以讀寫合一課程提昇五年級偏鄉地區學生的寫作能力

Raising the Writing Ability of Grade 5 Students from Schools in Rural Taiwan Using a Reading and Writing Bi-Focal Curriculum

陳淑麗; 曾世杰; 林慧敏
Shu-Li Chen; Shih-Jay Tzeng; Hui-Min Lin

Doi:10.3966/181665042018121404003


所屬期刊: 第14卷第4期 「教育心理、輔導與測評」
主編:國立臺北教育大學教育學系教授
張郁雯
系統編號: vol055_03
主題: 課程與教學
出版年份: 2018
作者: 陳淑麗; 曾世杰; 林慧敏
作者(英文): Shu-Li Chen; Shih-Jay Tzeng; Hui-Min Lin
論文名稱: 以讀寫合一課程提昇五年級偏鄉地區學生的寫作能力
論文名稱(英文): Raising the Writing Ability of Grade 5 Students from Schools in Rural Taiwan Using a Reading and Writing Bi-Focal Curriculum
共同作者:
最高學歷:
校院名稱:
系所名稱:
語文別: 中文
論文頁數: 30
中文關鍵字: 偏鄉地區學生; 讀寫合一課程; 寫作能力;
英文關鍵字: students from rural Taiwan; writing bi-focal curriculum; writing intervention
服務單位: 國立臺東大學教育學系
稿件字數: 20910
作者專長: 補救教學、學習障礙、兒童發展
投稿日期: 2018/4/9
論文下載: pdf檔案icon
摘要(中文): 閱讀和寫作是重要的語文能力,但許多弱勢低成就學生的讀寫能力嚴重落後。
本研究以偏鄉地區5年級學生為對象,探究整合閱讀和寫作的讀寫合一課程是否能有效提升其寫作能力。本研究採準實驗設計,實驗組和對照組各有28 位來自偏鄉地區學校的5年級學生,教學實驗執行一學年,利用每週5節的國語課進行,總共介入180 節。實驗組採用研究者研發的讀寫合一課程,對照組採用原學校選用的國語教材與課程,所有參與學生都於上學期初、第一學期末、第二學期末進行3 次寫作能力評估。研究主要發現有三:一、實驗組學生的寫作進展整體比對照組佳,但總字數及平均句長沒有顯著差異。二、寫作能力中高階文意層次的提升,要一學年的介入才能看到成效;較低階的句子語法處理能力,一學期就可以看到成效。三、實驗組學生的寫作品質能逐漸脫離低分群的範疇,但對照組學生則未看到此趨勢。
摘要(英文): The researchers developed a reading and writing bifocal curriculum for grade 5 students from schools of rural Taiwan. The present study aims to examine the effects of the curriculum on students’ writing outcomes. A quasi-experimental design was adopted. The experimental group and control group were both composed of 28 grade 5 students recruited from schools in a remote area in Taiwan. All students received the intervention 5 sessions per week for 2 semesters. The total number of intervention sessions was 180. The experimental group received the bi-focal curriculum while the control group received current reading programs from their schools. Writing measures were collected at the beginning of the first semester, the end of the first semester, and the end of second semester. There were 3 major findings. 1. After conducting the bifocal program for 2 semesters, the progress of writing in the experimental group was better than that in the control group. There was no significant difference between the total number of characters and the average sentence length. 2. The bifocal program brought about quick observable growth of low-level tasks such as sentence length and total number of characters, in merely one semester. However, it took 2 semesters in the present study, to raise high-level skills like meaning expression. 3. With the involvement of the experimental intervention, students gradually got away from the “poor writer” group. The distribution of the outcome measures became more positively skewed. No such trend was observed in the control group.
