期刊專區/ Periodical Section

教師運用動態幾何軟體之研究：以科技接受、成長需求與教學優使性為探究因素

Technology Acceptance, Growth Needs, and Pedagogical Usability as Factors Influencing Teachers’ Perceptions about the Use of Geometer’s Sketchpad Software

所屬期刊：	第16卷第2期 主編：國立政治大學師資培育中心教授 陳幼慧
系統編號：	vol061_04
主題：	課程與教學
出版年份：	2020
作者：	黃仲楷；鄭章華；張景媛；林俊佑
作者(英文)：	Chung-Kai Huang；Chang-Hua Chen；Ching-Yuan Chang；Chun-Yu Lin
論文名稱：	教師運用動態幾何軟體之研究：以科技接受、成長需求與教學優使性為探究因素
論文名稱(英文)：	Technology Acceptance, Growth Needs, and Pedagogical Usability as Factors Influencing Teachers’ Perceptions about the Use of Geometer’s Sketchpad Software
共同作者：
最高學歷：
校院名稱：
系所名稱：
語文別：
論文頁數：	39
中文關鍵字：	動態幾何軟體；教學優使性；科技接受；成長需求
英文關鍵字：	geometry sketchpad software, pedagogical usability, technology acceptance, growth needs
服務單位：
稿件字數：	12000
作者專長：
投稿日期：	2019/4/9
論文下載：
摘要(中文)：	本研究主要探討臺灣中學數學科教師使用動態幾何軟體的影響因素，針對科技接受程度與教學優使性進行評量，除了科技相關的因素考量之外，我們亦將教師的成長需求納入研究架構中。在回顧相關教學設計與優化理論之後，我們使用了問卷填答與一系列的任務活動，測量數學教師對動態幾何軟體的使用回饋。共有124位中學數學科教師填答了科技接受調查問卷，另有24位教師參與了情境與任務導向的優化性測試。根據研究問題與結果，本研究之發現不僅可提供數學教學實務者參考，並且針對強化使用者為中心的設計功能進行建議，亦對教師專業成長需求進行相關探討。
摘要(英文)：	In this study, teachers’ level of acceptance of current technology, and the pedagogical usability of the dynamic geometry sketchpad (GSP) software, were evaluated for their utility in the teaching of secondary geometry in Taiwan. Here the incorporation of multi-faceted technological factors was considered along with teachers’ growth needs. Relevant instructional designs and usability testing theories were used to develop a survey and a series of tasks, in order to elicit follow-up responses from Taiwanese mathematics teachers. This generic, technology-acceptance-based survey was completed by 124 secondary school mathematics teachers, and 24 secondary school mathematics teachers were invited to participate in the testing of specific context- and task-based pedagogical usability. The findings naturally led to further questions regarding the user-centered design of the GSP software’s functions, as well as mathematics teachers’ growth needs in terms of their professional development.
