多角度圖像鑑賞教學方式應用於大一藝術賞析課之行動研究

An Action Research on Applying Multi-Dimensional Image-Appreciation-Based Teaching Approaches in a Freshman Art Appreciation Class

楊馥如
Fu-Ju Yang

Doi:10.6925/SCJ.202103_17(1).0003


所屬期刊: 第17卷第1期 主編:國立中正大學教育學研究所教授
林明地
系統編號: vol064_03
主題: 課程與教學
出版年份: 2021
作者: 楊馥如
作者(英文): Fu-Ju Yang
論文名稱: 多角度圖像鑑賞教學方式應用於大一藝術賞析課之行動研究
論文名稱(英文): An Action Research on Applying Multi-Dimensional Image-Appreciation-Based Teaching Approaches in a Freshman Art Appreciation Class
共同作者:
最高學歷:
校院名稱:
系所名稱:
語文別:
論文頁數: 32
中文關鍵字: 圖像鑑賞、多角度教學方式、藝術賞析
英文關鍵字: Image-appreciation, Multi-dimensional Teaching Approach, Art
服務單位: 開南大學資訊傳播學系副教授
稿件字數: 20297
作者專長:
投稿日期: 2020/9/10
論文下載: pdf檔案icon
摘要(中文): 面對圖像取代文字的環境,藝術教育應有適當圖像鑑賞教學方式來幫助學生瞭解生活中的圖像。但目前藝術鑑賞教學使用的方法,學生只能被動接受專家觀點,很難印象深刻。因此,研究者深入探究Darras及多位學者的教學方法,建構應用於大學課堂師生互動、課外專業訪談的多角度圖像鑑賞教學方式,並瞭解實施結果。本研究採行動研究方法,於某私立大學兩屆大一學生的「藝術賞析」課程中實施,各歷時8週。結果發現綜合多位學者建構的多角度圖像鑑賞教學方式,可培養學生用專業方式來分析作品的能力,從不同對象的角度比較、反思來建構意義及從不同對象身上學習。第一次教學省思後,改採生命教育議題來設計課程;教材加入漫畫;善用Facebook媒體;從提問轉為探究及加入學生提問。
教學前學生不懂如何鑑賞作品,教學實施後問卷顯示此課程可幫助他們鑑賞圖像作品,學會比較、反思等。增加的生命教育議題則可幫助他們更認識自己,關懷他人、環境,增進對生命意義的瞭解。質性資料也顯示學生除提升自主鑑賞能力,也增進觀察、分析、思考、提問等能力;學會從不同角度看事物及激發更多想法。
摘要(英文): With images replacing written text, art education needs to incorporate suitable teaching approaches to reinforce students’ image appreciation, and help them to better understand the images they are exposed to in daily life. However, the art appreciation teaching approaches currently in use often fail to make lasting impressions on students, who can only passively accept the specialists’ ideas. This researcher examined the teaching approaches of Darras and others in order to develop a multi-dimensional image-appreciation teaching approach for application in university-level teacher-student interactions and extracurricular professional interviews, and came to better understand the implementation outcomes. This study, which conducted an action research methodology, was undertaken as part of the “art appreciation” course for freshmen at a private university for two consecutive years, while the course lasted for eight weeks each year.
The results showed that by using a teaching approach based on synthesizing the multi-dimensional image-appreciation learning methods already established by various scholars, students can gain the ability to analyze art works using specialist techniques, comparing different perspectives, reflecting on the meanings and learning from different subjects. After the first session was completed a different approach was adopted, utilizing life-education-related topics in order