教育政策的科學基礎研究法：以美國「沒有學生落後法案」研究為例

Methodology of the Scientifically Based Research in Educational Policy: Examples of the Study of No Child Left Behind Act in the United States

張鈿富
吳慧子
Dian-Fu Chang


所屬期刊： 第1卷第2期 「教育政策與制度」
主編：國立政治大學
教育學院 秦夢群院長
系統編號： vol002_02
主題： 教育政策與制度
出版年份： 2005
作者： 張鈿富
吳慧子
作者(英文)： Dian-Fu Chang
論文名稱： 教育政策的科學基礎研究法：以美國「沒有學生落後法案」研究為例
論文名稱(英文)： Methodology of the Scientifically Based Research in Educational Policy: Examples of the Study of No Child Left Behind Act in the United States
共同作者：
最高學歷：
校院名稱：
系所名稱：
語文別： 中文
論文頁數： 18
中文關鍵字： 教育政策;教育政策研究方法;沒有學生落後法案;以科學基礎的研究
英文關鍵字： Educational policy; educational policy research;No Child Left Behind Act; scientifically based research
服務單位： 暨南國際大學教育政策與人文學系
稿件字數： 0
作者專長：
投稿日期： 94/08/14
論文下載： pdf檔案icon
摘要(中文)： 本文主要目的在探討近年來美國教育政策推動的「沒有學生落後法案」中的研究方法。本文以教育政策研究方法為主，從「沒有學生落後法案」的背景敘述到政策科學研究方法的主要內涵介紹，發現此一教育政策研究取向是以科學基礎的研究為主，對教育政策相關研究做一規範。本文評述此一教育政策研究方法的主要形貌、爭議問題、以及運用在台灣的教育政策訂定與執行的可能性。
摘要(英文)： The Purpose of this study is to discuss that the methodology on scientifically based research in recent educational policy, No Child Left Behind Act. This study focuses on the methodology in the educational policy, including the background of the No Child Left Behind and the methodology of the scientific research in the educational policy. From this study, it is found that the scientifically based research is the major methodology in the No Child Left Behind Act, and it provides the standards of the educational policy research. This study is to examine basic issues related to this methodology in the educational policy research, to present its contestation, and to apply it to improving the decision-making and implementation of the educational policy in Taiwan.
參考文獻： Beghetto, R. (2003). Scientifically based research. Oregon: University of Oregon, College of Education. ERIC Digest 167. Retrieved June 17, 2005, from http://cepm.uoregon.edu/publications/roundup/spring2003.html
Berliner, D. C. (2002). Educational research: The hardest science of all. Educational Researcher, 31 (8), 18-20.
Bouffard, S. (2003). Doing what works: Scientifically based research in education. The Evaluation Exchange, IX (1). Retrieved June 19, 2005, from http://www.gse.harvard.edu/hfrp/eval/issue21/bbt1.html
Comprehensive School Reform Program Office, Office of Elementary and Secondary Education, & U.S. Department of Education. (2002). Scientifically Based Research and the Comprehensive School Reform (CSR) Program. Retrieved June 18, 2005, from http://www.ed.gov/programs/compreform/guidance/appendc.pdf
Educational Sciences Reform Act of 2002. (Pub. L. No. 107-279). Retrieved June 18, 2005, from http://www.ed.gov/policy/rschstat/leg/PL107-279.pdf
Eisenhart, M., & Towne, L. (2003). Contestation and change in national policy on “scientifically based” education research. Educational Researcher, 32(7), 31-38.
H.R. 3801. Education Sciences Reform Act of 2002 (107th Congress). Retrieved June 18, 2005, from http://www.ed.gov/policy/rschstat/leg/PL107-279.pdf
H.R. 4875. Scientifically Based Education Research, Statistics, Evaluation, and Information Act of 2000 (“original Castle Bill” introduced in House [106th Congress]). Retrieved June 19, 2005, from http://thomas.loc.gov
Learning Point Associates. (2004). Scientifically based research. Retrieved June 19, 2005, http://www.ncrel.org/csri/tools/qkey7/qkey7.pdf
National Research Council. (2002). Scientific research in education. R. J. Shavelson & L. Towne (Eds.), Committee on Scientific Principles for Education Research. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
No Child Left Behind Act of 2001, Pub. L. No. 107-110. Retrieved June 18, 2005, from http://www.ed.gov/policy/elsec/leg/esea02/index.html
Taub, J. (2002, November 10). Does it work? The New York Times.
Wiles, J. (1999). Curriculum essentials: A resource for educators. Boston: Allyn and Bacon.