參考文獻：	Abdullah, A. H., Surif, J., Ibrahim, N. H., Ali, M., & Hamzah, M. H. (2014). The development of MyGSP: An online resource for teaching mathematics based on Geometer’s Sketchpad (GSP). Asian Social Science, 10(22), 227-240. doi:10.5539/ass.v10n22p227 Ajzen, I., & Fishbein, M. (1980). Understanding attitudes and predicting social behavior. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall. Akayuure, P., & Apawu, J. (2015). Examining mathematical task and pedagogical usability of web contents authored by prospective mathematics teachers. International Journal of Research in Education and Science, 1(2), 101-110. doi:10.21890/ijres.69649 Albion, P. R., Tondeur, J., Forkosh-Baruch, A., & Peeraer, J. (2015). Teachers’ professional development for ICT integration: Towards a reciprocal relationship between research and practice. Education and Information Technologies, 20(4), 655-673. Al-Emran, M., Mezhuyev, V., & Kamaludin, A. (2018). Technology acceptance model in M-learning context: A systematic review. Computers & Education, 125, 389-412. doi: 10.10 16/j.compedu.2018.01.003 An, Y. J., & Reigeluth, C. (2011). Creating technology-enhanced, learner-centered classrooms: K–12 teachers’ beliefs, perceptions, barriers, and support needs. Journal of Digital Learning in Teacher Education, 28(2), 54-62. doi: 10.1080/21532974.2011.10784681 Bakar, K. A., Tarmizi, R. A., Ayub, A. F. M., & Yunus, A. S. M. (2009). Effect of utilizing Geometer’s Sketchpad on performance and mathematical thinking of secondary mathematics learners: An initial exploration. International Journal of Education and Information Technologies, 3(1), 20-27. Baron, R. M., & Kenny, D. A. (1986). The moderator–mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51(6), 1173–1182. Baylor, A. L., & Ritchie, D. (2002). What factors facilitate teacher skill, teacher morale, and perceived student learning in technology-using classrooms?. Computers & Education, 39(4), 395-414. doi: 10.1016/S0360-1315(02)00075-1 Belbase, S. (2015). A preservice mathematics teacher’s beliefs about teaching mathematics with technology. International Journal of Research in Education and Science, 1(1), 31-44. Calisir, F., Altin Gumussoy, C., Bayraktaroglu, A. E., & Karaali, D. (2014). Predicting the intention to use a web-based learning system: Perceived content quality, anxiety, perceived system quality, image, and the technology acceptance model. Human Factors and Ergonomics in Manufacturing & Service Industries, 24(5), 515-531. doi: 10.1002/hf m.20548 Chan, K. K., & Leung, S. W. (2014). Dynamic geometry software improves mathematical achievement: Systematic review and meta-analysis. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 51(3), 311-325. doi:10.2190/EC.51.3.c Cheng, Y.-H., Chen, J.-C. & Hsu, H.-Y. (2017). Junior high school students conjecture geometric properties in a dynamic geometry software environment. Taiwan Journal of Mathematics Education, 4(1), 1- 34. doi: 10.6278/tjme.20170317.001 Chou, C.-Y., & Lu, L. (2014). Exploring the attitude differentiation on e-Learning systems based on TAM: The strength of growth need as a moderator. Journal of Information Management, 21(1), 83-105. Christou, C., Mousoulides, N., Pittalis, M., & Pitta-Pantazi, D. (2004). Proofs through exploration in dynamic geometry environments. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 2(3), 339-352. Chuang, H.-H., Weng, C.-Y., & Huang, F.-C. (2015). A structure equation model among factors of teachers technology integration practice and their TPCK. Computers & Education, 86, 182-191. doi: 10.1016/j.compedu.2015.03.016 Clark, A. K., & Whetstone, P. (2014). The impact of an online tutoring program on mathematics achievement. The Journal of Educational Research, 107(6), 462-466. doi: 1 0.1080/00220 671.2013.833075 Davis, F. D. (1989). Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Quarterly, 13(3), 319-340. doi: 10.2307/249008 Davis, F. D., Bagozzi, R. P., & Warshaw, P. R. (1989). User acceptance of computer technology: A comparison of two theoretical models. Management Science, 35(8), 982-1003. doi: 10.1287/mnsc.35.8.982 Feille, K. K., Nettles, J. R., & Weinburgh, M. H. (2018). Silhouettes of development: A tool for understanding the needs and growth of science teachers. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 29(1), 30-45. doi: 10.1080/1046560X.2017.1422644 Fishbein, M. & Ajzen, I. (1975). Belief, attitude, intention and behaviour: An introduction to theory and research. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley. Fornell, C., & Larcker, D. F. (1981). Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. Journal of Marketing Research, 18(1), 39-50. doi: 10.2 307/3151312 Furner, J. M., & Marinas, C. A. (2007). Geometry sketching software for elementary children: Easy as 1, 2, 3. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science & Technology Education, 3(1), 83-91. Hackman, J. R., & Lawler, E. E. (1971). Employee reactions to job characteristics. Journal of Applied Psychology, 55(3), 259-286. doi: 10.1037/h0031152 Hair, J. F., Black, W. C., Babin, B. J., & Anderson, R. E. (2010). Multivariate data analysis. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall. Hanna, G. (2000). Proof, explanation and exploration: An overview. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 44(1-2), 5-23. Hannafin, R. D., Burruss, J. D., & Little, C. (2001). Learning with dynamic geometry programs: Perspectives of teachers and learners. The Journal of Educational Research, 94(3), 132-144. doi: 10.1080/00220670109599911 Harel, G., & Sowder, L. (2007). Toward comprehensive perspectives of the learning and teaching of proof. In F. K. Lester Jr. (Ed.), Second handbook of research on mathematics teaching and learning (pp. 805-842). Charlotte, NC: Information Age Publishing. Hollebrands, K. F. (2007). The role of a dynamic software program for geometry in the strategies high school mathematics students employ. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 38(2), 164-192. doi:10.2307/30034955 Holmes, V. L., & Hwang, Y. (2016). Exploring the effects of project-based learning in secondary mathematics education. The Journal of Educational Research, 109(5), 449-463. doi: 10.1080/00220671.2014.979911 Hooper, D., Coughlan, J., & Mullen, M. (2008). Structural equation modelling: Guidelines for determining model fit. The Electronic Journal of Business Research Methods, 6(1), 52-60. doi: 10.21427/D7CF7R Hoyles, C., & Noss, R. (1994). Dynamic geometry environments: Whats the point? Mathematics Teacher, 87, 716-717. Huang, C. K., Hsin, C. O. & Chiu, C. H. (2010). Evaluating CSL/CFL website usability: A user-center approach design. Journal of Educational Multimedia and Hypermedia, 19 (2), 177-210. Hsu, H. Y., & Edward, A. S. (2014). Cognitive complexity of mathematics instructional tasks in a Taiwanese classroom: An examination of task sources. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 45(4), 460-496. doi:10.5951/jresematheduc.45.4.0460 Jones, K. (2000). Providing a foundation for deductive reasoning: Students’ interpretations when using dynamic geometry software and their evolving mathematical explanations. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 44, 55-85. Joo, Y. J., So, H. J., & Kim, N. H. (2018). Examination of relationships among students self-determination, technology acceptance, satisfaction, and continuance intention to use K-MOOCs. Computers & Education, 122, 260-272. doi: 10.1016/j.compedu.2018.01.003 Joubert, M. (2013). Using digital technologies in mathematics teaching: Developing an understanding of the landscape using three “grand challenge” themes. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 82(3), 341-359. Jr. Hair, J. F., Black, W. C., Babin, B. J., & Anderson, R. E. (2014). Multivariate data analysis (7th ed.). Essex, UK: Pearson Education. Karaku?, F., & Peker, M. (2015). The effects of dynamic geometry software and physical manipulatives on pre-service primary teachers’ van Hiele levels and spatial abilities. Turkish Journal of Computer and Mathematics Education, 6(3), 338-365. doi:10.16949/t urcomat.31338 Kaufmann, H., & Schmalstieg, D. (2003). Mathematics and geometry education with collaborative augmented reality. Computers & Graphics, 27(3), 339-345. doi:10.1016/S0 097-8493(0 3)00028-1 Knapp, A. K., Barrett, J. E., & Moore, C. J. (2016). Prompting teacher geometric reasoning through coaching in a dynamic geometry software context. School Science and Mathematics, 116(6), 326-337. doi:10.1111/ssm.12184 Knuth, E. J., & Elliot, R. (1998). Characterizing students’ understandings of mathematical proofs. Mathematics Teacher, 91(8), 714-717. Kong, S. C., Chan, T.