臺北市國民小學教學導師制度實施成效與困難之研究

Research of Effect and Implementation Difficulty of Mentor Teacher Program for Elementary Schools in Taipei

高紅瑛;張德銳;丁一顧
共同作者：張德銳;丁一顧
Hong-Ying Kao


所屬期刊： 第3卷第1期 「師資培育」
主編：朝陽科技大學幼保系
陳迺臣教授
系統編號： vol008_08
主題： 師資培育
出版年份： 2007
作者： 高紅瑛;張德銳;丁一顧
作者(英文)： Hong-Ying Kao
論文名稱： 臺北市國民小學教學導師制度實施成效與困難之研究
論文名稱(英文)： Research of Effect and Implementation Difficulty of Mentor Teacher Program for Elementary Schools in Taipei
共同作者： 張德銳;丁一顧
最高學歷：
校院名稱：
系所名稱：
語文別：
論文頁數： 34
中文關鍵字： 教學輔導;教學導師;夥伴教師
英文關鍵字： instructional mentoring;mentor teacher;partner teacher
服務單位： 吳鳳技術學院幼兒保育系兼任講師
稿件字數： 21737
作者專長： 教學與輔導、教育政策、教育視導
投稿日期： 2006/11/30
論文下載： pdf檔案icon
摘要(中文)： 本研究旨在瞭解臺北市國民小學教學輔導教師制度，94學年度試辦之成效與困境。本研究兼採問卷調查與焦點團體訪談二種研究方法，以「教學輔導教師制度實施現況與成效意見調查問卷」及「教學輔導教師制度實施現況與成效焦點團體訪談大綱」為研究工具，進行研究。
根據研究結果發現，臺北市國民小學教學導師制度有下列實施之成效：
一、受訪者對於教學導師與夥伴教師的「互動方式」、「互動品質」、「互動頻率」、「學校對教學導師制度的實施成效」、「教學導師對於自己的輔導表現」皆感到滿意。
二、教學導師所發揮的功能獲得相當高程度的肯定，其中尤以：「協助教師解決教職生活適應問題」、「協助教師進行班級經營」、「協助建立學校同儕互動文化」、「協助教師解決教學問題」、「協助教師進行學生輔導」等功能更受肯定。
三、經過一年的教學輔導推行，大多數的行政人員願意繼續在校內推動教學導師制度；大多數教學導師願意繼續擔任下一年度的教學導師；多數夥伴教師願意繼續接受教學導師的輔導和協助。
此外，本制度的推展亦發現許多困難，例如：「教學導師與夥伴教師任教年級、科目未能配合」、「夥伴教師的教學或行政工作負擔沉重」、「夥伴教師沒有減少授課時數，缺乏與教學導師進行互動的時間」、「教學導師與夥伴教師雙方缺乏共同討論時間」、「夥伴教師未接受足夠的教學導師制度職前培訓與在職成長課程」等問題。
摘要(英文)： The purpose of this study was to investigate the effect and implementation difficulty of the 2005 mentor teacher program for elementary schools in Taipei. The research methods were questionnaire survey and focus group interview.
According to the survey and interview findings, the positive impacts of the program were: (1) mentor teachers and partner teachers (proteges) were satisfied with their interaction, (2) the functions of the program were recognized by mentor teachers and partner teachers, (3) mentor teachers and partner teachers were willing to continue their relationships.
The implementation problems of the program were found to be the following: (1) some menter teachers were not matched with the partner teachers who taught the same grade level or subject matter; (2) the instructional loading of the partner teachers were quite high; (3) the mentor teachers and partner teachers did not have adequate time for informal and formal conferencing, planning, and conversation, (4) the preservice and inservice training of partner teachers were not enough.
Based on the research findings, some recommendations are proposed to improve the implementation of the program.
參考文獻： 王煥琛（1990）。我國小學師資教育之發展與趨向。載於教育學術論文（上）（頁750-769）。臺北市：三民。
李雅婷（1999）。美國德克薩斯州實習輔導教師培訓方案分析。教育實習輔導季刊，5（1），31-36。
施冠慨譯（1993）。初任教師的輔導。臺北市：五南。
許雅惠（2004）。臺北市國民小學教學輔導教師制度試辦現況與實施成效之研究。臺北市立師範學院國民教育研究所碩士論文，未出版，臺北市。
張芬芬（2001）。英國進階教師制度及其啟示。初等教育學刊，9,，55-74。
張德銳（1998a）。師資培育與教育革新研究。臺北市：五南。
張德銳（1998b）。美國良師制度對我國實習輔導教師制度之啟示。師資培育與教育革新研究。臺北市：五南。
張德銳、張芬芬、邱錦昌、張明輝、熊曣、萬家春、鄭玉卿、葉興華、張嘉育、高紅瑛、李俊達（2002）。臺北市國民小學教學輔導教師九十學年度實施成效評鑑報告。臺北市：臺北市立師範學院初等教育學系，未出版。
張德銳、高紅瑛、丁一顧、李俊達、許雅惠、陳信夫（2003）。臺北市國民小學教學輔導教師九十一學年度實施成效評鑑報告。臺北市：臺北市立師範學院初等教育學系，未出版。
張德銳、高紅瑛、丁一顧、李俊達、簡賢昌、張純、魏韶勤、吳紹歆、蔡雅玲、曾莉雯（2004）。臺北市國民小學教學輔導教師九十二學年度實施成效評鑑報告。臺北市：臺北市立師範學院初等教育學系，未出版。
張德銳、高紅瑛、丁一顧、李俊達、簡賢昌（2005b）。臺北市國民小學教學輔導教師九十三學年度實施成效評鑑報告。臺北市：臺北市立師範學院初等教育學系，未出版。
American Federation of Teachers(1998). Mentor teacher programs in the states. Educational Issues Policy Brief, 5, 1-13. Retrieved October 31, 2002, from http://www.aft.org/edissues/downloads/Policy5.pdf .
Brooks, M. (1999). Mentors matter. In M. Scherer (Ed. ). A better beginning: Supporting and mentoring new teachers (pp. 53-59). Alexandria: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED435603)
Certo, J. L. (2002). The support and challenge offered in mentoring to influence beginning teachers’ thinking and professional development: A case study of beginning elementary teachers and their mentors. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Virginia Commonwealth University, Virginia. (UMI Dissertation Services Number: AAT 3042804)
Commission on Teacher Credentialing. (1993). Beginning teacher support and assessment program descriptions: Year one. Sacramento: California Department of Education.