to take part in the course design, including incorporating comics into the teaching material, utilizing social media such as Facebook, incorporating the questions raised by the students themselves and developing these questions into investigations. Prior to the application of this teaching approach, students were incapable of appreciating artworks on their own; however, after this teaching approach was applied, questionnaire results showed that the course had enhanced the students’ image-appreciation abilities as well their abilities to compare and reflect, etc. The topics on life education furthermore enabled the students to gain a deeper understanding of themselves, to show greater compassion toward others and the environment, and to attain a clearer understanding of the meaning of life. Qualitative data also showed that, aside from their enhanced autonomous capacities for appreciation, the students’ abilities to observe, analyze, ponder and question had improved, and that they had learned to observe from different perspectives, thus becoming inspired by new and different ideas.
參考文獻: 于富雲、葉玲瑤(2002)。國中美術教師鑑賞教學策略運作之歷程性探究。暨大學報,6(1),37-60。
王秀雄(1998)。鑑賞、認知、解釋與評價─美術鑑賞教育的學理與實務。台北:國立歷史博物館。
吳庶深、黃麗花(2001)。生命教育概論:實用的教學方案。學富文化。
李雅芳(2004)。歷史課堂中的圖像教學。國教天地,157,62-65。
林采薇、靳知勤(2018)。國小學生在社會性科學議題教學中的認知與立場改變─以全球暖化議題為例。科學教育學刊,26(4),283-303。http://doi.org/10.6173/CJSE.201812_26(4).0001
邱兆偉(2006)。生命教育的理念論述與實務需求之整合─以國民小學為例。教育學刊,26,133-162。http://doi.org/10.6450/ER.200606.0133
翁千雅(2007)。文化認同概念融入國中視覺藝術教學之行動研究(碩士論文,國立臺灣師範大學)。臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統。https://hdl.handle.net/11296/sfs3cg
翁慈凰、陳怡如(2019)。Vocabulary retention via E-flashcards aided with social media。數位學習科技期刊,11(2),57-86。http://doi.org/10.3966/2071260X2019041102003
張世旻(2020)。安樂死議題教學設計。弘文學報,5,77-85。
張鈞淇、蔡文榮(2017)。臺灣以國中生為對象之生命教育學位論文之評析。教育科學期刊,16(2),79-107。
陳又菱、孫之元、陳薇暄(2020)。行動社群應用軟體融入美感教育活動對大學生的美感經驗與情境興趣之影響:以Instagram為例。數位學習科技期刊,12(2),1-24。http://doi.org/10.3966/2071260X2020041202001
陳佩秀、黃建中(2014)。圖像教學法對國小五年級學童在怎樣解題單元解題表現之研究。科學教育研究與發展季刊,68,77-106。
陳芳玲(1998)。生命教育課程之探究。輔導通訊,55,29-34。
陳俊宏、楊東民(2014)。視覺傳達設計概論(第三版)。全華。
陳玲萱(2005)。批判思考在藝術鑑賞教學上的應用:一個文獻初探。藝術教育研究,9,115-141。
陳箐繡(2010)。藝術通識課程與教學發展之淺思:以後現代藝術教育理論觀點與實踐為取徑。關渡通識學刊,6,1-26。http://doi.org/10.6477/KGEJ.201012.0001
鈕則誠(2004)。生命教育─學理與體驗。揚智文化。
楊馥如(2009)。國一階段生命教育多媒體遊戲學習教材研發與評鑑研究。藝術學報,85,479-503。http://doi.org/10.6793/JNTCA.200910.0479
楊馥如(2010)。死亡教育議題融入藝術課程之行動研究。課程與教學季刊,13(2),99-126。
楊馥如(2015)。藝術鑑賞方法於大學中影像鑑賞教學之應用。師大書苑。
趙惠玲(2005)。視覺文化與藝術教育。師大書苑。
黎建球(2000)。生命教育的意義價值及其內容。載於林思伶(主編),生命教育的理念與實務(初版,頁37-48)。寰宇。
蔡清田(2000)。教育行動研究。台北:五南。

