實施翻轉教室對學習者學習成效影響之統合分析: 臺灣與中國大陸樣本的分析與比較
Meta-Analysis of Studies on the Effect of Flipped Classroom Models on Students’ Learning Outcomes: Analysis and Comparison of Samples from Taiwan and China
黃寶園;常雅珍
Bao-Yuan Huang;Ya-Jane Chaung
Doi:10.6925/SCJ.202206_18(2).0001
Bao-Yuan Huang;Ya-Jane Chaung
Doi:10.6925/SCJ.202206_18(2).0001
所屬期刊: |
第18卷第2期 主編:國立臺灣師範大學教育學系教授 周愚文 |
---|---|
系統編號: | vol069_01 |
主題: | 測驗與評量 |
出版年份: | 2022 |
作者: | 黃寶園;常雅珍 |
作者(英文): | Bao-Yuan Huang;Ya-Jane Chaung |
論文名稱: | 實施翻轉教室對學習者學習成效影響之統合分析: 臺灣與中國大陸樣本的分析與比較 |
論文名稱(英文): | Meta-Analysis of Studies on the Effect of Flipped Classroom Models on Students’ Learning Outcomes: Analysis and Comparison of Samples from Taiwan and China |
共同作者: | |
最高學歷: | |
校院名稱: | |
系所名稱: | |
語文別: | 中文 |
論文頁數: | 50 |
中文關鍵字: | 翻轉教室;學習成效;統合分析;效果量;臺灣與中國大陸 |
英文關鍵字: | flipped classroom;learning effect;meta-analysis;effect size;Taiwan and China |
服務單位: | |
稿件字數: | 28169 |
作者專長: | |
投稿日期: | 2021/12/28 |
論文下載: | |
摘要(中文): | 本研究旨在使用統合分析法,分析臺灣與中國大陸實施翻轉教室對學習者學習成效之影響及二者之差異。本研究經資料蒐集與篩選後,計納入24篇及38篇臺灣與中國大陸之期刊研究報告,總參與者為5,005人,隨後以Comprehensive Meta-Analysis(CMA)軟體進行資料分析,分析過程採隨機效果模式並以 Hedges’s g值為效果量,過程中也進行出版偏誤的分析。研究結果顯示:全體樣本、臺灣樣本與中國大陸樣本之翻轉教室實施成效之加權平均效果量分別為0.8238、0.8448、0.8113,三者皆為高等程度的有效效果量,表示不論是全體或是於臺灣或中國大陸實施翻轉教室,均能正向有效地提升學習者的學習成就,且達到高度的效果,此效果在臺灣與中國大陸之間並無顯著不同。藉由本研究結果可知,對學習者實施翻轉教室將能提升其學習成效,此結果可供各教育工作者實施翻轉教室之參考。 |
摘要(英文): | This study analyzed and compared the effect of the flipped classroom model on students’ learning outcomes in Taiwan and China. A meta-analysis was performed on 25 and 38 research reports from Taiwanese and Chinese journals, a total of 63 research papers were included in the meta-analysis (5053 participants). The meta-analysis was performed using Comprehensive Meta-Analysis (CMA) software and involved a random effects model as well as Hedges’s g values as a measure of effect size. Publication bias among the included studies was also analyzed. The weighted mean effect sizes of the flipped classroom model in the entire sample, the Taiwanese sample, and the Chinese sample were 0.8254, 0.8478 and 0.8113, respectively, indicating that the flipped classroom model can improve students’ learning outcomes in Taiwan and China, with no significant differences between the two. The results of this study may serve as reference for educators deciding whether and how to implement a flipped classroom model. |
參考文獻: | 卜彩麗、孔素真(2016)。現狀與反思:國內翻轉課堂研究評述。中國遠程教育,2,26-33。 卜彩麗、張寶輝(2016)。國外翻轉課堂研究熱點、主題與發展趨勢——基於共詞分析的知識圖譜研究。外國教育研究,43(9),93-106。 牛道慧(2017)。翻轉教學——以大學通識課程「西洋文明故事」為例的探討。臺灣教育評論月刊,6,78-89。http://www.ater.org.tw/journal/article/6-6/free/08.pdf 王豐緒(2019)。翻轉教室中預習教材形式對學生預習投入與學習成效的影響。教學實踐與創新,2(2),115-138。https://doi.org/10.3966/261654492019090202004 余惠娥、鄭永熏(2018)。國小四年級生YouTube融入翻轉教室對自然與生活科技領域學習成效之影響。教育傳播與科技研究,118,1-14。https://doi.org/10.6137/RECT.201806_118.0001 呂明英(2017)。翻轉教室學習成效之後設分析(碩士論文,中原大學)。臺灣碩博士論文知識加值系統。https://hdl.handle.net/11296/54ycbt 李彤彤、龐麗、王志軍(2018)。翻轉課堂教學對學生學習效果的影響研究。課程與教學,301,99-107。https://doi.org/10.13811/j.cnki.err.2018.05.015 李金城(2017)。翻轉課堂教學效果研究。設計藝術研究,7(1),120-128。 李政亮(2015)。