投稿日期: 2009/5/13
論文下載: pdf檔案icon
摘要(中文): 本研究旨在建構適合學前特教教師之專業評鑑規準。研究經由文獻分析、焦點團體訪談、專家審查等方式,發展「學前特教教師專業評鑑規準問卷」,並以問卷調查臺灣地區各縣市公立學前特教教師,包含特殊學校、特殊班、融合班、巡迴輔導教師等,總計寄出問卷345份,回收有效問卷214份,有效回收率達62%。研究結果發現,學前特教教師專業評鑑規準分為四領域:(一)課程設計領域:包含瞭解特殊學生的身心特質、掌握特教課程的理念與架構、評量與設計特教課程的能力等指標,合計10項檢核重點;(二)個別化教學領域:包含編擬與執行個別化教育計畫、訂定與執行個別化轉銜服務計畫等指標,合計7項檢核重點;(三)教學經營領域:包含運用合宜的教學方法與資源、營造適當的學習情境、建立有助於特殊學生學習的班級常規、營造良好的互動氣氛、參與教師進修等指標,合計18項檢核重點;(四)專業合作領域:包含與其他教師溝通合作、與家長維持良好的互動、提供家長相關療育資源等指標,合計7項檢核重點。最後,建議參考本研究專業評鑑規準協助學前特教教師專業發展,進行試驗性評鑑並研擬相關配套措施提升評鑑規準可行程度。
摘要(英文): The purpose of the study was to develop evaluation criteria for special early childhood educators in Taiwan. Development of the criteria has undergone with literature review, focus-group interviews, and experts’ reviews. Data were collected from 214 teachers of special early childhood education, who worked at special schools, special classes, inclusive classes, and kindergartens as itinerants. In addition to frequency count, factor analysis was also employed for data analysis. Four major domains of the criteria were found as follows:(1) curriculum design: consisting of 10 indicators that covered the topics of understanding of the characteristics of children with special needs, beliefs and teaching principals of special early childhood curriculum, and assessment and curriculum design for children with special needs; (2) individalized teaching: consisting of 7 indicators that covered the topics of planning and execution of the indivialized education program, and child referral; (3) teaching management: consisting of 18 indicators that covered the topics of implementation of developmentally appropriate practices, utilization of teaching resources, creation of an appropriate learning environment for children, and teacher in-service tranining; and (4) teacher collaboration: consisting of 7 indicators that covered the topics of communication among fellow teachers, relationship building with parents and provision of the resources of medicare and education for children to parents. Results indicated that teachers’ views of the signifiance and administration of evaluation criteria varied. With the current criteria, efforts to assist special early childhood educators in pursuing professional growth and to put teacher evaluation into use on a trial basis with complementary measures to ensue a feasible evaluation criteria should be warranted.
參考文獻: 王天苗(2003)。特殊教育相關專業服務作業手冊。臺北市:教育部。
王保進(2006)。視窗版SPSS與行為科學研究。臺北市:心理。
王振德(2004)。我國特殊教育評鑑及相關研究。教育資料集刊,29,341-358。
中華民國幼兒教育改革研究會(2001)。幼教專業倫理守則。2009年8月25日,取自http://aecer.org/download/%A5%AE%B1%D0%B1M%B7~%AD%DB%B2z%A6u%ABh.pdf
中華民國師範教育學會(2006)。各師資類科教師專業標準評估報告。2009年3月23日,取自http://www.edu.tw/EDU_WEB/EDU_MGT/HIGH-SCHOOL/EDU7273001/Jing/5653960131.doc.
