期刊專區/ Periodical Section

重看Ralph Tyler的課程思想

Ralph Tyler’s Curriculum Ideas Revisited

所屬期刊：	第3卷第2期 「課程與教學」 主編：國立政治大學教育學研究所 黃炳煌教授
系統編號：	vol009_04
主題：	課程與教學
出版年份：	2007
作者：	宋明娟
作者(英文)：	Min-Chuan Sung
論文名稱：	重看Ralph Tyler的課程思想
論文名稱(英文)：	Ralph Tyler’s Curriculum Ideas Revisited
共同作者：
最高學歷：
校院名稱：
系所名稱：
語文別：	中文
論文頁數：	30
中文關鍵字：	泰勒;泰勒原理;課程思想
英文關鍵字：	Tyler;Tyler Rationale;curriculum ideas
服務單位：	國立臺灣師範大學教育學系博士候選人 / 國立臺灣師範大學教育學系兼任講師
稿件字數：	28837
作者專長：	課程與教學
投稿日期：	2006/11/8
論文下載：
摘要(中文)：	學界對Ralph Tyler的課程思想評價不一，本文縷析批判與辯護立場的原委並重新審視之；首先探討以Kliebard為主的批判聲浪，繼而梳理Hlebowitsh有鑑於當代Tyler原理遭受批評而對批評論調所作的回應，並再予綜合討論。文中輔以Tyler談其自身實際從事課程工作的文章、其經典原著、訪談與問答紀錄，以及後輩與之互動的紀念文章等作為討論素材，透過更為貼近其人本身的文獻，再探討較不為人所提及的想法。本文結論以為，課程領域宜拓廣視野，理解對Tyler課程思想的貶抑或頌揚，乃源自相異的解讀理路與意圖；片面的評斷並不足以含括所有理解的全貌。
摘要(英文)：	Ralph Tyler’s curriculum ideas have been assessed by some scholars who held different kinds of viewpoints. To revisit the situation, this article aimed at analyzing mainly the criticism made by Herbert M. Kliebard and the defensive responses spoken from Peter S. Hlebowitsh. In addition, Tyler’s works, his classic writings, minutes on his curriculum practices, interviews and dialogues, and communications written by other curriculum scholars were analyzed. The author concluded that broader views should be taken in order to understand that various comments actually originated from different interpretations, and the whole picture of one thing could not be captured by partial points.
參考文獻：	方德隆（譯）（2004）。A. C. Ornstein & F. P. Hunkins著。課程基礎理論（Curriculum foundations, principles, and issuesⅠ）。台北：高等教育。 王秀玲（2006）。課程理論的先驅：R. W. Tyler《課程與教學的基本原理》。中等教育，57（1），130-143。 單文經（2002）。現代與後現代課程論爭之平議。師大學報－教育類，42（7），123-141。 黃光雄、蔡清田（1999）。課程設計—理論與實際。台北：五南。 黃俊儒（2005）。Ralph W. Tyler模式之批判、澄清與建議。課程與教學，8（3），91-104。 黃政傑（1991）。課程設計。台北：東華。 黃炳煌（譯）（1981）。R. W. Tyler著。課程與教學的基本原理（Basic principles of curriculum and instruction）。台北：桂冠。 黃嘉雄（2004）。釐清泰勒的課程評鑑觀。國立台北師範學院學報，17（1），27-50。 甄曉蘭（2004）。課程理論與實務：解構與重建。台北：高等教育。 歐用生（1989）。課程與教學概念、理論與實際。台北：文景。 蔡清田（2005）。泰勒的課程思想。載於黃政傑（主編），課程思想（頁25-53）。台北：冠學。 Apple, M. W.(1979). Ideology and curriculum. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul. Cohen, S. (1999). Challenging orthodoxies: Toward a new cultural history of education. New York: Peter Lang. Dewey, J. (1990). The school and society and The children and the education. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. Foucault, M. (1972). The archaeology of knowledge (A. M. S. Smith trans.). London: Tavistock. Foucault, M. (1973). Madness and civilization: A history of insanity in the age of reason(R. Howard trans.). New York: Vintage Books. Goodlad, J. I. (1995). Ralph Tyler: The educators’ educator. Educational Policy, 29(1), 75-81. Hlebowitsh, P. S. (1992). Amid behavioural and behavioristic objectives: Reappraising appraisals of the Tyler Rationale. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 24(6), 533-547. Hlebowitsh, P. S. (1993). Radical curriculum theory reconsidered: A historical approach. New York: Teachers College Press. Hlebowitsh, P. S. (1995). Interpretations of the Tyler Rationale: A reply to Kliebard. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 27(1), 89-94. Jackson, P. W. (1992). Concepts of curriculum and curriculum specialists. In In Jackson, P. W. (1992) (Ed.), Handbook of research on curriculum (pp. 3-40). New York: Macmillan. Kliebard, H. M. (1975). Reappraisal: The Tyler rationale. In W. Pinar(Ed.), Curriculum theorizing: The reconceptualists (pp.70-83). Berkeley, CA: McCutchan. (Originallypublished in School Review, 1970) Kliebard, H. M. (1977). The Tyler rationale. In A. A. Bellack & H. M. Kliebard (Eds.), Curriculum and evaluation (pp.56-67). Berkeley, CA: McCutchan. (Originally published in School Review, 1970) Kliebard, H. M. (1986). The struggle for the American curriculum 1893-1958. Boston: Routledge & Kegan Paul plc. Kliebard, H. M. (1992). The Tyler Rationale(1970). In H. M. Kliebard, Forging the American curriculum: Assays in curriculum and theory (pp. 153-167). New York: Routledge. (Originally published in School Review, 1970) Kliebard, H. M. (1995). The Tyler Rationale revisited. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 27(1), 81-88. Krathwohl, D. R. (1996). Lessons learned from Ralph W. Tyler. In C. Kridel, R. V. Bullough, Jr., & P. Shaker(Eds.), Teachers and mentors: Profiles of distinguished twentieth-century professors of education (pp.29-44). New York: Garland. Lawton, D. (1989). Education, culture and the national curriculum. Lawton: Hodder & Stoughton. Marsden, W. E. (2000). Historical approaches to curriculum study. In R. Lowe (Ed.), History of education vol. 3 (pp.3-39). London: Routledge Falmer. (Original published in 1979) Nowakowski, J. R. (1981). An interview with Ralph Tyler. Kalamazoo, MI: Western Michigan University. Nowakowski, J. R. (1983). On educational evaluation: A conversation with Ralph Tyler. Educational Leadership, 40(8), 24-29. Pagano, J. A. (1999). The curriculum field: Emergence of a discipline. In W. F. Pinar (Ed.), Contemporary curriculum discourses: Twenty years of JCT (pp.82-105). New York: Peter Lang. (Originally published in 1981) Pinar, W. F. (1988). Contemporary curriculum discourses. Scottsdale, AZ: Gorsuch Scarbrick. Rice, T., Rice, C., & Tyler(1989). The Eight-Year Study at East High School, Denver, Colorado. In C. Kridel (Ed.), Curriculum history: Conference presentations from the Society for the Study of Curriculum History (pp.204-212). Lanham, MD: University Press of America. (Originally published in 1981) Tyler, R. W.(1949). Basic principles of curriculum and instruction. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. Tyler, R. W. (1975). Specific approaches to curriculum development. In J. Schaffarzick & D. H. Hampson (Eds.), Stratedies for curriculum development(pp. 17-30). Berkeley, CA: McCutahan. Tyler, R.W. (1986/1987). The five most significant curriculum events in the twentiethcentury. Educational Leadership, 44,(4) ,36-38. Tyler, R. W. (1989a). Recollections of fifty years of work in curriculum. In C. Kridel (Ed.), Curriculum history: Conference presentations from the Society for the Study of Curriculum History (pp.172-177). Lanham, MD: University Press of America. (Originally published in 1981) Tyler, R. W. (1989b). Reflecting on the Eight-Year Study. In C. Kridel (Ed.), Curriculum history: Conference presentations from the Society for the Study of Curriculum History (pp.193-203). Lanham, MD: University Press of America. (Originally published in 1981) U.S. Department of Education (1974). Report of the Committee of Ten on Secondary School Studies(From Report of the Commissioner of Education for the Year 1892-1893, vol. 2, 1415-17, 1420, 1422-24, 1438-46). In S. Cohen (Ed.), Education in the United States: A documentary history (vol.3)(pp.1930-1944). New York: Random House. (Originally published in 1895) Wright, H. K. (2005). Does Hlebowitsh improve on curriculum history? Reading a rereading for its political purpose and implications. Curriculum Inquiry, 35(1), 103-117.