中國教科書中的民族主義型構。臺灣國際研究季刊,11(2),159-175。http://www.tisanet.org/quarterly/11-2-8.pdf 李茂能(2015)。傳統整合分析理論與實務:ESS & EXCEL。五南。 岳麗(2016)。翻轉課堂本土化的反思。山西青年,21,77-78。 林佳蓉(2016)。翻轉學習的迷思與成功關鍵探討。教育研究月刊,261,32-45。https://doi.org/10.3966/168063602016010261003 林穎佑(2016)。中國近期網路作為探討:從控制到攻擊。台灣國際研究季刊,12(3),51-68。http://www.tisanet.org/quarterly/12-3-3.pdf 侯麗雪、趙磊磊(2016)。翻轉課堂在我國中小學課程教學中的應用。課程整合,2015(7),11-12。 洪駿命(2019)。翻轉學習對國小學生自然科學學習成效之影響。教育研究月刊,301,20-35。https://doi.org/10.3966/168063602019050301002 胡至沛、周玉琳(2019)。國民小學低年級硬筆書法教學之探討:BTS翻轉教室的實踐與觀察。中國行政評論,25(3),52-96。 容梅、彭雪紅(2015)。翻轉課堂的歷史、現狀及實踐策略探析。中國電化教育,342,108-115。 高俊虹(2016)。翻轉課堂的內涵解讀與發展研究。中國成人教育,15,96-98。 常培文(2015)。從E-learning到慕課教學模式的變革。長沙大學學報,29(1),139-141。 張佑誠、陳子威、林如瀚(2020)。翻轉教學對大專籃球課程之學生技能表現的影響。嘉大體育健康休閒期刊,19(1),27-39。https://doi.org/10.6169/NCYUJPEHR.202006_19(1).03 陳怡、趙呈領(2014)。基於翻轉課堂模式的教學設計及應用研究。現代教育技術,27(2),49-54。https://doi.org/10.6169/10.3969/j.issn.1009-8097.2014.02.007 曾釋嫻、蔡秉燁 (2015)。翻轉課堂教學與傳統教學對大學生學習策略之差異研究。雙溪教育論壇,3,1-19。 ?小芳(2016)。"翻轉課堂"在中國本土實踐教學中的應用研究。科教文匯,2016(31),28-29。 黃奕碩(2005)。教科書開放之探究。教育研究,13,105-114。 黃政傑(2014)。翻轉教室的理念、問題與展望。臺灣教育評論月刊,3,161-186。http://www.ater.org.tw/教評月刊/臺評月刊第三卷第十二期網路公告版/007.%20臺灣教育評論月刊第三卷第12期「學歷通膨」專論文章.pdf 黃振豊(2017)。透過磨課師優化偏鄉教育。教育研究學報,51(2),71-94。https://doi.org/10.3966/199044282017105102004 黃國禎、伍柏翰、朱蕙君、葉丙成、楊韶雄、許庭嘉、王秀鶯、洪駿命(2016)。翻轉教室:理論、策略與實務。高等教育。 黃淑汝(2018)。關於翻轉教學,我們需要思考的那些事。臺灣教育評論月刊,7(8),9-12。http://www.ater.org.tw/journal/article/7-8/topic/03.pdf 黃琰、蔣玲、黃磊(2014)。翻轉課堂在現代教育技術實驗教學中的應用研究。中國電化教育,327,87-94。 楊九民、邵明杰、?磊(2013)。基于微視頻資源的翻轉課堂在實驗教學中的應用研究——以現代教育技術實驗課程為例。現代教育技術,23(10),36-40。https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1009-8097.2013.10.007 楊曉宏、黨建寧(2014)。翻轉課堂教學模式本土化策略研究。中國電化教育,334,101-110。 葉璟、劉超男(2016)。基於微信及微信公眾平台的翻轉課堂教學模式研究。大學教育。2016(3),33-35。 廖玉鈴、林素微(2020)。利用合作學習教學策略提升偏鄉小校國小二年級學童數學學習之探討。臺灣數學教師,41(2),22-43。https://doi.org/10.6610/TJMT.202010_41(2).0002 廖婉雯(2018)。以學習者中心模式發展國際教育融入綜合活動領域之行動研究──以「小小地球村」為例。教育理論與實踐學刊,38,71-97。https://doi.org/10.7038/JETP.201812_(38).0004 劉怡甫(2014)。從翻轉課堂擅場看現代培訓發展之因應。T&D飛訊,201,1-33。https://ws.csptc.gov.tw/Download.ashx?u=LzAwMS9VcGxvYWQvNy9yZWxmaWxlLzEyMjIwLzIzMjgwLzNhZDRmYmU0LWRlOWUtNGNkZS1iN2QzLWNlZjUzYzhhNTNhNC5wZGY%3d&n=MmRhZGQzYjc1MGM2YWRkOTUyZjllYzlkZTAxMDdmM2YucGRm&icon=.pdf 劉許燕、王天平(2018)。美國翻轉課堂發展脈絡及其啟示。課程教學研究,2018(5),19-22。 潘奕叡、吳明隆(2016)。翻轉教室的理論與實務。五南。 蔡瑞君(2016)。不轉不行?從一個平凡小學教室之「翻轉教室」經驗省思科技翻轉教育的意義。教育研究月刊,261,82-99。https://doi.org/10.3966/168063602016010261006 戴文雄、王裕德、王瑞、陳嘉苓(2016)。翻轉教學式合作學習對生活科技實作課程學習成效影響之研究。科學教育學刊,24,57-88。https://doi.org/10.6173/CJSE.2016.2401.03 鍾昌宏、王國華(2015)。別被影片綁架了-逆向的翻轉教室課程設計。中等教育,66,69-87。https://doi.org/10.6249/SE.2015.65.2.05 羅寶鳳(2016)。學教翻轉:翻轉課堂的課程與教學。課程與教學,19,1-21。https://doi.org/10.6384/CIQ.201610_19(4).0001 邊婧(2017)。美國翻轉課堂教學模式的優勢與製約因素。他山之石,12,74-76。 嚴銘政、黃寶園(2019)。翻轉教室對國中小學生學習成效影響之統合分析。教育心理學報,51(1),23-50。