期刊專區/ Periodical Section

中學體育師資生實施理解式教學法之探究

A Case Study of Physical Education Student Teachers’ Implementation of Teaching Games for Understanding (TGfU)

所屬期刊：	第13卷第2期 「課程與教學」 主編：國立政治大學教育學系名譽教授 黃炳煌
系統編號：	vol049_02
主題：	課程與教學
出版年份：	2017
作者：	陳萩慈; 掌慶維
作者(英文)：	Chiu-Tsu Chen; Ching-Wei Chang
論文名稱：	中學體育師資生實施理解式教學法之探究
論文名稱(英文)：	A Case Study of Physical Education Student Teachers’ Implementation of Teaching Games for Understanding (TGfU)
共同作者：
最高學歷：
校院名稱：
系所名稱：
語文別：	中文
論文頁數：	30
中文關鍵字：	遊戲比賽概念教學法; 集中實習; 師資培育
英文關鍵字：	games concept approach; teaching practice program; teacher education
服務單位：
稿件字數：	18411
作者專長：	運動教育學; 體育課程; 體育教學; 體育師資培育
投稿日期：	2017/1/20
論文下載：
摘要(中文)：	探討中學體育師資生在集中實習時，運用遊戲比賽促進戰術理解之教學 （理 解式教學）（Teaching Games for Understanding, TGfU），針對知覺面（教學前）、 實施面 （教學中） 與反思面 （教學後）。研究方法以訪談法、參與觀察法、內容 分析法，立意取樣4 位。教學項目以球類為主，並以持續比較法將進行分析與歸 納。結果發現，一、知覺面－特色：引發學習動機的教學、先行遊戲比賽的教學、 提升教學能力與培養教材教具能力。二、實施面以教學前、中與後期進行探討成 功經驗與問題情境之遭遇情形。三、反思面－體育課經驗、專業知能與知覺上的 衝突、學生能力與高國中生階段動機、課程流程與評量、教學環境、學校風氣、 師資培育單位及場地。研究建議增加中學體育師資生在教學時成功的經驗，加入 實習輔導教師及實習指導教師的協助、以供給師資培育單位參酌。
摘要(英文)：	The purpose of this study was to explore student teachers’ (STs) implementation of Teaching Games for Understanding (TGfU) during their teaching practice in a secondary school. Student teachers’ perception, teaching practice, and reflection of their teaching practice were examined during 5 weeks teaching practicum. Four participants (2 males and 2 females) were selected from the teaching practicum course. Qualitative research method was adopted, including class observations, interviews, and professional dialogue with the university supervisor, and teaching reflection journals. All gathered data were transcribed and then analysed with the inductive method. Firstly, the results indicated that STs’ perception was focused on a student-centered orientation and tactical awareness, teaching skills, expression, creativity, observation and classroom management skills. Secondly, in terms of teacher education program, the designing games activities, the implementation of the successful experience, the limits of time and equipment factors, time management, students’ acceptance were the major parts while STs implemented TGfU. Cooperating teachers’ (CTs) support or lack thereof and problem-solving context of the situation were encountered during the STs’ implementation. Finally, in terms of the teaching reflection, STs’ past experience, professional knowledge and ability, students ability and students’ motivation and different competency levels, assessment process, and learning environment were major factors. Implications extracted for the future showed that: 1.To assist CTs and UTs to build teachers professional development network platform; 2.To build TGfU community data base; 3.To enhance the STs’ self-efficacy.
參考文獻：	周宏室、潘義祥（2002）。運動教育學的課程理論，運動教育學，105-144。臺北市： 師大書苑。 張世忠（2001）。協同教學模式之初探。教育研究資訊雙月刊，9（4），66-82。 教育部（2013）。十二年國民基本教育實施計畫。臺北市：作者。 鄭博真（2012）。我國大學教師專業發展之現況、困境與展望。教育研究與發展 期刊，8（1），61-92。 陳則賢（1995）。Mosston 命令式與練習式教學愛國中體育教學效果之研究（未出 版之碩士論文）。國立臺灣師範大學體育系，臺北市。 陳玉枝（2011）。理解式球類教學對體育師資生學習成效與歷程之研究。國科會 專題研究計畫成果報告（編號：NSC 99-2410-H-143-016），未出版。 蔡居澤、廖炳煌（2007）。探索教育與活動學校。桃園市：中華探索教育發展協會。 掌慶維（2007）。國小五年級建構取向籃球遊戲學習之研究（未出版之博士論 文）。國立臺灣師範大學體育系，臺北市。 黃志成、闕月清（2003）。球類教學新趨勢- 理解式球類教學法。「2003 臺灣運 動教育學會」發表之論文，國立臺灣師範大學。 廖玉光 （2002）。球類教學－領會教學法。香港，中國：香港教育學院。 闕月清 （2008）。理解式球類教學法。臺北市：師大書苑。 AEE (1995). Association for experiential education. The AEE Horizen, 15(1), 21. Alison, S., & Thorpe, R. (1997). A comparison of the effectiveness of two approaches to teaching games within physical education: A skills approach versus a games for understanding approach. The British Journal of Physical Education, 28(3), 9-13. Alison, P. C., Pissanos, P. W., Turner, A. P., & Law, D. R. (2000). Pre-service physical educators’ epistemologies of skillfulness. Journal of Teaching in Physical Education, 19, 141-161. Bunker, D., & Thorpe, R. (1986). The curriculum model. In R. Thorpe, D. Bunker, & L. Almond (Eds.), Rethinking Games Teaching (pp. 7-10). Loughborough, England: University of Technology. Bunker, D., & Thorpe, R. (1986a). Landmarks on our way to teaching for understanding. In R. Thorpe, D. Bunker, & L. Almond (Eds.), rethinking games Teaching. Loughborough, England: University of Technology. Bunker, D., & Thorpe, R. (1986b). The curriculum model .In R. Thorpe, D. Bunker, & L. Almond (Eds.), Rethinking Games Teaching. Loughborough, England: University of Technology. Butler, J., Griffin, L., Lombardo, B., & Nastasi, R. (2003). An