期刊專區/ Periodical Section

從生活美學實踐家的實踐智慧探究國民中學美感素養導向課程與教學的取徑

Effects of Curriculum and Instruction Based on Aesthetic Competence and Life Aesthetics Practitioners’ Phronesis and Designed for Junior High School Students

所屬期刊：	第18卷第4期 主編：國立彰化師範大學教育研究所教授 龔心怡
系統編號：	vol071_02
主題：	課程與教學
出版年份：	2022
作者：	黃祺惠
作者(英文)：	Chi-Hui Huang
論文名稱：	從生活美學實踐家的實踐智慧探究國民中學美感素養導向課程與教學的取徑
論文名稱(英文)：	Effects of Curriculum and Instruction Based on Aesthetic Competence and Life Aesthetics Practitioners’ Phronesis and Designed for Junior High School Students
共同作者：
最高學歷：
校院名稱：
系所名稱：
語文別：	中文
論文頁數：	38
中文關鍵字：	108課綱；美感教育；生活美學實踐家；設計為本研究法；飲食課程
英文關鍵字：	2019 Curriculum Guidelines；aesthetic education；aesthetic life practitioners；design-based research；diet course
服務單位：	國家教育研究院課程及教學研究中心助理研究員
稿件字數：	23053
作者專長：
投稿日期：	2022/6/22
論文下載：
摘要(中文)：	美感教育是全人教育中重要的一環，十二年國教新課綱將美感素養納入核心素養中，如何透過課程發展，讓學生廣泛接觸多樣化的生活題材，並能轉化在生活中的行為與態度上的美感素養，是本研究所關切的課題。美感的內涵會隨著時空而變遷，需要融合社會、文化觀點與情境脈絡，透過「生活美學實踐家」的觀點來掌握美感落實於生活的取徑，遂成為進行美感教學設計的重要參著。本研究目的在透過訪談，探析四位生活美學實踐家（以飲食方面為例）的實踐智慧，據此設計飲食美感實驗課程並進行學生前、後測問卷調查，以提出美感素養導向課程與教學的取徑。本研究採「設計為本的研究法」，以新北市一所國中的兩個班級透過準實驗不等組前、後測設計進行教學成效檢核，結果顯示實驗組學生整體美感學習成效顯著高於對照組學生，具有大程度效果量，此外，本研究進一步就各子構念進行分析，也發現實驗組學生在美感三大面向與各類學習目標表現皆顯著高於對照組學生。最後，本研究提出未來相關課程實施與研究的建議。
摘要(英文)：	Aesthetic education is an important aspect of holistic education, and aesthetic competency is included in the core competencies of Curriculum Guidelines of 12-Year Basic Education. How students learn to perceive aesthetics in classes and transform it into aesthetic competency is what the researcher concerns about. The connotation of aesthetics changes with time and space, and needs to be integrated with social, cultural perspectives and context. The opinions of aesthetic life practitioners can help us realize the way how aesthetics is implemented in life, besides, they can also become models for students learning. The purpose of the study is to analyze the practical wisdom of life aesthetics practitioners （taking diet as an example）, design a diet aesthetics experimental course, and evaluate the learning effect accordingly. Two classes in a junior high school in New Taipei City were selected for quasi-experimental research. The design of the course adopts the "design-based research （DBR）" method. The questionnaires results showed that the performance of the experimental group was significantly better than the control group. In addition, further analysis was carried out according to each construct, including three aspects of aesthetic education and 4 learning objectives. Finally, the researcher makes some suggestions for implementation in the future.
參考文獻：	米高‧奎因‧巴頓（Patton, M. Q.）（1995）。質的評鑑與研究（吳芝儀、李奉儒， 譯）。桂冠。（原著出版年：1980） 李雅婷（2015）。學校日常生活之美育課程美感經驗探究（計畫編號：MOST 102- 2410-H-153-007）。行政院國家科學委員會。https://grbdef.stpi.narl.org.tw/fte/ download4?docId=2497529&responseCode=6735&grb05Id=3086345 亞太地區美感教育研究室（2018）。教育部第一期五年美感教育計畫影響評估報告。 教育部。 洪詠善、范信賢（2015）。同行～走進十二年國民基本教育課程綱要總綱。國家教 育研究院。 范信賢、洪詠善、阮凱利、黃祺惠、陳伯璋（2016）。美感教育的圖像與發展。載 於范信賢（主編），這樣美嗎？美感教育在臺灣（頁1-23）。國家教育研究院。 教育部（1979）。國民教育法。載於教育部國教司（編），國民教育法令彙編（頁 11-14）。 教育部（1992）。國民中學藝能科教學訪視與教師座談會報告。 許瑛玿、莊福泰、林祖強（2012）。解析設計研究的架構與實施：以科學教育研究 為例。教育科學研究期刊，57（1），1-27。https://doi.org/10.3966/2073753X2012035701001 郭秋汶（2021）。美感教育融入國小生活課程實踐之個案研究（碩士論文，國立臺 灣師範大學）。臺灣碩博士論文知識加值系統。https://hdl.handle.net/11296/n8rq5p 陳育淳（2021）。美力洋溢─跨領域美感校本課程之發展與省思。國際藝術教育 學刊，19（1），152-176。 陳瓊花（2017）。美感素養導向教學之理論與實踐。教育研究月刊，275，18-33。 https://doi.org/10.3966/168063602017030275002 喻薈融（2017）。中等學校跨領域美感課程教學案例之研究（碩士論文，國立臺灣 師範大學）。臺灣碩博士論文知識加值系統。https://hdl.handle.net/11296/28ptxs 馮至、范大燦（1989）。席勒審美教育書簡。淑馨。 黃書庭（2021）。節奏律動教學應用於生活課程提升美感學習成效之行動研究（碩 士論文，臺北市立大學）。臺灣碩博士論文知識加值系統。https://hdl.handle.net/11296/puza7f 楊深坑（1998）。美育與實踐智慧。通識教育季刊，5（1），123-136。https://doi.org/10.6745/JGE.199803_5(1).0009 漢寶德（2010）。如何培養美感。聯經。 歐用生（2003）。課程慎思與課程領導。載於中華民國教材研究發展學會（主編）， 邁向課程新紀元（十五）：活化課程領導（頁35-49）。中華民國教材研究發 展學會。 