二向度或三向度？國中生之成就目標建構適用性與自主性在學習歷程角色之研究

Dichotomous or Trichotomous? The Research into the Appropriateness of Achievement Goal Frameworks and the Role of the Autonomy in the Learning Process

陳嘉成
Chia-Cheng Chen


所屬期刊： 第6卷第4期 「測驗與評量」
主編：國立臺灣師範大學教育心理與輔導學系
林世華
系統編號： vol023_05
主題： 測驗與評量
出版年份： 2010
作者： 陳嘉成
作者(英文)： Chia-Cheng Chen
論文名稱： 二向度或三向度？國中生之成就目標建構適用性與自主性在學習歷程角色之研究
論文名稱(英文)： Dichotomous or Trichotomous? The Research into the Appropriateness of Achievement Goal Frameworks and the Role of the Autonomy in the Learning Process
共同作者：
最高學歷：
校院名稱：
系所名稱：
語文別：
論文頁數： 30
中文關鍵字： 成就目標;自我決定論;自主動機;內在動機
英文關鍵字： achievement goal;self-determination theory;autonomy;intrinsic motivation
服務單位： 國立臺灣藝術大學 師資培育中心副教授
稿件字數： 17874
作者專長： 教育心理學;學習心理學;認知心理學;動機心理學
投稿日期： 2010/8/12
論文下載： pdf檔案icon
摘要(中文)： 成就目標理論近年來已經從早期的二向度、三向度，發展到所謂的四
向度成就目標理論，本研究的主要目的在於：探討成就目標理論在面對不同
發展階段的受試對象時，是否應考慮採用不同向度的問卷來進行施測。研究
樣本是大台北地區國中一年級學生為對象，採用立意取向共抽取18個班級，
扣除無效問卷後有效樣本為共557個學生，其中男生296位，女生261位。經
由驗證性因素分析結果發現，採用二向度的成就目標建構，在適配度上會比
三向度的模式來得佳，但從修正指標上也發現，在精熟目標與表現目標的測
量當中，反映出國中學生可能同時「追求精熟」與「顧及表現」的學習目
標；此外，本研究以二向度成就目標結合自我決定論與學習組型變項，所建
立的路徑模式有不錯的適配度，文末並對成就目標理論在方法論與研究上提
出一些建議。
摘要(英文)： The theoretical and empirical work on achievement goals had developed from dichotomous and trichotomous into 2 × 2 achievement goal framework recently.One of the aims in this study is to examine how many dimensions of goal construct will fit the observed data well by using the method of structural Equation Modeling. Besides, we attempt to examine the relationships of junior high school students’ achievement goals,autonomy and pattern variables using the path model. The data are based on a sample of 18 classes of students from junior high schools and the sample size is 557. The conclusions in this research are as follows: (A) By using Confirmatory Factor Analysis, the dichotomous model fitted the observed data better than the trichotomous model. (B) The path model fitted the observed data well, but the direct effect between the autonomy and mathematic
grade is not significant. Based on the findings of this study, implications for achievement goal theory and research methodology are discussed.
參考文獻： 余民寧（1987）。考試焦慮、成就動機、學習習慣與學業成績之研究。國立政治
大學教育研究所碩士論文，未出版，台北市。
余民寧、陳景花 （1996）。時間管理對學業成就的影響。政大學報，72(上冊)，
63-82。
吳靜吉、余民寧、陳嘉成 (1999)。自我設限策略量表。未出版。
吳靜吉、程炳林（1992）。激勵學習策略量表。未出版。
吳靜吉、林偉文、劉士豪 (1998)。成就目標量表。未出版。
林易慧、程炳林(2006)。課室目標線索與個人目標導向對國小學童解題成就及自我調整學習之影響。教育心理學報，37(3)，231-255。
施淑慎 (2004)。成就目標、自我效能、以及策略使用在考試焦慮上所扮演之角
色。國立台北師範學院學報，17，355-378。
施淑慎 (2008)。學習情境中之自主支持與國中生成就相關歷程間關係之探討。教育與心理研究，31(2)，1-26。
施淑慎、曾瓊慧、蔡雅如 (2007)。國小學童之成就目標、動機與情感中介歷程以
及學業成就間路徑模式之檢驗。測驗學刊，54(1), 31-57。
陳嘉成 (2001)。中學生之成就目標導向、動機氣候知覺與學習行為組型之關係研
究。教育與心理研究，24(上冊)，167-190。
陳嘉成 (2002)。成就目標、行動控制取向與數學能力知覺的中介效果對國中生數
學學習行為組型之關係研究。教育與心理研究，25(下冊)，629-656。
陳嘉成 (2004)。國中數學科高智商低成就學生學習行為構型之研究。測驗學刊，
51(1)，1-28。
陳嘉成 (2006)。為什麼自我設限？與數學能力知覺、測驗焦慮對學習行為組型的
中介效果。測驗學刊，53 (1)，49-78。
陳嘉成(2007)。區別高低分群學生數學成就因素的國際比較以台灣、南韓、
澳洲與塞普勒斯的TIMSS 2003學生背景變項為例。測驗學刊，54(2)，377-
402。
程炳林 (2003)。四向度目標導向模式之研究。師大學報：教育類，48(1)，15-40。
Ames, C. (1992). Classroom: Goals, structures, and student motivation. Journal of Educational Psychology, 84(3), 261-271.
