期刊專區/ Periodical Section

優質教學釋義與啟示

Interpretation and Implication of Quality Teaching

所屬期刊：	第2卷第2期 「課程與教學」 主編：國立台南大學 黃政傑校長
系統編號：	vol005_01
主題：	課程與教學
出版年份：	2006
作者：	簡紅珠
作者(英文)：	Hong-Chu Chien
論文名稱：	優質教學釋義與啟示
論文名稱(英文)：	Interpretation and Implication of Quality Teaching
共同作者：
最高學歷：
校院名稱：
系所名稱：
語文別：
論文頁數：	18
中文關鍵字：	優質教學、分化式教學、學課研究、教學評鑑、教師專業發展
英文關鍵字：	quality teaching, differentiated instruction, Lesson Study, evaluation of teaching, professional development
服務單位：	新竹教育大學教育系所教授
稿件字數：	11591
作者專長：	課程教學、師範教育
投稿日期：	2006/4/30
論文下載：
摘要(中文)：	本文旨在闡釋Fenstermacher與Richardson對優質教學的詮釋，並參考此詮釋，提出優質教學對我國教師的課室教學、專業成長、與教學評鑑的一些啟示。根據Fenstermacher與Richardson的詮釋，優質教學結合良好教學與成功教學兩種特質，不但對學習者要敏感，也要求學生學習表現良好。優質教學對我國教師的課室教學、專業成長、和教學評鑑的啟示如下: 一、在強調學科或領域的學習成就之際，也應重視分化式教學； 二、為達優質教學，教師應加強對學生的學習與認知思考的「看」、「聽」、和「讀」; 三、教師專業發展應與教師課堂教學和學生學習直接相關，日本教師專業成長活動「學課研究」，可資仿效；四、教學品質的評定應從多重面相去考量。
摘要(英文)：	This article tries to illustrate the interpretation of quality teaching by Fenstermacher and Richardson and to draw some implications of quality teaching for classroom teaching, professional development, and evaluation of teaching in Taiwan. According to Fenstermacher and Richardson, quality teaching can be understood as an integration of both good and successful teaching with good teaching being learner sensitive while successful teaching being learning dependent. The implications of quality teaching are as follows: 1.Differentiated instruction is recommended to practice along with standardization of individual differences and teaching to the test in current curricular and teaching practice; 2.To obtain quality teaching, teachers should be able to see, to hear, and to read their students’ minds and learning; 3. Professional development should be targeted and directly related to teachers’ classroom teaching and students’ learning. Lesson Study, a Japanese form of professional development, could be a good alternative for professional development in our schools; 4. The quality of teaching must be assessed multi-dimensionally.
參考文獻：	單文經（1995）。教學的本義與引伸義。載於李咏吟、單文經著，教學原理（頁1-17）。台北: 遠流。 簡紅珠（1992）。教學研究的主要派典及其啟示之探析。高雄: 復文。 簡紅珠（2004）。從教學的道德性與藝術性論教學評鑑的盲點與限制。教育研究月刊，127，55-62。 Ball, D. L. (1996). Integrity in teaching: Recognizing the fusion of the moral and intellectual. American Educational Research Journal, 33(1), 155-192. Ball, D. L. (1997). What do students know? Focusing challenges of distance, context, and desire in trying to hear children. In B. Biddle, T. Good, & I. Goodson(Eds.), International handbook of teachers and teaching(pp. 769-818). Boston: Kluwer Academic Publishers. Eisner, E. (2003). What does it mean to say that a school is doing well. In A.Ornstein, L. Behar-Horenstein & B. Pajak(Eds.), Contemporary issues in curriculum (3rd ed., pp239-247). Boston: Pearson Education. Fenstermacher, G. (1986). Philosophy of research on teaching: Three aspects. In M. Wittrock(Ed.), Handbook of research on teaching(3rd ed., pp 37-49). New York: Macmillan. Fenstermacher, G., & Richardson, V. (2005). On making determinations of quality in teaching. Teachers College Record, 107(1), 186-213. Fischler, H. (1994). Concerning the difference between intention and action: Teachers’ conceptions and actions. In I. Carlgren, G. Handal, & S. Vaage (Eds.), Teachers’ minds and actions: Research on teachers’ thinking and practice(pp. 165-180). London: Falmer Press. Fischler, H. (1999). The impact of teaching experiences on student-teachers’ and beginning teachers’ conceptions of teaching and learning science. I J. Loughnan(Ed.), Researching teaching: Methodologies and practices for understanding pedagogy(pp. 172-197). London: Falmer Press. Hopkins, D., & Stern, D. (1996). Quality teachers, quality schools: International perspectives and policy implications. Teaching and Teacher Education, 12, 501-517. Kennedy, M. (2006). From teacher quality to quality teaching. Educational Leadership, 63(6), 14-19. Levitt, K. E. (2002). An analysis of elementary teachers’ beliefs regarding the teaching and learning of science. Science Education, 86, 1-22. Lewis, C., Perry, R., & Murata, A. (2006). How should research contribute to instructional improvement? The case of lesson study. Educational Researcher, 35(3), 3-14. Marton, F. (1994). On the structure of teachers’ awaremess. In I. Carlgren, G. Handal, & S. Vaag (Eds.), Teachers’ minds and actions: Research on teachers’ thinking and practice (pp. 28-42). London: Falmer Press. Marzano, R. J., & Costa, A. L. (1998). Question: Do standardized test measure general cognitive skills? Answer: No. Educational Leadership, 55(8), 66-71. Nuthall, G. (2004). Relating classroom teaching to student learning: A critical analysis of why research has failed to bridge the theory-practice gap. Harvard Educational Review, 74(3), 273-306. Ornstein, A. C. (2003). Teaching and teacher accountability. In A. Ornstein, L. Behar-Horenstein, & E. Pajak(Eds.), Contemporary issues in curriculum(3rd ed., pp.248-261). Boston: Pearson Education. Prawat, R. S. (1992). Teachers’ beliefs about teaching and learning: A constructivist perspective. American Journal of Education, 100, 354-395. Ravitch, D. (1995). National standards in American education: A citizen’s guide. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution. Shulman, L. (1987). Knowledge and teaching: Foundations of the new reform. Harvard Educational Review, 57, 1-22. Stigler, J. W., & Hiebert, J. (1999). The teaching gap: Best ideas from the world’s teachers for improving education in the classroom. New York: Free Press. Tomlinson, C. A. (1992). Reconcilable differences: Standards-based teaching and differentiation. Educational Leadership, 58(1), 6-11. Watanabe, T. (2002). Learning from Japanese lesson study. Educational Leadership, 59(6), 36-39. Wehrmann, K. S.(2000). Baby steps: A beginner’s guide. Educational Leadership, 58(1), 20-23. Wittrock, M. C. (Ed.)(1986). Handbook of research on teaching (3rd ed.).New York: Macmillan.