參考文獻: 王逸芝(2007)。故事結構教學對國小寫作困難學生故事重寫及故事改寫作成效
之研究(未出版之碩士論文)。國立臺南教育大學特殊教育學系碩士班,臺
南市。
王瓊珠(2004)。故事結構教學加分享閱讀對增進國小閱讀障礙學生讀寫能力與
故事結構概念之研究。臺北市立師範學院學報:教育類,35(2),1-22。
巫有鎰(2007)。學校與非學校因素對臺東縣原、漢國小學生學業成就的影響。
臺灣教育社會學研究,7(1),29-67。
沈欣怡、蘇宜芬(2011)。推論性問題引導課程對國小四年級學童推論理解與閱
讀理解能力之影響。教育心理學報,43,337-356。
林宜利(2003)。「整合繪本與概念構圖之寫作教學方案」對國小三年級學童記
敘文寫作表現之影響(未出版之碩士論文)。國立臺灣師範大學教育心理與
輔導研究所,臺北市。
柯華葳(2005)。國科會教育學門閱讀與寫作計畫回顧。載於行政院國科會(主
編),九十四年度國科會教育學門課程與教學領域專題計畫成果發表會會議
手冊(頁80-93)。臺南市:國立臺南大學教育學系。
柯華葳、詹益綾、丘嘉慧(2013)。PIRLS 2011 報告:臺灣四年級學生閱讀素
養。國立中央大學學習與教學研究所。桃園市:國立中央大學學習與教學研
究所。
張妙君(2004)。以圖畫故事書進行國小一學年級提早寫作教學歷程之研究(未
出版之碩士論文)。國立新竹教育大學臺灣語言與語文教育研究所,新竹市。
張郁雯(2013)。國小常見字測驗【成就測驗】未出版之工具。
張郁雯(2013)。國小詞彙測驗【成就測驗】未出版之工具。
張新仁(1992)。寫作教學研究。高雄市:復文。
張新仁(2004)。臺灣地區寫作研究之回顧與展望。載於(單文經)主編,課程
與教學新論(頁245-308),臺北市:心理。
陳宜君、葉靖雲(2009)。自我調整寫作策略教學對國小學習障礙學生寫作表現
之影響,載於中華民國特殊教育學會(主編),中華民國特殊教育學會98 年
度年刊,139-156。臺北市: 作者。
陳姝蓉、王瓊珠(2003)。故事結構教學對增進國小閱讀障礙學生閱讀理解能力
之研究。特殊教育研究學刊,25,221-242。
陳美芳、謝佳男、黃楷茹(2007)。影響高中優秀學生寫作表現的因素分析。特
殊教育研究學刊,32(3),63-86。
陳淑麗、洪儷瑜(2010)。有效的閱讀補救教學。載於王瓊珠、陳淑麗主編。突
破閱讀困難- 理念與實務(P49-71)。臺北市:心理。
陳淑麗、洪儷瑜(2011)。花東地區學生識字量的特性:小型學校—弱勢中的弱勢。
教育心理學報閱讀專刊,43,205-226。
陳淑麗、曾世杰、蔣汝梅(2012)。初級與次級國語文介入對弱勢低學力學校的
成效研究:不同介入長度的比較。特殊教育研究學刊,37(3),27-58。
陳淑麗、蘇倩慧、曾世杰(2010)。透過國語文補救教學提升低成就兒童的口語
能力。教育與心理研究,33(3),25-46。
陳鳳如(1999)。閱讀與寫作整合的寫作歷程模式驗證及其教學效果之研究(未
出版之博士論文)。國立臺灣師範大學行政管理碩士學程,臺北市。
陳鳳如(2007)。國中學生寫作能力的學習潛能評估之分析研究。師大學報教育
類,52(2),73-94。
陳鳳如、郭生玉 (2000)。閱讀與寫作整合的寫作歷程模式之適配度研究。師大
學報:教育類,45(1),1-18.
陸怡琮(2011)。摘要策略教學對提升國小五年級學童摘要能力與閱讀理解的成
效。教育科學研究期刊,56(3),1-28。
黃筱雯、蔡家姍(2004)。國中學生語言能力、閱讀理解能力及寫作表現三者之
關係研究:以桃園縣為例。教育科學期刊,4(2),118-160。
楊坤堂、李水源、吳純純和張世慧(2002)。國小兒童書寫語文能力診斷測驗。
臺北市:心理。
楊淑華、葉憲峻、王喧博(2009)。寫作評量之研發與應用:以國小六年級記敘
文為例。教育科學研究期刊,54(3),139-173。
臺灣PISA 國家研究中心(2014)。臺灣PISA 精簡報告。取自http://pisa.nutn.edu.
tw/download/data/TaiwanPISA2012ShortReport.pdf/
蔡銘津(1995)。文章結構分析策略教學對增進學童閱讀理解與寫作成效之研究
(未出版之博士論文)。國立高雄師範大學教育學系,高雄市。
錢昭君、張世彗(2010)。心智圖法寫作教學方案對國小學生創造力及寫作表現
之影響。特殊教育學報,32,79-100。
Abbott, R. D., Berninger, V. W., & Fayol, M. (2010). Longitudinal relationships of levels
of language in writing and between writing and reading in grades 1 to 7. Journal of
Educational Psychology, 102(2), 281.
Al Otaiba, S., & Fuchs, D. (2006). Who are the young children for whom best practices
in reading are ineffective? An experimental and longitudinal study. Journal of
Learning Disabilities, 39(5), 414-431.
Case, L. P., Speece, D. L., Silverman, R., Ritchey, K. D., Schatschneider, C., Cooper,
D. H., Montanaro, E., & Jacobs, D. (2010). Validation of a supplemental reading
intervention for first-grade children. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 43(5), 402-
417.
Chall, J. S., Bissex, G. L., Conard, S. S., & Harris-Sharples, S. H. (1996). Qualitative
assessment of text difficulty: A practical guide for teachers and writers. Cambridge,
MA: Brookline Books.
De La Paz, S, & Graham, S. (2002). Explicitly teaching strategies, skills, and knowledge:
Writing instruction in middle school classrooms, Journal of Educational
Psychology, 94(4), 687-698.
Elbow, P. (1974). Writing without teachers. New York, NY : Oxford University Press.
