期刊專區/ Periodical Section

運用文獻計量分析創造力教育研究的演進情形與發展趨勢

Bibliometric Analysis on Progress and Development Trend of Creativity Education Research

所屬期刊：	第19卷第1期 主編：國立彰化師範大學教育研究所教授 龔心怡
系統編號：	vol072_03
主題：	課程與教學
出版年份：	2023
作者：	林業盈
作者(英文)：	Yeh-Ying Lin
論文名稱：	運用文獻計量分析創造力教育研究的演進情形與發展趨勢
論文名稱(英文)：	Bibliometric Analysis on Progress and Development Trend of Creativity Education Research
共同作者：
最高學歷：
校院名稱：
系所名稱：
語文別：	中文
論文頁數：	36
中文關鍵字：
英文關鍵字：
服務單位：
稿件字數：	20207
作者專長：
投稿日期：	2022/08/22
論文下載：
摘要(中文)：	為了瞭解國內外創造力教育研究的演進情形與發展趨勢，本研究篩選自「華藝線上圖書館」與「Web of Science」資料庫共1,625篇相關研究文獻作為樣本，以進行文獻計量分析。重要研究發現：第一，國內外在時間分布上，2000年以前皆為「萌芽期」，國內從2001至2010年為「成長期」，2011至2020年為「高原期」；國外從2001至2014年為「緩和成長期」，2015至2020年為「快速成長期」。第二，創造力教育研究包含23項研究前沿，以及「創造力的教與學」、「創造力教育理論」、「創造力教育政策」及「創造力教育應用」四種知識領域。第三，兩個資料庫的新興前沿數量都多於成長前沿，顯示不論國內外對創造力教育不僅持續受到重視和關注，並出現具發展性的新興議題。國內以「創造力的教與學」知識領域中的研究集群具長時間且連貫性的演進，「創造思考教學」和「教師創意教學」研究集群為新興前沿或成長前沿，顯示我國近年仍以創造力的教學為主要研究議題。國外以「創造力的教與學」和「創造力教育理論」知識領域中的研究集群具長時間且連貫性的演進。從近十年的研究前沿來看，教學、理論、政策到應用層面的知識領域，皆出現蓬勃成長且具發展潛力的研究集群。
摘要(英文)：	To explore the knowledge fields and research fronts generated at different time periods, as a basis for understanding the progress and development trend of creativity education research. There are 1,625 articles in the "Airiti Library " and "Web of Science " about creativity educationin this study. Biliometric analysis is used on the samples. The main findings of this research are as follows. (1) In terms of time distribution in Taiwan and abroad, the period before 2000 was the "stages in germination". In Taiwan, the period from 2001 to 2010 was the "stages in growth "and the period from 2011 to 2020 was the "stages in plateau". In foreign countries, the period from 2001 to 2014 was the "stages in slow growth" and the period from 2015 to 2020 was the " stages in rapid growth". (2) Creativity education research includes 23 research fronts and four fields of knowledge: "creativity teaching and learning", "creativity education theory", "creativity education policy" and "creativity education application". (3)The number of emerging fronts in both databases is greater than that of growth fronts, which shows that creativity education has not only received continuous attention, but also has emerging issues with developmental potential in Taiwan and abroad. In Taiwan, the research clusters in the field of "creative teaching and learning" have been evolving continuously for a long time, and the research clusters of "creative thinking teaching" and "creative teaching for teachers" are emerging fronts or growing fronts, which shows that the teaching of creativity is the main research topic in recent years. Research clusters in the knowledge fields of "creativity teaching and learning" and "creativity education theory" have been a long-term and consistent evolution in abroad. According to the research frontiers of the past decade, there are thriving and promising research clusters in the fields of knowledge of teaching, theory, policy, and application.
