歐洲高等教育經費機制之現況、發展趨勢與啟示

The Current Situation, Developmental Trends and Implications of Funding Mechanism of Higher Education in Europe

范麗雪
Li-Hsueh Fan


所屬期刊: 第6卷第1期 「師資培育」
主編:國立東華大學花師教育學院院長
吳家瑩
系統編號: vol020_08
主題: 其它
出版年份: 2010
作者: 范麗雪
作者(英文): Li-Hsueh Fan
論文名稱: 歐洲高等教育經費機制之現況、發展趨勢與啟示
論文名稱(英文): The Current Situation, Developmental Trends and Implications of Funding Mechanism of Higher Education in Europe
共同作者:
最高學歷:
校院名稱:
系所名稱:
語文別:
論文頁數: 26
中文關鍵字: 經費機制;高等教育;市場化;歐洲
英文關鍵字: funding mechanism; higher education; marketization; Europe
服務單位: 國立台南大學教育經營與管理研究所博士候選人;崑山科技大學財務金融系講師
稿件字數: 15014
作者專長: 教育經費、教育財政
投稿日期: 2009/08/24
論文下載: pdf檔案icon
摘要(中文): 面對全球化的發展,歐洲高等教育近年來歷經許多的改革,市場化的思維更促成歐洲高等教育經費機制的變革。本文首先探討市場化的發展及其對歐洲高等教育經費政策的影響,並以歐盟組織發表的文件進行分析,說明目前歐洲30個國家的高等教育經費分配現況以及經費使用的監督與績效責任。本文歸納出歐洲高等教育經費分配機制的三個變革趨勢,即(1)採用總額預算,提高大學的財務自主性,(2)自主性提高,伴隨著更高與透明化的績效責任,(3)注重產出導向的經費機制,將經費補助連結於大學的績效表現。最後,則提出對我國高等教育經費分配機制的啟示。
摘要(英文): In response to the development of globalization, reforms in funding mechanism have occurred in Europe higher education over the past decade. The construct of marketization is the driving force to the reform agenda for higher education funding policy. This paper analyzes the development of marketization and its impact on European higher education funding policy. In addition, this paper provides an in-depth understanding of funding allocation mechanism across 30 countries in Europe through the documentary analysis of the publication of European Union. There are three trends for funding allocation mechanism, including (1) block grants budgeting give more autonomy in managing financial resources, (2) more financial autonomy, and more accountability, and (3) establishing links between university performance and public funding. Finally, the implication on funding allocation mechanism in Taiwan higher education is provided.
參考文獻: 湯堯(2005)。大學學問大:改善高等教育的27計。臺北市:天下遠見。
蓋浙生(2008)。教育經濟與財政新論。臺北市:高等教育。
戴曉霞(2002)。全球化及國家∕市場關係之轉變:高等教育市場化之脈絡分析。載於戴曉霞、莫家豪、謝安邦(主編),高等教育市場化:台、港、中趨勢之比較(4-39頁)。臺北市:高等教育。
Agasisti, T. and Catalano, G. (2006). Governance models of university systems - towards quasi-markets? Tendencies and perspectives: A European comparison. Journal of Higher Education Policy and Management, 28(3), 245-262.
Calero, J. (1998). Quasi-market reforms and equity in the financing of higher education. European Journal of Education, 33(1), 11-20.
CHEPS (2006). Issues in higher education policy 2005. Retrieved February 10, 2009,from http://www.utwente.nl/cheps/publications/downloadable_publications/ downloadablesenglish.doc/
Clark, B. (1983). The higher education system: Academic organization in cross-national perspective. Berkeley: University of California Press.
Clark, B. (1998). Creating Entrepreneurial Universities: Organizational Pathways of Transformation. Oxford and New York: Published for the IAU Press by Pergamon Press.
Deer, C. (2005). Higher Education Access and Expansion: the French Experience. Higher Education Quarterly, 59(3), 230–241.
Deer C. and de Meulemeester, J. (2005). Reforms of the financing of higher education in Europe: Powerful universities, paying universities? IAU Horizons, 11(1), 4.
Dill, D. (1997). Market and higher education: an introduction. Higher Education Policy, 10(3), 163-166.