Coppenhaver, A., & Schaper, L. (1999). Mentoring the mentors. In M. Scherer (Ed.) , A better beginning: Supporting and mentoring new teachers. (pp.60-68). Alexandria: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 435603)
Drake, T. L., & Roe, W. H. (2003). The principalship(6th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Merrill/Prentice Hall.
Fagan, M. M., & Walter G. (1982). Mentoring among teachers. Journal of Educational Research, 76(2), 113-118.
Feiman-Nemser, S. (1992). Helping novices learn to teach: Lessons from an experienced support teacher (Report No. 91-6). East Lansing: Michigan State University, National Center for Research on Teacher Learning.
Freiberg, M. R., Zbikowski, J., & Ganser, T. (1996). Where do we go from here? Decisions and dilemmas of teacher mentors. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association, New York. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 395930)
Ganser, T. (1996b). What do mentors say about mentoring? Journal of Staff Development. 17(3), 36-39.
Gordon, S.P.(1991). How to help beginning teachers succeed. Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.Haberman, S. J. (1978). Analysis of qualitative data. New York: Academic Press.
Hawk, P. (1987). Beginning teacher programs: Benefits for the experienced educator in recruiting and inducting quality personnel for schools. Action in Teacher Edu-
cation, the Journal of the Association of Teacher Educators, 8(4), 59-63.
Huffman,G.,& Leak, S.(1986). Beginning teachers’ perceptions of mentors. Journal of Teacher Education, 37(1), 22-25.
Huling-Austin, L. (1986). What can and cannot reasonably be expected from teacher induction programs. Journal of Teacher Education, 37,1,2-5.
Huling-Austin, L., & Murphy, S. C. (1987). Assessing the impact of teacher induction programs: Implications for program development. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Washington, DC . (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 283779)
Jorissen, K. T. (2002). Retaining alternate route teachers: The power of professional integration in teacher preparation and induction. The High School Journal, 86(1), 45-56.
Mei, L. (1994). Mentor teacher internship program, 1993-94. OERA report. Brooklyn, NY: New York City Board of Education. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED387481)
Odell, S. J. (1990). A collaborative approach to teacher induction that works. The journal of Staff Development, 11, 4, 12-16.
Odell, S. J., & Ferraro, D. P. (1992). Teacher mentoring and teacher retention. Journal of Teacher Education, 43(3), 200-204.
Romatowski,J.A., Dorminey, J.J., & Voorhees, B.V. (1989). Teacher induction programs: A report. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 316525)
Scott, N. (1998). Careful Planning or serendipity well-being through teacher induction. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the Canadian Society for the Study of Education, Ottawa, Canada. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED420627)
Shulman, J. H. (1986). Opportunities of a mentorship: The implementation of the California mentor teacher program. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 278650)
Stanford, R. L. et al. (1994). Empowering cooperating teachers: The University of Alabama clinical master teacher (CMT) program. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 378157)
Stansbury, K., & Zimmerman, J. (2002). Smart induction programs become lifelines for the beginning teacher. Journal of Staff Development, 23(4), 10-17.
Storms, B., Wing, J., Jinks, T., Banks, K., & Cavazos, P. (2000). CFASST(field review) implementation 1999-2000: A formative evaluation report. Princeton, NJ:Educational Testing Service.
Wagner, L. A., & Ownby, L. (1995). The California mentor teacher program in 1980s and 1990s. Education & Urban Society, 28 (1), 20-35.
Wollman-Bonilla, J. (1997). Mentoring as a two-way street. Journal of Staff Development, 18(3), 50-52.
Zeichner, K. M. (1980). The student teaching seminar: A vehicle for the development of reflective teachers. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Association of Teacher Educators. Washington DC, Feb, 1980.