期刊專區/ Periodical Section

一所國中教師社群實踐課程領導的行動研究：閱讀好胃口

An Action Research on Curriculum Leadership Practiced by a Junior High School Teacher Community: Cultivating Interest in Reading

所屬期刊：	第14卷第1期 「教師培育與專業發展」 主編：臺北市立大學幼兒教育學系副教授 林佩蓉
系統編號：	vol052_03
主題：	師資培育
出版年份：	2018
作者：	洪郁婷
作者(英文)：	Yu-Ting Hung
論文名稱：	一所國中教師社群實踐課程領導的行動研究：閱讀好胃口
論文名稱(英文)：	An Action Research on Curriculum Leadership Practiced by a Junior High School Teacher Community: Cultivating Interest in Reading
共同作者：
最高學歷：
校院名稱：
系所名稱：
語文別：	中文
論文頁數：	30
中文關鍵字：	行動研究; 教師專業學習社群; 課程領導
英文關鍵字：	action research; curriculum leadership; professional learning community
服務單位：	國立臺灣師範大學課程與教學研究所
稿件字數：	20001
作者專長：	課程與教學; 教師專業發展
投稿日期：	2018/1/15
論文下載：
摘要(中文)：	本研究談一個國中國文教師專業學習社群在7年的發展歷程中，如何從培養學生的閱讀好胃口出發，再經由文學圈的理論指引，實踐課程領導；並藉由這個故事，探究教師社群適合的運作模式以及發展主題。由於本篇研究者即為該社群領導人，故本文採行動研究，深入研究者任教之新北市S國中某教師社群；藉由文件分析及深度訪談，探究社群於課程領導的實踐軌跡。研究發現，此社群以理解學生的需求為課程領導主軸，成員彼此關係融洽、勇於面對困境，並以理論作為實踐的依據。研究結論有三，冀能作為國中教師專業發展的參考：一、課程領導為社群與師生、學校脈絡互相理解的動態過程；二、教師社群的運作須採輪流領導，並持續實踐與反思；三、社群的發展主題須先確立課程與教學理論基礎，再進行技術操作。
摘要(英文)：	This research investigates how a professional learning community (PLC) of junior high school teachers practices curriculum leadership by cultivating interest in reading among students, and by employing literary circles theory during a seven years’ development course. This research also explores the suitable modes of operation as well as development themes for teachers’ communities. Since the author is the leader of this community, this study is an action research. The author joined the PLC while teaching at a junior high school in New Taipei City, and investigated the trajectory of the curriculum leadership through literature analyses and intensive interviews of the PLC members .The study found that this community practiced course leadership according to the needs of the students. The members of this community had good relationships with each other, faced the challenges of curriculum development confidently and practiced curriculum leadership by using leadership theories. Three main conclusions can be drawn from this study, and hopefully these can serve as references for policy implementation for professional development of junior high school teachers: 1. Curriculum leadership is a dynamic process of the development of mutual understanding between communities, teachers, students, and the school. 2. The PLC operated under rotational leadership, practicing and reflecting continuously upon curriculum leadership. 3. The development themes for the PLC included the establishment of curriculum and pedagogy theories and then their practical implementation.
參考文獻：	丁一顧（2011）。教師專業學習社群之調查研究：「關注學生學習成效」為焦點。 課程與教學季刊，17（1），209-232。 丁一顧（2012）。國民小學校長教練式領導：理論、實踐與評量工具之研究（1）。 行政院國家科學委員會專題研究成果報告（編號：101-2410-H-133-005），未 出版。 丁一顧（2014）。國小校長教練式領導與教師專業學習社群關係之研究。教育政 策論壇，17（3），117-151。 卯靜儒（2003）。新世紀衝擊下的九年一貫課程願景—社會學觀點的分析。載於 國立高雄師範大學教育學院主編，國民中小學九年一貫課程理論基礎叢書（頁 95-108）。臺北市：教育部。 吳敏而（2005）。文學圈之理論與實務。臺北市：朗智。 吳芝儀（譯）（2007）。Lieblich, A., Tuval-Mashiach, R., & Zilber, T. 著。敘事研究： 閱讀、分析與詮釋（Narrative research: Reading, analysis, and interpretation）。 嘉義縣：濤石。 吳清山、林天祐（2005）。教育新辭書。臺北市：高等教育。 吳清山、林天祐（2012）。學習領導。教育研究月刊，217，139-140。 洪志成、洪慧真（2017）。中小學問題導向學習的研究光譜。課程與教學季刊， 20（2），1-28。 栗筱雯（譯）（2004）。Albom, M. 著。在天堂遇見的五個人（The five people you meet in heaven）。臺北市：大塊文化。 徐國棟（2010）。課程領導與學校發展：回顧與展望。教育曙光，58（2），83- 92。 高慕蓮、何志恒、張壽洪、歐惠珊、袁國明（2015）。改革「聚焦、深化、持續」 時期的課程領導能力—從支援新任小學中文科科主任計劃的經驗說起。香港 教師中心學報，14，51-68。 張嘉育（2001，12 月）。課程領導概念內涵分析。論文發表於臺北市立大學課程 與教學研究所舉辦之「課程領導與實務國際學術研討會」。臺北市立大學。 張新仁（主編）（2009）。中小學教師專業學習社群手冊。臺北市：教育部。 歐用生（2004）。課程領導：議題與展望。臺北市：高等教育。 鄭圓鈴、許芳菊（2013）。有效閱讀—閱讀理解，如何學？怎麼教？臺北市：親 子天下。 潘慧玲、陳佩英、張素貞、鄭淑惠、陳文彥（2014）。從學習領導論析學習共同 體的概念與實踐。市北教育學刊，45，1-28。 薛雅慈、李家鳳（2012，10 月）。少子化時代小校展能的新契機：一個郊區小校 以轉型課程領導及創新經營展現學校效能之探究。載於國家教育研究院辦之 「2012 國際學術研討會：全球教育論壇—課程及教學」研究會論文集（頁 1-38），新北市。 簡杏娟、賴志峰（2014）。國民小學教師領導促進專業學習社群建構之個案研究。 學校行政，90，172-193。 