-W., Huang, R., & Cheah, H. M. (2014). A review of e-learning policy in school education in Singapore, Hong Kong, Taiwan, and Beijing: Implications to future policy planning. Journal of Computers in Education, 1(2-3), 187-212. doi: 10.1007/s4069 2-014-0011-0 Koyuncu, I., Akyuz, D., & Cakiroglu, E. (2015). Investigating plane geometry problem-solving strategies of prospective mathematics teachers in technology and paper-and-pencil environments. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 13(4), 837-862. Lee, D. Y., & Lehto, M. R. (2013). User acceptance of YouTube for procedural learning: An extension of the technology acceptance model. Computers & Education, 61, 193-208. doi: 10.1016/j.compedu.2012.10.001 Lehrer, R., & Chazan, D. (2012). Designing learning environments for developing understanding of geometry and space. Mahwah, NJ: Routledge. Leikin, R., & Grossman, D. (2013). Teachers modify geometry problems: From proof to investigation. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 82(3), 515-531.doi: 10.1007/s10649-0 12-9460-4 Lennex, L., & Nettleton, K. F. (2012). Cases on inquiry through instructional technology in math and science. Hershey, PA: IGI Global. Leong, K. E. (2013). Impact of geometers sketchpad on students achievement in graph functions. Malaysian Online Journal of Educational Technology, 1(2), 19-33. MacCallum, R. C., Browne, M. W., & Sugawara, H. M. (1996). Power analysis and determination of sample size for covariance structure modeling. Psychological Methods, 1(2), 130-149. doi: 10.1037/1082-989X.1.2.130 McLeod, J., Vasinda, S., & Dondlinger, M. J. (2012). Conceptual visibility and virtual dynamics in technology-scaffolded learning environments for conceptual knowledge of mathematics. Journal of Computers in Mathematics and Science Teaching, 31(3), 283-310. Mertens, D. M. (2014). Research and evaluation in education and psychology: Integrating diversity with quantitative, qualitative, and mixed methods. Thousands Oak, CA: Sage Publications. Mishra, P., & Koehler, M. (2006). Technological pedagogical content knowledge: A framework for integrating technology in teacher knowledge. Teachers College Record, 108(6), 1017-1054. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9620.2006.00684.x Motaghian, H., Hassanzadeh, A., & Moghadam, D. K. (2013). Factors affecting university instructors adoption of web-based learning systems: Case study of Iran. Computers & Education, 61, 158-167. doi: 10.1016/j.compedu.2012.09.016 Mumtaz, S. (2000). Factors affecting teachers use of information and communications technology: A review of the literature. Journal of Information Technology for Teacher Education, 9(3), 319-342. doi:10.1080/14759390000200096 Nielsen, J., & Landauer, T. K. (1993). A mathematical model of the finding of usability problems. Paper presented at the Proceedings of ACM INTERCHI93 Conference, Amsterdam, The Netherlands. Niess, M. L. (2011). Investigating TPACK: Knowledge growth in teaching with technology. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 44(3), 299-317. doi: 10.2190/EC.44.3.c Nokelainen, P. (2006). An empirical assessment of pedagogical usability criteria for digital learning material with elementary school students. Journal of Educational Technology & Society, 9(2), 178-197. Nordin, N., Zakaria, E., Mohamed, N. R. N., & Embi, M. A. (2010). Pedagogical usability of the Geometers Sketchpad (GSP) digital module in the mathematics teaching. The Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology, 9(4), 113-117. Okumu?, S., Lewis, L., Wiebe, E., & Hollebrands, K. (2016). Utility and usability as factors influencing teacher decisions about software integration. Educational Technology Research and Development, 64(6), 1227-1249. doi:10.1007/s11423-016-9455-4 Olive, J. (2013). Dynamic and interactive mathematics learning environments: Opportunities and challenges for future research. Mevlana International Journal of Education, 3(3), 8-24. doi: 10.13054/mije.si.2013.02 Olkun, S., Sinoplu, N. B., & Deryakulu, D. (2009). Geometric explorations with dynamic geometry applications based on van Hiele levels. Coleccion Digital Eudoxus, 1(2). Retrieved from http://www.cimm.ucr.ac.cr/ojs/index.php/eudoxus/article/view/97/92 Ottenbreit-Leftwich, A. T., Glazewski, K. D., Newby, T. J., & Ertmer, P. A. (2010). Teacher value beliefs associated with using technology: Addressing professional and student needs. Computers & Education, 55(3), 1321-1335. doi: 10.1016/j.compedu.2010.06.002 Padilla-MeleNdez, A., Del Aguila-Obra, A. R., & Garrido-Moreno, A. (2013). Perceived playfulness, gender differences and technology acceptance model in a blended learning scenario. Computers & Education, 63, 306-317. doi: 10.1016/j.compedu.2012.12.014 Podsakoff, P. M., MacKenzie, S. B., Lee, J.