Anderman, E. M., & Midgly, C. (1997). Changes in achievement goal orientation, perceived academic competence, and grades across the transition to middle-level schools. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 22, 269-298.
Black, A. E., & Deci, E. L. (2000). The effects of instructors autonomy support and students autonomous motivation on learning organic chemistry: A self- determination theory perspective. Science Education, 84, 740-756.
Brockelman, K. F. (2009). The interrelationship of self-determination, mental illness, and grades among university students. Journal of College Student Development, 50(3), 271-286.
Chirkov V. I. & Ryan R. M. (2001). Parent and teacher autonomy support in Russian and US adolescents: Common effects on well-being and academic motivation, Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 32, 618—635.
Covington, M. V. (1984). The self-worthy theory of achievement motivation: Finding and implication. The Elementary School Journal, 85 (1), 5-20.
Covington, M. V. (1992). Making the grade: A self-worth perspective on motivation and school reform. New York, NY: Cambridge Univ. Press.
Covington, M. V. (1998). The will to learn. NY: Cambridge Univ. Press.Covington.
M. V. (2000). Goal theory, motivation, and school achievement: An integrative view. Annual Review of Psychology, 51, 171-200.
Covington, M. V., & Omelich, C. L. (1979). Effort: The double edged-sword in school achievement. Journal of Educational Psychology, 77, 446-459.
Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (1985). Intrinsic motivation and self-determination in human behavior.
New York, NY: Plenum.
Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (2000). The ‘‘what’’ and ‘‘why’’ of goal pursuits: Human
needs and the self determination of behavior. Psychological Inquiry, 11, 227–268.
Dweck, C. S. (2000). Self-theories: Their role in motivation, personality, and development. New
York, NY: Psychology Press.
Dweck, C. S., & Leggett, E. L. (1988). A social-cognitive approach to motivation and personality.
Psychological Review, 95(2), 256-273.
Elliot , A. J., & Harackiewicz, J. M. (1996). A hierarchical model of approach and avoidance
achievement motivation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 72(1), 218-231.
Elliot, A .J., & McGregor, A. (2001). A 2 ×2 achievement goal framework. Journal of Personality
and Social Psychology, 80, 501-519.
Elliot, A.J., & Thrash, T.M. (2001). Achievement goals and the hierarchical model of achievement
motivation. Educational Psychology Review, 12, 139-156.
Fortier, M. S., Vallerand, R. J., & Guay, F. (1995). Academic motivation and school performance: Toward a structural model. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 20, 257-274.
Gottfried, A. E., Fleming, J. S., & Gottfried, A. W. (2001). Continuity of academic intrinsic motivation from childhood through late adolescence: A longitudinal study. Journal of Educational Psychology, 93(1), 3-13.
Graham, S., & Weiner, B. (1996). Theories and principles of motivation. In D. C. Berliner & R. C.
Calfee (Eds.), Handbook of Educational Psychology (pp.63-84). New York, NY: Macmillan.
Hagger, M. S., Chatzisarantis, N. L. D., Hein, V., Pihu, M., Soos, I., & Karsai, I. (2007). The perceived autonomy support scale for exercise settings (PASSES): Development, validity, and cross-cultural invariance in young people. Psychology of Sport and Exercise, 8, 632-653.
Harackiewicz, J. M.; Barron, K.E., & Elliot, A.J. (1998). Rethinking achievement goal:When they are adaptive for college students and why? Educational Psychologist, 33(1), 1-21.
Harackiewicz, J. M., Durik, A. M., Barron, K. E., Lineenbrink, G. L., & Tauer, J. M.(2008).
The role of achievement goals in the development of interest reciprocal relations between achievement goals, interest, and performance. Journal of Educational Psychology, 100(1),105-122.
Hulleman, C. S., Durik, A. M., Schweigert, S., & Harackiewicz, J.M. (2008). Task values, achievement goals, and interest: An integrative analysis. Journal of Educational Psychology, 100(2), 398-416.
Ilies, R., & Judge, T. A. (2005). Goal regulation across time: The effects of feedback and affect.
Journal of Applied Psychology, 90(3), 453-467.
