期刊專區/ Periodical Section

析論香港小學中國語文科教師為學生準備「全港性系統評估」（TSA）的策略

Discuss the Strategies Used by Hong Kong Primary Chinese Language Teachers Helping Students to Deal with Territory-wide System Assessment (TSA)

所屬期刊：	第5卷第4期 「測驗與評量」 主編：國立政治大學教育學系教授兼系主任 余民寧
系統編號：	vol019_04
主題：	測驗與評量
出版年份：	2009
作者：	廖佩莉
作者(英文)：	Pui-Lee Liu
論文名稱：	析論香港小學中國語文科教師為學生準備「全港性系統評估」（TSA）的策略
論文名稱(英文)：	Discuss the Strategies Used by Hong Kong Primary Chinese Language Teachers Helping Students to Deal with Territory-wide System Assessment (TSA)
共同作者：
最高學歷：
校院名稱：
系所名稱：
語文別：
論文頁數：	20
中文關鍵字：	全港性系統評估;倒流效應;促進學習
英文關鍵字：	TSA; Backwash effect; facilitate learning
服務單位：	香港教育學院中文學系助理教授
稿件字數：	12552
作者專長：	語文評估
投稿日期：	2009/3/12
論文下載：
摘要(中文)：	香港「全港性系統評估」的主要目的是協助學校管理階層了解學生在主要學習階段（小三、小六及中三）完結時，於中、英、數三科基本能力的整體表現，藉以檢視學生的水準，從而改善教學和優化課程設計。同時政府可為有需要的學校提供支援以及檢核教育政策執行的成效。教師運用不同的策略為學生準備「全港性系統評估」，希望學生能獲得良好的成績。因此，本研究主要是探討小學中文科教師為學生準備應付「全港性系統評估」的策略與教師對所用策略的意見。 本研究採用定量研究（Quantitative Approach）和定性研究（Qualitative Approach）兩種研究方式。定量研究是採用問卷調查方式，共派發90份問卷；定性研究是採用與教師面談方式，受訪者共6位。研究發現教師採用的應試策略是受到「倒流效應」的影響，他們為學生準備應試的策略很注重幫助學生熟習一些應試技巧，包括請學生購買坊間出版的「全港性系統評估」練習和補課，幫助學生操練試題。他們甚至在校內考試的內容和形式設計上盡量貼近「全港性系統評估」的模式。可是教師比較忽略考完試後的跟進策略，例如就個別學校的報告，分析學生表現，修訂課程和改善教學，這似乎有失當局提出「全港性系統評估」的原意。本文最後的總結提出了一些建議，希望校長和教師能得到?發。
摘要(英文)：	The main aim of Territory-wide System Assessment (TSA) is to help the school administrators to have a clear understanding their students’ standard in Chinese Language, English Language and Mathematics at the level of primary 3, primary 6 and secondary 3 so that they can evaluate their school effectiveness so as to improve the school curriculum and teachers can adjust their teaching strategy. Moreover, the government can also understand the effectiveness of the school policy and provide supports for schools in need of assistances. Many teachers would expect their students to perform well in TSA. They have used different strategies to help students to tackle TSA. This study finds out how Hong Kong Primary Chinese Language teachers help students to prepare for TSA and explores their comments on it. The study employed a combination of quantitative and qualitative methods, with data being collected through questionnaires and interviews. Questionnaires were sent to 90 experienced teachers. A total of six teachers were interviewed, all were experienced teachers. Finding indicates that many teachers have prepared different strategies for helping students to face TSA. The strategies they used were influenced by the "backwash effect". Most of them asked students to buy the TSA exercises and drill students to do exercises so that they could manage the skills in tests. Even in the internal school examination, teachers designed the examination papers, which were very similar to the questions set in the TSA so that students were accustomed to the format and content of the test. Based on the content of the TSA, most teachers were "teaching to the test", but not only "teaching for test". However, teachers neglected to analyze the TSA individual school reports given by the Government so as to evaluate their curriculum design and improve their teachings. On the basis of the major results, this study also makes suggestion at the conclusion.
參考文獻：	亓萊濱、張亦輝、鄭有增、周朋紅、楊雲（2003）。調查問卷的信度效度分析。當代教育科學，22，53-54。 香港教統局（2000）。香港教育制度改革建議。香港：香港印務署。 香港教統局（2004）。教育改革進展性報告（三）。香港：香港印務署。 香港教統局（2006）。教育改革進展性報告（四）。香港：香港印務署。 香港考試及評核局（2005）。全港性系統評估第一至第三學習階段中國語文、英國語文科、數學科學生基本能力報告。香港：香港印務署。 香港考試及評核局（2006）。全港性系統評估第一至第三學習階段中國語文、英國語文科、數學科學生基本能力報告摘要。香港：香港印務署。 侯傑泰、何穎欣（2008）。學習回饋及系統監察：香港的經驗。教育研究與發展期刊，4（4），1-18。 張國松、廖佩莉、張壽洪（2006）。香港小學中國語文教師對評估的認識狀況研究<，論文發表於全球化中的教育研究、政策與實踐研討會，香港。 廖佩莉（2007）。理念與實踐：香港小學中國語文科教師對語文評估的意見調查。教育曙光，55（1），51-58。 董奇（譯）（2003）。促進教學的課堂評價。北京：中國輕工業出版。 Alderson, J. C. & Wall, D. (1993). Does Washback Exist? Applied Linguistics, 14(2), 115-129.Hau, K. T. & Ho, I. T. (2008). Editorial: Insights from research on Asian students’ achievement motivation. International journal of Psychology, 43, 865-869. Kaufhold, J. (1998). What’s wrong with teaching for the test? The School Administrator, 12, 9-11. Menken, K. (2006). Teaching to the Test: how No Child Left Behind Impacts Language Policy, Curriculum, and Instruction for English Language learners, Bilingual Research Journal, 30(2), 521-546. Mertler, C. A. (2007). Interpreting Standarized Test Scores, Strategies for data-driven instructional Decision- making. London：Sage. Popham, W. J. (1991). Appropriateness of Teachers Test-Preparation Practices. Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice, 4, 12-15. Popham, W. J. (1995). Classroom assessment: what teacher needs to know. Bosten: Allyn and Bacon. Powell, S. D. (1999). Teaching to the test. In Educational Research Service, Info-File Providing an overview and general understanding of professional information and thinking on a specific educational topic or issue (3-5). Arlington, VA.：ERS press Smith, M.L. (1991). Meaning of Test Preparation. American Educational Research Journal, 28 (3), 521-542. Veach, A. (1999). Preparing for Exist Tests in Texas. High School Magazine, 6(5), 36-37. Wall, D. (1997). Impact and Washback in Language Testing. In C. Clapham & D. Corson (Eds.), Encyclopaedia of Language and Education, Vol. 7. Language Testing And Assessment. (291-302). Bosten: Kluwer. Wilde, D (2002). Testing and Standards, A Brief Encyclopedia. Portsmouth, NH： Heinemann.