技職校院中評鑑倫理兩難之探析

An Exploration on Ethical Dilemma in Technological and Vocational School Evaluation Practice

曾淑惠
Shu-Hui Tseng


所屬期刊： 第5卷第3期 「教育政策與制度」
主編：國立暨南國際大學人文學院院長
張鈿富
系統編號： vol018_08
主題： 教育政策與制度
出版年份： 2009
作者： 曾淑惠
作者(英文)： Shu-Hui Tseng
論文名稱： 技職校院中評鑑倫理兩難之探析
論文名稱(英文)： An Exploration on Ethical Dilemma in Technological and Vocational School Evaluation Practice
共同作者：
最高學歷：
校院名稱：
系所名稱：
語文別：
論文頁數： 32
中文關鍵字： 評鑑倫理;倫理兩難;技職校院
英文關鍵字： evaluation ethic;ethical dilemma;technological and vocational school
服務單位： 國立台北科技大學技術及職業教育研究所副教授
稿件字數： 19252
作者專長： 教育評鑑;教學研究;資訊教育
投稿日期： 2009/4/17
論文下載： pdf檔案icon
摘要(中文)： 國內技職校院評鑑實務直至1998年職校評鑑時，才開始規範「訪評委員倫理準則」。然而評鑑倫理並非只應用於規範評鑑委員，受評單位在評鑑倫理的議題中仍應扮演重要角色。準此，本研究旨在探討技職校院因應評鑑所遭遇倫理兩難的情境，並界定處理倫理兩難的倫理守則。為達研究目的，本研究訪談30位技職校院評鑑關係人，並邀請五位評鑑理論與實務專家及32位德懷術專家進行意見調查以界定倫理議題，最後獲致以下結論：一、技職校院在因應評鑑時主要遭遇14項倫理兩難情境，其中受評者不願說出真實情形、運用與評鑑委員的人際關係影響評鑑結果以及評鑑結果的運用等問題受訪者有較深刻的感受。二、技職校院避免遭遇評鑑倫理兩難問題的倫理守則共可分為4面向共13項。
摘要(英文)： There were no ethic guidelines for evaluators until the vocational high schools evaluation in 1998. But, evaluator is not the only one who should take the responsibility to obey the ethic codes. The object of evaluation should fulfill its own obligation too. Therefore, the purpose of this study was to discuss the ethic dilemma situation in technological and vocational school evaluation. Semi-structured interview and opinion survey were used in order to collect information, which 30 stakeholders were interviewed and another 5 scholar and 32 delphi expert were involved in opinion survey. The main conclusions of this study are as follows: 1. There are 14 ethical dilemma situations of school evaluation. The major problems occurred in the situations such as: the school member do not tell the truth, the staff tried to influence evaluators and want to get better grades, and how to use the evaluation results. 2. The ethic guidelines which avoid the ethical dilemma situations occurring in technological and vocational school evaluation can be divided into 4 dimensions and 13 items.
參考文獻： 李隆盛、賴志?、施明發、曾淑惠、許照庸、林吉峰、黃文振、曹汝民（2002）。高級中等學校校務評鑑整合之研究。教育部委託專案研究計畫（專案編號：911A045）。臺北市：國立臺灣師範大學。
林尚平（2003）。技專校院評鑑。載於技術及職業教育百科全書編輯委員會編撰執行小組編輯，技術及職業教育百科全書（1）技職教育通論（頁581-589）。臺北市：佳新文化。
社團法人中華民國管理科學學會（2006）。教育部對私立學校技專學院執行整體發展獎補助經費運用績效訪視計畫：訪視委員手冊。臺北市：作者。
國立臺灣師範大學工業教育學系（2004）。臺灣省暨金馬地區九十三年度高級職業學校評鑑訪視委員手冊。臺北市：作者。
曾美惠（2006）。建立評鑑倫理專家學者提建言。評鑑雙月刊，4，14-16。
曾淑惠（2006）。評鑑專業化的概念與發展對我國教育評鑑專業化的啟示。教育研究與發展期刊，2（3），171-190。
蘇錦麗、蕭錫錡、葉忠達、顏國樑（1999）。我國高級職業學校評鑑之研究。臺北市：教育部。
Alexander, L. B.,& Richman, K. A. (2008). Ethical dilemmas in evaluations using indigenous research workers. American Journal of Evaluation, 29(1), 73-85.
American Evaluation Association. (2004). Guiding Principles for Evaluators. Retrieved: June 13, 2005. On http://www.eval.org/Guiding%20Principles. htm.
Australasian Evaluation Society, (1998). Improving the theory, practice and use of evaluation: Guidelines for the ethics conduct of evaluation. Retrieved February 3, 2002. On http://www.parklane.com.au/aes/guildlines.htm.
Australasian Evaluation Society, (2002). Code of ethics. Retrieved: May, 23, 2005 On http://wwwaes.asn.au/ethics.cfm.
Canadian Evaluation Society, (no date). CES guidelines for ethical conduct. Retrieved January 5, 2005. On http://www.unites.uqam.ca/ces/ethics.html.
Cousins, J. B., & Whitmore, E. (1998). Framing participatory evaluation. New Directions for Evaluations, 80, 5-23.
Cranston, N., Ehrich, L. C., & Kimber, M. P. (2004). Towards an understanding of ethical dilemmas faced by school leaders. Journal of the Queensland Secondary Principals’ Association, 1, 1-3.
