科學寫作融入野外探究教學之研究

A Study of Incorporating Science Writing in Field-based Inquiry Teaching

蘇明俊;羅豪章
共同作者:羅豪章
Ming-Jun Su;Hao-Chang Lo


所屬期刊: 第3卷第2期 「課程與教學」
主編:國立政治大學教育學研究所
黃炳煌教授
系統編號: vol009_07
主題: 課程與教學
出版年份: 2007
作者: 蘇明俊;羅豪章
作者(英文): Ming-Jun Su;Hao-Chang Lo
論文名稱: 科學寫作融入野外探究教學之研究
論文名稱(英文): A Study of Incorporating Science Writing in Field-based Inquiry Teaching
共同作者: 羅豪章
最高學歷:
校院名稱:
系所名稱:
語文別: 中文
論文頁數: 26
中文關鍵字: 五段式科學寫作引導;多元評量;科學寫作;野外探究教學
英文關鍵字: field-based inquiry;five-stage science writing guide;multiple assessment;science writing
服務單位: 樹德科技大學休閒事業管理系助理教授;中山醫學大學師資培育中心副主任
稿件字數: 22977
作者專長: 科學教育、探究教學
投稿日期: 2007/1/20
論文下載: pdf檔案icon
摘要(中文): 諸多相關研究及文獻顯示,融入科學寫作的教學,有助於學生科學學習;結合野外教學和科學探究的野外探究教學,讓學習者得以在自然真實的情境中學習科學,也讓科學學習更活潑生動。本研究旨在探討如何將科學寫作融入野外探究教學之中,並評估在野外探究教學中,以科學寫作作為多元評量工具的適切性。在連續四年(2001年至2004年)舉辦野外探究教學歷程中,研究團隊以行動研究的方式發現,將科學寫作融入野外探究教學的過程中,學生在進行心得寫作時,無法順利地將其學習成果透過作文方式呈現出來,因此研究團隊發展出五段式科學寫作引導模式,透過破題、描述、延伸、加強以及結論五個階段的寫作引導,協助學生在野外探究學習活動中進行心得寫作。經由研究證實:透過此科學寫作模式,確能有效協助學生在野外探究教學活動中進行心得寫作。此外,根據科學寫作的觀點,分析學生於野外探究教學中所撰寫的心得寫作發現,活動所安排的心得寫作對受測學生而言難度適中,且具有鑑別學生科學寫作能力高低的作用,教學者也可以透過心得寫作瞭解到學生在認知、情意、技能三個領域教學目標的學習情形,顯示以心得寫作做為野外探究教學的多元評量工具,確具其適切性。最後,本文亦針對後續研究及教學推廣提出若干的建議。
摘要(英文): According to the literature, incorporating science writing in science teaching is helpful for science learning. Field-based inquiry teaching, a combination of field teaching and science inquiry, creates authentic circumstances in nature for students to learn science. This paper aims to discuss how to incorporate science writing in field-based inquiry teaching and evaluate the applicability of using science writing as a tool for multiple assessments in field-based inquiry teaching. Field-based inquiry teaching activities for this research were conducted from 2001 to 2004. The research team found that in the first two years students who participated in the activities could not finish their tasks. The researchers believed that it was necessary to provide a framework of writing in teaching activities. Hence, the team developed a strategy, called “five-stage science writing guide”, that includes introduction, description, expansion, strengthening, and conclusion. The results indicated that students could complete science writing for field-based inquiry activities using the framework of writing given by the writing guide. The analysis of the students’ writing about what they had learned in field-based inquiry proved that the difficulty level of the writing was appropriate and demonstrated the students’ writing capability and their viewpoints of science. This kind of science writing is also an appropriate tool for multiple assessments because it can assess student learning in cognitive, affective, and skill domains. Some suggestions for further research and educational expansion are also proposed.
參考文獻: 劉祥通、周立勳(1997)。數學寫作活動-國小數學教學的溝通工具。嘉義師院國教所國民教育研究學報,3,239-262。
陳慧娟(1998)。科學寫作有效促進概念改變的教學策略。「中等教育」,49,123-131。
胡瑞萍、林陳涌(2003)。寫作與科學學習。科學課程論述,267-284。國立台灣師範大學。
教育部(1998)。國民教育階段九年一貫課程總綱綱要。台北市:教育部。
郭金美、蕭登峰(2003)。探討啟發式科學寫作融入教學對學童科學概念學習與改變之研究-以氧化概念學習為例。科學課程論述,243-274。國立台灣師範大學。
羅廷瑛、張景媛(2004)。科學寫作活動的知識建構對國小學生自然科學習效果之影響。教育心理學報, 35,4期,337-354頁,台北:國立台灣師範大學。
蘇明俊(2004)。野外探究教學模式之研究。國立高雄師範大學科學教育研究所博士論文,未出版。
蘇明俊、江新合(2004)。歸納式野外探究教學模式。新竹師院學報,18,323-361。新竹:國立新竹師範學院。
Ahmanan, J. S., & Glock, M. D. (1981). Evaluating Student Progress Principles of Tests and Measurement (6th ed.). Boston: Allyn and Bacon.
Arkle, S. (1985). Better Writers, Better Thinkers. In Roots in the Sawdust: Writing to Learn Across the Disciplines. Urbana, IL: NCTE.
Bereiter, C. & Scardamalia, M. (1987). The Psychology of Written Composition. London: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Bieger, E. M. (1995). Promoting multicultural education through a literature-based approach. The Reading Teacher, 49(4), 308-12.
Bloom, B. S., Engelhart, M. D., Furst, E. J., Hill, W. H., & Krathwohl, D. R. (1956). Taxonomy of educational objectives: The classification of educational goals: Handbook 1 cognitive domain. New York, NY: Longmans, Green and Company.
Britton, J. (1970). Language and Learning. New York: Penguin Books.
Britton, J. (1978). The composing process and the functions of writing. In C.R. Cooper, & L. Odell. (Eds.). Research on composing: Points of depature. Urbana, III: National Council of Teachers of English.
Bruer, J. (1999). Schools for Thought. Boston: MIT Press.Bryman, A., & Cramer D. (1997). Quantitative data analysis with SPSS for Windows. London & New York: Routledge.