https://doi.org/10.6251/BEP.201909_51(1).0002 Balzotti, J. M., & McCool, L. B. (2016). Using digital learning platforms to extend the flipped classroom. Business and Professional Communication Quarterly, 79(1), 68-80. https://doi.org/10.1177/2329490615606497 Begg, C. B., & Mazumdar, M. (1994). Operating characteristics of a rank correlation test for publication bias. Biometrics, 50(4), 1088-1101. https://doi.org/10.2307/2533446 Bergmann, J., & Sams, A. A. (2012). Flip your classroom: Reach every student in every class every day. ISTE/ASCD. Bergmann, J., & Sams, A. A. (2014). Flipped learning: Gateway to student engagement. ISTE/ASCD. Borenstein, M., Hedges, L. V., Higgins, J. P. T., & Rothstein, H. R. (2009). Introduction to meta-analysis. John Wiley & Sons. Cabi, E. (2018). The impact of the flipped classroom model on students’ academic achievement. International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 19(3), 202-221. https://doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.v19i3.3482 Ceylaner, S. G., & Karakus, F. (2018). Effects of the flipped classroom model on students’ self-directed learning readiness and attitudes towards the English course. English Language Teaching, 11(9), 129-143. https://doi.org/10.5539/elt.v11n9p129 Chen, K., Monrouxe, L., Lu, Y., Jenq, C., Chang, Y., Chang, Y., & Chai, P. Y. (2018). Academic outcomes of flipped classroom learning: A meta?analysis. Medical Education, 52(9), 910-924. https://doi.org/10.1111/medu.13616 Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. Cukurbasi, B., & Kiyici, M. (2018). High school students’ views on the PBL activities supported via flipped classroom and LEGO practices. Educational Technology & Society, 21(2), 46-61. Durak, H. Y. (2018). Flipped learning readiness in teaching programming in middle schools: Modelling its relation to various variables. J Comp Assist Learn, 34, 939-959. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcal.12302 Duval, S., & Tweedie, R. (2000). Trim and fill: A simple funnel-plot-based method of testing and adjusting for publication bias in meta?analysis. Biometrics, 56(2), 455-463. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0006-341x.2000.00455.x Foldnes, N. (2016). The flipped classroom and cooperative learning: Evidence from a randomised experiment. Active Learning in Higher Education, 17(1), 39-49. https://doi.org/10.1177/1469787415616726 Fulton, K. (2012). Upside down and inside out: Flip your classroom to improve student learning. Learning & Leading with Technology, 39(8), 12-17. Gillette, C., Rudolph, M., Kimble, C., Rockich-Winston, N., Smith, L., & Broedel-Zaugg, K. (2018). A Meta-Analysis of outcomes comparing flipped classroom and lecture. American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education, 82(5), 433-440. https://doi.org/10.5688/ajpe6898 Glass, G. V., McGaw, B., & Smith, M. L. (1981). Meta-analysis in social research. Sage. Hedges, L. V. (1981). Distribution theory for Glass’s estimator of effect size and related estimators. Journal of Educational Statistics, 6(2), 107-128. https://doi.org/10.2307/1164588 Jang, H. Y., & Kim, H. J. (2020). A Meta-analysis of the cognitive, affective, and interpersonal outcomes of flipped classrooms in higher education. Education Sciences, 10(4). https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci10040115 Khan, R. N., & Watson, R. (2018). The flipped classroom with tutor support: An experience in a level one statistics unit. Journal of University Teaching and Learning Practice, 15(3), Article 3. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1192172.pdf Kong, S. C. (2015). An experience of a three-year study on the development of critical thinking skills in flipped secondary classrooms with pedagogical and technological support. Computers & Education, 89, 16-31. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2015.08.017 Lai, C., & Hwang, G. (2016). A self-regulated flipped classroom approach to improving students’ learning performance in a mathematics course. Computers & Education, 100, 126-140. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2016.05.006 Li, B. Z., Cao, N. W., Ren, C. X., Chu, X. J., Zhou, H. Y., & Guo, B. (2020). Flipped classroom improves nursing students’ theoretical learning in China: A meta-analysis. PLoS ONE, 15(8), 1-17. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0237926 Nielsen, L. (2012). Five reasons I’m not flipping over the flipped classroom. Technology & Learning, 32(10), 46-46. Rosenthal, R. (1991). Meta-analytic procedures for social research. Sage. Saglam, D., & Arslan, A. (2018). The effect of flipped classroom on the academic achievement and attitude of higher education students. World Journal of Education, 8(4), 170-176. https://doi.org/10.5430/wje.v8n4p170 Slavin, R. E., & Lake, C. (2008). Effective programs in elementary mathematics: A best-evidence synthesis. Review of Educational Research, 78(3), 427-515. https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654308317473 Soltanpour, F., & Valizadeh, M. (2018). A flipped writing classroom: Effects on EFL learners’ argumentative essays. Advances in Language and Literary Studies, 9(1), 5-13. https://doi.org/10.7575/aiac.alls.v.9n.1p.5 Sudarmika, P., Santyasa, I. W., & Divayana, D. G. H. (2020). Comparison between group discussion flipped classroom and lecture on student achievement and student characters. International Journal of Instruction, 13(3), 171-186. https://doi.org/10.29333/iji.2020.13312a Wagner, M., Gegenfurtner, A., & Urhahne, D. (2021). Effectiveness of the flipped classroom on student achievement in secondary education: A meta-analysis. Zeitschrift fur Padagogische Psychologie, 35(1), 11-31. https://doi.org/10.1024/1010-0652/a000274 Zainuddin, Z., & Halili, S. H. (2016). Flipped classroom research and trends from different fields of study. International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 17(3), 313-340. https://doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.v17i3.2274 Zangaro, G. A., & Soeken, K. L. (2007). A meta-analysis of studies of nurses’ job satisfaction. Res Nurs Health, 30(4), 445-58. https://doi.org/10.1002/nur.20202 Zheng, L., Bhagat, K. K., Zhen, Y., & Zhang, X. (2020). The effectiveness of the flipped classroom on students learning achievement and learning motivation: A meta-analysis. Journal of Educational Technology & Society, 23(1), 1-15. |
熱門期刊下載排行