Goodyear, L. K. (2007). Special issue on ethics in evaluation. Evaluation and Program Planning, 30, 392-393.
Helgadottir, H. (2008). The ethical dimension of project management. International Journal of Project Management, 26, 743-748 .
MacKinnon, B. (2004). Ethics: Theory and contemporary issues. (4th ed.). Canada: Thomson learning Academic Resource center.
Mathison, S. (1991). Role conflicts for internal evaluators. Evaluation and Program Planning 14, 173–179.
Mathison, S. (1999). Rights, responsibilities, and duties: A comparison of rthics for internal and external evaluators. New Directions for Evaluation, 82, 25-34.
Morris, M. (2003). Ethical considerations in evaluation. In T. Kellaghan, D. L. Stufflebeam, & L. A. Wingate(Eds.), International handbook of educational evaluation, Part One: Perspectives (pp. 303-327). Boston: Kluwer Academic.
Morris, M. (2005). Ethics. In S. Mathison(ed.), Encyclopedia of evaluation (pp. 131-134). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Morris, M. (2008). Evaluation ethics for best practice: Cases and commentaries. NY: Guilford.
Morris, M., & Cohn, R. (1993). Program evaluators and ethical challenges: A national survey. Evaluation Review, 17, 621-642.
Newman, D, L., & Brown, R. D. (1996). Applied ethics for program evaluation. ThousandOaks, CA: Sage.
Rodi, M. S., & Paget, K. D. (2007). Where local and national evaluators meet: Unintended threats to ethical evaluation practice. Evaluation and Program Planning. 30, 416-421.
Rossi, P. H., Lipsey, M. W., & Freeman, H. E. (2004). Evaluation: A systematic approach (7th ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Saarni, S. I., Parmanne, P., & Halila, R. (2008). Ethically problematic treatment decisions: A physician survey. Bioethics, 22(2), 121-129.
Schweigert, F. J. (2007). The priority of justice: A framework approach to ethics in program evaluation. Evaluation and Program Planning, 30, 394-399.
Simons, H. (2006). Ethics in evaluation. In I. F. Shaw, J. C. Greene, & M. M. Mark,(eds). Handbook of evaluation: Policies, programs and practice. (pp.243-265). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Smith, N. L. (1985). Some characteristics of moral problems in evaluation practice. Evaluation and Program Planning, 8, 5-11.
Societe Francaise de l’Evaluation(SFE).(2003). Charter of evaluation guiding principles for public policies and programmes. May 2, 2006. Retrieved on http://www.sfe.asso.fr.
Sonnichsen, R. C. (2000). High impact internal evaluation. A practitioners guide to evaluating and consulting inside organizations. London: Sage.
Stake, R. (1998). When policy is merely promotion, by what ethic lives an evaluator?. Studies in Educational Evaluation. 24(2), 203-212.
Stufflebeam, D. L., & Shinkfield, A. J. (1985). Systematic evaluation: A self-instructional guide to theory and practice. Boston: Kluwer-Nijhoff.
Teddlie, C., & Reynolds, D. (Eds.) (2000). The international handbook of school effectiveness research. London: Falmer.
Torres, R. T., & Preskill, H. (1999). Ethical dimensions of stake holder participation and evaluation use. New Directions for Evaluation, 82, 57-66.
Turner, D. (2003). Evaluation Ethics and Quality: Results of a Survey of Australasian Evaluation Society Members. Retrieved September 10, 2006, from http://www.aes.asn.au/about/ethics_survey_summary.pdf
UK Evaluation Society. (2003). UK Evaluation Society good practice guidelines. Retrieved: May, 23, 2005 On http://www.evaluation.org.uk/ pub_library/good_practice.htm.