期刊專區/ Periodical Section

美國聯邦政府的幼教方案與幼兒入園狀況：Quality Counts 2015 的調查報告

Early Childhood Programs and Children Enrolled in Preprimary Programs in the US: A Review with the “Quality Counts 2015”

所屬期刊：	第11卷第3期 「教育政策與制度」 主編：淡江大學教育政策與領導研究所教授 吳明清
系統編號：	vol042_05
主題：	教育政策與制度
出版年份：	2015
作者：	洪福財
作者(英文)：	Fu-Tsai Hung
論文名稱：	美國聯邦政府的幼教方案與幼兒入園狀況：Quality Counts 2015 的調查報告
論文名稱(英文)：	Early Childhood Programs and Children Enrolled in Preprimary Programs in the US: A Review with the “Quality Counts 2015”
共同作者：
最高學歷：
校院名稱：
系所名稱：
語文別：
論文頁數：	28
中文關鍵字：	美國教育;幼兒教育;幼兒入園;教育政策
英文關鍵字：	education in the United States;early childhood education;children enrolled in preprimary programs;educational policy
服務單位：	國立臺北教育大學教育經營與管理學系副教授
稿件字數：	15804
作者專長：	教育政策、教育史哲、幼兒教育、師資培育
投稿日期：	2015/3/10
論文下載：
摘要(中文)：	在美國政黨政治的競爭環境裡，支持幼兒教育發展是當前政黨競爭環境下少見的共識所在。美國聯邦政府從廿世紀陸續推出許多幼教方案，直到今日的Obama 政府亦然，伴隨而來的巨額經費補助，不僅資助幼教發展，同時左右幼教的走向。提升弱勢幼兒入園率與教育品質，是近年美國教育發展的主軸方向，幼兒入園是否能消除背景因素的影響，便成為各方關注的焦點。本研究採文件分析法，首先，分析美國聯邦政府廿世紀以來實施的幼教方案，探討美國幼教政策發展的梗概；其次，以 2015 年《教育周報》（Education Week）出版《教育品質衡鑑 2015》（Quality Counts 2015）年度教育特刊所進行的幼教調查為依，輔以美國教育部「教育統計中心」（National Center for Education Statistics） 的統計結果，探討最新幼兒入園及其相關影響因素的調查結果；最後，解讀前述教育政策發展與調查結果，析論對於我國幼教發展的教育蘊義。依據前述分析結果，本研究歸納出五項解讀重點，並依據探討結果提出七項對我國幼教發展的蘊義。本研究的探討結果有利於瞭解美國幼教政策發展脈絡與幼兒入園資訊，所得的結果將可供我國進行幼教研究與發展幼教政策的參考論據。
摘要(英文)：	In the competitive bi-partisan political environment of America, supporting the development of early childhood is a rare consensus between democratic and republican parties. The federal government has launched a number of early childhood education program since the beginning of 20th century, accompanied by huge financial subsidies and directing the policy orientation. Raising the enrollment rate of disadvantaged children, improving the quality of early childhood education and facilitating the equity of education have been main aims of educational policy in recent years. This study has three purposes. First, to analyze the early childhood education programs implemented by federal government since the 20th century and asses their impact. Second, to analyze the early childhood education survey conducted by “Education Week” published on "Quality Counts 2015" and the survey conducted by Education statistics National Center of Department of Education, discuss the findings and the accordance between them. Finally, to inquire into the meanings behind the above analyses and to conclude with the meaningful findings on early childhood education. The study is beneficial to understand the policy development and status quo on early childhood education in America, and the findings and the following hints will benefit the ongoing research and policy analysis of early childhood education in Taiwan.
參考文獻：	內政部（2011）。內政統計通報：100年第二十六週。取自https://stats.moe.gov.tw/files/analysis/100children.doc 內政部移民署（2013）。101學年度重點學校及新住民人數統計。取自https://www.immigration.gov.tw/lp.asp?ctNode=34075&CtUnit=18351&BaseDSD=7&mp=tp 洪福財、翁麗芳、鍾志從 （2012）。「5歲幼兒免學費教育計畫」效益評估期末報告。臺北市：行政院研究發展考核委員會委託研究報告。計畫編號 RDEC-PLN-101-001。 原住民族委員會編著（2014）。102學年度原住民族教育調查統計。新北市 ：原住民族委員會。 張翔一（2012）。臺灣是富人的低稅天堂。天下雜誌，506，114-125。 教育部（2014）。教育部電子報606期。取自 http://epaper.edu.tw/old/print.aspxprint_type=topical&print_sn=868&print_num=606 郭靜晃、黃志成、吳幸玲（2012）。金門縣101年度兒童及少年生活狀況及需求調查。金門縣政府委託專案研究報告。取自http://www.kinmen.gov.tw/MultiMedia_FileDownload.ashx?guid=bad4f976-9201-45d6-9a44-c4b9ecd1e39a 臺北市政府社會局（2014）。102年度臺北市兒童及少年生活狀況調查報告摘要 。