教師對課程變革的認同感和關注：課程實施研究的探討

Teacher Receptivity to and Concerns about Curriculum Change: An Exploration of Research on Curriculum Implementation

李子建
尹弘飆


所屬期刊： 第1卷第1期 「課程與教學」
主編：國立台北教育大學
課程與教學研究所 莊明貞教授
系統編號： vol001_06
主題： 課程與教學
出版年份： 2005
作者： 李子建
尹弘飆
作者(英文)：
論文名稱： 教師對課程變革的認同感和關注：課程實施研究的探討
論文名稱(英文)： Teacher Receptivity to and Concerns about Curriculum Change: An Exploration of Research on Curriculum Implementation
共同作者：
最高學歷：
校院名稱：
系所名稱：
語文別：
論文頁數： 22
中文關鍵字： 認同感;關注階段;課程實施;情意因素
英文關鍵字： receptivity; Stage of Concerns; curriculum implementation; affective and conative factors
服務單位：
稿件字數： 15452
作者專長：
投稿日期： 2005/5/3
論文下載： pdf檔案icon
摘要(中文)： 對教師個人因素的關注是實施研究的一個新的發展趨勢。然而，現有的教師個人因素的分析大都採取了認知取向的研究策略，其研究對象也主要集中在教師的認知領域，對教師的情意因素關注不夠。在針對教師情意因素進行的實施研究中，認同感與關注階段是兩個值得我們注意的課題。本文首先簡要整理了認同感與關注階段的理論脈絡；然後結合近年來的一些實證研究結果，尤其是香港和大陸的經驗，對課程實施中的這兩種教師情意因素做出了初步分析；其次，作者從理論架構和實證研究兩個角度嘗試分析了認同感與關注階段之間的關係；在結語部分，本文總結了認同感與關注階段研究給課程實施帶來的啟示，並提出了認同感與關注的實施研究在未來的發展方向。
摘要(英文)： Focusing on teachers’ personal factors is one of the new trends in implementation research. However, most of the existing inquiries on teachers personal factors adopt a cognitive approach, which pays much more attention on teachers cognition than their affective and conative factors. In the implementation researches on teachers affective and conative factors, receptivity and Stage of Concerns(SoC) are two special and important issues. First, this paper introduces the theoretical frameworks of receptivity and SoC in brief. Then, we discuss the two factors role in implementation research based on the empirical studies recently published, especially the experiences in Hong Kong and Mainland China. Third, we make a preliminary analysis on the relationship between the two factors from the theoretical and empirical perspectives. In the last part, we conclude the practical implications of receptivity and SoC researches to curriculum implementation, and bring about some directions and issues for future researchers to explore.
參考文獻： 李子建（1998）。香港小學教師對課程改革的認同感：目標為本課程與常識科的比較。課程論壇，7（2），頁71-83。
李子建（2001）。教育改革的反思。基礎教育學報，10(2)、11(1)，頁3-12。
黃錦樟（1999）。導言。載於Fullan, M. & Hargreaves, A. 著，黃錦樟、葉建源等譯，學校與改革：人本主義的傾向。香港：香港教育圖書公司。
顏明仁、李子建（2002）。同儕觀課教學與學校文化。載於李子建（主編），課程、教學與學校改革：新世紀的教育發展，頁125-148。香港：中文大學出版社。
尹弘　、李子建、靳玉樂（2003）。中小學教師對新課程改革認同感的個案分析。比較教育研究，24（10），頁24-29。
靳玉樂、尹弘　（2003）。教師與新課程實施：基於CBAM的個案分析。課程．教材．教法，23（11），頁51-58。
Bailey, D. B. & Palsha, S. A.(1992). Qualities of the stages of concern questionnaire and implications for educational innovations. Journal of Educational Research, 85(4), 226-232.
Behar, L. S.(1994). The knowledge base of curriculum: An empirical analysis. Maryland: University Press of America, Inc.
Berman, P., & McLaughlin, M. W.(1976). Implementation of educational innovation. The Educational Forum, 40(3), 354-370.
Cheung, D., Hattie, J. & Ng, D.(2001). Reexamining the stages of concern questionnaire: A test of alternative models. The Journal of Educational Research, 94(4), 226-236.
Chueng, D.(2002). Refining a stage model for studying teacher concerns about educational innovations. Australian Journal of Education, 46(3), 305-322.
Collins, P. R. & Waugh, R. F.(1998). Teachers’ receptivity to a proposed system -wide educational change. Journal of Educational Administration. 36(2), 183-199.
Ebersole, W. J. Jr.(1989). Indicators of teacher receptivity to a staff development project focusing on mastery teaching in a consortium of local educational agencies. Unpublished PhD thesis. Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburgh.
Fullan, M. & Pomfret, A.(1977). Research on Curriculum and Instruction Implementation. Review of Educational Research. 47(1), 335-397.
Fullan, M.(1992).Successful school improvement and the implementation perspective. In M. Fullan (ed.), Successful school improvement: The implementation perspectives and beyond (pp.21-27). Buckingham: Open University Press.
Giacquinta, J. B.(1975). Status, risk and receptivity to innovations in complex organizations: A study of the response of four groups of educators to the proposed introduction of sex education in elementary school. Sociology of Education, 48, 38-58.
Gitlin, A. & Margonis, F.(1995). The political aspect of reform: Teacher resistance as good sense. American Journal of Education, 103(4), 377-405.
Goodson, I.(2001). Social histories of educational change. Journal of Educational Change, 2(1), 45-63.