Carter, P. L., Ogle, P. K., & Royer, L. B. (1993). Learning logs: What are they and how do we use them? In N. L. Webb & A. F. Coxford. (Eds.). Assessment in the mathematics classroom, 87-96. Reston, VA: National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.
Champagne, A. B. (1996). Assessment and science curriculum design. In R. W. Bybee. (Ed.). National Standards and the Science Curriculum: Challenges, Opportunities, and Recommendations, 75-82. Colorado Springs, CO: BSCS.
Champagne, A. B., & Kouba, V. L. (1999). Writing to Inquiry: Written Products as Performance Measures, Assessing Science Understanding: A Human Constructivist View. Academic Press.
Draper, V. (1979). Formative writing: writing to assist learning in all subject area (curriculum publication No.3). Berkeley:Bay Area Writing Project, University of California.
Ebel, R. L. (1979). Essentials of Educational Measurement. (3rd ed.). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
Elbow, P. (1974). Writing Without Teachers. NY: Oxford University Press.
Flower, L.F. & Hayes, J.R. (1981). A cognitive process theory of writing. College Composition and Communication, (4) :365 - 387.
Foster, G. (1984). Technical writing and science writing. Is there a difference and what does it matter? Paper presented at Annual Meeting of the Conference on College Composition and Communication 35th, New York City, USA, 29-31.
Hildebrand, G. M. (1998). Disrupting hegemonic writing practices in school science: Contesting the right way to write. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 35(4), 345-362.
Huang, Y. C. (1999). A study of reformulation relations in scientific reports. Unpublished masters thesis. University of Tsing Hua, Hsinchu, Taiwan, ROC.
Klein, P. D. (2000). Elementary student’s strategies for writing-to-learn in science. Cognition and Instruction, 18(3), 317-348.
Krashen, S. D. (1977). The monitor model for adult second language performance. In M. Burt, H. Dulay, & M. Finocchiaro. (Eds.). Viewpoint on English as a Second Language, 152-161. New York: Regents.
Krathwohl, D. R., Bloom, B. S., & Masia, B. B. (1964). Taxonomy of educational objectives: The classification of educational goals: Handbook ii: Affective domain. New York, NY: David McKay Company, Incorporated.
Kulm, G.. (1994). Mathematics assessment: What works in tile classroom. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
Levine, T., & Geldman-Caspar, Z. (1996). Informal science writing produced by boys andgirls: Writing preference and quality. British Educational Research Journal, 22(4), 421-439.
Lindemann, E. (1995). A Rhetoric for Writing Teachers. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Mason, L., & Boscolo, P. (2000). Writing and conceptual change. What changes? Instructional Science, 28, 199-26.
Mason, L. (2001). Introducing talk and writing for conceptual change: a classroom study. Learning and Instruction, 11, 305-329.
Miller, L. D. (1991). Writing to learn mathematics. Mathematic Teacher, 84(7), 516-521.
Noll, V. H., Scannell, D. P., & Craig, R. C. (1979). Introduction to Educational Measurement. (4th ed.). Boston: Houghton Mifflin.
Nunnally, J. C. (1978). Psychometric Theory. (2nd ed.). New York: McGraw Hill.
Prain, V., & Hand, B. (1995). Writing and Learning in Science: the Constructivist Classroom. Sydney: Brace.
Reeves, D. (2000). Accountability in Action. Denver: Advanced Learning Press.
Rivard, L.P. (1994). A review of writing to learn in science:implications for practice and research. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 31(9), 969-983.
Roid, G. H. (1994). Patterns of writing skills derived from cluster analysis of direct-writing assessments. Applied Measurement in Education. 7(2), 159-170.
Rohman, D. G. (1965). Prewriting, the stage of discovery in the writing process. College Composition and Communication, 16, 106-122.
Santa, C. M. & Havens, L.T. (1991). Learning through writing. In Santa, C.M. & Alvermann, D.E. (Eds.). Science Learning: Processes and Applications. Newark, International Reading Association.
Simpson, E. (1972). The classification of educational objectives in the psychomotor domain. (The psychomotor domain. Vol. 3.). Washington, DC: Gryphon House.
Soter, A. O. (1987). Recent research on writing: Implications for writing across the curriculum. Journal of Curriculum Studies. 19, 425-438.
Taylor, D. (1998). A guide to evaluating your own writing. Retrieved May 24, 2006, from htttp://www.mcu.edu.WdepartmenVpubaffair/parn/pais/write/critical-thinking.htm
Trice, A. D. (2000). A Handbook of Classroom Assessment. London: Longman Pubs.