學習表現的知識結構評量研究:以「教育統計學」學科知識為例

The Assessment of Knowledge Structures of Learning Performance in Educational Statistics

李敦仁;余民寧
共同作者:余民寧
Duen R. Lee


所屬期刊: 第3卷第4期 「測驗與評量」
主編:朝陽科技大學社工系
黃國彥教授
系統編號: vol011_05
主題: 測驗與評量
出版年份: 2007
作者: 李敦仁;余民寧
作者(英文): Duen R. Lee
論文名稱: 學習表現的知識結構評量研究:以「教育統計學」學科知識為例
論文名稱(英文): The Assessment of Knowledge Structures of Learning Performance in Educational Statistics
共同作者: 余民寧
最高學歷:
校院名稱:
系所名稱:
語文別:
論文頁數: 36
中文關鍵字: 學科知識、知識結構、路徑搜尋網路分析
英文關鍵字: content knowledge, knowledge structures, pathfinder network analysis
服務單位: 國立政治大學教育學系
稿件字數: 20940
作者專長: 研究方法論、測驗與評量、多變量分析、潛在變項模式分析
投稿日期: 2007/8/31
論文下載: pdf檔案icon
摘要(中文): 本研究目的,旨在利用路徑搜尋網路分析評量選修相關教育統計學的教育學程學生,對教育統計學概念間所形成的知識結構。具體而言,本研究檢視三項問題:(1)學習穩定型和學習異常型兩組學生與教師的知識結構圖為何?(2)學習穩定型和學習異常型兩組學生的知識結構圖與教師知識結構圖相似程度是否有顯著差異?(3)三種相似性指數對學生的學習表現是否有顯著的預測效果?研究結果發現:(1)兩種不同學習類型的學生對於知識結構不僅有「量」的差異,其概念連結亦呈現「質」不同;(2)三種知識結構指數與學習表現具有顯著的正相關;(3)知識結構指數對學習表現具有顯著的預測效果,以PRX指數最具預測力,其解釋變異量為34.20%。最後,本研究亦針對研究結果提出相關建議,以作為未來研究之參考。
摘要(英文): The main purpose of this study is to explore how to use the Pathfinder network analysis to assess knowledge structures in Educational Statistics courses taken by students in teacher training programs. Specifically, this paper examines (1) How to present knowledge structures in stable learning students, abnormal learning students, and experienced teachers? (2) In knowledge structure graphs, are the two types of students similar to experienced teachers? and (3) Do the three proximity indices predict learning performance? Research results are as follows: (1) In knowledge structure graphs and three proximity indices, there is a significant difference between two types of students and experienced teachers. (2) The proximity indices are all significantly positively correlated with learning performance. (3) The PRX index is the best predictor of knowledge structure on learning performance, and could explain 34.20% of the variance. Finally, some implications and suggestions are proposed.
參考文獻: 丁碧莉(2004)。語文知識結構之評量研究-以國小英語科為例。國立雲林科技大學資訊管理研究所碩士論文,未出版。
方慧君(2003)。知識結構診斷分析:以四技二專入學考試數學科為例。國立雲林科技大學資訊管理研究所碩士論文,未出版。
江淑卿(1997)。知識結構的重要特性之分析暨促進知識結構教學策略之實驗研究。國立臺灣師範大學教育心理與輔導研究所博士論文,未出版。
江淑卿(2000)。徑路探測法在測量知識結構的效度研究。測驗年刊,47(1),73-94。
宋德忠、林世華、陳淑芬、張國恩(1998)。知識結構的測量:徑路搜尋法與概念構圖法的比較。教育心理學報,30(2),123-142.
余民寧(2002a)。教育測驗與評量:成就測驗與教學評量(二版)。台北:心理。
余民寧(2002b)。學科知識結構之評量研究—以「教育測驗與評量」學科知識為例。教育與心理研究,25(中),341-367。
余民寧(2005)。心理與教育統計學(修訂二版)。台北:三民。
余民寧、林曉芳、蔡佳燕(2001)。國小學生數學知識結構認知診斷評量之研究。教育與心理研究,24(下),263-302。
余民寧、陳嘉成(2001)。領域知識結構之評量研究:以「垃圾分類處理」知識領域為例。教育與心理研究,24(下),393-420。
林清山(譯)(1990)。教育心理學-認知取向。台北:遠流。
林曉芳(1999)。數學低成就國中生在代數概念學習之評量研究。國立政治大學教育研究所碩士論文,未出版。
林曉芳、余民寧(2001)。國中學生在數學代數概念學習之評量研究:以二元一次方程式為例。教育與心理研究,24(下),303-326。
涂金堂(2002)。國小學生數學文字題知識結構之評量。教育與心理研究,25(中),369-399。
陳新豐(2002)。國小學生知識結構的評量分析-以國小自然學習成就為例。教育與心理研究,25(下),657-680。陳嘉甄(2001)。國小學生自然科知識結構之測量。教育與心理研究,24(下),327-344。
游森期、余民寧(2006)。知識結構診斷評量與S-P表之關性研究。教育與心理研究,29(1),183-201。
葉倩亨(2001)。路徑搜尋網路分析應用於大一心理學學習效果評量之研究。教育與心理研究,24(下),421-446。
塗振洋(2001)。路徑搜尋網路分析在教學評量上的應用-以國小六年級學生在天文概念上的學習為例。教育與心理研究,24(下),367-392。
鄭昭明(2001)。認知心理學:理論與實踐。台北:桂冠。
謝祥宏、段曉林(2001)。教學與評量:一種互為鏡像(mirror image)的關係。科學教育月刊,241,2-13.
Acton, W. H., Johnson, P. J., & Goldsmith, T. E. (1994). Structural knowledge assessment: Comparison of referent structures. Journal of Educational Psychology, 86, 303-311.
Azzarello, J. (2007). Use of the pathfinder scaling algorithm to measure student’s structural knowledge of community health nursing. Journal of Nursing Education, 46(7), 313-318.
Barlett, F. C. (1932). Remembering: A study in experiment and social psychology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Boldt, M. N. (2001). Assessing students’ accounting knowledge: A structural approach. Journal of Education for Business, 76(5), 262-269.
Chi, M. T. H., Glaser, R., & Rees, E. (1982). Expertise in problem solving. In R. Sternberg (Ed.), Advance in the psychology of human intelligence. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Day, E. A., Arthur, W., Jr., & Gettman, D. (2001). Knowledge structures and the acquisition of a complex skill. Journal of Applied Psychology, 86(5), 1022-1033.
