期刊專區/ Periodical Section

歡喜做課綱？學校現場教師的情緒與變革行動樣態及其組成差異分析

Enthusiastic about Implementing the New Curriculum? Analyzing the Profiles of Teacher Emotions and Change Actions and the Differences in Their Composition

所屬期刊：	第20卷第3期 主編：國立彰化師範大學教育研究所教授 龔心怡
系統編號：	vol078_03
主題：	課程與教學
出版年份：	2024
作者：	潘慧玲；鄭淑惠；陳文彥
作者(英文)：	Hui-Ling Wendy Pan；Shu-Huei Cheng；Wen-Yan Chen
論文名稱：	歡喜做課綱？學校現場教師的情緒與變革行動樣態及其組成差異分析
論文名稱(英文)：	Enthusiastic about Implementing the New Curriculum? Analyzing the Profiles of Teacher Emotions and Change Actions and the Differences in Their Composition
共同作者：
最高學歷：
校院名稱：
系所名稱：
語文別：	中文
論文頁數：	31
中文關鍵字：	十二年國教課綱；教師情緒；教師協作；教師自我效能感；素養導向教學
英文關鍵字：	Curriculum Guidelines of 12-year Basic Education；teacher emotions；teacher collaboration；teacher self-efficacy；competency-oriented teaching
服務單位：	淡江大學教育與未來設計學系特聘教授；國立臺灣師範大學教育學系暨教育政策與行政研究所副教授 ；國立暨南國際大學教育政策與行政學系教授
稿件字數：	19014
作者專長：
投稿日期：	2024/10/17
論文下載：
摘要(中文)：	本研究以108課綱變革為脈絡，聚焦探討教師情緒及變革行動所呈現之樣態。研究方法採問卷調查法，以臺灣本島公立普通型高中之教師為母群體，回收有效問卷624份。資料分析方法採描述統計、單因子變異數、群集分析、卡方檢定。研究結果顯示：一、高中教師實施108課綱時，依其高興情緒、疲憊情緒及變革行動（教師協作、素養導向教學）之得分高低組合可歸納為三個群集，包括：「積極投入型」、「獨行著力型」、「勉力維艱型」；二、從人口變項組成特徵來看，不同群集教師在性別、年齡和學歷之分布並未達顯著差異，具顯著落差的變項為職務別和任教領域；三、從自我效能感組成特徵來看，「積極投入型」教師的自我效能感顯著高於另兩型，「獨行著力型」教師又顯著高於「勉力維艱型」；四、從學校支持組成特徵來看，「積極投入型」教師的感受顯著高於另兩型，「獨行著力型」教師又高於「勉力維艱型」。整體研究結果除了在政策面向提供課綱變革實施後，教師參與情緒樣態及行動面向展現程度之實徵數據，更具體歸納了教師在變革中的異質性，以及教育領導者欲帶動教師「歡喜做課綱」時應優先掌握之變因。此外，本研究納入臺灣過往課程改革研究較少關注到的教師情緒面向，此亦值得後續進一步擴展。
摘要(英文)：	This study examined the profiles of teacher emotions and change actions in the context of the 108 Curriculum Reform in Taiwan. A questionnaire survey targeting teachers in public general high schools across Taiwan collected 624 valid responses. Analysis methods encompassed descriptive statistics, one-way ANOVA, cluster analysis, and chi-square tests. The findings reveal that high school teachers implementing the 108 Curriculum can be classified into three clusters based on their scores in emotions of joy and fatigue, teacher collaboration, and competency-oriented teaching: "Proactive Engagement Type," "Solo Striver Type," and "Struggling Diligence Type." Across demographic variables, no significant differences in gender, age, and educational background were observed among teachers in different clusters. However, disparities emerged in the job title and teaching field. Regarding self-efficacy, teachers in the "Proactive Engagement Type" exhibited significantly higher levels compared to the other two types, with the "Solo Striver Type" also showing notably higher levels than the "Struggling Diligence Type." Perceived school support was notably higher among teachers categorized as "Proactive Engagement Type," with those in the "Solo Striver Type" also reporting higher levels compared to the "Struggling Diligence Type." This study not only provides empirical evidence of teacher emotional patterns and action orientations during curriculum reform but also underscores the diversity among teachers amidst change. It pinpoints factors that educational leaders should prioritize when encouraging teachers to adopt curriculum reforms. Furthermore, by addressing the emotional dimension of teachers, this study sheds light on an aspect less explored in prior curriculum reform research in Taiwan, suggesting avenues for further investigation.
