評鑑專業化的概念與發展對我國教育評鑑專業化的啟示

The Implications of the Evaluation Professionalism Concept and Development for Educational Evaluation Professionalism in Taiwan

曾淑惠
Shu-Hui Tseng


所屬期刊： 第2卷第3期 「教育政策與制度」
主編：國立暨南國際大學
人文學院 張鈿富院長
系統編號： vol006_07
主題： 教育政策與制度
出版年份： 2006
作者： 曾淑惠
作者(英文)： Shu-Hui Tseng
論文名稱： 評鑑專業化的概念與發展對我國教育評鑑專業化的啟示
論文名稱(英文)： The Implications of the Evaluation Professionalism Concept and Development for Educational Evaluation Professionalism in Taiwan
共同作者：
最高學歷：
校院名稱：
系所名稱：
語文別：
論文頁數： 22
中文關鍵字： 教育評鑑;專業化;專業團體
英文關鍵字： educational evaluation;professionalism;professional community
服務單位： 國立台北科技大學技術及職業教育研究所副教授
稿件字數： 13587
作者專長： 教育評鑑、師資與教學
投稿日期： 2006/2/26
論文下載： pdf檔案icon
摘要(中文)： 本文透過文獻分析的方法，探究評鑑專業化之概念，檢視評鑑專業化發展並提出可供我國教育評鑑專業化發展參考的啟示。依據分析結果發現專業化有十大特徵，包括：專業人員，專業知能、專業訓練、專業組織、專業倫理、專業自主、專業證照、專業服務、專業生涯及專業成長。針對專業化的特徵討論評鑑專業化的發展現況與面臨的挑戰，本文作者認為對我國教育評鑑專業化具有下列的啟示：（1）應全面檢視我國教育評鑑專業化的現狀；（2）評鑑學術單位、評鑑專業團體及教育行政主管機關應有共同努力以成就教育評鑑專業化的策略；（3）開始啟動教育評鑑人員認證相關議題的討論與制度推動；（4）重視全球教育評鑑專業化的趨向並參與國際場域的對話討論。
摘要(英文)： The article aimed to explore the concept of evaluation professionalism, to discuss the status of evaluation professionalism development, and to propose implications for professional educational evaluation. The review of literature indicated that professionalism demonstrates the following characteristics: professional membership, professional knowledge, professional training, professional organization, professional ethics, professional autonomy, professional licensing, professional services, professional career, and professional growth. Then, we review the current status of evaluation professionalism. Finally, the following suggestions are made based on the above discussion. (1) A thorough examination of the status of evaluation professionalism in Taiwan education, (2) The evaluation of educational institutions, professional organizations, and educational administration requires cooperation to develop strategies for evaluation professionalism, (3) Begin a discussion of issues related to the implementation of a licensing system for educational evaluators, and (4) Observe global trends and participate in international discussion in evaluation professionalism.
參考文獻： 王政彥（1995）。台灣地區成人教育行政專業化之可行策略。成人教育，24，18-26。
江文雄（2004）。教育行政與管理評鑑的回顧與前瞻－一位教育行政老兵的見證與省思。教育資料集刊，29，271-292。
吳清山（1998）。建立教師教育權威之探索－談教師專業知能、專業自主與專業倫理。初等教育學刊，6，41-58。
沈清松（1996）。倫理學理論與專業倫理教育。通識教育季刊，3（2）。95年2月15日取自http://www.ncu.edu.tw/~cage/quarterl/0302.htm。
林天祐（2004a）。校務評鑑專業化的探討。載於張明輝主編 ，教育政策與教育革新（頁319-340）。台北：心理。
林天祐（2004b）。教育評鑑實施過程與方法的專業化。教育資料集刊，29，27-52。
曾淑惠（2002）。教育方案評鑑。台北：師大書苑。
曾淑惠（2004）。教育評鑑模式。台北：心理。
蘇錦麗（2003）。談教育評鑑之專業性。教育研究月刊，112，31-36。
謝文全（1998）。教育行政—理論與實務。台北：文景。
Abbott, A. (1988). The system of professions: An essay on the expert division of labor. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Abbott, A. (1991). The order of professionalization: An empirical analysis. Work and Occupations, 18(4), 355-384.
Abercrombie, M, Hickman M, Johnson, M. L. & Thain, M (1992). The Penguin Dictionary of Biology, 8thedition. Penguin Books, London.
Altschuld, J. W., Engle, M. (1994). Should evaluators be certified. New Directions for Program Evaluation, 62, 29-40.
Altschuld, J. W. (1999). Certification of evaluators: Highlights from a report submitted to the board of the American Evaluation Association. American Journal of Evaluation, 20(3), 481-493.
Bickman, L. (1994). An optimistic view of evaluation. Evaluation Practice, 15(3), 255-260.
Bickman, L. (1997). Evaluating evaluation. Evaluation Practice, 18(1), 1-16.
Bickman, L. & Reich, S. (2005). Profession of evaluation. In S. Mathison(eds.). Encyclopedia of evaluation(pp.331-334). Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications.
Brown, A. (1987). Metacognition, executive control, self-regulation, and other more mysterious mechanisms. In F. E, Weinert & R. H. Kluwe,(eds.).Motivation, and understanding(pp.65-116). Hillsdale: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Publishers.
Caplow, T. (1954). The sociology of work. Minneapolis, Minn.: The University of Minneapolis Press.
Carr-Saunders, A. M..& Wilson, P.A. (1933). The Professions. Oxford University Press, Oxford.
Cervero, R. M. (1988). Effective continuing education for professionals. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Datta, L. E. (2001). Coming attractions. American Journal of Evaluation. 22(3), 403-408.
