期刊專區/ Periodical Section

大學實施教師教學諮詢專業發展策略之探討

The Study of Implementing Teaching Consultation as Professional Development Strategy in University

所屬期刊：	第10卷第1期 「教師培育與專業發展」 主編：國立臺灣師範大學教育學系教授 周愚文
系統編號：	vol036_04
主題：	師資培育
出版年份：	2014
作者：	陳琦媛
作者(英文)：	Chi-Yuan Chen
論文名稱：	大學實施教師教學諮詢專業發展策略之探討
論文名稱(英文)：	The Study of Implementing Teaching Consultation as Professional Development Strategy in University
共同作者：
最高學歷：
校院名稱：
系所名稱：
語文別：
論文頁數：	32
中文關鍵字：	教學諮詢;高等教育;教學評鑑
英文關鍵字：	teaching consultation;higher education;teaching evaluation
服務單位：	中國文化大學師資培育中心助理教授
稿件字數：	22041
作者專長：	教育評鑑、高等教育、教育行政、學校建築
投稿日期：	2013/8/19
論文下載：
摘要(中文)：	本研究旨在了解我國大學實施教學諮詢之現況，蒐集分析國內外大學執行教學諮詢之經驗，以提出我國未來發展教學諮詢此項教學專業發展策略之建議。為達此研究目的，本研究以文件分析法分析我國118所大學實施教學諮詢之現況，並訪談3位美國大學教學發展單位主管和4位國內大學參與教學諮詢之主管或教師。研究結果發現我國有52所（44％）大學實施有教學諮詢服務，各大學多遴選校內教學表現優異之資深優良教師兼任諮詢人員，諮詢過程偏重於經驗分享和講座研習。雖開放給所有教師使用，但多數大學規定教學評鑑不佳教師需義務性接受教學諮詢，導致教師為免被誤認為教學不力教師而鮮少主動參與。如何提升教師使用意願，並正向看待且接納教學諮詢為實施此項教學專業發展策略較大挑戰。基於上述結論本研究提出若干研究建議供我國發展教學諮詢專業發展策略之參考。
摘要(英文)：	The purpose of the study is to explore and understand the experience of implementing teaching consultation programs in higher education institutions in Taiwan. To achieve this aim, the websites of all 118 universities in Taiwan were searched and the documents related to teaching consultation were collected and analyzed. The directors of three centers of teaching development at universities in the United States and four faculties which are involved in teaching consultation at universities in Taiwan were interviewed. The results show that: fifty-two universities (44% of all universities studied) offered the consultation service for their teachers in Taiwan; and the teaching consultants in the university were selected from the faculty body. The consultants were all full-time professors, served as part-time teaching consultants, and were paid by the hour for the time they spent on consultation. The process of teaching consultation includes sharing experiences and attending speeches. The teaching consultation service is always combined with teaching evaluation. If teachers receive negative teaching evaluation results, they are required to use the teaching consultation service. This policy makes teachers reluctant to use the consultation service in case they might be misjudged by their peers as poor teachers. It is a challenge to increase teachers willingness to use this service and have a more positive attitude about using consultation services. Based on the findings of this study, several suggestions are proposed on how to improve this service in universities in Taiwan.
參考文獻：	史美瑤（譯）（2012）。開創教師發展新紀元：學習過去，了解當下（原作者：. M. D. Sorcinelli, A. E. Austin, P. L. Eddy & A. L. Beach）。臺北市：高等教育。（原著出版年：2006） 李振清（2006）。建立有效教學機制—教師發展是高等教育評鑑的核心議題。評鑑雙月刊，9（3），9-12。 林意雪（2009）。三種大學教學諮詢模式的個案分析。教育資料與研究，86，81-110。 陳琦媛（2007）。我國公立大學教師教學評鑑之研究（未出版之博士論文）。國立政治大學，臺北市。 張德勝（2004）。臺灣地區大學校院「學生評鑑教師教學」制度之研究。師大學報，50（2），203-225。 張德勝（2007）。同儕團體教學諮詢方案對師培教師教學評鑑結果之影響。花蓮教育大學學報，24，1-22。 張德勝、林玟秀 （2008）。Peer consultation to improve a novice teacher educator’s instruction。師資培育與教師專業發展期刊，1（2），59-76。 潘世尊（2010）。學生評鑑成績未達標準教師之教學專業發展方案一所私立科技大學的實踐之反思與改善。勤益人文社會學刊，2，183-219。 Academic Ranking of World Universities (2012). Academic ranking of world universities – 2012(United States). Retrieved from http://www.shanghairanking.com/Country2012Main.jsp?param=United States Atkinson, D. J., & Bolt, S. (2010). Using teaching observations to reflect upon and improve teaching Practice in higher education. Journal of the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning, 10(3), 1-19. Brinko, K.T. (2012). The interaction of teaching improvement. In K.T. Brinko (Ed.). Practically speaking: A sourcebook for instructional consultants in higher education (pp. 3-7). Stillwater, Oklahoma: New Forums press. Centra, J. A. (1993). Reflective faculty evaluation. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass. Chen, C.Y. (2011). The application of teaching quality improvement strategies in higher education. Presented at Asia-Pacific Association for International Education 2011 Conference. Cohen, P. A. (1980). Effectiveness of student rating feedback for improving college instruction: a meta-analysis. Research in Higher Education, 13(4), 321-341. Cook, C. E., & Kaplan, M. (Eds.). (2011). Advancing the culture of teaching on campus: How a teaching center can make A difference. Sterling, VA: Stylus. Donnelly, R. (2007). Perceived impact of Peer observation of teaching in higher education. International Journal of Teaching and Learning in Higher Education, 19(2), 117-129. Dresel, M., & Rindermann, H. (2011). Counseling university instructors based on student evaluations of their teaching effectiveness: A Multilevel Test of Its Effectiveness under Consideration of Bias and Unfairness Variables. Research in Higher Education, 52(7), 717-737. Fetterley, J. (2005).Teaching and "my work". American Literary History, 17(4), 741-752. Finelli, C., Ott, M., Gottfried, A.C., Hershock, C., O’neal, C., & Kaplan, M. (2008). Utilizing instructional consultations to enhance the teaching performance of engineering faculty. Journal of engineering education, 97(4), 397-411. Gillespie, K.J., Robertson, D.L., Bergquist W. H. (2010). A guide to faculty development. