期刊專區/ Periodical Section

影響學生填答教學意見調查問卷的因素及其實施建議

The Influential Factors and Suggestions on Student Evaluation of Instructors

所屬期刊：	第5卷第4期 「測驗與評量」 主編：國立政治大學教育學系教授兼系主任 余民寧
系統編號：	vol019_09
主題：	測驗與評量
出版年份：	2009
作者：	許誌庭
作者(英文)：	Chih-Ting Hsu
論文名稱：	影響學生填答教學意見調查問卷的因素及其實施建議
論文名稱(英文)：	The Influential Factors and Suggestions on Student Evaluation of Instructors
共同作者：
最高學歷：
校院名稱：
系所名稱：
語文別：
論文頁數：	24
中文關鍵字：	高等教育;教學意見調查;影響教學評量的因素
英文關鍵字：	high education; influential factors of student ratings; student evaluation of instructors
服務單位：	崑山科技大學通識教育中心助理教授;崑山科技大學教育發展中心主任
稿件字數：	15633
作者專長：	教育哲史;教育基礎理論;課程與教學;教育政策與分析
投稿日期：	2009/3/2
論文下載：
摘要(中文)：	由於施教對象的成人化，教學行為是大學教師較少受到重視的工作內涵，但在2003年《大學法》修正公告實施後，大學教師的教學層面已被納為高等教育各種評鑑向度之一。 在各種因素的考量之下，對學生進行教師教學意見調查，成為最被普遍採行的方式之一，然而這種調查過程仍存在諸多其他因素，使得學生的評等結果是否反映出教師的教學品質，仍有不少爭議。這種現象在目前試圖將評等結果做為對教師進行實質處置的依據下，更需進一步加以釐清及進行有效的規劃。 藉由回顧國內外文獻，本文試圖探討學生評等教師教學的各種相關議題。文分六段，除前言外，其次澄清與教師有關的各種評鑑概念，藉以釐清教學評量的位階及與其相襯的後續處理措施；第三段落則歸納對實施學生評等教師教學的正反意見，以明瞭各方爭論之所在；笫四是探討影響學生評等教師教學的五大因素，包括行政決定、課程規劃、教師特質、學生特質及問卷內容等；第五則是提出八項實施建議；最後是結論。
摘要(英文)：	There is a long tradition that instruction given within higher education institutions captures relatively less attention from the public. After the launch of the Law of University in 2003, however, teaching in universities has been in the limelight not merely as a field demonstrating efficiency of institutions and teachers as well, but also as a very target that has to be evaluated in order to maintain its quality. Although the utilization of Student Evaluation takes the prevailing place in forming an estimate of teaching, it is not without its flaws. For example, some literature has shown that the process of conducting the Student Evaluation could be influenced in various respects and sometimes results in misleading as to the quality of teaching. Through probing into the literature and studies, this research analyzes and indicates the influential factors that have great impacts on the reliability and validity of Student Evaluation, such as administration decisions, curricula designs, personality of lecturers, characters of students, and content of questionnaire. Based on the results suggestions about the employment of this mechanism are put forward.
參考文獻：	《大學法》（2003）。 林天佑（2006）。教學評鑑。評鑑雙月刊，3，22-23。 張定貴、張德勝（2002）。國小教師教學評量表信效度探討—比較學生評鑑與教師自評。花蓮師院學報，14，25-42。 張德勝（2004）。大學校院「學生評鑑教師教學」與「教學諮詢方案」。教育研究月刊，127，63-73。 張德勝（2004）。學生評鑑教師教學—以花蓮師範學院為例。八十六學年度教育學術研討會論文集，1-21。 張德勝（2005）。台灣地區大學校院「學生評鑑教師教學」制度之研究。師大學報：50（2），203-225。 黃義良（2006）。教育行銷研究的發展分析與展望。新竹教育大學學報，22，189-219。 黃毅志、巫有鎰（2003）。影響教評鑑得分因素之探討—以台東師院為例。台東師院學報，14（上），347-370。 葉重新（1987）。台灣地區九所大學教師對「學生評鑑教師教學」期望之研究。國立政治大學教育研究所博士論文。未出版。 Algozzine, B., Beattie, J., Bray, M., Flowers, C., Gretes, J., Howley, L., Mohanty, G. & Spooner, F. (2004). Student evaluation of college teaching.In College Teaching, 52(4), p134-141. Bernstein, B. (1971). On the classification and framing of educational knowledge. In M. F. D. Young (Ed.). Knowledge and Control (pp 47-69). London: Collier Macmillan. Birnbaum, M. H., (1999). A survey of faculty opinions concerning student evaluations of teaching. In The senate form. Volume xiv, number 1, Fall. P19-22. Blunt, A. (1991). The effects of anonymity and manipulated grades on student ratings of instructors, Community College Review, 18, pp. 48-54. Brandenburg, G. C. & Remmers, H. H. (1927). A rating scale for instructors, EducationalAdministration and Supervision, 13, pp. 399-406. Braskamp, L. A., Brandenburg, D.C. & Ory, J. C. (1984). Evaluating Teaching Effectiveness. Newbury Park: CA, Sage. Cashin, W. E. (1990). Students do rate different academic fields differently, M. Theall & J. Franklin (Eds). Student Ratings of Instruction: Issues for Improving Practice, New Directions for Teaching and Learning, No. 43. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass. Chang, T. S.(1999). The Effect of Subject Area and Instructor Gender on Student Ratings of Instruction. 花蓮師院學報，9, 345-366. Chang, T. S.(1999).The validity and reliability of student ratings: Comparison between Paper-pencil and Online survey. 