期刊專區/ Periodical Section

教師社群互動對職場希望感與創新教學關係之探究：以幼教師觀點為例

The Exploration of the Relationship between Teachers’ Community Interaction for Workplace Promisingness and Innovative Teaching: The Example of Kindergarten

所屬期刊：	第9卷第1期 「教師培育與專業發展」 主編：國立政治大學教育學院教授 陳木金
系統編號：	vol032_02
主題：	師資培育
出版年份：	2013
作者：	劉秀枝;黃秀霜
作者(英文)：	Hsiu-Chih Liu;Hsiu-Shuang Huang
論文名稱：	教師社群互動對職場希望感與創新教學關係之探究：以幼教師觀點為例
論文名稱(英文)：	The Exploration of the Relationship between Teachers’ Community Interaction for Workplace Promisingness and Innovative Teaching: The Example of Kindergarten
共同作者：
最高學歷：
校院名稱：
系所名稱：
語文別：
論文頁數：	34
中文關鍵字：	幼教師;教師社群互動;職場希望感;創新教學
英文關鍵字：	kindergarten teachers;teacher community interaction;workplace promisingness;innovative teaching
服務單位：	國立臺南大學幼兒教育學系兼任助理教授;國立臺南大學教育系教授
稿件字數：	24398
作者專長：	正向心理、職場幸福感、顧客忠誠度、服務管理
投稿日期：	2012/12/28
論文下載：
摘要(中文)：	本研究旨在了解幼兒園教師參與園內教師社群互動對職場希望感與創新教學之關係。本研究以全國北、中、南、東立案之幼兒園教師為研究對象，針對11位幼教師進行訪談，研究結果發現：1.沒有參與社群，乃因園內沒有成立教師社群或規劃課程內容不同與時間點不能配合。2.參與教師社群互動可提升專業能力與聯絡感情。3.教師社群互動有助於學習區情境布置、教案設計與班級經營。4.教師社群互動可凝聚團體向心力。5.社群互動中認知與情感互動可以提升教師社群互動品質。6.教師社群互動能提升職場希望感與創新教學。7.教師社群互動、職場希望感及創新教學之關係是相輔相成、互為鷹架的。根據研究發現，提出後續相關研究建議。
摘要(英文)：	The main purpose of this study is to understand the relationship between kindergarten teachers participating community interaction for workplace promisingness and innovative teaching. Eleven kindergarten teachers from northern, middle, southern and eastern regions of Taiwan were assessed for studying and discussing (all from licensed kindergartens). The main findings are as follows:(1) Kindergartens not establishing their own teacher community or dissimilarity of curriculum contents and time constraints are the main factors for teachers not participating in a community.(2) Teacher community interaction can promote professional competence and build friendship between kindergarten teachers.(3) Teacher community interaction can help design learning area situations and teaching plans as well as assist with classroom management.(4) Teacher community interaction can condense into centripetal force.(5) The perceptional and emotional interactions can improve the interactive quality of the community.(6) The interactions among teacher communities can enhance workplace promisingness and innovative teaching.(7) Teacher community interactions, workplace promisingness and innovative teaching are complement to each other, building an inseparable relationship. Based on these results, suggestions for future research are discussed.
參考文獻：	王沂釗（2005）。幽谷中的曙光－正向心理學發展與希望理論在輔導上的應用。教育研究月刊，134，106-117。 王為國（2007）。從實務社群談課程發展與教師專業發展。課程研究，2，41-63。 古明峰（2012）。國小實習教師同儕專業成長團體實施效果之研究。教育研究與發展期刊，8（1），31-60。 李新民、陳密桃（2008）。職場希望感信念與職場復原力、組織美德行為之潛在關聯：以幼兒教師為例。當代教育研究，16（4），155-198。 李新民（2009）。幼兒教師的心理資本及其與工作表現的潛在關聯。幼兒保育學刊，1-23。 吳璧如（2007）。教育研究中的教學創新。教育研究月刊，157，12-20。 林偉文（2006）。樂在其中的創意教師：國民中小學教師教學福樂經驗與創意教學之關係。國立臺北市教育大學學報，19（2），111-128。 林偉文（2007）。教學創新的梅迪奇效應：以英國創意夥伴計畫為例。教育研究月刊，157，31-41。 林明地、連俊智（2008）。學校領導社群的意涵與塑造。教育研究月刊，171，16-27。 唐淑華（2004）。希望感的提升－另一個進行其情意教育的取向（I）。行政院國家科學委員會專題研究成果報告（NSC92-2413-H259-002）。花蓮：國立東華大學。 唐淑華（2010）。從希望感模式論學業挫折之調適與因應－正向心理學提供的「第三種選擇」。 臺北市：心理。 孫志麟（2004）。開啟專業學習的新視窗：教師的知識管理。教育研究月刊，126， 5-18。 孫培真、周至宏（2011）。教師嘗試使用先進資訊科技創新教學之研究。中山管理評論，19（2），423-465。 黃錫美（2007）。希望之概念分析。志為護理，6（2），57-63。 張世忠（2002）。教學創新應用與實例。臺北市：學富文化。 張新仁、王瓊珠、馮莉雅（編）（2009）。中小學教師專業學習手冊（再版）。臺北市：教育部。 蔡文正（2001）。九年一貫創新教學與超文件模組教材之探討。載於國立高雄師範大學教育學系（編），九年一貫課程改革下的創新教學研討會論文集編（頁125-133）。高雄市：國立高雄師範大學。 歐用生（1996）。教師專業成長。臺北市：師大書苑。 賴英娟、巫博瀚（2009）。希望理論的概念分析與理論應用。研習資訊，26（4）， 71-78。 Amabile, T. M., Barsade, S. G., Mueller, J. S., & Staw, B. M. (2005). Affect and creativity at work. Administrative science quarterly, 50(3), 367-403. Baker, P. H., & Murray, M. M. (2011). Building Community partnerships: Learning to serve while learning to teach. School Community Journal, 21(1), 113-127. Borkp, H., & Putnam, R.T. (1996). Learning to teach. In D. C. Berliner & R. C. Calfee (Ed.), Handbook of educational psychology (pp. 673-708). New York, NY: Macmillan. Brinkman, D. J. (2010). Teaching creatively and teaching for creativity. Arts Education Policy Review, 111(2), 48-50。 Chien, C. Y., & Hui, A. N. N. (2010). Creative in early childhood education: Teachers’ perceptions in three Chinese societies. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 5(2), 49-60. Clairbourne, C. (2003). Hope in the workplace. Creative Nursing, 1, 4-6. Doppelt, Y., Schunn, C. D., Silk, E. M., Mehalik, M. M., Reynolds, B., & Ward, E. (2009). Evaluating the impact of a facilitated learning community approach to professional development on teacher practice and student achievement. Research in Science & Technological Education, 27(3), 339-354. Dufault, K., & Martocchio, B. C. (1985). Hope: Its spheres and dimensions. Nursing Clinics of North America, 20(2), 379-391. Grossman, P., Wineburg, S., & Woolworth, S. (2001a). Toward a Theory of Teacher Community. Teachers College Record, 103(6), 942-1012. Hadr, L., & Brody, D. (2010). From isolation to symphonic harmony: Building a professional development community among teacher educators. Teaching and Teacher Education: An International Journal of Research and Studies, 26(8), 1641-1651. Hatchuel, A., Le Masson, P., & Weil, B. (2011). Teaching innovative design reasoning: How concept-knowledge theory can help to overcome fixation effects. AI Edam-Artificial Intelligence for Engineering Design Analysis and Manufacturing, 25(1), 77-92. Hord, S. M. (1997). Professional learning communities: Communities of continuous inquiry and improvement. Austin, TX: Southwest Educational Development Laboratory. Hord, S. M. (2004). Professional learning communities: An overview. In S. M. Hord (Ed.), Learning together, leading together: Changing school through professional learning communities (pp. 5-14). New York, NY: Teachers College Press. Horn, I. S. (2010). Teaching replays, teaching rehearsals, and re-visions of practice: learning from colleagues in a mathematics teacher community. Teachers College Record, 112(1), 225-259. Kangas, M. (2010). Creative and playful learning through game co-creation and game play in a playful learning environment. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 5(1), 1-15. Larson, M., & Luthans, F. (2006).The potential added value of psychological capital in predicting work attitudes. Journal of Leadership and Organizational Studies, 13, 44-61. Little, J. W. (2003). Inside teacher community: Representations of classroom practice. Teachers College Record, 105(6), 913-945. Louis, K. S., Marks, H. M., & Kruse, S. (1996). Teachers’ professional community in restructuring schools. American Educational Research Journal, 33(4), 757-798. Luthans, F., Avey, J. B., & Avolio, B. J. (2006). Psychological capital development: Toward a micro-intervention. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 27, 387-393. Luthans, F., Norman, S. M., Avolio, B. J., & Avey, J. B. (2008). The mediating role of psychological capital in the supportive organizational climate- employee performance relationship. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 29(2), 219-238. Matsumura, L. C., & Steinberg, J. R. (2002). Collaborative, school- based professional development settings for teachers: Implementation and links to improving the quality of classroom practice and student learning. CSE Technical Report 568. University of California, Los Angeles, CA. Pella, S. (2011). A situative perspective on developing writing pedagogy in a teacher professional learning community. Teacher Education Quarterly, 38(1), 107-125. Ritchhart, R. (2004). Creative teaching in the shadow of the standards. Independent School, 63(2), 32-41. Rose, S. E. (2007). The expansion and validation of dispositional and academic measure of hope. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Alabama. Slatter, W., & France, B. (2011).The teacher-community of practice-student interaction in the New Zealand technology classroom. International Journal of and Design Education, 21(2), 149-160. Slick, S. (2002). Teachers are enthusiastic participants in a Learning community. Clearing House, 75(4), 198-203. Snow-Gerono, J. L. (2005). Professional development in a culture of inquiry: PDS teachers identify the benefits of professional learning communities. Teaching and Teacher Education: An International Journal of Research and Studies, 21(3), 241-256. Snyder, C. R. (2002). Hope theory: Rainbows of the mind. Journal of Psychological Inquiry, 13 (4), 249-275. Snyder, C. R., Lehman, K. A., Kluck, B., & Monsson, Y. (2006). Hope for rehabilitation and vice versa. Rehabilitation Psychology, 51, 89-112. Takahashi, S. (2011). Co-constructing efficacy: A “Communities of Practice” perspective on teachers’ efficacy beliefs. Teaching and Teacher Education: An International Journal of Research and Studies, 27(4), 732-741. Tokumasu, K. (2007). Trajectories of participation to a community of practice: New elementary school teachers. Japanese Journal of Educational Psychology, 55(1), 34-47. Turner, N., Barling, J., & Zacharatos, A. (2002). Positive psychology at work. In C. R. Snyder & S. J. Lopez. (Ed.), Handbook of positive psychology (pp. 715-730). New York, NY: Oxford University Press. Watkins, K. E., & Marsick, V. J. (1993). Sculpting the learning organization: Lessons in the art and science of systemic change. San Francisco, CA: Jossey Bass. Webb, R., Vulliarmy, G., Sarja, A., Amalainen, S., & Poikonen, P. L. (2009). Professional learning communities and teacher well-being? A comparative analysis of primary schools in England and Finland. Oxford Review of Education, 35(3), 405-422.