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass. Grady, M. L. & Yao. Y (2006). How do faculty make formative use of student evaluation feedback? : A multiple case study. Journal of Personnel Evaluation in Education, 18, 107-126. Hampton, S. E., & Reiser, R. A. (2004). Effects of a theory-based feedback and consultation process on instruction and learning in college classrooms. Research in Higher Education, 45(5), 497-527. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1023/B:RIHE.0000032326.00426.d5 Havia, N. (1997). Teaching in a research university: Professors conceptions, practices, and disciplinary differences. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Chicago, IL. Hativa,N. (1998). Lack of clarity in university teaching: A case study. Higher Education, 36, 353-381. Hativa, N., Barak, R., & Simhi, E. (2001). Exemplary university teachers: Knowledge and beliefs regarding effective teaching dimensions and strategies. The Journal of Higher Education, 72(6), 699-729. Heppner, P.P., Johnston, J.A. (1994). Peer consultation: Faculty and students working together to improve teaching. Journal of Counseling & Development, 72(5), 492-499. Hicks, O. (1999). A conceptual framework for instructional consultation. New Directions for Teaching and Learning, 79, Fall. 9-18. Knapper, C. & Piccinin, S. (1999). Consulting about teaching: An overview. New Directions for Teaching and Learning, 79, Fall. 3-7. Keeley, J., Smith, D., & Buskist, W. (2006). The teacher behaviors checklist :Factor analysis of its utility for evaluating teaching. Teaching of Psychology, 33(2), 84-91. Kerwin, M. A. (1999). Instructional consultation in s statewide setting. New Directions for Teaching and Learning, 79, Fall. 29-38. Kristensen, E. (2012). Collecting information and analyzing teaching using video. In K.T. Brinko (Ed.), Practically speaking: A sourcebook for instructional consultants in higher education (pp. 65-71). Stillwater, Oklahoma, OK: New Forums press. Lenze, L.F. (2012). Collecting information using the small group instructional diagnosis (SGID). In K.T. Brinko (Ed.), Practically Speaking: A Sourcebook for Instructional Consultants in Higher Education (pp. 46-52). Stillwater, Oklahoma, OK: New Forums press. Lewis, K. G. (2012). Collecting information using class observation. In K.T. Brinko (Ed.), Practically speaking: A sourcebook for instructional consultants in higher education (pp. 27-45). Stillwater, Oklahoma, OK: New Forums press. L’Hpmmedieu, R., Menges, R. J. , & Brinko, K. T. (1990). Methodological explanations for the modest effects of feedback. Journal of Educational Psychology, 82, 232-241. Marsh, H. W. (1984). The influence of student, course and instructor characteristics on evaluations of university teaching. American Educational Research Journal, 17, 219-237. Marsh, H. W., & Roche, L.A. (1997). Making students evaluations of teaching effectiveness effective. American Psychologist, 52, 1187-1197. Marsh, H. W. (2007). Do university teachers become more effective with experience? A multilevel growth model of students evaluations of teaching over 13 years. Journal of Educational Psychology, 99(4), 775-790. Menges, R. & Brinko, K. T. (1986). Effects of student evaluation feedback: A meta-analysis of higher education research. Paper presented at the 1986 Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association, San Francisco. (ERIC Document Reproduction service No. ED 270408) Murray, H. G. (1985). Classroom teaching behaviors related to college teaching effectiveness. In J. C. Donald and A. M. Sullivan (Eds.), Using research to improve teaching: New directions for teaching and kearning. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass. Nasser, F. & Fresko, B. (2006). Predicting student ratings: the relationship between actual student ratings and instructors predictions. Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, 31(1), 1-18. Neunann, R. (2000). Communication student evaluation of teaching results: rating Interpretation Guides (RIGs). Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, 25(2), 121-134. Penny, A. R. & Coe, R. (2004). Effectiveness of consultation on student ratings feedback: A meta-analysis. Review of Educational Research, 74(2), 215-253. Piccinin, S. (1999). How individual consultation affects teaching. New Directions for Teaching and Learning, 79, Fall. 71-83. Smith, C. (2008). Building effectiveness in teaching through targeted evaluation and response: connecting evaluation to teaching improvement in higher education. Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, 33(5), 517-533. Sorcinelli, M. D., Austin, A. E., Eddy, P. L., & Beach, A. L. (2006). Creating the future of faculty development: Learning from the past, understanding the present. San Francison, CA: Jossey-Bass. Theall, M. & Franklin, J. (2012). Collecting information using student ratings. In K.T. Brinko(Ed.), Practically speaking: A sourcebook for instructional consultants in higher education (pp. 72-80). Stillwater, Oklahoma, OK: New Forums press. Tiberius, R. (2012). Collecting information using small group methods. In K.T. Brinko (Ed.), Practically speaking: A sourcebook for instructional consultants in higher education (pp. 53-64). Stillwater, Oklahoma, OK: New Forums press. Wilson, R. C. (1986). Improving faculty teaching: effective use of student evaluations and consultants. Journal of Higher Education, 57(2), 196-211.