期刊專區/ Periodical Section

國民小學初任教師導入輔導實施之研究：初任教師的觀點

A Study on Induction Programs for Beginning Elementary School Teachers: Perspectives of Novice Teachers

所屬期刊：	第21卷第2期 主編：國立暨南國際大學教育學院學士班教授兼副校長 楊洲松
系統編號：	vol081_01
主題：	師資培育
出版年份：	2025
作者：	賴怡潔；王為國
作者(英文)：	Yi-Chieh Lai；Wei-Kuo Wang
論文名稱：	國民小學初任教師導入輔導實施之研究：初任教師的觀點
論文名稱(英文)：	A Study on Induction Programs for Beginning Elementary School Teachers: Perspectives of Novice Teachers
共同作者：
最高學歷：
校院名稱：
系所名稱：
語文別：	中文
論文頁數：	32
中文關鍵字：	國民小學；初任教師；初任教師導入輔導
英文關鍵字：	elementary school；novice teacher；novice teacher induction program
服務單位：	臺中市大甲區文昌國民小學教師；國立清華大學教育與學習科技學系教授
稿件字數：	22401
作者專長：
投稿日期：	2024/7/29
論文下載：
摘要(中文)：	初任教師導入輔導是一位教師進入教育現場的重要環節，本研究旨在探討國民 小學初任教師導入輔導對於導入輔導的時間、輔導教師安排、研究主題與評鑑的想 法。本研究採個案研究，並以立意取樣，選擇 2018 年考上 T 市（化名）國民小學 的 5 位初任教師為研究參與者，運用半結構式的深度訪談法、文件分析等質性研究 方式進行資料的蒐集。本研究的結果是初任教師認為暑假的導入輔導安排適切，開 學後的共學輔導團與初任教師回流研習時間安排具有彈性。初任教師認為校內在薪 傳教師之安排方面，要再審慎思考並加以培訓。在研習主題安排方面，在前導時期 的研習與培訓主題安排方面，初任教師認為具有多元的課程，但行政相關的主題相 對較少。在評鑑安排方面，初任教師認為實施初任教師評鑑制度，宜考量到時間的 安排與評鑑的回饋機制是否適切。本研究對初任教師導入輔導的建議是納入行政職 務的導入輔導、初任教師回流研習的主題需要加深與加廣、校內薪傳教師的遴選與 培訓需要妥善規劃以及初任教師評鑑制度必需有回饋機制。對未來研究之建議是將 來可研究不同縣市、不同學校規模的初任教師，以及從多方的觀點，例如薪傳教師 或共學輔導團的輔導教師之觀點進行研究。
摘要(英文)：	The induction process for beginning teachers is a critical stage in entering the teaching profession. This study explores novice elementary school teachers’ perspectives on the induction program, including its timing, mentoring arrangements, training content, and evaluation mechanisms. Employing a qualitative case study approach and purposive sampling, five novice teachers who began teaching at an elementary school in City T (pseudonym) in 2018 were selected as research participants. Data were collected through semi-structured in-depth interviews and document analysis.The findings indicate that novice teachers viewed the induction activities arranged during the summer as appropriate, and found the post-semester collaborative mentoring groups and return-to-school training schedules to be flexible. However, they expressed concerns about the selection and preparation of mentor teachers, suggesting that further consideration and training are needed. While the training content in the preliminary phase was diverse, it lacked sufficient focus on administrative responsibilities. Regarding evaluation, the participants emphasized the importance of appropriate timing and effective feedback mechanisms within the induction assessment process.Based on the findings, this study recommends incorporating administrative duties into the induction program; expanding the scope and depth of return-to-school training content; establishing a well-structured system for the selection and training of mentor teachers; and ensuring that the teacher evaluation system includes constructive feedback. Future research may explore novice teachers in different regions or school sizes, and consider perspectives from other stakeholders, such as mentor teachers or members of collaborative mentoring teams.