江明曄(1997)。啟智教育教師應具備的專業能力。特殊教育季刊,64,33-36。
刑敏華(1998)。臺灣區啟聰學校教師之教學溝通行為與所需具備之專業能力調查。特殊教育與復健學報,6,103-123。
沈宜純(2006)。身心障礙類特殊教育教師評鑑指標意見調查及其應用之研究。國立台灣師範大學特殊教育研究所碩士論文,未出版,臺北市。
林惠芬(2002)。啟智教育教師教師效能之研究(Ι)。行政院國家科學委員會補助專題研究計劃成果報告(NSC89-2413-H-018-028)。彰化縣:國立彰化師範大學特殊教育學系。
洪毓瑛譯(2004)。幼教綠皮書—符合孩子身心發展的幼教專業。臺北:和英出版社。
張德銳(2004)。我國中小學教師專業評鑑的規劃與推動策略。現代教育論壇,10,216-231。
教育部(2002)。各教育階段身心障礙學生轉銜服務實施要點。
教育部(2004)。特殊教育法。
教育部(2008a)。教育部補助試辦教師專業發展評鑑實施計畫。
教育部(2008b)。特殊教育統計年報。
教育部(2009a)。特殊教育統計查詢。2009年3月30日,取自http://www.set.edu.tw/sta2/default.asp
教育部(2009b)。兒童教育及照顧法草案。2009年8月24日,取自http://140.126.23.12/childcarelaw98.html.郭正田(2002)。台中縣國小校長、教師對特殊教育教師專業評鑑意見調查之研究。國立台中教育大學國民教育研究所碩士論文,未出版,臺中市。
陳聖謨(1997)。國小教師對教師專業評鑑制度之態度研究。初等教育學刊,10,417-441。
黃麗君(2004)。幼稚園教師專業能力評鑑方案之建構。國立新竹教育大學幼兒教育研究所碩士論文,未出版,新竹市。
葉郁菁(1998)。英國督察體制之教師專業評鑑系統在我國可行性之初探。初等教育學報,11,365-382。
潘慧玲、王麗雲、簡茂發、孫志麟、張素貞、張錫勳、陳順和、陳淑敏、蔡濱如(2004)。國民中小學教師教學專業能力指標之發展。教育研究資訊,12(4),129-168。
簡惠閔(2004)。從利害關係人之角度看教師評鑑—Scriven之應用。現代教育論壇,10,253-264。
顏國樑(2003)。從教師專業發展導向論實施教師評鑑的策略。教育資料集刊,28,259-286。
鐘梅菁(2001)。學前教師融合教育專業知能之研究。特殊教育學報,15,309-335。
鐘梅菁、江麗莉、陳清溪、陳麗如(2007)。學前特殊教育教師對教師專業評鑑意見之研究。特殊教育學報,25,161-184。
Churchill, W. (1992). Evaluation special teachers. In J.W. Valentine(Ed.). Principles and practices for effective teacher evaluation(pp.146-214). Boston: Allyn and Bacon.
Danielson, C., & McGreal, T. L. (2000). Teacher evaluation: To enhance professional practice. Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.
Goldstein, J., & Noguera, P.A. (2006). A thoughtful approach to teacher evaluation. Educational Leadership, 63(6), 31-37.
Green, J. E., & Smyser, S. O. (1996). The teacher portfolio: A strategy for professional development and evaluation. Lancaster, PA: Technomic.
Grisham-Brown, J., Hemmeter, M. L., & Pretti-Frontczak, K. (2005). Blended practices for teaching young children in inclusive setting. Baltimor:Paul H.Brookes.
Hatfield, L. M. (1981). Inservice evaluation in early childhood education. Young Children,37(1), 59-65.
Hayes, L., Nikolic, V., & Cabaj, H. (2001). Am I teaching well?—Self-evaluation strategies for effective teachers. UK: Learning Matters.
Hoot, J., Bartkowiak, E. , Goupil, M.A.,Mercado, B., & Panepento, D. (1993). Astudy of relationship between early childhood teacher evaluation instruments and developmentally appropriate practices/code of ethics criteria. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 367477).
Hill, D. (1982). A content analysis of special education teacher evaluation form. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 223 697)
Joint Committee on Standards for Educational Evaluation (1994). The program evaluation standards (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Kontos , S. , & Diamond, K. (1997). Preparing practitioners to provide early intervention services in inclusive settings. In P. J. Winton , J. A. McCollum , & C. Catlett. ( Eds. ), Reforming personnel preparation in early intervention (pp.393-410). Baltimore: Paul H. Brookes.
Moya, S. A., & Gay, G. (1982). Evaluation of special education teachers. Teacher Education and Special Education, 5(1), 37-41.
National Board for Professional Teaching Standards(2006).Early chilhood generalist standards for the teachers of students ages 3-8. http://www.nbpts.org/index.cfm?t=downloader.cfm&id=596
Peterson, K. D. (1995). Teacher evaluation: A comprehensive guide to new directions and practices. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin.
Pretti-Frontczak, K., & Bricker, D. (2004). An activity-based approach to early intervention (3rd ed). Baltimor:Paul H.Brookes.
Sanna, E. (2003). Special education teacher. Broomall, PA: Mason Crest.
Stronge, J. H., & Tucker, P. D. (2003). Handbook on teacher evaluation-assessing and improving performance. Larchmont, NY: Eye On Education.
Toch, T. (2008). Fixing teacher evaluation-evaluations pay large dividends when they improve teaching practices. Educational Leadership, 66(2), 32-37.
Valentine, J. (1992). Principles and practices for effective teacher evaluation. Boston: Allyn and Bacon.
Vartuli, S., & Fyfe, B. (1993). Teacher need developmentally appropriate practices too. Young Children, 48(4), 36-42.