期刊專區/ Periodical Section

環境不正義之協商日常： 探討議題融入田野踏查課程模組之學習成效

Negotiating With Daily Life Amid Environmental Injustice: Exploring the Effects of Issue-Integrated Field Trip Modules on Learning Outcomes

所屬期刊：	第19卷第4期 主編：國立彰化師範大學教育研究所教授 龔心怡
系統編號：	vol075_03
主題：	課程與教學
出版年份：	2023
作者：	黃淑玲
作者(英文)：	Huang, Sheila Shu-Ling
論文名稱：	環境不正義之協商日常： 探討議題融入田野踏查課程模組之學習成效
論文名稱(英文)：	Negotiating With Daily Life Amid Environmental Injustice: Exploring the Effects of Issue-Integrated Field Trip Modules on Learning Outcomes
共同作者：
最高學歷：
校院名稱：
系所名稱：
語文別：	中文
論文頁數：	39
中文關鍵字：	課程模組；環境正義；混合式研究；敘事；戶外學習
英文關鍵字：	course module; environmental justice; mixed-methods research; narratives; outdoor learning
服務單位：	高雄醫學大學人文與藝術教育中心副教授；高雄醫學大學附設中和紀念醫院臨床醫學研究部兼任副研究員
稿件字數：	24934
作者專長：
投稿日期：	2023/9/10
論文下載：
摘要(中文)：	本研究旨在探討「環境正義」融入田野踏查之「5+1階段」課程模組如何影響學習經驗與課程觀點。研究對象包含臺灣南部兩所大學在110學年度，四個班級共計128名之正式課程學生。透過混合性研究法進行質性分析修課者之心得寫作，以及量化分析踏查者經驗問卷（n=100）。踏查前心得寫作透過質性分析建構出學習者眼中的「環境不正義之六角結構」；而踏查後心得分析則高度展現田野給予的學習體驗，包含踏查者對於公共議題、教育意涵、情意發展、歷史地景等面向有更深入的思考。其中，導覽居民扮演生命故事說書人的角色，不僅展開踏查者的思考與視野，建立議題與場域的連結，更引發對他者、他地之關懷與共感，體悟在地聚落處於環境不正義下的協商日常。統計分析也顯示導覽者的說書人角色，顯著影響學習者贊同田野作為場域教室賦予課程不同的意義、贊同遷村並非環境不正義之解方。總體而言，本議題融入田野踏查課程模組透過混和性研究後發現，具有課程結構性、議題連貫性、學習模式多樣性之課程模組能拓展視野並提升學習體驗，深化戶外學習的教育意涵。未來研究方向建議課程模組融入量化形成性評量，有益於先備知識的連結與內化，並作為田野踏查課程模組之基準點以利前、後測比較，推進戶外學習之實證研究。
摘要(英文)：	This study investigated the effects of a narrative-driven, environmental justice–focused 5+1 staged-course module on the learning experiences and curricular perceptions of students. The study population comprised 128 students from 4 classes conducted by 2 universities in southern Taiwan. They represented four cohorts across two semesters spanning the period from 2021 to 2022. An exploratory mixed-methods research design was used to conduct qualitative analyses of the students’ reflective writings before and after their field trips. Additionally, 100 qualified field trip participants underwent post–field trip surveys, and the results were quantitatively assessed. A qualitative inquiry revealed that the students held a hexagonal conceptualization of environmental injustice before their field trip. Post–field trip analyses were conducted to understand the students’ learning experiences from their field trips; the experiences involved profound reflections on public issues, the value of education, affective development, and appreciation of locality. Crucially, resident guides, who narrated their life stories, were instrumental in expanding the students’ cognitive and empathetic engagement, educating them on field-specific topics and fostering in them a compassionate awareness of others and diverse locales. The statistical findings of this study revealed the significant influence of these resident guides in shaping the students’ recognition of the field as an appropriate classroom setting. These guides infused distinct meanings into the curriculum, aligning it with the belief that relocation is inadequate as a response to environmental injustice. In summary, integrating narratives into an issue-centric learning module significantly broadened the learning horizons and experiences of the students, thereby deepening the pedagogical effects of outdoor learning. The findings indicate future courses should incorporate formative quantitative evaluations to strengthen the connection and assimilation of foundational knowledge to provide a comparative baseline for modules and enhance longitudinal fieldtrip analyses to advance research on outdoor education.
