協同教學的意義、特質與類型

A Study of the Meaning, Characteristics and Types of Team Teaching

王素芸
Su-Yun Wang


所屬期刊: 第5卷第2期 「課程與教學」
主編:國立臺北教育大學國民教育學系、課程與教學研究所教授
黃嘉雄
系統編號: vol017_03
主題: 課程與教學
出版年份: 2009
作者: 王素芸
作者(英文): Su-Yun Wang
論文名稱: 協同教學的意義、特質與類型
論文名稱(英文): A Study of the Meaning, Characteristics and Types of Team Teaching
共同作者:
最高學歷:
校院名稱:
系所名稱:
語文別:
論文頁數: 26
中文關鍵字: 教學;協同教學;協同教學類型
英文關鍵字: Assistant Professor; Department of Education; National Cheng-Chi University
服務單位: 國立政治大學教育學系助理教授
稿件字數: 21447
作者專長: 課程與教學;教育實習;青少年心理學
投稿日期: 2008/11/18
論文下載: pdf檔案icon
摘要(中文): 「協同教學」由於定義立場的不同,以及經常因人因時因地變異諸多不同種類的方案,加上其定義與內涵隨著時間而演變,下定義時經常面臨困擾,故本文從概念分析角度出發,釐清協同教學相關概念。本文認為在定義協同教學時,應趨向採取廣義取向的定義方式,以降低構成協同教學的門檻,但務必把握「兩位或兩位以上教學人員」、「教學事務」以及「共同合作」等必要成分。
其次,本文以一、「合作之意願態度」;二、「協同教師相對地位」;三、「教師角色固定性」;四、「教師分工方式」;五、「學科範圍」;六、「學科相對地位」;七、「實施例常程度」;八、「年班範圍」;九、「普及範圍」等九個向度,提出二十二種協同教學類型,並述其特徵、可能的優缺得失等,以期未來學校或政府在推動協同教學時,能突破舊有藩籬,鼓勵多樣性協同教學的實施,最後,提出對台灣協同教學的啟示。
摘要(英文): Amidst the academe, the definition of "team teaching" varies greatly from context to form. In addition, the definition seems to change with the passing of time, hence, give grounds to the existence of its diversity and complexity. This study suggested that in defining "team teaching", flexibility should be taken into consideration together with a broad concept in mind. Similarly team teaching should involve" two or more staffs", "teaching affairs", and "collaborative works".
This study utilized the following dimensions: 1. willingness to cooperate, 2. relative status of team teaching staffs, 3. stability of role played by faculties, 4. strategy used on the division of labor, 5. course/area content, 6. relative status of subject, 7. implementation of ordinary level, 8. range of class, and 9. range of popularizing; these made up the 22 types of team teaching. The results shall provide schools and government some information and insights on the different types of team teachings, and overcome their previous notion. They will increase the feasibility of team teaching.
參考文獻: 文林(譯)(1993)。Robert B. Maddux著。建立團隊-合作就是力量。臺北市:麥田。
王秀玲(2000)。協同教學法。載於黃政傑著教學原理,117-184。臺北市:師大書苑。
李坤崇(2001)。綜合活動學習領域教材教法。臺北市:心理。
呂翠夏(2001)。幼稚園的合作教學—以一個班級為例。台南師院學報,34,475-492。
汪嘉龢(1974)。協同教學的實驗與研究。女師專學報,4,1-21。
林志忠(2001)。九年一貫課程與協同教學。輯於國立暨南國際大學教育學程中心主編「教育改革的微觀工程—小班教學與九年一貫課程」,179-202。高雄市:復文。
林進材(1999)。教學理論與方法。臺北市:五南。
林雅萍(2004)。語文領域協同教學的型態-以高雄縣實施為例。屏東教育大學國民教育研究所碩士論文。未出版,屏東市。
柯啟瑤(1999)。「協同教學」的初步認識。翰林文教雜誌,5,1-2。
高紅瑛(2001)。國民小學實施協同教學問題解決之質性研究—以台北市一所小學為例。台北市立教育大學國民教育研究所碩士論文。未出版,臺北市。
孫邦正(1971)。協同教學法。輯於雲五社會科學大辭典第八冊教育學。臺北市:商務。
黃政傑(1997)。教學原理。臺北市:師大書苑。
蔡純華(1973)。協同教學面面觀。國教天地,3,12-13。
張世忠(2000)。師資生間同儕教練與協同教學實施之探究。載於中華民國師範教育學會主編:願景與承諾—展望新世紀的師資培育,277-295。臺北市:台灣書店。
