高職工業類科教師集體效能對學生學習成效影響之研究:以學習自我效能為中介變項
The Study on the Influence of Professional Teachers Collective Efficacy and Student Learning Outcome in Industrial Vocational Senior High School-Learning Self-Efficacy as a Mediator Variable
胡央志
Yang-Chih Hu
Doi:10.3966/181665042014121004005
Yang-Chih Hu
Doi:10.3966/181665042014121004005
所屬期刊: |
第10卷第4期 「測驗與評量」 主編:國立成功大學教育研究所特聘教授 陸偉明 |
---|---|
系統編號: | vol039_05 |
主題: | 測驗與評量 |
出版年份: | 2014 |
作者: | 胡央志 |
作者(英文): | Yang-Chih Hu |
論文名稱: | 高職工業類科教師集體效能對學生學習成效影響之研究:以學習自我效能為中介變項 |
論文名稱(英文): | The Study on the Influence of Professional Teachers Collective Efficacy and Student Learning Outcome in Industrial Vocational Senior High School-Learning Self-Efficacy as a Mediator Variable |
共同作者: | |
最高學歷: | |
校院名稱: | |
系所名稱: | |
語文別: | |
論文頁數: | 30 |
中文關鍵字: | 教師集體效能;學習自我效能;學習成效 |
英文關鍵字: | collective teacher efficacy;learning self-efficacy;learning outcome |
服務單位: | 弘光科技大學資訊管理系兼任助理教授;國立沙鹿高工教師 |
稿件字數: | 16834 |
作者專長: | 課程與教學、數位學習、技職教育 |
投稿日期: | 2014/9/19 |
論文下載: | |
摘要(中文): | 本研究旨在探討高職工業類科教師集體效能對學習成效之影響及探討學生學習成效其中介效果,並驗證高職工業類科教師集體教學效能與學生學習成效模式。本研究採用調查研究法以二階驗證性因素分析驗證量表之信效度,再以結構方程模式分析之有效問卷(教師181位,學生共543位),進行資料分析與模式驗證後,四個研究假設均獲得支持,其結論為教師集體效能對學生學習自我效能、學生學習成效均具直接正向影響;學生學習自我效能對學習成效具正向影響;學生學習自我效能對學習成效具有中介效果。本結論可供高職工業類科教師提升教學效能及增進學習成效之參考。研究建議如下:一、高職教師集體效能:加強高職教師的替代性經驗、提升教師集體教學規劃的能力、資訊科技能力及教師集體教學實施。二、學習自我效能:讓學生經常體驗成功、樹立學習榜樣、溫馨和諧的班級氣氛及讓學生自我強化以提升學習自我效能。 |
摘要(英文): | This article proposes that context influences collective teacher efficacy, student learning self-efficacy and student learning outcomes. Through a literature review, a model of effective teaching and learning is constructed. Using this model, we verify four hypotheses: (1) collective teacher efficacy has a positive effect on student learning self-efficacy; (2) collective teacher efficacy has a positive effect on student learning outcomes; and (3) student learning self-efficacy has a positive influence on student learning outcomes. (4) student learning self-efficacy has a mediator variable effect on student learning outcomes. We distributed 181 questionnaires to vocational high school teachers and 543 students in Taiwan. Based on the results, suggestions are as follows: First, in order to strengthen teachers collective efficacy: 1.Strengthen the industrial teachers’ vicarious experience. 2. Enhance teachers collective teaching planning capabilities. 3. Use information technology to enhance teaching collective efficacy. 4. Enhance teachers collective teaching implementation. Second, enhance learning self-efficacy: 1.Students often experience success. 2. To establish role models, enhance learning self-efficacy. 3. Harmonious classroom climate promotes learning self-efficacy. 4. Self-reinforcing in order to enhance learning self-efficacy. |
參考文獻: | 邱皓政(2004)。結構方程模式—LISREL的理論、技術與應用。臺北市:雙葉。 黃芳銘、張簡元崇(2003)。結構方程模式適配指標在台灣教育研究應用之評析:1991到2002年期刊論文之回顧。嘉義大學學報,75,101-128。 Anderson, R., Green, M., & Lowen, P. (1988). Relationships among teachers’and students’ thinking skills, sense of efficacy, and student achievement. Alberta Journal of Educational Research, 34(2), 148-168. Bagozzi, R. P., & Yi,Y.(1988). On the Evaluation of Structural Equation Models. Academy of Marketing Science, 16 (1), 76-94. Bandura, A. (1997). Self-efficacy: The exercise of control. New York, NY: W. H.Freeman. Bandura, A. (2000). Exercise of human agency through collective efficacy. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 9, 75–78. Bandura, A. (2006). Adolescent development from an agentic perspective. In F. Pajares & T. Urdan (Eds.), Self-efficacy beliefs of adolescents (pp.1-43). Greenwich, CT: Information Age. Baron R.M. & Kenny D.A.(1986) The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual strategic and statistical consideration. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 51(6) 1173-1182. Bartlett, M. S. (1951). An Inverse Matrix Adjustment Arising in Discriminant Analysis. The Annals of Mathematical Statistics 22(1), 107-111. Chen, P., & Zimmerman, B. (2007). A cross-national comparison study on the accuracy of self-efficacy beliefs of middle-school mathematics students. The Journal of Experimental Education, 75(3), 221–244. Chin, W. W., & Todd, P. (1995). On the Use, Usefulness, and Ease of Use of Structural Equation Modeling in MIS Research: A Note of Caution. MIS Quarterly, 19(2): 237-246. Cooper, D. R., & C. W. Emory (1995), Business Research Methods (5th ed.). Richard D. Irwin. Danielson, D., & McGreal, T. L.(2000). Teacher evaluation to enhance professional practice. Alexandria, VA: ASCD. DeVellis, R. F. (1991). Scale Development Theory and Applications. London, England: Sage. Ding, L., Velicer, W., & Harlow, L. (1995). Effect of Estimation Methods, Number of Indicators per Factor and Improper Solutions on Structural Equation Modeling Fit Indices. Structural Equation Modeling, 2(2), 119-143. Dress A. (2004). Structure Formation in Nature as a Topic of Mathematics. The 10th International Congress of Mathematics Education. Evelina Dimopoulou (2012). Self Efficacy and Collective Efficacy Beliefs of Teachers for Children with Autism. Literacy Information and Computer Education Journal,3(1), 509-520. Evelina Dimopoulou (2014). Self Efficacy and Collective Efficacy Beliefs in Relation to Position, Quality of Teaching and Years of Experience. Literacy Information and Computer Education Journal, 5(1), 1376-1384. Fornell, C., & Larcker, D. F. (1981). Evaluating Structural Equation Models with Unobservable and Measurement Errors. Journal of Marketing Research, 18, 39-50. Gibson, S., & Dembo, M. H. (1984). Teacher efficacy: A construct validation. Journa1 of Educational Psychology, 76(4), 569-582. Goddard, R. D. (2001). Collective efficacy: A neglected construct in the study of schools and student achievement. Journal of Educational Psychology, 93(3), 467-476. Goddard, R. D., Hoy, W. K., & Hoy, A. W. (2004). Collective efficacy beliefs: Theoretical developments, empirical evidence, and future directions. Educational Research, 33(3), 3-13. Goddard, R. D., Hoy, W. K., & Hoy, A. W.(2000).Collective teacher efficacy: Its meaning, measure, and impact on student achievement. American Educational Research Journal, 37(2), 479-507. Ground, N, E., & Linn. (1990). Measurement and evaluation in Teaching. (5th. ed.). New York, NY: Macmillan. Guskey, J. R. (1987). Context variables that affect measures of teacher efficacy. Journal of Educational Research, 81(1), 41-47. Hackett, G., & Betz, N.E. (1989). Mathematics performance, mathematics self-efficacy and the prediction of math-related college majors. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 20, 261-273. Hair, J. F. Jr., Anderson, R. E. Tatham, R. L., & Black, W. C. (1998). Multivariate Data Analysis(4th ed.), Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall. Hoy, W. K., Tarter, C. J., & Woolfolk Hoy, A. (2006). Academic optimism of schools: A force for student achievement. American Educational Research Journal, 43, 425-446. Hutchins, H. M. (2004). Enhancing skill maintenance through relapse prevention strategies: A comparison of two models. (Doctoral dissertation, University of North Texas, 2004). Dissertation Abstracts International, AAT 3126575. Kaiser, H.F. (1974). An index of factorial simplicity. Psychometrika, 39, 31-36. Kearsley G. (1999). Online Education: Learning and Teaching in Cyberspace. London, England: Wadsworth. Klassen, R. M., Usher, E. L., & Bong, M. (2010). Collective teacher efficacy, Job Satisfaction, and Job Stress in Cross-Cultural Context. The Journal of Experimental Education, 78(4), 464–486. Kraiger K. Ford J.K., & Salas E.(1993) Application of cognitive skill-based and affective theories of learning outcomes to new methods of training evaluation. Journal of Applied Psychology 78, 311-328. Krejcie, R. V., & Morgan, D. W. (1970). Determining sample size for research activities. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 30, 607-610. Kurt, T., Duyar, I., & Calik, T. (2012). Are we legitimate yet?: A closer look at the casual relationship mechanisms among principal leadership, teacher self-efficacy and collective efficacy. Journal of Management Development, 31(1), 71–86. Lee, J. C., Zhang, Z., & Yin, H. (2011). A multilevel analysis of the impact of a professional learning community,faculty trust in colleagues and collective efficacy on teacher commitment to students. Teaching and Teacher Education, 27(5), 820–830. Maely F.Holanda Ramos, Simone S. Costa e Silva, Fernando A. Ramos Pontes, Ana Patricia Fernandez & Karla C. Furtado Nina.(2014). Collective Teacher Efficacy Beliefs: a Critical Review of the Literature. International Journal of Humanities and Social Science, 4, 7(1). Margolis, H., & McCabe, P. P.(2003). Self-efficacy: A key to improving the motivation of struggling learners. Preventing School Failure, 47(4), 162. Moolenaar, N. M., Sleegers, P. J. C., & Daly, A. J. (2012). Teaming up: Linking collaboration networks, collective efficacy, and student achievement. Teaching and Teacher Education, 28(2), 251–262. Moores, T.T., & Chang, J.C.J. (2006). Ethical Decision Making in Software Piracy: Initial Development and Test of a Four-Component Model. MIS Quarterly, 30(1), 167-80. Multon, K. D., Brown, S. D. & Lent, R. W. (1991). Relation of self-efficacy beliefs to academic outcomes: A meta-analytic investigation. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 38, 30-38. Nunnally, J. C., & Berstein, I. H. (1994). Psychometric theory. New York: McGraw-Hill. Pajares, F. (1996). Self-efficacy beliefs in academic settings. Review of Educational Research, 66, 543-578. Pintrich, P. R., & Schunk, D. H. (2002). Motivation in education: Theory,research, and applications (2nd ed.). Columbus, OH: Merrill-Prentice Hall. Prussia, G. E., & Kinicki, A. J. (1996). A motivational investigation of group effectiveness using social-cognitive theory. Journal of Applied Psychology, 81, 187–198. Ryan, A. M., & Pintrich, P. R. (1997). Should I ask for help? The role of motivation and attitudes in adolescents’help seeking in math class. Journal of Educational Psychology, 89, 329–341. Schaubroeck, J., Lam, S. S. K., & Xie, J. L.(2000). Collective efficacy versus self-efficacy in coping responses to stressors and control: A cross- cultural study. Journal of Applied Psychology, 85(4), 512-525. Schoen, L. T., & Teddlie, C. (2008). A new model of school culture: a response to a call for conceptual clarity. School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 19(2), 129-153. Smith, L., Sinclair, K. E., & Chapman, E. S. (2002). Students’goals, self-efficacy, self-handicapping, and negative affective responses: An Australian senior school student study. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 27, 471-485. Tinsley, H. E. A., Tinsley, D. J. (1987). Uses of factor analysis in counseling psychology research. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 34, 414-424. Tschannen-Moran,M., Hoy,A.W.,& Hoy, W.K.(1998).Teacher efficacy: Its meaning and measure. Review of Educational Research, 68(2), 202-248。 Viel-Ruma, K., Houchins, D., Jolivette, K., & Benson, G. (2010). Efficacy Beliefs of Special Educators: The Relationships Among Collective Efficacy, Teacher Self-Efficacy, and Job Satisfaction. Teacher Education and Special Education: The Journal of the Teacher Education Division of the Council for Exceptional Children, 33(3), 225–233. Wilhite, S. C. (1990). Self-efficacy, locus of control, self-assessment of memory ability, and study activities as predictors of course achievement. Journal of Educational Psychology, 82, 696-700. Zhao, Y., & Cziko, G. (2001). Teacher Adoption of Technology: A Perceptual Control Theory Perspective. Journal of Technology and Teacher Education 9(1), 5-30. |
熱門期刊下載排行