取自http://www.dosw.gov.taipei/public/Attachment/410316134859.pdf Arnold, M. L., Newman, J. H., Gaddy, B. B., & Dean, C. B. (2005). A look at the condition of rural education research: Setting a direction for future research. Journal of Research in Rural Education, 20(6), 20-6. Editorial Projects in Education. (2014). Mission and history. Education Week. Retrieved from http://www.edweek.org/info/about/history.html?intc=thed Editorial Projects in Education. (2015a). Leaders to learn from 2015. Education Week, 34(22), s1-62. Retrieved from http://ew.edweek.org/nxtbooks/epe/ew_02252015/index.php Editorial Projects in Education. (2015b). Philanthropy. Education Week. Retrieved from http://www.edweek.org/info/about/philanthropy.html?intc=thed Education Week Research Center. (1997). Quality count. Bethesda, MD: Editorial Projects in Education Inc. Retrieved from http://www.edcounts.org/archive/sreports/qc97/ Education Week Research Center. (2015a). States graded on indicators for early years. Retrieved from http://www.edweek.org/ew/articles/2015/01/08/states-graded-on-indicators-for-early-years.html?intc=EW-QC15-TOC Education Week Research Center. (2015b). Quality counts introduces new state report card; U.S. Earns C, and Massachusetts ranks first in nation. Retrieved from http://blogs.edweek.org/edweek/early_years/2015/01/quality_counts_report_surveys_early-learning_landscape.html?qs=quality+counts Education Week Research Center. (2015c). Preparing to launch: Early childhood’s academic countdown. Bethesda, MD: Editorial Projects in Education Inc. Family and Social Services Administration. (2014). About first steps. Retrieved from http://www.in.gov/fssa/ddrs/4685.htm Fuller, B. (2008). Standardized childhood: The political and cultural struggle over early education. Palo Alto, CA: Stanford University Press. Klein, A. (January 20, 2015). In State of the Union, Obama pitches college access, child-care id. [Education Week Blog]. Retrieved from http://www.edweek.org/ew/section/blogs/index.html Lascarides, V. C., & Hinitz, B. F. (2011). History of early childhood education. New York, NY: Routledge. National Center for Education Statistics. (2014a). Percentage of the population 3 to 34 years old enrolled in school, by age group: Selected years, 1940 through 2013. Washington DC: U.S. Department of Education. Retrieved from http://nces.ed.gov/programs/digest/d14/tables/dt14_103.20.asp National Center for Education Statistics. (2014b). Number and percentage of students in prekindergarten through grade 12 living in poverty, by control of school: 2000 through 2013. Washington DC: U.S. Department of Education. Retrieved from http://nces.ed.gov/programs/digest/d14/tables/dt14_102.70.asp National Center for Education Statistics. (2014c). Estimates of resident population, by race/ethnicity and age group: Selected years, 1980 through 2013. Washington DC: U.S. Department of Education. Retrieved from http://nces.ed.gov/programs/digest/d14/tables/dt14_101.20.asp National Center for Education Statistics. (2014d). Percentage of 3-, 4-, and 5-year-old children enrolled in preprimary programs, by attendance status, level of program, and selected child and family characteristics: 2012. Washington DC: U.S. Department of Education. Retrieved from http://nces.ed.gov/programs/digest/d13/tables/dt13_202.20.asp OECD. (2014). Education at a glance 2014. Retrieved from http://dx.doi.org/10.1787/eag_highlights-2014-en SCCAP. (2014a). About SCCAP. Retrieved from http://www.insccap.org/pages/ABOUT. SCCAP. (2014b). SCCAP head start. IN: Author. Retrieved from http://www.insccap.org/styles/sccap/defiles/Head_Start/Head%20Start.pdf?phpMyAdmin=AL2cnc2oFpH%2CqySW%2ClwHYq4ZpU7 The North Carolina Partnership for Children, Inc. (2014). Raising the quality of early care and education. Retrieved from http://www.smartstart.org/raising-quality-of-care-education/raise-the-quality-of-early-care-and-education. Tobin, J. Jay, Hsueh, Y., & Karasawa, M. (2009). Preschool in three cultures revisited: China, Japan, and the United States. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press. Will, M. (2015). Government programs undergird early-ed. priorities. Retrieved from http://www.edweek.org/ew/articles/2015/01/08/government-programs-undergird-early-ed-priorities.html?intc=EW-QC15-TOC Morrison, G. (1995). Early childhood education today (6th ed.). Union, NJ: Merrill.