參考文獻：	中國科學院科技戰略諮詢研究院、中國科學院文獻情報中心、科睿唯安（2021）。 2020 研究前沿。https://www.tari.gov.tw/df_ufiles/intra/2020 年研究前沿- 科睿唯安.pdf 中國科學院科技戰略諮詢研究院、科睿唯安（2021）。2020 研究前沿熱度指數。 http://www.casisd.cn/zkcg/zxcg/202011/P020201114578547691796.pdf 何光國（1994）。文獻計量學導論。三民。 吳靜吉、樊學良（2011）。台灣創造力教育相關政策與實踐經驗。創造學刊，2（1）。 https://doi.org/10.30081/CESJ.201103.0001 吳靜吉、李澄賢、林偉文（2008）。台灣創造力教育研究之回顧。New Horizons in Education，55（3）。http://www.hkta1934.org.hk/NewHorizon/abstract/2007n/05.pdf 林巧敏、范蔚敏（2010）。臺灣地區檔案學文獻計量分析。圖書與資訊學刊，72， 16-38。https://doi.org/10.6575/JoLIS.2010.72.02 林偉文（2011）。創意教學與創造力的培育─以「設計思考」為例。教育資料與 研究雙月刊，100，53-74。 張世彗（2018）。創造力：理論、技法與教學。五南。 教育部（2003）。創造力教育白皮書：打造創造力國度。 陳曼玲（2015）。打造教育創新行動年：教育部部長吳思華以「創新」挑戰臺灣教 育。教育研究月刊，258，5-14。https://doi.org/10.3966/168063602015100258001 陳龍安（2010）。台灣的創造力教育發展與突破之道。創造學刊，1（1），5-37。 https://doi.org/10.30081/CESJ.201003.0001 臺灣科睿唯安（2021）。研究前沿報告。https://clarivate.com/zh-hant/products/scientific-and-academic-research/research-fronts/ 蔡明月（2003）。資訊計量學與文獻特性。華泰。 Beghetto, R. A., Plucker, J. A., & MaKinster, J. G. (2001). Who studies creativity and how do we know? Creativity Research Journal, 13(3-4), 351-357. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15326934CRJ1334_12 Bereczki, E. O., & Karpati, A. (2018). Teachers’ beliefs about creativity and its nurture: Asystematic review of the recent research literature. Educational Research Review, 23, 25-56. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2017.10.003 Bogilovi?, S., & ?erne, M. (2018). The intellectual structure and outlooks for individual creativity research: A bibliometric analysis for the period 1950-2016. In R. Reiter-Palmon, L. K. Victoria, & C. K. James (Eds.), Individual creativity in the workplace: A volume in explorations in creativity research (pp. 153-188). Academic. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-813238-8.00007-3 Boyack, K. W., & Klavans, R. (2010). Co-citation analysis, bibliographic coupling, and direct citation: Which citation approach represents the research front most accurately? Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 61(12), 2389-2404. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.21419 Castillo-Vergara, M., Alvarez-Marin, A., & Placencio-Hidalgo, D. (2018). A bibliometric analysis of creativity in the field of business economics. Journal of Business Research, 85, 1-9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2017.12.011 De Solla Price, D. J. (1965). Networks of scientific papers. Science, 149(3683), 510-515. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.149.3683.510 De Solla Price, D. J., & Beaver, D. B. (1966). Collaboration in an invisible college. American Psychologist, 21(11), 1011-1018. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0024051 Feist, G. J., & Runco, M. A. (1993). Trends in the creativity literature: An analysis of research in the Journal of Creative Behavior (1967-1989). Creativity Research Journal, 6(3), 271-286. https://doi.org/10.1080/10400419309534483 Hernandez-Torrano, D., & Ibrayeva, L. (2020). Creativity and education: A bibliometric review of the literature (1975-2019). Thinking Skills and Creativity, 35, 1-17. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2019.100625 Jacobs, D. (2001). A bibliometric study of the publication patterns of scientists in South Africa 1992-96, with special reference to gender difference. In M. Davis & C. S. Wilson (Eds.), Proceedings of the 8th international conference on scientometrics and informetrics (pp.275-285). University of New South Wales. Jarneving, B. (2005). A comparison of two bibliometric methods for mapping of the research front. Scientometrics, 65(2), 245-263. