角色楷模學習輔導方案應用於科技領域大學生之成效研究

The Effects of a Learning Guidance Intervention with Role Model on Learning Strategies and Career Self-Efficacy of College Students in Science and Technology

謝淑敏
Sui-Ming Hsieh

Doi:10.3966/181665042014121004003


所屬期刊: 第10卷第4期 「測驗與評量」
主編:國立成功大學教育研究所特聘教授
陸偉明
系統編號: vol039_03
主題: 測驗與評量
出版年份: 2014
作者: 謝淑敏
作者(英文): Sui-Ming Hsieh
論文名稱: 角色楷模學習輔導方案應用於科技領域大學生之成效研究
論文名稱(英文): The Effects of a Learning Guidance Intervention with Role Model on Learning Strategies and Career Self-Efficacy of College Students in Science and Technology
共同作者:
最高學歷:
校院名稱:
系所名稱:
語文別:
論文頁數: 32
中文關鍵字: 科技領域大學生;角色楷模學習輔導方案;學習策略;生涯自我效能
英文關鍵字: college students in science and technology;learning guidance intervention with role model;learning strategies;career self-efficacy
服務單位: 國立暨南國際大學課程教學與科技研究所助理教授
稿件字數: 20948
作者專長: 性別教育、生涯輔導、諮商理論與技術
投稿日期: 2014/9/4
論文下載: pdf檔案icon
摘要(中文): 本研究旨在探討角色楷模學習輔導方案運用於科技領域大學生之成效,研究者設計角色楷模學習輔導方案融入性別教育課程進行實驗,並以自編之「大學生生涯自我效能量表」、「大學生學習策略調查問卷」進行施測,瞭解角色楷模學習輔導方案的介入,對科技領域大學生在學習策略及生涯自我效能上的成效為何。研究對象為中部地區某綜合大學修習性別教育課程之兩班學生,一班為實驗組,另一班為對照組。研究結果如下:(1)實施角色楷模融入性別教育課程的學生與參與一般性別教育課程的學生,在學習策略的使用上有顯著差異。(2)實施角色楷模融入性別教育課程的學生與參與一般性別教育課程的學生,在整體生涯自我效能的提升上並無顯著差異。最後並提出教育、輔導與未來研究上的建議。
摘要(英文): This study examined a learning guidance intervention with role model to explore its influence on learning strategies and career self-efficacy for college students in science and technology. The result will act as a guide to college educators to implement incorporated role model influences with students’ development program. The purpose of this study was: (1) to compare the differences of learning strategies of students between learning guidance intervention with role model applied in gender education class and typical gender education class; and (2) to analyze the differences between career self-efficacy of students by attending learning guidance intervention with role model applied in gender education class. 30 college students (2 classes) were selected from a Comprehensive University in central Taiwan. The quasi-experimental design was implemented in this study. One class was empirical group, and the other was control group. The participants of the research were administered “College students’ learning strategies questionnaire”, and “College students’ career self-efficacy questionnaire.” The analysis was carried out through one-way ANOVA. The results were as follows: (1) there were differences in learning strategies questionnaire score between empirical group and control group, and (2) there were no differences in career self-efficacy questionnaire score between empirical group and control group. Based on the results of the study, some suggestions were provided for school educators and counselors and for further research.