參考文獻：	吳璧純、鄭淑慧、陳春秀（2017）。以學生學習為主軸的生活課程素養導向教學。 教育研究月刊，275，50-63 。https://doi.org/10.3966/168063602017030275004 阮孝齊、王麗雲（2017）。縣市教育資源對學習共同體擴散影響之研究。教育研究 集刊，63（1），69-107。https://doi.org/10.3966/102887082017036301003 范信賢（2016）。核心素養與十二年國民基本教育課程綱要：導讀《國民核心素養： 十二年國教課程改革的 DNA》。教育脈動，5，1-6。 國家教育研究院（2014）。十二年國民基本教育課程發展指引。https://ws.moe.edu. tw/001/Upload/23/relfile/8006/51083/c1f743ce-c5e2-43c6-8279-9cc1ae8b1352.pdf 教育部（2014）。十二年國民基本教育課程綱要總綱。https://cirn.moe.edu.tw/ WebContent/index.aspx?sid=11&mid=12504 陳志偉、湯家偉（2022）。高中教師素養導向教學效能量表之發展與驗證。教育與 心理研究，45（3），63-87。https://doi.org/10.53106/102498852022094503003 潘慧玲（2017）。從學校變革觀點探析學習領導。學校行政，110，1-23。https:// doi.org/10.3966/160683002017070110001 潘慧玲（主編）（2016）。十二年國民基本教育普通高中課程規劃及行政準備手冊。 國家教育研究院。 潘慧玲、洪瑞璇（2022）。共治共學觀關乎課程變革？教師對十二年國教課綱變革 意向的影響因素。當代教育研究季刊，30（1），1-37。https://doi.org/10.6151/ CERQ.202203_30(1).0001 潘慧玲、黃?莉、陳文彥、鄭淑惠（2020）。學校準備好了嗎？國高中教育人員實 施 108 課綱的變革準備度。教育研究與發展期刊，16（1），65-100。https:// doi.org/10.6925/SCJ.202003_16(1).0003 Ainley, J., & Carstens, R. (2018). Teaching and learning international survey (TALIS) 2018 conceptual framework. OECD. Alpaslan, M. M., & Ulubey, O. (2017). Adaptation of the teacher emotion scale into Turkish culture. Online Submission, 12(25), 119-130. http://doi.org/10.7827/TurkishStudies.12343 Alsaleh, A. A. (2022). The influence of heads of departments’ instructional leadership, cooperation, and administrative support on school-based professional learning in Kuwait. Educational Management Administration & Leadership, 50(5), 832-850. https://doi.org/10.1177/1741143220953597 Anderson, J. C., & Gerbing, D. W. (1988). Structural equation modeling in practice: A review and recommended two-step approach. Psychological Bulletin, 103(3), 411-423. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.103.3.411 Brown, J. S., Collins, A., & Duguid, P. (1989). Situated cognition and the culture of learning. Educational Researcher, 18(1), 32-42. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X018001032 Buri?, I., Sli?kovi?, A., & Macuka, I. (2018). A mixed?method approach to the assessment of teachers’ emotions: Development and validation of the teacher emotion questionnaire. Educational Psychology, 38(3), 325-349. https://doi.org/10.1080/01443410.2017.1382682 Cerit, Y. (2013). Relationship between Teachers’ Self-Efficacy Beliefs and Their Willingness to Implement Curriculum Reform. International Journal of Educational Reform, 22(3), 252-270. https://doi.org/10.1177/105678791302200304 Chen, J. (2016). Understanding teacher emotions: The development of a teacher emotion inventory. Teaching and Teacher Education, 55, 68-77. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2016.01.001 Chen, J. (2019). Efficacious and positive teachers achieve more: Examining the relationship between teacher efficacy, emotions, and their practicum performance. The Asia-Pacific Education Researcher, 28, 327-337. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40299-018-0427-9 Cheng, L. P., & Ko, H. K. (2009). Teacher-team development in a school-based professional development program. The Mathematics Educator, 19(1), 8-17. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ867894.pdf Day, C. (2007). What being a successful principal really means: An international perspective. Educational Leadership and Administration: Teaching and Program Development, 19, 13-24. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ819947.pdf Evers, W. J., Brouwers, A., & Tomic, W. (2002). Burnout and self-efficacy: A study on teachers’ beliefs when implementing an innovative educational system in the Netherlands. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 72(2), 227-243. https://doi.org/10.1348/000709902158865 Fornell, C., & Larcker, D. F. (1981). Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. Journal of Marketing Research, 18(1), 39-50. https://doi.org/10.1177/002224378101800104 Frenzel, A. C. (2014). Teacher emotions. In R. Pekrun & L. Linnenbrink-Garcia (Eds.), International handbook of emotions in education (pp. 494-519). Routledge. Frenzel, A. C., Pekrun, R., Goetz, T., Daniels, L. M., Durksen, T. L., Becker-Kurz, B., & Klassen, R. M. (2016). Measuring teachers’ enjoyment, anger, and anxiety: The teacher emotions scales (TES). Contemporary Educational Psychology, 46, 148-163. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cedpsych.2016.05.003 Fried, L., Mansfield, C., & Dobozy, E. (2015). Teacher emotion research: Introducing a conceptual model to guide future research. Issues in Educational Research, 25(4), 415- 441. https://www.iier.org.au/iier25/fried.pdf Fullan, M., & Hargreaves, A. (1992). What’s worth fighting for in your school? Working together for improvement. Open University. Gamoran, A., & Weinstein, M. (1998). Differentiation and opportunity in restructured schools. American Journal of Education, 106(3), 385-415. https://doi.org/10.1086/444189 Gigante, N. A., & Firestone, W. A. (2008). Administrative support and teacher leadership in schools implementing reform. Journal of Educational Administration, 46(3), 302-331. https://doi.org/10.1108/09578230810869266 Golombek, P., & Doran, M. (2014). Unifying cognition, emotion, and activity in language teacher professional development. Teaching and Teacher Education, 39, 102-111. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2014.01.002 Grossman, P. L., & Stodolsky, S. S. (1995). Content as context: The role of school subjects in secondary school teaching. Educational Researcher, 24(8), 5-23. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X024008005 Hammerness, K., Darling-Hammond, L., Grossman, P., Rust, F., & Shulman, L. (2005). The design of teacher education programs. In J. Bransford & L. Darling-Hammond (Eds.), Preparing teachers for a changing world: What teachers should learn and be able to do (pp. 390-441). Jossey-Bass. Hargreaves, A. (2001). The emotional geographies of teachers’ relations with colleagues. International Journal of Educational Research, 35(5), 503-527. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0883-0355(02)00006-X Hargreaves, A. (2005). Educational change takes ages: Life, career and generational factors in teachers’ emotional responses to educational change. Teaching and Teacher Education, 21(8), 967-983. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2005.06.007 Hong, J., Nie, Y., Heddy, B., Monobe, G., Ruan, J., You, S., & Kambara, H. (2016). Revising and validating achievement emotions questionnaire-teachers (AEQ-T). International Journal of Educational Psychology, 5(1), 80-107. https://doi.org/10.17583/ijep.2016.1395 Imants, J. (2003). Two basic mechanisms for organisational learning in schools. European Journal of Teacher Education, 26(3), 293-311. https://doi.org/10.1080/0261976032000128157A Klassen, R. M., Tze, V. M., Betts, S. M., & Gordon, K. A. (2011). Teacher efficacy research 1998-2009: Signs of progress or unfulfilled promise? Educational Psychology Review, 23, 21-43. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-010-9141-8 Kock, N., Mayfield, M., Mayfield, J., Sexton, S., & De La Garza, L. M. (2019). Empathetic leadership: How leader emotional support and understanding influences follower performance. Journal of Leadership & Organizational Studies, 26(2), 217-236. https://doi.org/10.1177/1548051818806290 Koenen, A. K., Vervoort, E., Kelchtermans, G., Verschueren, K., & Spilt, J. L. (2019). Teachers’ daily negative emotions in interactions with individual students in special education. Journal of Emotional and Behavioral Disorders, 27(1), 37-51. https://doi.org/10.1177/1063426617739579 Kolb, D. A. (1984). Experiential learning: Experience as the source of learning and development (Vol. 1). Prentice-Hall. Kwakman, K. (2003). Factors affecting teachers’ participation in professional learning activities. Teaching and Teacher Education, 19(2), 149-170. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0742-051X(02)00101-4 Lee, J. C. K., Huang, Y. X. H., Law, E. H. F., & Wang, M. H. (2013). Professional identities and emotions of teachers in the context of curriculum reform: A Chinese perspective. Asia-Pacific Journal of Teacher Education, 41(3), 271-287. https://doi.org/10.1080/1359866X.2013.809052 Leithwood, K., & Riehl, C. (2005). What we know about successful school leadership. In W. Firestone & C. Riehl (Eds.), A new agenda for research in educational leadership (pp. 22-47). Teachers College. Leithwood, K., Menzies, T., & Jantzi, D. (1994). Earning teachers’ commitment to curriculum reform. Peabody Journal of Education, 69(4), 38-61. https://doi.org/10.1080/01619569409538785 Little, J. W. (1990). The persistence of privacy: Autonomy and initiative in teachers’ professional relations. Teachers College Record, 91(4), 509-536. https://doi.org/10.1177/016146819009100403 Maag, J. W. (2008). Rational-emotive therapy to help teachers control their emotions and behavior when dealing with disagreeable students. Intervention in School and Clinic, 44(1), 52-57. http://doi.org/10.1177/1053451208318680 Min, M. (2023). School culture, self-efficacy, outcome expectation, and teacher agency toward reform with curricular autonomy in South Korea: A social cognitive approach. Asia Pacific Journal of Education, 43(4), 951-967. https://doi.org/10.1080/02188791.2019.1626218 Nias, J. (1996). Thinking about feeling: The emotions in teaching. Cambridge Journal of Education, 26(3), 293-306. https://doi.org/10.1080/0305764960260301 Nie, Y., Tan, G. H., Liau, A. K., Lau, S., & Chua, B. L. (2013). The roles of teacher efficacy in instructional innovation: Its predictive relations to constructivist and didactic instruction. Educational Research for Policy and Practice, 12(1), 67-77. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10671-012-9128-y Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. (2018). Teaching and learning international survey (TALIS) 2018: Teacher questionnaire. https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/media/5f679d62d3bf7f7234487c72/ TALIS_2018_KS3_Teacher_questionnaire.pd.pdf Pitkaniemi, H. (2017). A teacher’s practical theories, self-efficacy, and emotions: What connections do they have, and how can they be developed? Nordisk Tidskrift for Allman Didaktik, 3(1), 2-23. https://doi.org/10.57126/noad.v3i1.12265 Schmidt, M., & Datnow, A. (2005). Teachers’ sense-making about comprehensive school reform: The influence of emotions. Teaching and Teacher Education, 21(8), 949-965. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2005.06.006 Schuman, V., & Scherer, K. R. (2014). Concepts and structures of emotions. In R. Pekrun & L. Linnenbrink-Garcia (Eds.), International handbook of emotions in education (pp. 13-35). Routledge. Skaalvik, E. M., & Skaalvik, S. (2011). Teacher job satisfaction and motivation to leave the teaching profession: Relations with school context, feeling of belonging, and emotional exhaustion. Teaching and Teacher Education, 27(6), 1029-1038. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2011.04.001 Stodolsky, S. S., & Grossman, P. L. (1995). The impact of subject matter on curricular activity: An analysis of five academic subjects. American Educational Research Journal, 32(2), 227-249. https://doi.org/10.3102/00028312032002227 Strat, T. T. S., Henriksen, E. K., & Jegstad, K. M. (2024). Inquiry-based science education in science teacher education: A systematic review. Studies in Science Education, 60(2), 191-249. https://doi.org/10.1080/03057267.2023.2207148 Stoll, L., Bolam, R., McMahon, A., Wallace, M., & Thomas, S. (2006). Professional learning communities: A review of the literature. Journal of Educational Change, 7(4), 221-258. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10833-006-0001-8 Suprayogi, M. N., Valcke, M., & Godwin, R. (2017). Teachers and their implementation of differentiated instruction in the classroom. Teaching and Teacher Education, 67, 291- 301. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2017.06.020 Sutton, R. E., & Wheatley, K. F. (2003). Teachers’ emotions and teaching: A review of the literature and directions for future research. Educational Psychology Review, 15(4), 327-358. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1026131715856 Taxer, J. L., Becker-Kurz, B., & Frenzel, A. C. (2019). Do quality teacher-student relationships protect teachers from emotional exhaustion? The mediating role of enjoyment and anger. Social Psychology of Education, 22(1), 209-226. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11218-018-9468-4 Tschannen-Moran, M., & Hoy, A. (2001). Teacher efficacy: Capturing an elusive construct. Teaching and Teacher Education, 17(7), 783-805. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0742-051X(01)00036-1 Uitto, M., Kaunisto, S. L., Syrjala, L., & Estola, E. (2015). Silenced truths: Relational and emotional dimensions of a beginning teacher’s identity as part of the micropolitical context of school. Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research, 59(2), 162-176. https://doi.org/10.1080/00313831.2014.904414 Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes (M. Cole, V. Jolm-Steiner, S. Scribner, E. Souberman Eds. & Trans.). Harvard University. https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctvjf9vz4 Yu, X., Wang, P., Zhai, X., Dai, H., & Yang, Q. (2015). The effect of work stress on job burnout among teachers: The mediating role of self-efficacy. Social Indicators Research, 122, 701-708. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-014-0716-5 Zajda, J. (2011). Constructivist pedagogy: Learning and teaching. Curriculum and Teaching, 26(2), 19-31. Zee, M., & Koomen, H. M. (2016). Teacher self-efficacy and its effects on classroom processes, student academic adjustment, and teacher well-being: A synthesis of 40 years of research. Review of Educational Research, 86(4), 981-1015. https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654315626801