盧姵綺(2006)。視覺文化融入藝術鑑賞教學:以達文西作品─「蒙娜麗莎的微笑」為例。美育,154,70-77。
蕭卉妤(2016)。心智圖運用於國中藝術鑑賞教學之行動研究(碩士論文,國立嘉義大學)。臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統。https://hdl.handle.net/11296/8dj42x
羅美蘭(2007)。「批評與脈絡學習」在藝術師資培育的應用研究:跨文化的觀點與在地教學行動研究的省思。藝術教育研究,13,95-121。
Aguirre, I. (2004). Beyond the understanding of visual culture: A pragmatist approach to aesthetic education. International Journal of Art & Design Education, 23(3), 256-269. http://doi.org/10.1111/j.1476-8070.2004.00405.x
Anderson, T. (1988). A structure for pedagogical art criticism. Studies in Art Education, 30(1), 28-38. https://doi.org/10.2307/1320649
Anderson, T., & Milbrandt, M. K. (2004). Art for life: Authentic instruction in art. McGraw Hill.
Avgerinou, M. (2001). Visual literacy: Anatomy and diagnosis [Unpublished doctoral dissertation]. University of Bath.
Ballengee-Morris, C., & Stuhr, P. L. (2001). Multicultural art and visual cultural education in a changing world. Art Education, 54(4), 6-13. https://doi.org/10.2307/3193897
Brown, I. (2004). Global trends in art education: New technologies and the paradigm shift to visual literacy. The International Journal of Arts Education, 2(3), 50-61.
Carpentier, R. (1987). Concepts of empathy and the nature of aesthetic response applied to visual art appreciation [Unpublished doctoral dissertation]. The Ohio State University.
Darras, B. (2010). New media and the new ways of designing the content of visual education. The International Journal of Arts Education, 8(2), 51-74.
Darras, B. (2015). A new model to analyze images and media: Case study of the images education website project. The International Journal of Arts Education, 13(2), 69-88.
Duncum, P. (1999). A case for an art education of everyday aesthetic experiences. Studies in Art Education, 40(4), 295-311. https://doi.org/10.2307/1320551
Efland, A., Freedman, K., & Stuhr, P. (1996). Postmodern art education: An approach to curriculum. National Art Education Association.
Feldman, E. B. (1972). Varieties of visual experience : Art as image and idea (2nded.). Prentice Hall. Englewood Cliffs, N.J. : Prentice-Hall.Freiberg, H. J., & Driscoll, A. (1992). Universal teaching strategies. Allyn & Bacon.
Hornby, A. S., Gatenby E. V., & Wakefield, H. (1963). The advanced learner’s dictionary of current English (2nd ed.). Oxford University.
Hubard, O. M. (2008). The act of looking: Wofgang Iser’s literary theory and meaning making in the visual arts. International Journal of Art & Design Education, 27(2), 168-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1476-8070.2008.00572.x
Iser, W. (1980). The indeterminacy of the text: A critical reply (R. Foster, Trans.). In E. Shaffer (Ed.), Comparative criticism: A yearbook, 2 (pp. 27-47). Cambridge University.
Jakesch, M., & Leder, H. (2009). Finding meaning in art: Preferred levels of ambiguity in art appreciation. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 62(11), 2105-2112. https://doi.org/10.1080/17470210903038974
Low, D. E., & Jacobs, K. B. (2018). Literature circle roles for discussing graphica in language arts classrooms. Language Arts, 95(5), 322-331.
Mitchell, W. J. T. (1994). Picture theory: Essays on verbal and visual representation. University of Chicago.
Rublee, D. A., & Yarber, W. L. (1983). Instructional units of death education: The impact of amount of classroom time on changes in death attitudes. Journal of School Health, 53(7), 412-415. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1746-1561.1983.tb03150.x
Sharp, C., & Dust, K. (1990). Artists in schools: A handbook for teachers and artists. Bedford Square.
Smith, R. A. (1973). Teaching aesthetic criticism in the schools. The Journal of Aesthetic Education, 7(1), 38-49. https://doi.org/10.2307/3332108
Sturken, M.,  Cartwright, L. (2001). Practices of looking: An introduction to visual culture. Oxford University.
Taylor, R. (1989). Critical studies in art and design education: Passing fashion or the missing element? In D. Thistlewood (Ed.), Critical studies in art and design education (pp. 27-41). Longman.
Taylor, R. (1992). Visual arts in education. Falmer.
Vianna, R. D. S. (2002). Art education and urban aesthetics. Leonardo, 35(3), 255-261. https://doi.org/10.1162/002409402760105244
Villeneuve, P., & Love, A. R. (2007). Rethinking the gallery learning experience through inquiry. In P. Villeneuve (Ed.). From periphery to center: Art museum education in the 21st century (pp. 194-204). Reston, VA: National Art Education Association.
Villeneuve, P. (2015). Inquiry in the art class. The International Journal of Arts Education, 13(2), 1-16.