期刊專區/ Periodical Section

學生反思內涵的分析及其對教學實習課程的啟示

The Analysis of the Reflection of Students and Its Implication on Teaching of Teaching Practicum Course

所屬期刊：	第5卷第1期 「師資培育」 主編：大同大學通識教育中心講座教授 歐用生
系統編號：	vol016_02
主題：	師資培育
出版年份：	2009
作者：	徐綺穗
作者(英文)：	Chi-Sui Hsu
論文名稱：	學生反思內涵的分析及其對教學實習課程的啟示
論文名稱(英文)：	The Analysis of the Reflection of Students and Its Implication on Teaching of Teaching Practicum Course
共同作者：
最高學歷：
校院名稱：
系所名稱：
語文別：
論文頁數：	24
中文關鍵字：	反思;教學反思;教學實習
英文關鍵字：	self-refection;reflective teaching;teaching practicum
服務單位：	國立台南大學教育系
稿件字數：	20029
作者專長：	課程與教學
投稿日期：	2007/12/26
論文下載：
摘要(中文)：	教師專業素質的優劣關係著教育的品質，因此如何強化師資培育的功能為一重要課題。在師資培育的過程中，而教學實習課程是準教師踏入教學實務現場的第一步，具有相當的重要性。本研究根據Argyris & Schon（1974）、McGill & Brockbank（2004）的反思觀點，引導學生在教學實習課程中的見習及試教兩項活動進行反思，並針對學生的反思內涵進行分析，再根據研究發現，提出對教學實習課程的建議。本研究採取質性研究方法，研究對象是三位修習教學實習課程的大四學生，以三位學生的反思報告為主要的分析依據，再加上對學生的訪談及教學光碟作為三角校正。研究有三項主要發現：一、實習學生在實務現場歷經正負向情緒轉變，見習時，是從興奮、期待到無助；試教則是從緊張、焦慮到無助，試教時的焦慮感有助於激發其積極的學習動機。二、實習學生對於見習，會依據所見進行對教師班級經營各面向廣泛的反思檢討，而在試教的活動中，實習學生會聚焦於教學策略及學生特質做較深入的反思。三、學生產生多層次的反思，包括行動中的反思、行動中反思的敘述及行動後的反思及雙重迴圈的學習。根據研究發現，本研究對教學實習課程的實施，提出三點建議：一、引導學生進行內省及對話的反思。二、見習與試教活動交替進行，強化學生的教學知識。三、教學時引發學生多層次的反思。
摘要(英文)：	Reflection is an important method for improving preservice teachers’ connection between theory and practice. The study is to explore the reflection of college students majored in the curriculum of teaching practicum. Qualitative analysis was employed in this study. Data collection includes the college students’ reports of self-reflection and field notes during the observation and teaching in the elementary school classroom setting. The records of college students’ interview and the CD of their teaching practice were also checked. There are four conclusions: 1. College students had both positive and negative academic emotions when they observed or teaching in the elementary classroom. 2. College students reflected on all kind of teachers’ knowledge when they observed the teacher’s routine in the classroom. 3. College students reflected on the teaching strategies and the characteristic of children mostly through teaching by themselves. 4. College students had multidimensional reflections in the authentic environment. The suggestions about the teaching practicum curriculum including: the teacher can conduct the college students to observe only and teach by themselves in the classroom setting in turn, for improving their teachers’ knowledge. Promoting reflections through the college students’ dialogs in the peer group for intensify their positive academic emotions and active learning attitude. Multidimensional reflections can also use to enhance college students clarifying the concepts, and knowledge construction.
參考文獻：	阮馨儀（2005）。行動學習對於學生學習效果之研究—以中原大學企管系學生為例。中原大學企業管理研究所碩士論文，未出版，桃園縣。 邱祺霈（2004）。一位教師教學歷程的反思。國立台北師範學院課程與教學研究所碩士論文，未出版，台北市。 曾榮華（2005）。一位國民小學校長課程領導實踐智慧之研究：課程美學探究取向。國立臺中教育大學國民教育研究所博士論文，未出版，台中市。 楊美伶（2004）。輔導國小數學教師發展教學反思能力之研究。國立台北師範學院數學教育研究所碩士論文，未出版，台北市。 蔡鳳芝（2004）。職前教師在教學實習課程中教學信念與教學反省行為之探究。國立中山大學教育研究所碩士論文，未出版，高雄市。 鄭玟君（2002）。職前教師反思之研究：以班級經營課程為例。國立中山大學教育研究所碩士論文，未出版，高雄市。 Argyris, C., & Schon, D. (1974). Theory in practice: Increasing professional effectiveness. London: Jossey-Bass. Argyris, C., Putnam, R., & McLian S. D. (1985). Action Science: Concepts, Methods, and Skills for Research and Intervention. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass. Bath, D., Smith, C., Stein, S., & Swann, R. (2004). Beyond mapping and embedding graduate attributes: bringing together quality assurance and action learning to create a validated and living curriculum. Higher Education Research and Development, 23(3), 313-328. Bourner, T., Cooper, A., & France, L. (2000). Action learning across a university community. Innovations in Education and Training International, 37(1), 2-9. Brockbank, A. & McGill, I. (1998). Facilitating reflective learning in higher education. Buckingham: Open University Press.Danielowich, R. (2007). Negotiating the conflicts: Reexamining the structure and function of reflection in science teacher learning. Science Education, 91(4), 629-663. Dewey, J. (1933). How we think: A restatement of the relation of reflective thinking to the education process. Chicago, Ill: D. C. Heath. Elliott, J. (1991). Action Research for Education Change. Philadelphia: Open University Press. Frank, H. D. (1996). The use of action learning in British higher education. Education＋Training, 38(8), 7-15. Johnson, C. & Spicer, D. P. (2006). A case study of action learning in an MBA program. Education and Training, 48(1), 39-54. Lasky, B., & Tempone, I. (2004). Practising what we teach: Vocational teachers learn to research through applying action learning techniques. Journal of Further and Higher Education, 28(1), 79-94. Lizzio, A. & Wilson, K. (2004). Action learning in higher education: An investigation of its potential to develop professional capability. Studies in Higher Education, 29(4), 470-488. McGill, I. & Brockbank, A. (2004). The action learning handbook. London: RouledgeFalmer. Moran, M. J. (2007). Collaborative action research and project work: Promising practices for developing collaborative inquiry among early childhood preservice teachers. Teaching and Teacher Education: An International Journal of Research and Studies, 23(4), 418-431. Orland-Barak, L. & Yinon, H. (2007). When theory meets practice: What student teachers learn from guided reflection on their own classroom discourse. Teaching and Teacher Education, 23(6), 957-969. Pekrun, R. (1992). The impact of emotions on learning and achievement: Towards a theory of cognitive/motivational mediators. Applied Psychology: An International Review, 41(4), 359-376. Pekrun, R., Goetz, T., Titz, W., & Perry, R. P. (2002). Academic emotions in students’ self-regulated learning and achievement: A program of qualitative and quantitative research. Educational Psychologist, 37(2), 91-105. Revans, R. (1982). The origins and growth of action learning. Charterwell-Bratt, Bromley Kent. Schon, D. (1983). The reflective practitioner: How professionals think in action. New York: Basic Books. Shulman, L. S. (1987). Knowledge and teaching: Foundation of the new reform. Harvard Educational Review, 57(1), 1-22. van den Boom, G., Paas, F., & van Merrienboer, J. G. (2007). Effects of elicitedreflections combined with tutor or peer feedback on self-regulated learning and learning outcomes. Learning & Instruction, 17(5), 532-548. Wilson, K., & Fowler, J. (2005). Assessing the impact of learning environments on students’ approaches to learning: Comparing conventional and action learning designs. Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, 30(1), 87-101.