期刊專區/ Periodical Section

從街友到導覽員：萬華經濟弱勢者培力課程實踐歷程的個案分析

From Homeless to a Tour Guide: A Case Analysis of Training Course of Empowerment Process among the Economically Disadvantaged Groups of Taipei’s Wanhua District

所屬期刊：	第14卷第2期 「課程與教學」 主編：國立臺灣師範大學教育學系教授 卯靜儒
系統編號：	vol053_01
主題：	課程與教學
出版年份：	2018
作者：	徐敏雄
作者(英文)：	Min-Hsiung Hsu
論文名稱：	從街友到導覽員：萬華經濟弱勢者培力課程實踐歷程的個案分析
論文名稱(英文)：	From Homeless to a Tour Guide: A Case Analysis of Training Course of Empowerment Process among the Economically Disadvantaged Groups of Taipei’s Wanhua District
共同作者：
最高學歷：
校院名稱：
系所名稱：
語文別：	中文
論文頁數：	34
中文關鍵字：	培力; 經濟弱勢族群; 街友; 導覽員
英文關鍵字：	empowerment; economically disadvantaged groups; homeless; tour guide
服務單位：	國立臺灣師範大學社會教育學系
稿件字數：	22215
作者專長：	社區教育; 生命教育; 成人學習與教學; 社會與文化理論
投稿日期：	2017/12/26
論文下載：
摘要(中文)：	本研究主要目的在了解導覽培力課程對經濟弱勢者可能的影響，為此，研究者採取個案研究方法，以半結構式訪談、反思日誌撰寫和活動攝影等方式蒐集資料，分析曾經參與本課程的講師、學伴和街友之參與經驗及其歷程。研究結果發現，導覽培力課程能嘗試透過導覽技巧示範、導覽活動的親身體驗、多元場所規則適應，以及「學員」和「導覽員」之新社會角色扮演，搭配師生和同儕間信任關係的支持，便可引發街友印象整飾動機，讓他們較具安全感的氛圍下，持續調整既有的言行儀態、展現不同於以往流浪生涯的生活風格，促使街友從學員逐漸朝向導覽員的角色目標邁進。
摘要(英文)：	To better understand the potential effects that tour guide training courses may have on the economically disadvantaged, this study has chosen to employ a case study method. Data have been collected using semi-structured interviews, reflexive journal writing and event photography. Together, these tools have been used to analyze the experiences of instructors, fellow students, and homeless who participated in the training course. The results of this study show that by using firsthand experience methods of instruction such as tour guide skill demonstrations and tour guide activities; developing adaptation strategies for different rules from locale to locale; the construction of new social relationships among differing spaces; the acting out and narration of new roles and community relationships in both “learners” and “tour guides”, all coupled with the support of a relationship of trust between instructors, learners, and peers, the tour guide training courses have the power to trigger changes in motivation and intent with regard to impression management among the homeless. Within this safer environment, there was a continued adjustment of existing behavior and speech, resulting in a departure from previous vagabond lifestyles, which, in turn, spurred the homeless to gradually evolve from the role of learners to that of tour guides.
參考文獻：	方孝鼎（2011，1 月）。遊民身體與習性的自我照顧與社會規訓－臺灣遊民服務的 觀察筆記。論文發表於CSA 文化研究學會舉辦之「嘿山寨．慮消費：生態、 科技與文化政治」研討會論文集，取自http://www.csat.org.tw/paper/C3-3%20 %E6%96%B9%E5%AD%9D%E9%BC%8E.pdf 朱儀羚、康萃婷、柯禧慧、蔡欣志、吳芝儀（譯）（2004）。M. L. Crossley（著）。 敘事心理與研究：自我、創傷與意義的重建（Introducing narrative psychology: self, trauma, and the construction of meaning）。嘉義市：濤石。 李媚媚、林季宜、鍾聿琳﹙ 2002 ﹚。萬華地區遊民的生活狀況與健康問題。護理 雜誌，49（4），87-91。 林萬億（1994）。遊民問題之調查分析。行政院研考會委託研究。 吳芝儀、廖梅花（ 譯）（2001）。A. Strauss 與J. Corbin 著。紮根理論研究方 法（Basics of qualitative research: techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory）。