Ha, A. S. C., Lee, J. C. K., Chan, D. W. K. & Sum, R. K. W.(2004). Teachers’ perceptions of in-service teacher training to support curriculum change in physical education: The Hong Kong experience. Sport, Education and Society, 9(3), 421-438.
Hall, G. E. & Hord, S.M.(1987). Changes in schools: Facilitating the process. Albany: SNUY Press.
Hall, G. E. & Hord, S.M.(2001). Implementing change: Patterns, principles, and potholes. Boston: Allyn and Bacon.
Hall, G. E., George, A.A.& Rutherford, W. L.(1977). Measuring stages of concern about the innovation: A manual for the use of the SoC Questionnaire. Austin, TX: Southwest Educational Development Laboratory. (ERIC No.: ED147 342).
Hargreaves, A.(1998a). The emotional practice of teaching. Teaching and Teacher Education, 14(8), 835-854.
Hargreaves, A.(1998b). The emotion of teaching and educational change. In Hargreaves, A., Lieberman, A., Fullan, F. & Hopkins, D.(eds.). International handbook of educational change(pp. 558-575). Dordrecht, Boston, London: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
Katz, E. H., Dalton, S., & Giaquinta, J. B.(1994). Status risk and receptivity of home economics teachers to a statewide curriculum innovation. Home Economics Research Journal, 22(4), 401-421.
Kazlow, C.(1977). Faculty receptivity to organizational change: A test of two explanations of resistance to innovation in higher education. Journal of Research and Development in Education, 10(2), 87-98.
Lee, C. K. J. (2000). Teacher receptivity to curriculum change in the implementation stage: The case of environmental educational in Hong Kong. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 32(1), 95-115.
Lee, C. K. J.(1995). Teacher receptivity to environmental education: A preliminary study. In Proceedings of the international curriculum conference on partnership in curriculum development: Towards more effective learning(pp. 81-88). Hong Kong: Department of Curriculum Studies, University of Hong Kong, CDI & OECD.
Lee, C. K. J.(1996). Environmental education in the primary curriculum in Hong Kong. Unpublished PhD thesis. Hong Kong: Chinese University of Hong Kong.
Moroz, R., & Waugh, R. F.(2000). Teacher receptivity to system-wide educational change. Journal of Educational Administration, 38(2), 159-178.
Morris, P.(1987). Curriculum innovation and implementation: A cautionary note. Educational Research Journal, 2, 49-54.
Peers, I. S.(1990). Utility of concerns-based staff development in facilitating education and training about…. British Educational Research Journal, 16(2), 179-189.
Pratt, D.(1980). Curriculum: Design and development. New York: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich Inc.
Punch, K. F., & McAtee, W. A.(1979). Accounting for teachers’ attitude towards change. Journal of Educational Administration, 17(2), 171-182.
Richardson, V., & Placier, P.(2001). Teacher change. In Richardson, V.(ed.). Handbook of Research on Teaching(4th ed.)(pp.905-950).Washington, D. C.: American Educational Research Association.
Snyder, J., Bolin, F., & Zumwalt, K.(1992). Curriculum implementation. In P. W. Jackson (ed.), Handbook of research on curriculum(pp.402-435). New York: Macmillan Pub. Co.
van den Berg, R.(1993). The concerns-based adoption model in the Netherlands, Flanders and United Kingdom: State of the art and perspective. Studies in Educational Evaluation, 19, 51-63.
van den Berg, R., Sleegers, P. & Geijsel, F.(2001). Teacher’s concern about adaptive teaching: Evaluation of a support program. Journal of Curriculum and Supervision, 16(3), 245-258.
Wade, S. E., Welch, M., & Jensen, J. B.(1994). Teacher receptivity to collaboration: Levels of interest, types of concern, and school characteristics as variables contributing to successful implementation. Journal of Educational and Psychological Consultation, 5(3), 177-209.
Waugh, R. F. & Godfrey, J.(1995). Understanding teachers’ receptivity to system-wide educational change. Journal of Educational Administration, 33(3), 38-54.
Waugh, R. F. & Punch, K. F.(1987). Teacher receptivity to system-wide change in the implementation stage. Review of Educational Research, 57(3), 237-254.
Waugh, R. F.(2000). Towards a model of teacher receptivity to planned system-wide educational change in a centrally controlled system. Journal of Educational Administration. 38(4), 350-367.
Waugh, R., & Godfrey, J.(1993). Teacher receptivity to system-wide change in the implementation stage. British Educational Research Journal, 19(5), 565-578.