教師自我研究取向之應用與國小社會領域民主教育之促進

Applying Teacher’s Self-Study Research Approach and Improving Democratic Education of Social Studies Curriculum

章五奇
Wu-Chi Chang

Doi:10.3966/181665042015031101004


所屬期刊: 第11卷第1期 「教師培育與專業發展」
主編:國立臺灣師範大學教育學教授
周愚文
系統編號: vol040_04
主題: 師資培育
出版年份: 2015
作者: 章五奇
作者(英文): Wu-Chi Chang
論文名稱: 教師自我研究取向之應用與國小社會領域民主教育之促進
論文名稱(英文): Applying Teacher’s Self-Study Research Approach and Improving Democratic Education of Social Studies Curriculum
共同作者:
最高學歷:
校院名稱:
系所名稱:
語文別:
論文頁數: 28
中文關鍵字: 民主教育;教師自我研究;教師專業發展;國小社會領域
英文關鍵字: democracy education;teacher’s self-study;teacher professional development;social studies of elementary school
服務單位: 新北市安坑國民小學教師
稿件字數: 19990
作者專長: 課程設計、課程理論
投稿日期: 2014/7/12
論文下載: pdf檔案icon
摘要(中文): 過去對民主教育的研究,研究方法多以理論性探討和量化研究為主,較少探討教室的實際教學。然而透過教室的教學探究,才真正能了解民主教育如何運作,並發揮效果。本研究採取自我研究方法,由一位國小教師在社會脈絡中深切反思自我處境,進而轉化課程,引導六年級學生從分析自我生活經驗中,理解民主意義,學習民主生活應有的價值、態度與技能。研究目的是透過教師的自我研究,促進學生社會領域民主教育的學習。研究有四發現︰一、透過教師的自我研究,教師能示範民主價值及態度,促進學生的民主教育;二、自我研究促使師生經驗交流,增進對民主知識的理解及學習解決問題;三、自我研究能使民主教育加深加廣,也有助於統整其他學科領域的學習;四、自我研究和生活問題的導引,有助社會議題的深思。
摘要(英文): Taiwan’s democratic education researchers are used to using the method of theory analysis and quantity analysis, but seldom focus on the practice of curriculum and instruction in the classroom. However, it is important for us to understand the democratic education operations through exploring the complexity of curriculum development and teaching practice in the classroom. The aim of this study is for the researcher, an upper-grade teacher of an elementary school, who employ self-study and teaching research to improve democratic education of social studies curriculum in the classroom that help students become citizens who can negotiate with others and respect diversity. The main conclusions are: (1) Democratic education of social studies curriculum can be improved when the self-study teacher sets an example of democracy; (2) It can help students to acquire the knowledge and skills of democratic education of the social studies textbook when teacher presents students with examples of real-life scenarios; (3) Using self-study research on democratic education can broaden, deepen, and integrate other disciplines; (4) It would help students to discuss social issues by sharing life experiences.
參考文獻: 吳啟綜(2011年3月25日)。多元文化週,全校都變裝。國語日報,2版。
黃炳煌(1989)。民主、法治教育與課程設計。載於中國教育學會(編),民主法治與教育。臺北︰臺灣書店。
歐用生(1999)。國民小學社會科教學研究(第六版)。臺北市︰師大書苑。
Applebee, A. N. (1996). Curriculum as conversation: Transforming traditions of teaching and learning. Chicago, IL: The University of Chicago.
Bauman, Z. (1995). Life in fragments: Essays in postmodern morality. Oxford, UK: Blackwell.
Crowe, A. R. (2010). Advancing social studies education through self-study methodology: The power, promise, and use of self-study in social studies education. New York, NY: Springer.
Dewey, J. (1916). Democracy and education. New York, NY: Macmillan.
Dewey, J. (1933). How we think: A restatement of the relation of reflective thinking to the educative process. Boston, MA: D.C. Heath and Company.
Engle, S. H. & Ochoa, A. S. (1988). Education for democratic citizenship: Decision making in the social studies. New York, NY: Teachers College.
Evans, R. W. (2004). The social studies wars: What should we teach the children? New York, NY: Teachers College, Columbia University.
Kroll, L. R. (2012). Self-study and inquiry into practice. New York, NY: Routledge.
Kaltsounis, T. (1987). Teaching social studies in the elementary school: The basics for citizenship. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
Kincheloe, J. L. (2001). Getting beyond the facts: Teaching social studies/social sciences in the twenty-first century. New York, NY: Peter Lang.
Pinar, W. F. (1994). Autobiography, politics and sexuality: Essays in curriculum theory 1972-1992. New York, NY: Peter Lang.
Powell, D. (2010). Join, or Die! A pragmatic case for reflective self-study in social studies. In A. R. Crowe (Ed.), Advancing social studies education through self-study methodology: The power, promise, and use of self-study (pp.42-57). New York, NY: Springer.
Rawls, J. (1972). The theory of justice(2nd ed.). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University.
Rogoff, B. (1995). Observing sociocultural activity on three planes: participatory appropriation, guided participation, and apprenticeship. In J. V. Wertsch, P. DelRio, & A. Alvarez (Eds.), Sociocultural studies of mind (pp.139-164).New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
Schug, M. C. & Beery, R. (1987). Teaching social studies in the elementary school. Glenview, IL: Scott Foresman and Company.
Skilbeck, M. (1990). Curriculum reform: An overview of trends. Washington, D. C. , WA: OECD.
Tidwell, D. & Fitzgerald, L. (Eds.) (2006). Self-study and diversity. Rotterdam, The Netherlands: Sense.
West, E. (1968). Preparation and evaluation of social studies curriculum guides and materials for grades K-14. Retrieved from University of Minnesota, Report Project No. HS-045, Grant No. OE3-10-106.