參考文獻: 于曉平、林幸台(2010)。角色楷模課程對高中數理資優女生性別角色、生涯自我效能與生涯發展影響之研究。教育科學研究期刊,55(1),27-61。
王紅彬(2010)。團體心理輔導對提高女大學生職業決策自我效能的有效性研究。 教育與教學研究,24(9),56-58。
王瑋、李春暉、王欣(2006)。團體心理輔導對大三學生職業生涯決策的影響研 究。中國臨床心理學雜誌,14(6),649-651。
毛菁華、周富美、許鶯珠(2008)。技職校院女大學生生涯發展歷程模式之研究。諮商輔導學報:高師輔導所刊,19,105-139。
田秀蘭(1999)。女性對生涯阻礙知覺之質的分析。教育心理學報,31(1),89-107。
呂姿瑩(2010)。高學歷女性生涯發展歷程及重要他人之敘事研究(未出版之碩士論文)。國立成功大學,臺南市。
吳靜吉、程炳林(1992)。激勵的學習策略量表之修訂。測驗年刊,39,59-78。
林曉萍、王有智、李小雁(2010)。班級生涯心理輔導促進大學生職業生涯規劃的對照研究。中國心理衛生雜誌,24(1),34-37。
周富美(2010)。運用同儕輔導制度提升大一學生學習成效—以北部某技術學院會資系為例。教育研究學報,44(1),101-131。
范瑞文(2003)。自我調整學習輔導團體對於大學僑生輔導效果之研究(未出版之碩士論文)。彰化師範大學,彰化縣。
洪寶蓮(2003)。內在動機與情意學習方案之小團體輔導效果。彰化師大輔導學報,24,35-71。
黃政傑(2001)。高等教育的發展。師友,409,6-10。
楊龍立(1996)。男女學生科學興趣差異的評析。臺北市:文景。
蔡麗玲(2010)。理工能力優異女性學習適應與生涯挑戰—性別與認同研究取向(II)。行政院國家科學委員會專題研究計畫期末成果報告(NSC96-2628-S-017-001-MY2),未出版。
Anderson, E. M., & Shannon. A. L. (1988). Toward a conceptualization of mentoring. Journal of Teacher Education, 39(1), 38-42.
Astin, A.W. (1991). What really matters in general education: Provocative findings from a national study of student outcomes. Paper presented at the Association of General and liberal Studies Meeting, Seattle, WA.
Austin, H. & Sax, L. (1996). Developing scientific talent in undergraduate women. In C. Davis, A. B. Ginorio, C. S. Hollenshead, B. B. Lazarus, & P. M. Rayman, The equity equation: Fostering the advancement of women in the sciences, mathematics, and engineering (pp.96-121). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
Bandura, A. (1977). Self-efficacy: Toward a unifying theory of behavioral change. Psychological Review, 84, 191-215.
Bandura. (1986). Social foundations of thought and action: A social cognitive theory. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
Basow, S. A., & Howe, K. G. (1979). Model influence on career choices of college students. The Vocational Guidance Quarterly, 27(3), 239-245.
Betz, N. E. (1992). Counseling uses of career self-efficacy theory. Career Envelopment Quarterly, 41, 22-26.
Betz, N. E. (1994). Career counseling for women in the sciences and engineering. In W. B. Walsch & S.H.Osipow (Eds.), Career counseling for women (pp.237-263). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Betz, N. E., & Schifano, R. S. (2000). Evaluation of an intervention to increase Realistic self-efficacy and interests in college women. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 56, 35-52.
Campbell, A., & Skoog, G. (2004). Preparing undergraduate women for science careers. Journal of College Science Teaching, 33(5), 24-26.
Ehrhart, J. K., & Sandler B. R. (1987). Looking for more than a few good women in traditional male field. Washington, DC: Project on the Status of Women, American Association of Colleges.
Evans, M.A. (1995). The effect of a role model project upon the attitude of ninth-grade science students. Journal of research in science teaching, 32(2), 195-204.
Fried, T., & MacCleave, A. (2009). Influence of role models and mentors on female graduate students’choice of science as a career. Alberta Journal of Educational Research, 55(4), 482-496.
Flores, Y. L. & Obasi, E. M. (2005). Mentors’influence on Mexican American students’career and educational development. Journal of Multicultural Counseling and Development, 33, 146-164.
Gibson, D. E. (2004). Role models in career development: New directions for theory and research. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 65, 134-156.
Gottfredson, L. S. (1981). Circumscription and compromise: A development theory of Occupational Aspirations. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 28, 545-579.
Grunert, M. L. & Bodner, G. M.(2011). Finding fulfillment: Women’s self-Efficacy beliefs and career choices in chemistry. Chemistry Education Research and Practice, 12(4), 420-426.
Hackett, G. & Betz, N. E. (1981). A self-efficacy approach to the career development of women. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 18, 326-339.
Hanson, S. L. (1996). Lost talent: Women in the sciences. Philadelphia, PA: Temple University Press.
Kerr, B., & Robinson Kurpius, S. E. (2004). Encouraging talented girls in math and science: effects of a guidance intervention. High Ability Studies, 15(1), 85-102.
Kost-Smith, L. E., Pollock, S. J., Finkelstein, N. D. (2010). Gender disparities in second-semerster college physics: The incremental effects of a“Smog of Bias”. Physical Review Special Topics-Physics Education Research, 6(2), 1-17.