Dolenec, D. (2006). Marketization in Higher Education Policy: An Analysis of Higher Education Funding Policy Reforms in Western Europe between 1980 and 2000. Retrieved March 20, 2009, from http://www.rsp.hr/ojs2/index.php/rsp/article/ viewFile/100/106
Eurydice (2000). Two decades of reform in higher education. Retrieved February 10, 2009, from http://eacea.ec.europa.eu/portal/page/portal/Eurydice
Eurydice (2007). Key data on Higher education in Europe. Retrieved December 8, 2008, from http://eacea.ec.europa.eu/portal/page/ portal/Eurydice
Eurydice (2008). Higher education governance in Europe: policies, structures, funding and academic staff. Retrieved December 8, 2008, from http://eacea.ec.europa.eu/portal/page/ portal/Eurydice
Hauptman, A. (2006). Higher education finance: trends and issues. In James J. F. Forest & Philip g. Altbach(Eds.), International handbook of higher education (pp.83-106). Netherlands: Springer.
HEFCE (2005). Accountability for higher education institutions: consultation on a new process. Retrieved February 10, 2009, from http://www.hefce.ac.uk/pubs/ hefce/ 2005/05_31/
HEFCE (2007). Accountability for higher education institutions: new arrangements from 2008. Retrieved February 10, 2009, from http://www.hefce.ac.uk/pubs/ hefce/ 2005/05_31/
HEFCE (2009). ‘Single conversation’ annual accountability returns: Outcomes for 2008. Retrieved August 18, 2009, from http://www.hefce.ac.uk/pubs/hefce/ 2009/09_26/
Johnstone, D. B. (1998). The financing and management of higher education: a status report on worldwide reforms. Retrieved December 22, 2008, from http://www.worldbank.org/ html/ extdr/ educ/postbasc.htmKaiser, F., Vossensteyn, H. and Koelman, J. (2001). Public funding of higher education: A comparative study of funding mechanisms in ten countries. Retrieved December 8, 2008, from http://www.utwente.nl/cheps/publications /downloadable_publications/downloadablesenglish.doc/
King, R. (2007). Governance and accountability in the higher education regulatory state. Higher Education, 53, 411-430.
Leisyte L. and Kizniene, D. (2006). New public management in Lithuania’s higher education. Higher Education Policy, 19, 377-396.
Liefner, I. (2003). Funding, resource allocation, and performance in higher education systems. Higher Education, 46, 469-489.
Neave, G. (1990). On preparing for markets: trends in higher education in Western Europe 1988-1990. Europe Journal of Education, 25(2), 105-122.
Orr, D., Jaeger, M. and Schwarzenberger, A. (2007). Performance-based funding as an instrument of competition in German higher education. Journal of Higher Education Policy and Management, 29(1), 3-23.
Orr, D. (2005). Can Performance-Based Funding and QualityAssurance Solve the State vs Market Conundrum? Higher Education Policy, 18, 31-50
Trow, M. (2006). Reflections on the transition from elite to mass to universal access: forms and phases of higher education in modern societies since WWII. In James J. F. Forest & Philip G. Altbach(Eds.), International handbook of higher education (pp.243-280). Netherlands: Springer.
Vossensteyn, H. (2004). Fiscal stress: Worldwide trends in higher education finance. Journal of Student Financial Aid, 34(1), 39-55.
Weiler, H. (2000). States, markets and university funding: new paradigms for the reform of higher education in Europe. Compare, 30(3), 333-339.
Williams, G. (1997). The market route to mass higher education: British experience 1979-1996. Higher Education Policy, 10(3), 275-289.