中華心理學刊，47（2），113-125。 Chang, T. S. (2003). Results of student ratings: Does faculty attitude matter? 教育心理學報， 35（2），183-200. Feldman, K. A. (1978). Course characteristics and college students ratings of their teachers: What we know and what we dont, Research in Higher Education, 9, pp. 199-242. Feldman, K. A. (1979). The significance of circumstances for college students’ ratings of their teachers and courses, Research in Higher Education, 10, pp. 149-172. Feldman, K. A. (1993). College students’ views of male and female college teachers: Part IIEvidence from students’ evaluations of their classroom teachers, Research in Higher Education, 34, pp. 151211. Franklin, J., Theall, M. & Ludlow, L. (1991). Grade inflation and student ratings: A closer look. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Chicago. Frankhouser, W. M. (1984). The effects of different oral directions as to disposition of results on student ratings of college instruction, Research in Higher Education, 20, pp.367-374. Jackson, P. W. (1968). Life in classrooms. N. Y.: Teacher College Press. Kolitch, E. & Dean, A. V. (1999). Student rating of instruction in the USA: hidden assumptions and missing conception about “good” teachers. Studies in Higher Education, 24(1), 27-42. Koushki, P. A. & Kuhn, H. A. J. (1982). How reliable are student evaluations of teachers?, Engineering Education, 72, pp. 362-367. Kulik, J. A. (2001). Student ratings: Validity, utility, and controversy. New directions for institutional research. No 109, 9-24. Lortie, D. (1975). School-teacher: A Sociological Study. London: The University of Chicago. McDaniel, T. R.（2006）.Student evaluations of instructors: A good thing? , Academic Leader, 22(8), p8.Marsh, H. W. & Dunkin, M. J. (1992). Students’ evaluations of university teaching: A multidimensional perspective. in: J. C. Smart(ed). Higher education: Handbook of theory and research, 8, 143-233. N. Y.: Agathon Press. Murray, H. G., Rushton, P. J. & Paunonen, S. V. (1990). Teacher personality traits and student instructional ratings in six types of university courses, Journal of Educational Psychology, 82, pp. 250-261. Naftulim, D. H., Ware, J. E. & Donnelly, F. A. (1973). The Doctor Fox lecture: A paradigm of educational seduction, Journal of Medical Education, 48, pp. 630-635. Nasser, F. & Fresko, B. (2002). Faculty Views of Student Evaluation of College Teaching, in Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, Vol. 27, No. 2. pp. 187-198. Perry, R. P., Abrami, P. C., Leventhal, L. & Check, J. (1979). Instructor reputation: An expectancy relationship involving student ratings and achievement, Journal of Educational Psychology, 71, pp. 776-787. Perry, R. P., Niemi, R. R. & Jones, K. (1974). Effect of prior teaching evaluations and lecture presentation on ratings of teaching performance, Journal of Educational Psychology, 66, pp. 851-856. Remmers, H. H. & Brandenburg, G. C. (1927). Experimental data on the Purdue ratings scale for instructors, Educational Administration and Supervision, 13, pp. 519-527. Remmers, H. H. (1928). The relationship between students’ marks and students’ attitudes toward instructors, School and Society, 28, pp. 759-760. Remmers, H. H. (1930). To what extent do grades influence student ratings of instructors?, Journal of Educational Psychology, 2 l, pp. 314-316. Seldin, P. (1993). The use and abuse of student ratings of professors, Chronicle of Higher Education, 39(46), p. A40. Spencer, P. A. & Flyr, M. L. (1992). The formal evaluation as an impetus to classroom change.’ Myth or reality? (Research/Technical Report, Riverside, CA.) Tator, C. N. (1995). Gender effects on student evaluations of faculty, Journal of Research and Development in Education, 28, pp. 169-173. Wachtel, H. K. (1998). Student evaluation of college teaching effectiveness: A brief review. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 23(2), p191-211. Wilson, T. (1988). Student evaluation of teaching forms: a critical perspective, Study of Higher Education, 12, pp. 79-95.