introduction to teaching games for understanding. Teaching Games for Understanding in physical education and sport, 1-9. Gurvitch, R., Blankenship, B., Metzler, W. Lund L. (2008). Student teachers’ implementation of model-based instruction: Facilitators and inhibitors. Journal of Teaching in Physical Education, 27, 466-486. Hall, G. E. (1982). Beginning teacher induction: Five dilemmas. The Proceedings from a Public Forum. Research on the Improvement Process in Schools and Colleges. R&D Report No. 3153. Li, C., & Cruz, A. (2008). Pre-service PE teachers’ occupational socialization experiences on Teaching Games for Understanding. New Horizons in Education, 56(3), 20-30. Light, R. (2003). The social nature of games: Australian preservice primary teachers’ first experiences of teaching games for understanding. European Physical Education Review, 8(3), 286-304. Kirk, D., & Macdonald, D. (1998). Situated learning in physical education. Journal of Teaching in Physical Education, 17, 376-387. McNeill, M. C., Fry, J. M., Wright, S. C., Tan, W. K. C., Tan, K. S. S., & Schempp, P. G. (2004). ‘In the local context’: Singaporean challenges to teaching games on practicum. Sport, Education and Society, 9(1), 3-32. Mckeen, K., Webb, P. I., & Pearson, P. J., (2007). Promoting physical activity through teaching games for understanding in undergraduate teacher education. In J. A. Diniz (Ed.), AIESEP 2005 World Congress, 251-258. PT: Lisboa: Faculdade de Motricidade Humana. Mitchell, S. A., Griffin, L. L., & Oslin, J. L. (1995). An analysis of two instructional approaches to teaching invasion games. Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport, 66, 31-65. Mitchell, S. A., Griffin, L. L., & Oslin, J. L. (2003). Sport foundations for elementary physical education: A tactical games. Journal of Physical Education, Recreation and Dance, 67(1), 28-33. Mitchell, S. A., Griffin, L. L., & Oslin, J. L. (1997). Teaching invasion games: A comparison of two instructional approaches. Teaching and Coach in Physical Education and Sports, 3(2), 56-69. Mitchell, S. A., Griffin, L. L., & Oslin, J. L. (2003). Sport foundations for elementary physical education: A tactical games. Journal of Physical Education, Recreation and Dance, 67(1), 28-33. Nevett, M., Rovegno, I., & Babiarz, M. (2001). Fourth-grade childrens knowledge of cutting, passing and tactics in invasion games after a 12-lesson unit of instruction. Journal of Teaching in Physical Education, 20(4), 389-401. Rossi, T., Fry, J. M., McNeill, M., & Tan, C. W. (2007). The Games Concept Approach (GCA) as a mandated practice: Views of Singaporean teachers. Sport, Education and Society, 12(1), 93-111. Turner, A. P., & Martinek, T. J. (1999). An investigation into teaching games for understanding: Effects on skill, knowledge, and game play. Research quarterly for exercise and sport, 70(3), 286-296. Shaw-Baker, M. (1995). Communication the key to successful ?eld experiences. Slick, GA (1995). Making the difference for teachers: The field experience in actual practice. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin. Sweeney, M., Everitt, A., & Carifio, J. (2003). Teaching games for understanding: A paradigm shift for undergraduate students. In J. Butler, L., Griffin, B. Lombardo, & R. Nastasi (Eds.), Teaching Games for Understanding in physical education and sport: An international perspective (pp. 113-121). Oxin Hill, MD: AAHPERD Publications. Schreiter, B., & Ammon, P. (1989, Mar 29). Teachers’ thinking and their use of reading contracts. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American association of colleges for teacher education, San Francisco, CA. Wright, S., McNeill, M., & Fry, J. M. (2009). The tactical approach to teaching games from teaching, learning and mentoring perspectives. Sport, Education and Society, 14(2), 223-244. Wang, C. L., & Ha, A. S. (2012). Mentoring in TGfU teaching mutual engagement of pre-service teachers, cooperating teachers and university supervisors. European Physical Education Review, 18(1), 47-61. Wang, C. L., & Ha, A. S. (2013). The theory of planned behaviour: Predicting pre-service teachers teaching behaviour towards a constructivist approach. Sport, Education and Society, 18(2), 222-242. Wang, C. L., & Ha, A. S. (2012). Factors influencing pre-service teachers’ perception of teaching games for understanding: A constructivist perspective. Sport, Education and Society, 17(2), 261-280.