Datta, L. E. (2003). The evaluation profession and the government. In T. Kellaghan, & D. L. Stufflebeam,& L. A. Wingate,(eds).International handbook of educational evaluation (pp.345-360). Kluwer Academic Publishers.
Donaldson, S. I. (2001). Overcoming our negative reputation: Evaluation becomes known as a helping profession. American Journal of Evaluation. 22(3), 355-361.
Fitzpatrick, J. L., Sanders, J. R. & Worthen, B. R. (2004). Program evaluation: Alternative approaches and practical guidelines( 3rd ed.). Pearson Education, Inc.
House, E. R. (1990). Ethics of Evaluation Studies. In H. J. Walberg, & G. D. Haertel, (eds) . The International Encyclopedia of Educational Evaluation(pp. 91-94), Oxford: Pergamon.
House, E. R. (1993). Professional evaluation: Social impact and political consequences. London: Newbury Park Sage Publication.
Hoy, W. K. & Miskel, C. G. (1987). Educational administration. New York: Random House.
Johnson, T. R. (1972). Professions and power. London: Macmillan.
Larson, M. S. (1977). The rise of professionalism: A sociological analysis. Berkeley: University of California Press.
Mark, M. M. (2001).Evaluation’s future: Furor, futile, or fertile? American Journal of Evaluation. 22(3), 457-479.
Mertens, D. M. (1994). Training evaluators: Unique skill and knowledge. New Directions for Program Evaluation. 62, 17-28.
Morell, J. A. (1990). Evaluation: Status of a loose coalition. Evaluation Practice. 11, 213-219.
Newcomer, K. (2001). Tracking and probing program performance: Fruitful path or blind alley for evaluation professionals. American Journal of Evaluation. 22(3), 337-341.
Parsons, T. (1949) The Structure of Social Action, New York: The Free Press.
Patton, M. Q. (1990). The challenge of being a profession. Evaluation Practice. 11, 45-51.
Preskill, H.(2003). The evaluation profession as a sustainable learning community. In T. Kellaghan, & D. L. Stufflebeam,& L. A. Wingate,(eds).International handbook of educational evaluation (pp.361-372). Kluwer Academic Publishers.
Roberts, K. H., & Hunt, D. M. (1991). Organization behavior. Boston Masachusets: PWS-KENT Publishing Company.
Rossi, P. H. & Freeman, H. E. (1985). Evaluation: A systematic approach(3rd ed.). Bevery Hills.CA: Sage.
Schon, D. A. (1974). Theory in practice: Increasing professional effectives. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass Publishers.
Schon, D. A. (1983). The reflective practitioner. New York: Basic Books.
Schon, D. A. (1987). Educating the reflective practitioner: Toward a new designs for teaching and learning in the professions. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Sechrest, L. (1994). Program evaluation: Oh what it seemed to be. Evaluation Practice. 15(3), 359-365.
Shadish, W. R. (1994). Need-based evaluation: good evaluation and what you need to know to do it. Evaluation Practice. 15(3), 347-358.
Smith, M. F. (1999). Should AEA begin a process for restricting membership in the profession of evaluation: American Journal of Evaluation. 20(3), 521-531.
Smith, M. F. (2003). The future of the evaluation profession. In T. Kellaghan, & D. L. Stufflebeam,& L. A. Wingate,(eds).International handbook of educational evaluation (pp.373-386). Kluwer Academic Publishers.
Stufflebeam, D. L. (2001). Interdisciplinary. Ph. D. programming in evaluation. American Journal of Evaluation. 22(3), 445-455.
Trevison, M. S. (2004). Practical training in evaluation: A review of the literature. American Journal of Evaluation. 25(2), 256-272.
Wilensky, H. L. (1964). The professionalization of everyone? AAmerican Journal of Sociology. 70 (2), 137-158.
Worthen, B. R. (1994). Is evaluation a mature profession that warrants the preparation of evaluation professions?. New Directions for Program Evaluation. 62, 3-15.
Worthen, B. R., Sanders, J. R. & Fitzpatrick, J. L. (1997). Program evaluation: Alternative approaches and practical guidelines( 2nd ed.). Pearson Education, Inc.
Worthen, B. R. (2003). How can we call evaluation a profession if we are no qualification for practice? In T. Kellaghan, & D. L. Stufflebeam,& L. A. Wingate,(eds). International handbook of educational evaluation (pp.329-343). Kluwer Academic Publishers.