Lent, R. W., Brown, S. D., & Hackett, G. (1994). Toward a unifying social cognitive theory of career and academic interest, choice, and performance. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 45, 79-122.
Lent, R. W., Brown, S. D., Nota, L., & Soresi, S. (2003). Testing social cognitive interest and choice hypotheses across Holland types in italian high school students. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 62(1), 101-118.
Lent, R. W., Brown, S. D., Sheu, H., Schnidt, J., Brenner, B. R., and Gloster, C. S. (2005). Social cognitive predictors of academic interests and goals in engineering: Utility for woman and students at historically Black universities. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 52, 84-92.
Mann, S. (2001). Alternative perspectives on the student experience: alienation and engagement. Studies in Higher Education, 26(1), 7-19.
Mertz, N. T. (2004). What’s a mentor, anyway? Educational Administration Quarterly, 40, 541-560.
Milgram, D. (2011). How to recruit women and girls to the science, technology, engineering, and math (STEM) classroom. Technology and Engineering Teacher, 71(3), 4-11.
MIT Faculty Newsletter. (1999). A study of the status of women in science at MIT. Retrieved from http://web.mit.edu/fnl/women/women.html.
Nauta, M. M., Epperson, D. L., & Kahn, J. H. (1998). A multiple-groups analysis of predictors of higher level career aspirations among women in mathematics, science, and engineering majors. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 45(4), 483-496.
Nauta, M. M., & Kokaly, M. L. (2001). Assessing role model influence on students’academic and vocational decisions. Journal of Career Assessment, 9, 81-89.
Paglis, L., Green, S., & Bauer, T. (2006). Dose advisor mentoring add value? A longitudinal study of mentoring and doctoral student outcomes. Research in Higher Education, 47(4), 451-456.
Phelan, J. E. (2010). Increasing women’s aspirations and achievement in science: the effect of role models on implicit cognitions. (Doctoral dissertation, Rutger The State University of New Jersey), Retrieved from http://search.proquest.com.autorpa.lib.ncnu.edu.tw/pqdt/docview/751307521/C5A66C2BCEB141E8PQ/1?accountid=12721
Poel, E., Wolfe, E., Arroyos-Jurado, E., & Coppola, B. (2006). Women, mentoring, and a border university. Journal of Public Affairs Education, 12(4), 501-513.
Pintrich, P. R., Smith, D. A. F., Garcia, T. & McKeachie, W. J. (1991). A manual for the Use of the Motivated Strategies for Learning Questionnaire (MSLQ). Ann Arbor, MI: National Center for Research to Improve Postsecondary Teaching and Learning.
Pursell, C. (2001). Feminism and rethinking of the history of technology. In A. N. H. Creager, L. Elizabeth & L. Schiebinger (Eds.), Feminism in Twentieth-Century Science, Technology and Medicine (pp. 199-213). Chicago, IL: The University of Chicago Press.
Quimby, J. L., & DeSantis, A. M. (2006). The influence of role models on women’s career choices. Career Development Quarterly, 54(4), 297-306.
Rose, G. (2005). Group differences in graduate students’concept of the ideal mentor. Research in Higher Education, 46(1), 53-80.
Rosson, M. B., Carroll, J. M. & Sinha, H.(2011). Orientation of undergraduates toward careers in the computer and information sciences: Gender, self-efficacy and social support. ACM Transactions on Computing Education, 11(3), 1-23.
Sax, L. J. (2008). The gender gap in college: maximizing the developmental potential of women and men. San Franciso, CA: Jossey-Bass.
Schmidt, J., & Smith, M. C. (2010). Girls disengage from high school science. Educational digest: Essential Readings Condense for Quick Review, 75(8), 44-45.
Settles, I. H., Cortina, L. M., Stewart, A.J., & Malley. J. (2007).Voice matters: Buffering the impact of a negative climate for women in science. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 31, 270-281.
Taylor, K. M., & Betz, N. E. (1983). Applications of self-efficacy theory to the understanding and treatment of career indecision. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 22, 63-81.
Valian, V. (1999). Why So Slow: The Advancement of women. London, England: MIT.
Weber, K. (2011). Role models and informal STEM-Related activities positively impact female interest in STEM. Technology and Engineering Teacher, 71(3), 18-21.
Williams, D. F. (2012). The impact of career workshops on freshman college students at risk for dropout: an action research study. Journal of College Student Retention: Research, Theory & Practice, 13(1), 37-62.