「高職學生學業動機調節量表」構念效度驗證之研究

Confirmatory Factor Analysis and Construct Validity of the Academic Motivational Regulation Scale for Taiwan Vocational High School Students

林啟超
Chi-Chau Lin


所屬期刊： 第7卷第4期 「測驗與評量」
主編：國立成功大學教育研究所特聘教授
陸偉明
系統編號： vol027_04
主題： 測驗與評量
出版年份： 2011
作者： 林啟超
作者(英文)： Chi-Chau Lin
論文名稱： 「高職學生學業動機調節量表」構念效度驗證之研究
論文名稱(英文)： Confirmatory Factor Analysis and Construct Validity of the Academic Motivational Regulation Scale for Taiwan Vocational High School Students
共同作者：
最高學歷：
校院名稱：
系所名稱：
語文別：
論文頁數： 28
中文關鍵字： 學業動機調節;驗證性因素分析;測量恆等性
英文關鍵字： academic motivational regulation;confirmatory factor analysis;measurement invariance
服務單位： 東海大學教育研究所助理教授
稿件字數： 14663
作者專長： 教育心理學研究、學習動機研究、教育研究法心理與測驗研究
投稿日期： 2011/2/10
論文下載： pdf檔案icon
摘要(中文)： 研究旨在發展一份適合國內高職學生學業動機調節量表，以驗證性因素分析及測量恆等性來檢驗。研究對象為中部地區高職二年級學生共1273人。首先，以男生樣本606位評鑑測量模式是否與實徵資料相互適配，並且找出最佳的適配與簡效模式。結果顯示二階因素模式為最佳簡效模式且適配良好，進而檢定此一最佳簡效模式之信效度，包括個別項目信、組成信度、收斂效度以及區別效度。最後，再以女生樣本667位進行測量恆等性檢驗，結果顯示對不同性別的高職學生而言，該量表通過恆等性之檢驗，顯示該量表具有跨樣本的有效性及穩定性。
摘要(英文)： The purpose of this study was to examine the construct validity of Academic Motivational Regulation Scale by confirmatory factor analysis and to test the factor invariance of this scale. The subjects were 1,273 students, drawn from vocational high schools in central Taiwan, divided into two groups. The first group of 606 male students was used for the development of Academic Motivational Regulation Scale and to conduct confirmatory factor analysis. This study adopted the way of comparing the model fitness of the competitive models to choose the best model. Furthermore, this study tested the reliability and validity of the best model, including item reliability, composite reliability, convergent validity and discriminant validity. At last, the other group (667 female students)
was used to measure invariance of the best model to assure the stability of the factorial structure construct validity. The factor structure was a good fit for the empirical data and invariant across gender levels.
參考文獻： 丁學勤（2009）。學校服務品質量表的發展與因素結構之研究。教育學刊，33，115-158。
吳明隆（2007）。結構方程模式AMOS的操作與應用。台北市：五南。
林清山（1988）。驗證性因素分析的理論及應用：修訂魏氏兒童智力量表之驗證性因素分析。測驗年刊，35，117-136。
林啟超（2008）。父母親成就教養取向、課室目標結構對高職學生之成就目標與
學習行為之關係。測驗統計年刊，16，59-84。
林啟超、謝智玲（2001）。高職學生之目標取向對學習策略與學習成就之關係研究。測驗統計年刊，9，131-168。
陳秀惠 （2010）。國中生自我決定動機之發展模式及其相關因素探討。國立成功大學教育研究所碩士論文，未出版，台南市。
陳正昌、程炳林、陳新豐、劉子鍵（2003）。多變量分析分法-統計軟體應用。台
北市：五南。
黃芳銘（2007）。結構方程模式理論與應用（第五版）。台北市：五南。
黃芳銘、楊金寶、許福生（2005）。在學青少年生活痛苦指標發展之研究。師大學報：教育類，50（2），97-119。
蘇素美、吳裕益 （2008）。害羞量表之修訂及其效度研究。教育與心理研究，31 （4），53-82。
Bagozzi, R. P., & Yi, Y. (1988). On the evaluation of structural equation models. Journal of the Academic of Marketing Science 16, 74-79.
Benson, J. (1998). Developing a strong program of construct validation: A test anxiety example. Educational measurement: Issues and practice, 17, 10–17.
Benson, J., & Hagtvet, K. A. (1996). The interplay among design, data analysis, and theory in the measurement of coping. In M. Zeidner & N. S. Endler (Eds.), Handbook of coping (pp. 83-106), New York, NY: Wiley.
Bollen, K. A. (1989). Structural equations with latent variables. New York, NY: Wiley.
Byrne, B. M. (1998). Structural equation modeling with LISREL, PRELIS, and SIMPLIS: Basics concepts, applications and programming. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Association.
Crocker, L., & Algina, J. (1986). Introduction to classical and modern test theory. Philadelphia, PA: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich College Publishers.
Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (1985). Intrinsic motivation and self-determination in human behavior. New York, NY: Plenum Press.
Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (1991). A motivational approach to self: Integration in personality. In R. A. Dienstbier (Ed.), Nebraska symposium on motivation: Perspectives on motivation (pp. 237-288). Lincoln, NE. Universtiy of Nebraska.
Eccles, J. S., Midgley, C., Wigfield, A., Buchanan, C. M., Reuman, D., Flanagan, C., & Maclver, D. (1993). Development during adolescence: The impact of stage-environment fit on young adolescents’experiences in school and in families. American Psychologist, 48, 90-101.
Fairchild, A. J., Horst, S. J., Finney, S. J., & Barron, K. E. (2005). Evaluating existing new validity evidence for the Academic Motivaiton Scale. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 30, 331-358.
Fornell C., & Larcker, D. F. (1981). Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable and measurement errors. Journal of Marketing Research 18(1), 39-50.
Gregory, R. J. (1992). Psychological testing: History, principles and applications. Boston, MA : Allyn and Bacon.