Flower, L. S., & Hayes, J. R. (1981). A cognitive basis theory of writing. College
Composition and Communication, 32, 365-378.
Foorman, B. R., & Torgesen, J. (2001). Critical elements of classroom and small-group
instruction promote reading success in all children. Learning Disabilities Research
and Practice, 16(4), 203-212.
Gaskins, I. W., Ehri, L. C., Cress, C., O’Hara, C., & Donnelly, K. (1997). Analyzing
words and making discoveries about the alphabetic system: Activities for beginning
readers. Language Arts, 74(3), 172-184.
Gordon, C. (1990). Changes in readers’ and writers’ metacognitive knowledge: Some
observations. Reading Research and Instruction, 30(1), 1-14.
Graham, S. (2006). Strategy instruction and the teaching of writing: A meta-analysis. In C.
A. MacArthur, S. Graham & J. Fitzgerald (Eds.), Handbook of writing research (pp.
187-207). New York, NY: Guilford.
Graham, S., & Perin, D. (2007). A meta-analysis of writing instruction for adolescent
students. Journal of Educational Psychology, 99, 445-476.
Graham, S., Gillespie, A., & McKeown, D. (2013). Writing: Importance, development,
and instruction. Reading and Writing, 26(1), 1-15.
Harris, K. R., Graham, S. (1992). Self-regulated strategy development: A part of the
writing process. In M. Pressley, K. R. Harris & J. T. Guthrie (Eds.), Promoting
academic competence and literacy in school (pp. 277-309). San Diego,CA:
Academic.
Juel, C. (1988). Learning to read and write: A longitudinal study of 54 children from first
through fourth grades. Journal of Educational Psychology, 80(4), 243-255.
Kiuhara, S. A., Graham, S., & Hawken, L. S. (2009). Teaching writing to high school
students: A national survey. Journal of Educational Psychology, 101(1), 136.
Kroll, B. M.(1981). Developmental relationships between speaking and writing. In B. M.
Kroll & R. J. Vann(Eds.), Exploring speaking-writing relationships: Connections
and contrasts (pp. 32-54). Champaign, IL: National Council of Teachers of English.
Langer, J. A. (1986). Children reading and writing: Structures and strategies. Norwood,
NJ: Ablex.
Lee, J., & Schallert, D. L. (2016). Exploring the Reading–Writing Connection: A
Yearlong Classroom-Based Experimental Study of Middle School Students
Developing Literacy in a New Language. Reading Research Quarterly, 51(2), 143-
164.
MacArthur, C. A., & Philippakos, Z. (2010). Instruction in a strategy for compare–
contrast writing. Exceptional Children, 76(4), 438-456.
Mason, L. H., Davison, M. D., Hammer, C. S., Miller, C. A., & Glutting, J. J. (2013).
Knowledge, writing, and language outcomes for a reading comprehension and
writing intervention. Reading and Writing, 26(7), 1133-1158.
Moats, L., Foorman, B., & Taylor, P. (2006). How quality of writing instruction impacts
high-risk fourth graders’ writing. Reading and Writing, 19(4), 363-391.
National Commission on Writing (2003, April). The neglected R: The need for a writing
revolution. Retrieved from https://www.nwp.org/cs/public/print/resource/2523
Persky, H. R., Daane, M. C., & Jin, Y. (2003). The nation’s report card: Writing 2002.
Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education, Institute of Education Sciences.
Rohman, D. G. (1965). Prewriting, the stage of discovery in the writing process. College
Composition and communication, 16, 106-112.
Salahu-Din, D., Persky, H., & Miller, J. (2008). NAEP 2007 writing report card for the
nation and the states. Washington, DC: National Center for Education Statistics.
Scardamalia, M. & Bereiter, C. (1986), Research on written composition, In M. C.
Wittrock (Ed.), Handbook of research on teaching, 778-803. New York, NY:
Macmillan.
Scott, C. M. (1999). Learning to write. In H. W. Catts & A. G. Kamhi (Eds.), Language
and reading disabilities (pp. 233-268). Boston, MA: Allyn & Bacon.
Simmons, D., Kame’enui, E. J., Dickson, S., Chard, D., Gunn, B., & Baker, S. (1994).
Integrating narrative reading and writing instruction for all learners. Yearbook of the
National Reading Council, 43, 572-582.
Stanovich, K. E. (1986). Matthew effects in reading: Some consequences of individual
differences in the acquisition of literacy. Reading Research Quarterly, 21, 360-407.
Torgesen, J. K. (2000). Individual differences in response to early interventions in
reading: The lingering problems of treatment resisters. Learning Disabilities
Research and Practices, 15(1), 55-64.
Torgesen, J. K., Rashotte, C. A., Alexander, A., Alexander, J., & MacPhee, K.
(2003). Progress toward understanding the instructional conditions necessary
for remediating reading difficulties in older children. In B. R. Foorman (Ed.),
Preventing and Remediating Reading Difficulties: Bringing Science to Scale
(pp.275-298). Baltimore, MD: York Press.