Jones, E., & Berglas, S. (1978). Control attributions about the self through self-handicapping strategies: The appeal of alcohol and the role of under- achievement. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 4, 200-206.
Joreskog, K. G., & Sorbom, D. (1993). LISREL 8: Structural equation modeling with the SIMPLIS command language. Chicago, IL: Scientific Software International.
Kaplan, A.; Middleton,M. J.; Urdan,T.& Midgley,C. (2002). Achievement goals and goal structure.
In C. Midgley (Ed.). Goals, Goal Structure, and Pattern of Adaptive Learning (pp.21-54). NJ:LEA.
Lau, S., & Nie, Y. (2008). Interplay between personal goals and classroom goal structures in predicting student outcomes: A multilevel analysis of person-context interactions. Journal of
Educational Psychology, 100(1), 15-29.
Lepper, M. R., Corpus, J. H., & Iyengar, S. S. (2005). Intrinsic and extrinsic motivational orientation in the classroom: Age differences and academic correlates. Journal of Educational Psychology, 97(2), 184-196.
Levy-Tossman, I., Kaplan, A., & Assor, A. (2007). Academic goal orientations, multiple goal profiles, and friendship intimacy among early adolescents. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 32, 231-252.
Maehr, M. L., & Midgley, C. (1996). Transforming School Culture. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
Markus, H. R., & Kitayama, S. (1991). Culture and the self: Implications for cognition, emotion, and motivation. Psychological Review, 98, 224-253.
Midgley, C.; Anderman, E. M., & Hicks, L. (1995). Differences between elementary and middle school teachers and students: A goal theory approach. Journal of Early Adolescence, 15, 90-113.
Midgley, C., Kaplan, A., & Middleton, M. (2001). Performance-approach goals: Good for what, for whom, under what circumstances, and at what cost? Journal of Educational Psychology, 93, 77–86.
Midgley, C., Maehr, M. L., Hicks, L., Roeser, R., Urdan, T., Anderman, E., Kaplan, A., Arunkumar,
R., & Middleton, M. (1997). Patterns of Adaptive Learning Survey (PALS). MI: The University of Michigan.
Nicholls, J. (1984). Achievement motivation: Conception of ability, subjective experience, task choice, and performance. Psychological Review, 91, 328-346.
Otis, N., Grouzet, M. E., & Pelletier, L. G. (2005). Latent motivational change in an academic setting: A 3-year longitudinal study. Journal of Educational Psychology, 97(2), 170-183.
Pintrich, P. R. (2000). An achievement goal theory perspective on issues in motivation terminology theory and research. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 25, 92-104.
Pintrich, P. R., & Garcia, T. (1991). Student goal orientation and self-regulation in the college. In M.
L. Maehr& P. R. Pintrich, P. R. (Eds.), Advanced in motivation and achievement: Goals and self-regulatory processes (Vol. 7, pp. 371-402). Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.
Rudy, D., Sheldon, K., Awong, T., & Tan, H. (2007). Autonomy, culture, and well-being: The benefits of inclusive autonomy. Journal of Research in Personality. 41, 983-1007.
Ryan, R. M., & Connell, J. P. (1989). Perceived locus of causality and internalization: Examining
reasons for acting in two domains. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 57, 749-761.
Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2000). Self-determination theory and the facilitation of intrinsic
motivation, social development, and well-being. American Psychologist, 55, 68–78.
Smith, L., Sinclair, K. E., & Chapman, E. (2002). Students’ goals, self-efficacy, selfhandicapping, and negative affective responses: An Australian senior school student study.
Contemporary Educational Psychology, 27, 471-485.
Soenens, B., & Vansteenkiste, M. (2005). Antecedents and outcomes of self- determination in three life domains: The role of parents’ and teachers’ autonomy support. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 34, 589–604.
Vansteenkiste, M., Zhou, M., Lens, W., & Soenens, B. (2005). Experiences of autonomy and control among chinese learners: Vitalizing or immobilizing? Journal of Educational Psychology, 97, 468-483.
Weiner, B. (1992). Human motivation: Metaphor, theories, and research. Thousand Oaks , CA: Sage Publication.
Weinstein, N., & Ryan, R. M. (2010). When helping helps: Autonomous motivation for prosocial behavior and its influence on well-being for the helper and recipient. Journal of Personality
and Social Psychology, 98, 222-244.
Xiang, P., Lee, A. M., & Shen, J. (2001). Conceptions of ability and achievement goals in physical education: Comparisons of American and Chinese Students. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 26(3), 348-365.
Zimmerman, B. J. (1989). A social cognitive view of self-regulated academic learning. Journal of Educational Psychology, 81, 329-339.
Zimmerman, B. J. (2000). Self-efficacy: An essential motive to learn. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 25, 82-91.