Grolnick, W. S., & Ryan, R. M. (1987). Autonomy in children’s learning: An experimental and individual difference investigation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 52, 890-898.
Hambleton, R. K. (1994). Guidelines for adapting educational and psychological tests: A progress report. European Journal of Psychological Assessment, 10, 229-224.
Hair, J. F, Jr., Anderson, R. E., Tatham, R. L., & Black, W. C. (1998). Multiple data analysis (5th ed.). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
Joreskog, K. G., & Sorbom, D. (1999). LISREL8: User’s reference guide. Chicago, IL: Scientific Software International.
Lepper, M. R., Corpus, J. H., & Iyengar, S. S. (2005). Intrinsic and extrinsic motivational orientations in the classroom: Age differences and academic correlates. Journal of Educational Psychology, 97, 184-196.
Lepper, M., & Henderlong, J. (2000). Turning“play”into “work”and “work”into “play”: 25 years of research on intrinsic versus extrinsic motivation. In C. Sansone & J. Harackiewicz (Eds.), Intrinsic and extrinsic motivation: The search for optimal motivation and performance (pp. 257-307). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
Li, F., & Harmer, P. (1996). Testing the simplex assumption underlying the sport motivation scale: A structure equation modeling analysis. Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport, 67, 396-405.
Little, T. D. (1997). Mean and covariance structures (MACS) analysis of cross-cultural data: Practice and theoretical issue. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 32, 53-76.
MacCallum, R. C., Roznowski, M., Mar, C. M., & Reith, J. V. (1994). Alternative strategies for cross-validation of covariance structure models. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 29(1), 1-32.
Mallett, C. J., & Hanrahan, S. J. (2004). Elite athletes: Why does the“fire”burn so brightly? Psychology of Sport and Exercise, 5, 183-200.
Mallett, C., Kawabata, M., Newcombe, P., Otero-Forero, A., & Jackson, S. (2007). Sport motivation scale-6 (SMS-6): A revised six-factor sport motivation scale. Psychology of Sport and Exercise, 8, 600-614.
Marsh, H. W., & Hocevar, D. (1985). Application of confirmatory factor analysis to the study of self-concept: First and higher order factor models and their invariance across groups. Psychological Bulletin, 97(3), 562-582.
Noar, S. M. (2003). The role of structural equation modeling in scale development. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal. 10(4), 622-647.
Nunnally, J. C. (1978). Psychometric theory. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.
Pelletier, L. G., Fortier, M. S., Vallerand, R. J., Tuson, K. M., Briere, N. M., & Blais, M. R. (1995). Toward a new measure of intrinsic motivation, extrinsic motivation, and amotivation in sports: The sport motivation scale (SMS). Journal of sport and Exercise Psychology, 17, 35-53.
Ryan, R. M., & Connell, J. P. (1989). Perceived locus of causality and internalization: Examining reasons for acting in two domains. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 89(2), 329-341.
Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2000a). Self-determination theory and the facilitation of intrinsic motivation, social development, and well-being. American Psychologist, 55, 68-78.
Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2000b). Intrinsic and extrinsic motivations: Classic definitions and new directions. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 25, 54-67.
Ryan, R. M., & Deci E. L. (2002). An overview of self-determination theory: An organismic-dialectical perspective. In E. L. Deci & R. M. Ryan (Eds.) Handbook of self-determination research (pp. 3-33). Rochester, NY: University of Rochester Press.
Sharma, S. (1996). Applied multivariate technique. New York, NY: John Wiley and Sons.
Soenens, B. & Vansteenkiste, M. (2005)。Antecedents and outcomes of self-determination in three life domains: The role of parents’and teachers’autonomy support. Journal of Youth and Adolescence 34, 589-604.
Vallerand, R. J., Blais, M. R., Briere, N. M., & Pelletier, L. G. (1989). Construction et validation de l’Echelle de Motivation en education (EME) [Construction and validation of the Echelle de Motivation en Education (EME)]. Canadian Journal of Behavioral Sciences, 21, 323-349.
Vallerand, R. J., & Bissonnette, R. (1992a). Intrinsic, extrinsic, and amotivational styles as predictors of behavior: A prospective study. Journal of Personality, 60, 599-620.
Vallerand, R. J., Pelletier, L. G., Blais, M. R., Briere, N. M., Senecal C., & Vallieres, E. F. (1992b). The academic motivation scale: A measure of intrinsic, extrinsic and amotivation in education. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 52,1003-1019.

誌謝：作者對於匿名審查委員提供的寶貴建議，使本文更臻完整，深表謝忱。