參考文獻：	張芬芬（2001）。教學生活：新手教師的成長之路。載於黃政傑、張芬芬（主編）， 學為良師—在教育實習中成長（頁 1-31）。師大書苑。 張德銳（2003）。中小學初任教師的教學輔導與考核。課程與教學，6（3）， 72-80。https://doi.org/10.6384/CIQ.200307.0067 張德銳、丁一顧（2005）。教學導師臨床視導對新進教師教學效能影響之研究。當 代教育研究季刊，13（3），149-180。 張德銳、丁一顧、陳育吟（2003）。初任教師導入方案：一個亟待推動與研究的教 改方案。初等教育學刊，14，83-108。 張德銳、李俊達（2020）。從國際比較觀點論我國初任教師導入輔導制度的改革。 台灣教育研究期刊，1（4），11-20。 教育部（2012）。中華民國師資培育白皮書。https://depart.moe.edu.tw/ED2600/cp.a spx?n=37734BA79B67A89A&s=AF04D533FC93AA8D 教 育 部（2024）。113 年 初 任 教 師 導 入 輔 導 計 畫 書。https://depart.moe.edu.tw/ ED2600/cp.aspx?n=37734BA79B67A89A&s=AF04D533FC93AA8D 魏韶勤、張德銳（2006）。教學觀察與回饋對國小初任教師教學效能影響之研究。 課程與教學，9（2），89-103。https://doi.org/10.6384/CIQ.200604.0089 Akta?, B. C. (2018). Assessment of induction to teaching program: Opinions of novice teachers, mentors, school administrators. Universal Journal of Educational Research, 6(10), 2101-2114. https://doi.org/10.13189/ujer.2018.061007 Angelides, P., & Mylordou, A. (2011). The beneficial outcome of a successful mentoring relationship: The development of inclusive education. Teacher Development, 15(4), 533-547. https://doi.org/10.1080/13664530.2011.642650 Burger, J., Bellhauser, H., & Imhof, M. (2021). Mentoring styles and novice teachers’ well-being: The role of basic need satisfaction. Teaching and Teacher Education, 103, 103345. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2021.103345 Commission on Teacher Credentialing. (1993). Beginning teacher support and assessment program description: Year one. California Department of Education. Commission on Teacher Credentialing. (2009). California standards for the teaching profession. Commission on Teacher Credentialing. Commission on Teacher Credentialing. (2017). Teacher induction program preconditions and program standards. https://www.ctc.ca.gov/docs/default-source/educator-prep/ standards/teacher-induction-precon-standards-pdf.pdf?sfvrsn=59e14eb1_2 Courtney, S. A., Austin, C. K., & Zolfaghari, M. (2023). International perspectives on teacher induction: A systematic review. Teaching and Teacher Education, 125, 104047. https:// doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2023.104047 Darling-Hammond, L. (2017). Teacher education around the world: What can we learn from international practice? European Journal of Teacher Education, 40(3), 291-309. https:// doi.org/10.1080/02619768.2017.1315399 Diab, A., & Green, E. (2024). Cultivating resilience and success: Support systems for novice teachers in diverse contexts. Education Sciences, 14(7), 711. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci14070711 European Commission. (2010). Developing coherent and system-wide induction programs for beginning teachers: A handbook for policymakers. Evertson, C. M., & Smithey, M. W. (2000). Mentoring effects on proteges’ classroom practice: An experimental field study. Journal of Educational Research, 93(5), 294-304. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220670009598721 Ewing, L.-A. (2021). Mentoring novice teachers. Mentoring and Tutoring: Partnership in Learning, 29(1), 50-69. https://doi.org/10.1080/13611267.2021.1899585 Fletcher, S., Strong, M., & Villar, A. (2008). An investigation of the effects of variations in mentor-based induction on the performance of students in California. Teachers College Record, 110(10), 2271-2289. https://doi.org/10.1177/016146810811001003 Geeraerts, K., Tynjala, P., Heikkinen, H. L., Markkanen, I., Pennanen, M., & Gijbels, D. (2015). Peer-group mentoring as a tool for teacher development. European Journal of Teacher Education, 38(3), 358-377. https://doi.org/10.1080/02619768.2014.983068 Hobson, A. J., Ashby, P., Malderez, A., & Tomilson, P. D. (2009). Mentoring beginning teachers: What we know and what we don’t. Teaching and Teacher Education, 25(1), 207-216. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2008.09.001 Huling-Austin, L. (1990). Teacher induction programs and internships. In W. R. Houston., M. Haberman, & J. Sikula (Eds.), Handbook of research on teacher education: A project of the Association of Teacher Education (pp. 535-548). Macmillan. Hunter, S. B., & Springer, M. G. (2022). Critical feedback characteristics, teacher human capital, and early-career teacher performance: A mixed-methods analysis. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 44(3), 380-403. https://doi.org/10.3102/0162373721106 2913 Ingersoll, R. M. (2012). Beginning teacher induction: What the data tell us. Phi delta kappan, 93(8), 47-51. https://doi.org/10.1177/003172171209300811 Keese, J., Thompson, C. G., Waxman, H. C., McIntush, K., & Svajda-Hardy, M. (2023). A worthwhile endeavor? A meta-analysis of research on formalized novice teacher induction programs. Educational Research Review, 38, 100505. https://doi.org/https:// doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2022.100505 Korhonen, H., Heikkinen, H. L., Kiviniemi, U., & Tynjala, P. (2017). Student teachers’ experiences of participating in mixed peer mentoring groups of in-service and pre-service teachers in Finland. Teaching and Teacher Education, 61, 153-163. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2016.10.011 LoCasale-Crouch, J., Davis, E., Wiens, P., & Pianta, R. (2012). The role of the mentor in supporting new teachers: Associations with self-efficacy, reflection, and quality. Mentoring and Tutoring: Partnership in Learning, 20(3), 303-323. https://doi.org/10.10 80/13611267.2012.701959 MacDowell, P., Moskalyk, K., Korchinski, K., & Morrison, D. (2024). Preparing educators to teach and create with generative artificial intelligence. Canadian Journal of Learning and Technology, 50(4), 1-23. https://doi.org/10.21432/cjlt28606 Mansfield, C., & Gu, Q. (2019). “I’m finally getting that help that I needed:” Early career teacher induction and professional learning. The Australian Educational Researcher, 46(4). 639-659. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13384-019-00338-y McGuire, S. N., Xia, Y., Guzy, A., Akoto, T. S., & Meadan, H. (2024). Behavior management training for teachers in the induction phase. Psychology in the Schools, 61(6), 2489-2507. https://doi.org/10.1002/pits.23176 Moen, M., Pham, H. T. T., Samsudin, M. A., & Chun, T. C. (2024). Measuring South African novice teacher resilience in coping with teaching challenges: A rasch model framework. Journal of Research in Innovative Teaching and Learning. https://doi.org/10.1108/JRIT-11-2023-0166 National Center on Education and the Economy. (2024a). Top performing countries: Japan. https://ncee.org/country/korea/.https://ncee.org/country/japan/ National Center on Education and the Economy. (2024b). Top performing countries: Singapore. https://ncee.org/country/singapore/ National Center on Education and the Economy. (2024c). Top performing countries: Korea. https://ncee.org/country/korea/ National Center on Education and the Economy. (2024d). Top performing countries: Canada. https://ncee.org/country/canada/ Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. (2011). Teachers matter: Attracting, developing and retaining effective teachers. https://doi.org/10.1787/9789264018044-en Pennanen, M., Bristol, L., Wilkinson, J., & Heikkinen, H. L. (2016). What is ‘good’ mentoring? Understanding mentoring practices of teacher induction through case studies of Finland and Australia. Pedagogy, Culture & Society, 24(1), 27-53. https://doi.org/10.1080/14681 366.2015.1083045 Pennanen, M., Heikkinen, H. L. T., & Tynjala, P. (2020). Virtues of mentors and mentees in the Finnish model of teachers’ peer-group mentoring. Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research, 64(3), 355-371. https://doi.org/10.1080/00313831.2018.1554601 Schatz-Oppenheimer, O., & Goldenberg, J. (2024). The impact of professional mentoring on mentors of novice-teachers. International Journal of Mentoring and Coaching in Education, 13(1), 122-141. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJMCE-08-2022-0070 Smith, T., & Ingersoll, R. (2004). What are the effects of induction and mentoring on beginning teacher turnover? American Educational Research Journal 41(3), 681-714. https://doi.org/10.3102/00028312041003681 Stanulis, R. N., Little, S., & Wibbens, E. (2012). Intensive mentoring that contributes to change in beginning elementary teachers’ learning to lead classroom discussions. Teaching and Teacher Education, 28(1), 32-43. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2011.08.007 Taylor, M., McLean, L., Bryce, C. I., Abry, T., & Granger, K. L. (2019). The influence of multiple life stressors during teacher training on burnout and career optimism in the first year of teaching. Teaching and Teacher Education, 86, 102910. https://doi.org/10.1016/ j.tate.2019.102910 Tynjala, P., Pennanen, M., Markkanen, I., & Heikkinen, H. L. (2021). Finnish model of peer-group mentoring: Review of research. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 1483(1), 208-223. https://doi.org/10.1111/nyas.14296 United Nations. (n.d.). (2024, April 24). Sustainable Development Goals. https://www.un.org/sustainabledevelopment/ Wang, J., & Odell, S. J. (2002). Mentored learning to teach according to standard-based reform: A critical review. Review of Educational Research, 72(3), 481-546. https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543072003481 Webb, L. D., & Norton, M. S. (2003). Human resources administration: Personnel issues and needs in education (6th ed). Merrill. Wong, H. K. (2004). Induction programs that keep new teachers teaching and improving. NASSP Bulletin, 88(638), 41-58. https://doi.org/10.1177/019263650408863804 Woulfin, S. L., & Jones, B. (2021). Special development: The nature, content, and structure of special education teachers’ professional learning opportunities. Teaching and Teacher Education, 100, 103277. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2021.103277