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-005-0270-7 Kaufman, J. C. (2009). Creativity 101. Springer. Kumar, S., Mandol, A. K., & Verma, M. (2013). Citation analysis of journal of creative behaviour: A critical study. International Journal of Information Research, 2(3), 326-338. Kupers, E., Lehmann-Wermser, A., McPherson, G., & van Geert, P. (2018). Children’s creativity: A theoretical framework and systematic review. Review of Educational Research, 89(1), 93-124. https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654318815707 Long, H., Plucker, J., Yu, Q., Ding, Y., & Kaufman, J. (2014). Research productivity and performance of journals in the creativity sciences: A bibliometric analysis. Creativity Research Journal, 26(3), 353-360. https://doi.org/10.1080/10400419.2014.929425 Montuori, A., & Donnelly, G. (2016). The creativity of culture and the culture of creativity research: The promise of integrative transdisciplinarity. In V. P. Gl?veanu (Ed.), The Palgrave handbook of creativity and culture research (pp. 743-765). Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-46344-9_36 Nemeth, C. J., & Goncalo, J. A. (2005). Creative collaborations from afar: The benefits of independent authors. Creativity Research Journal, 17(1), 1-8. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15326934crj1701_1 Plucker, J. A. (2000). Positive approaches to violence prevention: Peacebuilding in schools and communities. NASSP Bulletin, 84(614), 1-4. https://doi.org/10.1177/019263650008461402 Plucker, J. A., & Callahan, C. M. (2014). Research on giftedness and gifted education: Status of the field and considerations for the future. Exceptional Children, 80(4), 390-406. https://doi.org/10.1177/0014402914527244 Plucker, J. A., Beghetto, R. A., & Dow, G. T. (2004). Why isn’t creativity more important to educational psychologists? Potentials, pitfalls, and future directions in creativity research. Educational Psychologist, 39(2), 83-96. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15326985ep3902_1 Plucker, J. A., & Makel, M. C. (2010). Assessment of creativity. In J. C. Kaufman & R. J. Sternberg (Eds.), The Cambridge handbook of creativity (pp. 44-68). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781316979839.005 Runco, M. A., & Sakamoto, S. O. (1999). Experimental studies of creativity. In R. J. Sternberg (Ed.), Handbook of creativity (pp. 62-92). Cambridge University Press. Ryhammar, L., & Brolin, C. (1999). Creativity research: Historical considerations and mainlines of development. Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research, 43(3), 259-273. https://doi.org/10.1080/0031383990430303 Sharabchiev, J. T. (1989). Cluster analysis of bibliographic references as a scientometric method.Scientometrics, 15, 127-137. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02021804 Small, H. (1973). Co-citation in the scientific literature: A new measure of the relationship between two documents. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 24(4), 265-269. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.4630240406 Sternberg, R. J. (2002). Raising the achievement of all students: Teaching for successful intelligence. Educational Psychology Review, 14, 383-393. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1020601027773 Sullivan, D., White, D. H., & Barboni, E. J.(1977). Co-citation analyses of science: An evaluation.Social Studies of Science, 7(2), 223-240. https://doi.org/10.1177/030631277700700205 Treffinger, D. J., Sortore, M. R., & Cross, J. A. (1993). Programs and strategies for nurturing creativity. In K. A. Heller, F. J. Monks, R. J. Sternberg, & R. F. Subotnik (Eds.), International handbook of giftedness and talent (pp. 481-494). Pergamon. UCINET. (2013). UCINET software. https://sites.google.com/site/ucinetsoftware/home Upham, S. P., & Small, H. (2010). Emerging research fronts in science and technology: Patterns of new knowledge development. Scientometrics, 83, 15-38. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-009-0051-9 Williams, R., Runco, M., & Berlow, E. (2016). Mapping the themes, impact, and cohesion of creativity research over the last 25 years. Creativity Research Journal, 28(4), 385-394. https://doi.org/10.1080/10400419.2016.1230358