臺北市：濤石。 吳忠宏（譯）（2000）。L. Beck 和T. Cable 著。21 世紀的解說趨勢：解說自然與文 化的15 項指導原則（Interpretation for the 21st century: Fifteen guiding principles for interpreting nature and culture）。臺北市：品度。 吳秀琪（1995）。底層的社會建構與自我認同—以臺北市遊民為例（未出版之碩 士論文）。國立清華大學社會人類學研究所，新竹市。 高雄市政府（2012）。高雄市街友安置輔導辦法。取自http://law.kcg.gov.tw/law/NewsContent.aspx?id=407 郭慧明（2004）。我要活下去！遊民的生存策略和生活世界（未出版之碩士論 文）。世新大學社會發展研究所，臺北市。 陳自昌（1995）。遊民的社區生活與遊民服務－臺北市萬華社區的遊民研究（未 出版之碩士論文）。臺灣大學社會學研究所，臺北市。 陳炳輝（2006）。導覽解說實務。臺北市：華立。 陳嬿嬿（2013）。低碳旅遊與解說員專業能力探討－以南部區域低碳旅遊為例。 休閒運動保健學報，4，90-103。 張明洵、林玥秀（2002）。解說概論。臺北市：揚智。 Daly, G. (1996). Homeless: Policies, strategies, and lives on the street. London, England: Routledge Doak, M. J. (2008). Social welfare: Fighting poverty and homelessness. Detroit, MI: Gale. Gergen, K. J. (1999). An invitation to social construction. London, England: Sage. Giddens, A. (1984). The constitution of society: outline of the theory of structuration. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press. Giddens, A. (1991). Modernity and self-identity. Oxford, England: Polity. Goffman, E. (1959). The presentation of self in everyday life. New York, NY: Anchor. Goffman, E. (1961). Encounters: Two studies in the sociology of interaction. Indianapolis, IN: Bobbs-Merrill. Goffman, E. (1967). Interaction ritual: Essays on face to face behavior. New York, NY: Anchor/Doubleday. Karinshak, C. B. (1996). Empowering homeless adults to learn: A journey toward perspective transformation. PAACE Journal of lifelong learning, 5, 57-66. Leite, A. P. (2013, January-February). Art/Education & Paulo Freire – Matrix of a methodology in formative processes of social educators. 1st Conference on artsbased and artistic research: Critical reflections on the intersection between art and research. Retrieved from http://som.esbrina.eu/artsbased/docs/sessio3/ AlvaroPantojaLeite.pdf Lewis, T. E. (2011). The future of the image in critical pedagogy. Studies in Philosophy and Education, 30,37-51. McLean, K. (1993). Planning for People in museum exhibitions. Washington DC: Association of Science-Technology Centers. McNaughton, C. (2008). Transitions through homelessness: Lives on the edge. Basingstoke, England: Palgrave Macmillan. Mezirow, J. (2000). Learning to think like an adult core concepts of transformational theory. In J. Mezirow & Associates (Eds.), Learning as transformation critical perspectives on a theory in progress (pp. 3-33). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass. Reynalds, J. (2006). Homeless culture and the media: How the media educate audiences in their portrayal of America’s homeless culture. Youngstown, NY: Cambria. Snow, D.A. & L. Anderson (1987). Identity work among the homeless: The verbal construction and avowal of personal identities. American Journal of Sociology, 92 (6), 1336–1371. Wasserman, J. A., & Clair, J. M. (2010). At home on the street: People, poverty, and a hidden culture of homelessness. Boulder, CO: Lynne Rienner.