-Y., & Podsakoff, N. P. (2003). Common method biases in behavioral research: A critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88(5), 879. doi: 10.1037/0021-9010.88.5.879 Potter, S. L., & Rockinson?Szapkiw, A. J. (2012). Technology integration for instructional improvement: The impact of professional development. Performance Improvement, 51(2), 22-27. doi: 10.1002/pfi.21246 Ross, J. A., & Bruce, C. D. (2007). Teacher self-assessment: A mechanism for facilitating professional growth. Teaching and Teacher Education, 23(2), 146-159. doi: 10.1016/j.tat e.2006.04.035 Serra, M. (2015). Discovering geometry. Dubuque, IA: Kendall Hunt. Sheehan, M., & Nillas, L. (2010). Technology integration in secondary mathematics classrooms: Effect on students’ understanding. Journal of Technology Integration in the Classroom, 2(3), 67–83. Sinclair, N., & Jackiw, N. (2010). Modeling practices with the Geometer’s Sketchpad. In R. Lesh, P. L. Galbraith, C. R. Haines, & A. Hurford (Eds.), Modeling students mathematical modeling competencies (pp. 541-554). New York, NY: Springer. Sinclair, N., & Robutti, O. (2013). Technology and the role of proof: The case of dynamic geometry. In A. Bishop, M. A. Clements, C. Keitel, J. Kilpatrick, & F. Leung (Eds.), Third international handbook of mathematics education (pp. 571–596). New York, NY: Springer. Stols, G. (2007). Designing mathematical-technological activities for teachers using the technology acceptance model. Pythagoras, (65), 10-17. doi: 10.4102/pythagoras.v0i65.86 Teo, T. (2009). Evaluating the intention to use technology among student teachers: A structural equation modeling approach. International Journal of Technology in Teaching and Learning, 5(2), 106-118. Teo, T., & van Schaik, P. (2012). Understanding the intention to use technology by preservice teachers: An empirical test of competing theoretical models. International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction, 28(3), 178-188. doi: 10.1080/10447318.2011.581892 Teoh, B. T., & Fong, S. F. (2005). The effects of Geometer’s Sketchpad and graphic calculator in the Malaysian mathematics classroom. Malaysian Online Journal of Instructional Technology, 2(2), 82-96. The International Commission on Mathematical Instruction. (1995). Perspectives on the teaching of geometry for the 21st century. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 28(1), 91-98. Tso, T.-Y. (2012). The conceptual tool in dynamic geometry system. Secondary Education, 63(4), 6 -15. doi: 10.6249/SE.2012.63.4.01 Venkatesh, V., Brown, S. A., & Bala, H. (2013). Bridging the qualitative-quantitative divide: Guidelines for conducting mixed methods research in information systems. MIS Quarterly, 37(1), 21-54. doi: 10.25300/MISQ/2013/37.1.02 Wachira, P., & Keengwe, J. (2011). Technology integration barriers: Urban school mathematics teachers perspectives. Journal of Science Education & Technology, 20(1), 17-25. doi: 10.1007/s10956-010-9230-y Ware, J., & Stein, S. (2014). Teachers’ critical evaluations of dynamic geometry software implementation in 1: 1 classrooms. Computers in the Schools, 31(3), 134-153. doi: 10.108 0/07380569.2014.931779 Watson, D. (1992). Correcting for acquiescent response bias in the absence of a balanced scale. Sociological Methods & Research, 21(1), 52-88. doi:10.1177/0049124192021001003 Wong, K.-T., Osman, R. B., Goh, P. S. C., & Rahmat, M. K. (2013). Understanding student teachers’ behavioural intention to use technology: Technology acceptance model (TAM) validation and testing. International Journal of Instruction, 6(1), 89-104. Zhang, L., & Jiao, J. (2013). A study on effective hybrid math teaching strategies. International Journal of Innovation and Learning, 13(4), 451-466. doi:10.1504/ijil.2013.054239