Amadio, M., Truong, N., & Tschurenev, J. (2006). Instructional time and the place of aesthetic education in school curricula at the beginning of the twenty-first century. IBE-UNESCO. http://www.ibe.unesco.org/sites/default/files/artseducation_ibewpci_1.pdf Anderson, L. W., Krathwohl, D. R., Airasian, P. W., Cruikshank, K. A., Mayer, R. E., Pintrich, P. R., Raths, J., & Wittrock, M. C. (2001). A taxonomy for learning, teaching, and assessing: A revision of Bloom’s taxonomy of educational objectives. Longman. Borghini, A., & Baldini, A. (2021). Cooking and dining as forms of public art. Food, Culture & Society, 25, 310-327. http://doi.org/10.1080/15528014.2021.1890891 Borghini, A., & Piras, N. (2022). Eating local as public art. Pratiche, Linguaggi E Saperi dell’estetico, 15(1), 15-27. http://doi.org/10.36253/Aisthesis-13449 Brown, A. L. (1992). Design experiments: Theoretical and methodological challenges in creating complex interventions in classroom settings. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 2(2), 141- 178. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327809jls0202_2 Clinard, J., & Foster, L. (1998). Putting art standards into practice with aesthetic literacy. NASSP Bulletin, 82(597), 18-24. https://doi.org/10.1177/019263659808259704 Cobb, P. (2001). Supporting the improvement of learning and teaching in social and institutional context. In S. Carver & D. Klahr (Eds.), Cognition and instruction: 25 years ofprogress (pp. 455-478). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. Collins, A., Joseph, D., & Bielaczyc, L. (2004). Design research: Theoretical and methodological Issues. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 13(1), 15-42. http://doi.org/10.1207/s15327809 jls1301_2 Dewey, J. (1916). Democracy and education: An introduction to the philosophy of education.MacMillan. Etikan, I., Alkassim, R., & Abubakar, S. (2016) Comparison of Snowball Sampling and Sequential Sampling Technique. Biometrics and Biostatistics International Journal, 3, 6-7. https:// doi.org/10.15406/bbij.2016.03.00055 Hu, L., & Bentler, P. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling, 6(1), 1-55. https://doi.org/10.1080/10705519909540118 Krathwohl, D. R., Bloom, B. S., & Bertram, B. M. (1973). Taxonomy of educational objectives: The classification of educational goals. David McKay. Latour, K. A., & Deighton, J. A. (2019). Learning to become a taste expert. Journal of Consumer Research, 46(1), 1-19. http://doi.org/10.1093/jcr/ucy054 Lazarsfeld, P., Berelson, B., & Gaudet, H. (1948). The people’s choice. Columbia University. Lopes, D. M. (2014). Beyond art. Oxford University. Lopes, D. M. (2015). Aesthetic experts, guides to value. Journal of Aesthetics & Art Criticism, 73(3), 235-246. https://doi.org/10.1111/jaac.12170 McDonald, R. P., & Ho, M. H. R. (2002). Principles and practice in reporting structural equation analyses. Psychological Methods, 7(1), 64-82. http://doi.org/10.1037/1082-989X.7.1.64 Mishler, E. G. (1986). Rsearch intervewing: Context and narrative. Havard University. Nautiyal, J. (2016). Aesthetic and affective experiences in coffee shops: A Deweyan engagement with ordinary affects in ordinary spaces. Education and Culture, 32(2), 99-118. https:// doi.org/10.5703/educationculture.32.2.0099 Organization of Economic Co-operation and Development. (2018). The future of education and skills 2030. Schroder, M. (2015). Competence-oriented study programmes. https://www.en-fibaa.org/fileadmin/uploads/content_uploads/13_Werkstatt_Kompetenzorientierung_Mai_2015_V3_en_01.pdf Schwab, J. J. (1973). The practical 3: Translation into curriculum. School Review, 81(4), 501-522. https://doi.org/10.1086/443100 Schwab, J. J. (1974). Decision and choice: The coming duty science teaching. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 11(4), 309-317. http://doi.org/10.1002/tea.3660110404 Schwab, J. J. (1978). The practical: A language for curriculum. In I. Westbury & N. J. Wilkof(Eds.), Science, curriculum, and liberal education: Selected essays (pp. 287-321). University of Chicago. (Original work published 1970) Simpson, E. J. (1972). The classification of educational objectives in the psychomotor domain:The psychomotor domain (Vol. 3). Gryphon House.