張德銳、邱惜玄、高紅瑛、陳淑茗、管淑華、蕭福生(2002)。協同教學—理論與實務。臺北市:五南
張清濱(1999)。怎樣實施協同教學。師友,387, 43-47。
蕭福生(1999)。生動活潑的學習型態-協同教學。教師天地,102,52-57。
錢濤(1974)。協同教學法研究。教育輔導,24(8),18-23。
蘇清守(1976)。協同教學的型態與評價。師友,109,23-25。
鄭博真(2002)。協同教學的基本概念、實務和研究。高雄市:復文。
Bakkenes, I., de Brabander, C., & Imants, J. (1999). Teacher isolation and communication network analysis in primary schools. Educational Administration Quarterly, 35(2), 166-202.
Buckley, F. J.(2000). Team Teaching: What,Why and How? Thousand Oaks:Sage.
Buckley, F. J.(1999). Team teaching-what, why, and how? Thousand Oaks:Sage.
Buffie, E. G.(1964). Potentials for team teaching in the junior high school. In D. W. Beggs, Ⅲ(Eds.), Team Teaching-Bold New Venture, 61-73. Bloomington & London,Indiana University Press.
Casey, V. M.(1964). A summary of team teaching-its patterns and potentials. In D. W. Beggs, Ⅲ(Eds.), Team Teaching-Bold New Venture, 164-178. Bloomington & London, Indiana University Press.
Cookson, Jr. (2008). The Challenge of Isolation. Retrieved May 28, 2008, fromhttp://www.teachingk-8.com/archives/your_first_year/the_challenge_of_isolation_by_peter_w_cookson_jr.html
Finley, R. M. (1964). How team teaching fits into the elementary school. In D. W. Begg, Ⅲ(Eds.), Team Teaching-Bold New Venture(pp.50-60) . Blooming & London, Indiana University Press.
Heider, K.L. (2005). Teacher isolation: how mentoring programs Can Help . Current Issues in Education, 8(14) , Retrieved June 23, 2005, from http://cie.ed.asu.edu/volume8/number14/
McMahon, T. A.(2008). From Isolation to Interaction? Network-Based Professional Development and Patterns of Teacher Communication.
(The ACM Portal is published by the Association for Computing Machinery. Copyright c 2008 ACM, Inc)
Norman, D. A. (1964). Stochastic learning and a quantal model of signal detection. Transactions of IEEE on Applications and Industry, 83, 292-296.
Oja, S. N., & Smulyan, L.(1989). Collaborative Action Research: A Developmental Approach. London: Falmer.
Rich, D. (1988). Bridging the parent gap in ed- ucation reform. Educational Horizons, 66, 90- 92.
Singer, I.J.(1964). What team teaching really is. In D. W. Beggs, Ⅲ(Eds.), Team Teaching-Bold New Venture(13-28). Bloomington & London, Indiana University Press.
The North Nevada Writing Project. (1996). Team Teaching. NY: ME: Stenhouse Publisher.
Tomchek, D.(1964). A teacher comments on team taching. In D. W. Beggs. In D. W. Beggs, Ⅲ(Eds.), Team Teaching-Bold New Venture, 118-130, Bloomongton & London, Indiana University Press.
Trusty, F. M.(1964). An administrator looks at team teaching. In D. W. Beggs, Ⅲ(Eds.), Team Teaching-Bold New Venture, 131-144, Bloomongton & London, Indiana University Press.