Atkinson, R. (2007). The life story interview as a bridge in narrative inquiry. In D. J. Clandinin (Ed.), Handbook of narrative inquiry: Mapping a methodology (pp. 224- 245). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage. Ball, M., & Smith, G. (2001). Technologies of realism? Ethnographic uses of photography and film. In R. Atkinson, A. Coffey, S. Delamont, J. Lofland, & L. Lofl and (Eds.), Handbook of Ethnography (pp. 302-319). London, England: Sage. Ball, D. L., Thames, M. H., & Phelps, G. (2008). Content knowledge for teaching-What makes it special? Journal of Teacher Education,59(5), 389-407. Connelly, F. M., & Clandinin, D. J. (1988). Teachers as curriculum planners: Narratives of experience. New York, NY: Teachers College Press. Clay, W. C. (2001). Coming to know my place. In J. Zeni (Ed). Ethical issues in practitioner research (pp. 24-34). New York, NY: Teachers College Press. Charmaz, K. (2006). Constructing grounded theory: A practical guide through qualitative analysis. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage. Dempster, N. (2009). Leadership for learning: A framework synthesizing recent research. Canberra, Australia: The Australian College of Educators. Erickson, F., & Shultz, J. (1992). Students’ experience of the curriculum. In P. Jackson (Ed.), Handbook of research on curriculum (pp. 465-485). New York, NY: Macmillan. Ervay, S. B., & Roach, C. (1996). The curriculum leader: A comprehensive guide for the curriculum decision maker. Emporia, KS: The curriculum leadership Institute. Edwards, R. (2009). Introduction: Life as a learning context? In R. Edwards, G. Biesta, & M. Thorpe (Eds.), Rethinking contexts for learning and teaching: Communities, activities and networks (pp. 1-13).Oxford, England: Routledge. Jorgensen, R. (2012). Curriculum leadership: Reforming and reshaping successful practice in remote and regional Indigenous education. In J. Dindyal, L. P. Cheng, & S. F. Ng (Eds.), Proceedings of the 35th annual conference of the mathematics education research group of australasia (pp. 370–377). Singapore: MERGA. Kesson, K. R. (1999). Toward a curriculum of mythopoetic meaning. In J. G. Henderson & K. R. Kesson (Eds.),Understanding democratic curriculum leadership (pp. 84- 105). New York, NY: Teachers college, Columbia University. Knapp, M. S., Copland, M. A., Honig, M. I., Plecki, M. L., & Portin, B. S. (2010). Learning-focused leadership and leadership support: meanings and practice in urban systems. Seattle, WA: University of Washington, Center for the Study of Teaching and Policy. Louis, K. S., Leithwood, K., Wahlstrom, K. L., & Anderson, S. E. (2010). Learning from leadership: Investigating the links to improved student learning. New York, NY: The Wallace Foundation. Miller, D. (1992). Deliberative democracy and social choice. Political Studies, 40 (Special Issue), 54–67. Munby, H., Russell, T., & Martin, A. K. (2001). Teachers’ knowledge and how it develops. In V. Richardson (Ed.), Handbook of research on teaching (pp. 433-436). New York, NY: Macmillan. Prior, L. (2003). Basic themes: Use, production and content. In Prior, L. (Ed.): Using documents in social research (pp. 1-29). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage. Parkes, R. J. (2011). The new curriculum history. In Parkes, R. J. (Ed.): Interrupting history: Rethinking history curriculum after ‘The End of History’ (pp. 21-42). London, England: Peter Lang. Short, K. (1986). Literacy as a collaborative experience (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Indiana University, Bloomington. Shulman, L. (1987). Knowledge and teaching: Foundations of the new reform. Harvard Educational Review, 57(1), 1-22. Webster, L. & Mertova, P. (2007). Using narrative inquiry as a research method: An introduction to using critical event narrative analysis in research on learning and teaching. New York, NY: Routledge.