參考文獻：	石慧瑩（2017）。論環境正義的多元涵義。應用倫理評論，63，101-122。https://in.ncu.edu.tw/~phi/NRAE/newsletter/no63/05.pdf 行政院環境保護署（2022）。中華民國空氣品質監測報告 111 年年報。https://www.moenv.gov.tw/DisplayFile.aspx?FileID=C4E6C90EACB58366 周志建（2012）。故事的療癒力量：敘事、隱喻、自由書寫。心靈工坊。 紀駿傑、蕭新煌（2003）。當前臺灣環境正義的社會基礎。國家政策季刊，2（3）， 169-179。https://doi.org/10.6407/NPQ.200309.0169 張守真、楊玉姿（2018）。臨港聚落大林蒲開發史。高雄市立歷史博物館。 許淑娟、吳育臻（2019）。大林蒲歷史地理區域研究調查計畫期末報告。高雄市歷 史博物館。http://www.khm.org.tw/storage/files/1662/original/4668923774603889d 4e8248.pdf 黃月美（2005）。敘事研究：一種理解課程與教學的新途徑。教育研究月刊，130， 30-44。 黃淑玲（2018）。習醫造就：以「專業社會化」析論臨床環境對見習經驗之影響。 科學教育學刊，26（2），97-121。https://doi.org/10.6173/CJSE.201806_26(2).0001 黃淑玲、黃詠愷、陳怡婷（2022）。共敘大港聚落之環境正義：敘事力融入通識課 程之人文陶養與學習成效探究。通識教育學刊，29，97-139。https://doi.org/10. 6360/TJGE.202206_(29).0003 黃凱靖（2022，10 月 28 日）。中油大林煉油廠爆炸！大火直竄居民不敢睡。TVBS 新聞網。https://news.tvbs.com.tw/local/1946049 黃錦敦（2018）。最想說的話，被自己聽見：敘事實踐的十五堂課。張老師。 Altman, R. (2008). A theory of narrative. Columbia University Press. Ballantyne, R., & Packer, J. (2002). Nature-based excursions: School students’ perceptions of learning in natural environments. International Research in Geographical and Environmental Education, 11(3), 218-236. https://doi.org/10.1080/10382040208667488 Behrendt, M., & Franklin, T. (2014). A review of research on school field trips and their value in education. International Journal of Environmental & Science Education, 9(3), 235-245. Boeve-de Pauw, J., & Van Petegem, P. (2011). The effect of Flemish eco-schools on student environmental knowledge, attitudes, and affect. International Journal of Science Education, 33(11), 1513-1538. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2010.540725 Boeve-de Pauw, J., Van Hoof, J., & Van Petegem, P. (2019). Effective field trips in nature: The interplay between novelty and learning. Journal of Biological Education, 53(1), 21-33. https://doi.org/10.1080/00219266.2017.1418760 Chiu, H.-M. (2011). The dark side of silicon island: High-tech pollution and the environmental movement in Taiwan. Capitalism Nature Socialism, 22(1), 40-57. https://doi.org/10.1080/10455752.2010.546647 Clandinin, D. J., & Connelly, F. M. (2000). Narrative inquiry: Experience and story in qualitative research. Jossey-Bass. Connelly, F. M., & Clandinin, D. J. (1990). Stories of experience and narrative inquiry. Educational Researcher, 19(5), 2-14. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X019005002 Deguen, S., & Zmirou-Navier, D. (2010). Social inequalities resulting from health risks related to ambient air quality—A European review. European Journal of Public Health, 20(1),27-35. https://doi.org/10.1093/eurpub/ckp220 Dillon, J., Rickinson, M., Teamey, K., Morris, M., Choi, M. Y., Sanders, D., & Benefield, P. (2006). The value of outdoor learning: Evidence from research in the UK and elsewhere. The School Science Review, 87(320), 107-111. Doran, P., Burden, S., & Shryane, N. (2022). Integration of narratives into mixed methods research: An example from a study on the value of social support to older people with cancer. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 16(4), 418-437. https://doi.org/10.1177/15586898211056747 Eco, U. (2006). The island of the day before. Harper Collins. Fraser, N. (2000). Rethinking recognition. New Left Review, 3(3), 107-120. Friese, S. (2014). Qualitative data analysis with ATLAS.ti (2nd ed.). Sage. Johnson, R. B., Onwuegbuzie, A. J., & Turner, L. A. (2007). Toward a definition of mixed methods research. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 1(2), 112-133. https://doi.org/10.1177/1558689806298224 Jones, M. D., & McBeth, M. K. (2010). A narrative policy framework: Clear enough to be wrong? Policy Studies Journal, 38(2), 329-353. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1541-0072.2010.00364.x Jucker, R. (2022). How to raise the standards of outdoor learning and its research: Summary of ‘the existing evidence-base about the effectiveness of outdoor learning’. In R. Jucker & J. von Au (Eds.), High-quality outdoor learning (pp. 123-132). Springer. https://doi. org/10.1007/978-3-031-04108-2_6 Jucker, R., & von Au, J. (2022). Outdoor learning—Why it should be high up on the agenda of every educator. In R. Jucker & J. von Au (Eds.), High-quality outdoor learning (pp.1-26). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-04108-2_1 Kim, J. H. (2016). Understanding narrative inquiry: The crafting and analysis of stories as research. Sage. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781071802861 Mann, J., Gray, T., Truong, S., Brymer, E., Passy, R., Ho, S., Sahlberg, P., Ward, K., Bentsen,P., Curry, C., & Cowper, R. (2022). Getting out of the classroom and into nature: A systematic review of nature-specific outdoor learning on school children’s learning and development. Frontiers in Public Health, 10, 877058. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2022.877058 Merriam, S. B. (2009). Qualitative research: A guide to design and implementation. Jossey-Bass. Olmos-Vega, F. M., Stalmeijer, R. E., Varpio, L., & Kahlke, R. (2023). A practical guide to reflexivity in qualitative research: AMEE guide no. 149. Medical Teacher, 45(3), 241-251, http://doi.org/10.1080/0142159X.2022.2057287 Orion, N., & Hofstein, A. (1994). Factors that influence learning during a scientific field trip in a natural environment. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 31(10), 1097-1119. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.3660311005 Palm, E., Hasselbalch, J., Holmberg, K., & Nielsen, T. D. (2022). Narrating plastics governance: Policy narratives in the European plastics strategy. Environmental Politics, 31(3), 365-385. https://doi.org/10.1080/09644016.2021.1915020 Perez, A. C., Grafton, B., Mohai, P., Hardin, R., Hintzen, K., & Orvis, S. (2015). Evolution of the environmental justice movement: Activism, formalization and differentiation.Environmental Research Letters, 10(10), Article 105002. https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/10/10/105002 Perry, M. J., Arrington, S., Freisthler, M. S., Ibe, I. N., McCray, N. L., Neumann, L. M., Tajanlangit, P., & Rosas, B. T. M. (2021). Pervasive structural racism in environmental epidemiology. Environmental Health, 20, Article 119. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12940-021-00801-3 Purdie, N., Neill, J. T., & Richards, G. E. (2002). Australian identity and the effect of an outdoor education program. Australian Journal of Psychology, 54(1), 32-39. https://doi.org/10. 1080/00049530210001706493 Rawls, J. (1971). A theory of justice. Harvard University Press. https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctvjf9z6v Rickinson, M., Dillon, J., Teamey, K., Morris, M., Choi, M. Y., Sanders, D., & Benefield, P.(2004). A review of research on outdoor learning. National Foundation for Educational Research and King’s College London. https://www.informalscience.org/sites/default/ files/Review%20of%20research%20on%20outdoor%20learning.pdf Roberts, J. W. (2012). Beyond learning by doing: Theoretical currents in experiential education. Routledge. Sandelowski, M. (2000). Combining qualitative and quantitative sampling, data collection, and analysis techniques in mixed-method studies. Research in Nursing & Health, 23(3),246-255. https://doi.org/10.1002/1098-240X(200006)23:3<246::AID-NUR9>3.0.CO;2-H Sarbin, T. R. (1986). The narrative as a root metaphor for psychology. In T. R. Sarbin (Ed.), Narrative psychology: The storied nature of human conduct (pp. 3-21). Praeger Publishers/Greenwood Publishing Group. Schlosberg, D. (2013). Theorising environmental justice: The expanding sphere of a discourse. Environmental Politics, 22(1), 37-55. https://doi.org/10.1080/09644016.2013.755387 Smith, A., & Laribi, O. (2022). Environmental justice in the American public health context: Trends in the scientific literature at the intersection between health, environment, and social status. Journal of Racial and Ethnic Health Disparities, 9(1), 247-256. https://doi. org/10.1007/s40615-020-00949-7 Strauss, A. L., & Corbin, J. M. (1998). Basics of qualitative research: Techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory (2nd ed.). Sage. World Health Organization. (2022, December 19). Ambient (outdoor) air pollution. https://www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/ambient-(outdoor)-air-quality-and-health Young, I. M. (1990). Justice and the politics of difference. Princeton University Press. https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctvcm4g4q Yuan, C.-S., Lai, C.-S., Chang-Chien, G.-P., Tseng, Y.-L., & Cheng, F.-J. (2022). Kidney damage induced by repeated fine particulate matter exposure: Effects of different components.Science of The Total Environment, 847, Article 157528. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv. 2022.157528 Yuan, C.-S., Lai, C.-S., Tseng, Y.-L., Hsu, P.-C., Lin, C.-M., & Cheng, F.-J. (2021). Repeated exposure to fine particulate matter constituents lead to liver inflammation and proliferative response in mice. Ecotoxicology and Environmental Safety, 224, Article 112636. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoenv.2021.112636