Dearholt, D. W., & Schvaneveldt, R. W. (1990). Properties of pathfinder networks. In R. W. Schvaneveldt(Ed.), Pathfinder associative networks: Studies in knowledge organization. Norwood, NJ: Alex.
Glaser, R. (1962). Psychology and instructional technology. In R. Glaser (Ed.), Training, research, and education. University of Pittsburgh Press.
Goldsmith, T. E., & Davenport, D. M. (1990). Assessing structural similarity of graphs. In R. W. Schvaneveldt(Ed.), Pathfinder associative networks: Studies in knowledge organization. Norwood, NJ: Alex.
Gonzalvo, P., Canas, J., & Bajo, M. T. (1994). Structural representations in knowledge acquisition. Journal of Educational psychology, 86, 601-616.
Hoole, E. R. (2005). Integrating and evaluating mathematical models of assessingstructural knowledge: Comparing associative network methodologies. James Madison University Disseration.
Johnson, P. J., Goldsmith, T. E., & Teague, K. W. (1994). Locus of the predictive advantage in pathfinder-based representations of classroom knowledge. Journal of Educational Psychology, 86, 617-626.
Jonassen, D. H., Beissner, B., Yacci, M.(1993). Structure knowledge: Techniques for representing, conveying, and acquiring structural knowledge. Hillsdale, NJ : Erlbaum.
Knoebel, A., Dearholt, D., & Schvaneveldt, R. (1988). Empty nexus graphs. Paper presented at the American mathematical Society meeting, Las Cruces, NM.
Larkin, J., McDermott, J., Simon, D. P., & Simon, H. A. (1980). Expert and novice performance in solving physics problems. Science, 208, 1335-1342.
Minsky, M. F. (1975). A framework for representing knowledge. In P. H. Winston(Ed.), The psychology of computer vision(pp. 211-277). New York: McGraw-Hill.
Morton, J., & Bekerian, D. (1986). Three ways of looking at memory. In N. E. Sharkdy(Ed.), Advances in cognition science 1. ChichESTER: Ellis Horwood.
Nassaji, H. (2002). Schema theory and knowledge-based processes in second language reading comprehension: A need for alternative perspectives. Language Learning, 52(2), 439-481.
Nichols, P. D., Chipman, S. F., & Brennan, R. L. (1995). Cognitively diagnostics assessment. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Pines, A. L. (1985). Toward a taxonomy of conceptual relations and the implications for the evaluation of cognitive structures. In L. H. T. West & A. L. Pines (Ed.), Cognitive structure and conceptual change, (pp. 101-105). Orlando: Academic Press, Inc.
Rumelhart, D. E, & Ortony, A. (1977). The representation of knowledge in memory. In R. C. Anderson, R. J. Spiro, & W. E. Montague (Eds.), Schooling and the acquisition of knowledge. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Rumelhart, D. E, & Norman, D. A. (1983). Representation in memory. In R. C. Atkinson, R. J. Herrnstein, G. Lindzey, & R. D. Luce (Eds.), Handbook of Experimental psychology. New York, NY: Wiley.
Schank, R. C., & Abelson, R. P. (1977). Scripts, plans, goals, and understanding. Hillsdale, HJ: Erlbaum.
Schvaneveldt, R. W. (1990). Proximities, networks, and schemata. In R. W. Schvanevldt(Ed.), Pathfinder associative networks: Studies in knowledge organization. Norwood, NJ: Alex.
- (1994). Knowledge network organizing tool (PCKNOT version: 4.3). Las Cruces, NM: Interlink, Inc.
Shavelson, R. J., & Stanton, G. C. (1975). Construct validation: Methodology and application to three measures of cognitive structure. Journal of EducationalMeasurement, 12, 67-85.
Thro, R. P. (1978). Relationship associative and content structure of physics concepts. Journal of Educational Psychology, 70, 971-997.
Wiggins, G. P. (1998). Educative assessment: Designing assessment to inform and improvement student performance. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Basss.
William, V. F., Craig, T. N., & David, P. M. (1997). Concepts of drugs: Differences in conceptual structure across groups with different levels of drug experience. Addiction, 92(7), 847-858.